The Seahawks have been in every game this year and haven't lost by more than a touchdown. Being impressed by this, I did a little research to find out how many other teams could boast the same claim.

We're one of only 6 teams that haven't lost by more than a touchdown (or one of 9 if you count 8 points as being within a TD). Below is a list of each team, and the number next to them is the largest amount by which they lost.


ATL -3
NE 2
SEA 7
TB 7
NYG 7
WAS 7
GB 8
DET 8
NO 8
DEN 10
MIN 12
PIT 12
CHI 13
ARI 14
CLE 14
STL 17
HOU 18
DAL 20
MIA 20
PHI 21
SF 23
SD 24
IND 26
KC 28
TEN 28
CAR 29
BAL 30
OAK 31
CIN 31
NYJ 34
JAX 38
BUF 42

Is this an indicator of a really good team? I'd like to think so. Even if it isn't, its still nice to know we're capable of winning any game we play. The only teams better are either undefeated or a consistently great team.

Very interesting...nice post.

It's a frustrating angle, for now. On one hand, it's much better having a shot to win every week - I think about to the Mora season and how I just knew we were going to get steamrolled every week. On the other hand, it's very maddening waiting to get over the hump.

It's such a narrow margin in the NFL. One score losses literally end up coming down to a few plays at the most.

_________________
@SeahawkGreg

YEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!

I love that we still have yet to play two teams near the bottom of this list. How the hell do you LOSE by 42???

_________________

Both those teams (Buf and NYJ) are playing much better.

_________________
@SeahawkGreg

YEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!

Unfortunately both of those defeats came at the hands of the 49ers.

signs of a team on the verge for sure...I felt the same way last season, most of our losses were within a score late in the game w/ the outlier being the Pittsburgh game.

We care about margin of defeat because it tells us something about the underlying probability of winning, and that underlying probability is how we judge the strength of our team and predict future wins. Losing 42-0 is upsetting because it makes us think that our team had a very low chance of winning. That tells us that our team is worse than the opponent and that makes us think we are less likely to win games in the future than we thought before the game. On the other hand, the silver lining of a narrow defeat is that the probability of winning was better and wins in the future are still possible with better luck or minor improvements.

If what we really care about is the probability of winning than the approach here is too blunt for two reasons.

1. Point differential is heavily impacted by the quality of the defense.

A lopsided game between two top defenses will have a much smaller margin of defeat than a lopsided game between two top offenses, even if the probability of winning was exactly the same.

2. Choosing the worst defeat is much less meaningful than taking the average of all defeats (and wins).

This is partly a matter of sample size, and partly an issue of consistency. A significant amount of how we react to events is based on how we think it will impact the future. If your computer crashes for the first time ever and you lose some work, it is momentarily upsetting but not a huge deal as long as you view it as an aberration. If it crashes a second time later on you may be much more unhappy because you are now implicitly considering a trend and considering a future in which your computer crashes from time to time and you lose work.

The 49ers loss to the Giants was a lopsided game that sucked for 49er fans, but we tend to view single events as outliers and not weight them too heavily in our overall fan happiness. Despite one bad loss, 49ers fans certainly do not believe that they are in the bottom half of the NFL in terms of future wins. Total point differential including every win and every loss is much more meaningful in this context.

_________________
"Check out my 2012 NFL Draft Grades. I just gave the worst grade ever to Seattle." - WalterFootball.com

It would be increasingly interesting to compare that next to an "average loss by" chart.

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.

I wouldn't call Tampa a good team.

Still, this shows that overall, we are in every game, and we really only have to work on a few things.

It's going to be hard to improve our defense much more. We're going to get some improvement on individual player development, since a lot of our guys are still young. I theorized at the end of last year and the beginning of this year that Browner could still improve as last year was tantamount to a rookie season in terms of him playing in the NFL. In the same vein, Sherman could also improve, as well as Wagner, Wright, and Chancellor. Thomas is playing at a very high level, and has more experience than most guys, so I'm thinking we could be close to the ceiling on him. We will see improvement with Irvin, as we already have as the season progresses.

That leaves the offense. Wilson shows progression, but I still think we're weak on high end WR talent. Wilson's improvement will also improve production from out TE's.

But then again, we already knew we had to improve our passing game, and that is our achilles heel.

Point differential by team:

Houston 88
Chicago 84
NY Giants 68
San Francisco 65
Atlanta 58
New England 54
Minnesota 36
Denver 32
Green Bay 29
Baltimore 13
Tampa Bay 12
San Diego 11
Seattle 10
Pittsburgh 8
Arizona 6
Miami 3
Washington 1
New Orleans -6
St. Louis -11
NY Jets -11
Detroit -17
Dallas -20
Cincinnati -21
Philadelphia -22
Cleveland -33
Carolina -38
Indianapolis -41
Buffalo -56
Oakland -58
Jacksonville -76
Kansas City -79
Tennessee -89

Hopefully this isnt also a sign that we cant really separate ourselves from other teams. IE: put them away.

Our defense will usually keep us in games. Our offense seams to be keeping us close but that is about it.

_________________

Best part about this list is that -20 for the Cowboys is exactly how many points we beat them by take that game out of the equation, they sit at zero....

Sorry to revive an old thread, but Tampa's recent emergence as a playoff contender got me thinking about this thread. This could have been an indicator that they were a team on the verge and they eventually broke out.