Really NFL AM?

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:31 am
  • Generally NFL AM is pretty good but it was bad this morning...

    First they said the Niners are the number 1 defense. Alright, we can let this one slide. Niners are really good and who knows exactly what stat they are basing this off of.

    Second they were bashing the Chiefs and were talking about Cassel. I got no idea who the guy is but he goes on to say this "Cassel has as many interceptions as Russel Wilson and the original gracious pigskin donor, Carson Palmer".

    WTF is that? Why just randomly choose to throw Russel Wilson in there? Wilson has 6 and Palmer has 3. I don't really get the angle there. I can say Cassel has as many INTs as the Manning brothers combined. It just seemed to me as a stab at Wilson.
    User avatar
    amill87
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1345
    Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:35 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:38 am
  • The niners have the #1 defense if you go by the yards/game stat. We're currently #4, we were #1 before the Pats put up 475 yards on us.

    So technically they are correct if you go off that one stat.
    So you think you can tell Heaven from Hell, blue skies from pain. Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? A smile from a veil?
    User avatar
    twisted_steel2
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5344
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:41 am
    Location: Ballard


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:55 am
  • I hate how they go off yards to determine defense rankings. It should be points allowed (by the defense only). I think it is pretty clear the Seahawks and Niners Defenses are 1-2 in some order.
    User avatar
    NorCal
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 257
    Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:10 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:10 am
  • NorCal wrote:I hate how they go off yards to determine defense rankings. It should be points allowed (by the defense only). I think it is pretty clear the Seahawks and Niners Defenses are 1-2 in some order.


    I agree - yards is a pointless metric to base a defensive ranking on. Way too many caveats to why a team might allow a lot of yards (being way up on a team, bend but don't break philosophy, etc.).

    In fact, the only stat that "matters" in the NFL at all is points scored vs points allowed - obviously. All the fancy stats and window dressing mean squat.
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7490
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:12 am
  • NorCal wrote:I hate how they go off yards to determine defense rankings. It should be points allowed (by the defense only). I think it is pretty clear the Seahawks and Niners Defenses are 1-2 in some order.


    yuck, I agree with a 9'er but yeah, you're right. Since the game is won on the scoreboard and not the stat sheet, it's really points that should truly matter when talking about who the best is. If you can hold a team to FG's, you're more than likely going to win (unless you're playing St. Louis with their space mutant kicker).
    Radish, check your PMs. Man upstairs has an invite for a tail gate up in heaven with your name on it.
    User avatar
    CANHawk
    * Gangnameister *
     
    Posts: 11310
    Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
    Location: PoCompton, BC Canada


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:14 am
  • Timely defensive plays aren't measured (in stats), are they?
    User avatar
    AVL
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 319
    Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 4:11 am


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:34 am
  • Points allowed (by defense only) can be misleading too. For example, if a punt returner returns it deep into the opponent's territory, obviously, they have a better chance to score than if the team on offense was deep into their own territory. Is there some kind of situational statistic that combines yards allowed and points allowed?
    LengthMustBe
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 95
    Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:15 am


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:48 am
  • Haha, this board was loving it and jumping on the "We're the #1 Defense train" last week, but now that the Hawks have dropped to #4, all I hear is "the yardage stat is a poor determiner of defensive ranking".
    Image
    Radish and Cheinhill — Gone, but not forgotten
    User avatar
    HawkFan72
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11455
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
    Location: Antioch, CA


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:54 am
  • HawkFan72 wrote:Haha, this board was loving it and jumping on the "We're the #1 Defense train" last week, but now that the Hawks have dropped to #4, all I hear is "the yardage stat is a poor determiner of defensive ranking".


    I've never been a fan of yards allowed, can't speak for others but I never felt like we had the #1 defense. I view defenses off points allowed.

    Like I said in my original post, the Niner's defense ranking doesn't bother me. They are good. They've earned that status if based off nothing but reputation.

    The reason I bought it up is the context of their conversations. It was kinda like "Hey the Niners are the best defense around" but they failed to mention that the Hawks are just as good while playing better offenses.

    What bothered me more was the little shot at Wilson. There was no reason to throw Wilson's name out there when you are trashing another QB.
    Last edited by amill87 on Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
    User avatar
    amill87
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1345
    Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:35 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:56 am
  • HawkFan72 wrote:Haha, this board was loving it and jumping on the "We're the #1 Defense train" last week, but now that the Hawks have dropped to #4, all I hear is "the yardage stat is a poor determiner of defensive ranking".


    Just be careful over generalizing - "this board" is pretty broad.

    I've never been a fan of the yardage metric. I also could care less if we are the #1 defense or the #10 defense or whatever, as long as we win games.
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7490
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:04 am
  • FlyingGreg wrote:
    HawkFan72 wrote:Haha, this board was loving it and jumping on the "We're the #1 Defense train" last week, but now that the Hawks have dropped to #4, all I hear is "the yardage stat is a poor determiner of defensive ranking".


    Just be careful over generalizing - "this board" is pretty broad.

    I've never been a fan of the yardage metric. I also could care less if we are the #1 defense or the #10 defense or whatever, as long as we win games.


    It is pretty broad, but I read a lot of posts about our "#1 Defense" last week and read absolutely zero posts about how "defensive rankings based on yardage are garbage".
    Image
    Radish and Cheinhill — Gone, but not forgotten
    User avatar
    HawkFan72
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11455
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
    Location: Antioch, CA


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:05 am
  • FlyingGreg wrote:
    HawkFan72 wrote:Haha, this board was loving it and jumping on the "We're the #1 Defense train" last week, but now that the Hawks have dropped to #4, all I hear is "the yardage stat is a poor determiner of defensive ranking".


    Just be careful over generalizing - "this board" is pretty broad.

    I've never been a fan of the yardage metric. I also could care less if we are the #1 defense or the #10 defense or whatever, as long as we win games.


    It does have the benefitof being a confidence builder going into any particular game if you need to rely on your defense to contain an opponent while trying to come from behind.
    It has value, but you're right. Positive stats don't matter if it doesn't help W vs. L.
    Give me some damn skittles...
    User avatar
    Basis4day
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3190
    Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:08 am
  • NorCal wrote:I hate how they go off yards to determine defense rankings. It should be points allowed (by the defense only). I think it is pretty clear the Seahawks and Niners Defenses are 1-2 in some order.


    I agree, it makes no sense to assign the points to the defense when a pick 6 or a special teams return is the real culprit.

    Both teams have tremendous defenses, it will be intersting to see how the offense perform.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2409
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:17 am
  • Basis4day wrote:
    FlyingGreg wrote:
    HawkFan72 wrote:Haha, this board was loving it and jumping on the "We're the #1 Defense train" last week, but now that the Hawks have dropped to #4, all I hear is "the yardage stat is a poor determiner of defensive ranking".


    Just be careful over generalizing - "this board" is pretty broad.

    I've never been a fan of the yardage metric. I also could care less if we are the #1 defense or the #10 defense or whatever, as long as we win games.


    It does have the benefitof being a confidence builder going into any particular game if you need to rely on your defense to contain an opponent while trying to come from behind.

    It has value, but you're right. Positive stats don't matter if it doesn't help W vs. L.


    I doubt the team bases its confidence on where the defense is ranked. I think they feel like they are the best in the NFL, and that's all that matters. They have confidence regardless.
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7490
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:58 am
  • amill87 wrote:What bothered me more was the little shot at Wilson. There was no reason to throw Wilson's name out there when you are trashing another QB.


    I don't think that was a jab at Wilson. Wilson is a rookie, Cassel isn't. I think that was the comparison.
    User avatar
    taz291819
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3535
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:16 pm
    Location: Huntsville, Al


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:39 am
  • I've never been a fan of yards allowed, can't speak for others but I never felt like we had the #1 defense. I view defenses off points allowed.


    I used to think that way too, until St Louis kicker were making 60 yard field goals. If that is the case, yards allowed does make a difference if they convert to points every time the opponent has the ball.
    seahawks08
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 631
    Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:15 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:00 pm
  • Our defense, overall, hasn't failed us all year long. I can't think Thursday will be any different.
    Image
    User avatar
    KARAVARUS
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2911
    Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:09 am
    Location: Omaha, NE


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:10 pm
  • Dec. 16th ~ Sunday Night Football
    Whinners AT Pats ( unless this game gets "flexed out" ?? )

    .....let's see how many yards Brady & Co. put up on the San Fran D ???
    THEN we'll see where both our defenses rank ??

    :th2thumbs:
    "If You're Good At Making Excuses, You'll Never Be Great At Anything Else." ~ Richard Sherman

    GO HAWKS !!
    User avatar
    glowingeyedseahawk
    * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan *
     
    Posts: 545
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
    Location: Sinking Spring, PA


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:13 pm
  • taz291819 wrote:
    amill87 wrote:What bothered me more was the little shot at Wilson. There was no reason to throw Wilson's name out there when you are trashing another QB.


    I don't think that was a jab at Wilson. Wilson is a rookie, Cassel isn't. I think that was the comparison.


    Why throw Palmer into it? It was the most random thing I've heard in awhile. There are a ton of other combinations of QBs that combine for 9 INTs.
    User avatar
    amill87
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1345
    Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:35 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:16 pm
  • NorCal wrote:I hate how they go off yards to determine defense rankings. It should be points allowed (by the defense only). I think it is pretty clear the Seahawks and Niners Defenses are 1-2 in some order.


    Well said NorCal.
    Image
    User avatar
    Blitzer88
    * NET Eeyore *
     
    Posts: 11033
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Pasco, WA


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:27 pm
  • I just look at DVOA rankings. They seem to be the most scientific. After 6 weeks the top 3 defenses are:

    1: Chicago
    2: Seattle
    3: San Francisco
    Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

    R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
    User avatar
    SalishHawkFan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4645
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:31 pm
  • ^ Yep, and we've had a tougher slate than the Bears and 49ers as far as offenses faced.
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7490
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:38 pm
  • Our defense was #1 in points allowed last week, so I don't really understand the whole disconnect of "people were on the #1 defense bandwagon last week".

    I would've thought we were going to be #1 this week, and the Niners would be #2, since the Giants hung significantly more points on the Niners than the Patriots hung on us, but guess it didn't average out that way. I also am not real fond of yardage statistics being used for total defense. I do think stuff like Yards per Rush allowed is pertinent, but a lot of passing stats are inflated by the pass friendly rules in the NFL today, so I don't think all of them are always valid.
    Hawks46
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3584
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm


Re: Really NFL AM?
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:47 pm
  • Hawks46 wrote:I would've thought we were going to be #1 this week, and the Niners would be #2, since the Giants hung significantly more points on the Niners than the Patriots hung on us, but guess it didn't average out that way. I also am not real fond of yardage statistics being used for total defense. I do think stuff like Yards per Rush allowed is pertinent, but a lot of passing stats are inflated by the pass friendly rules in the NFL today, so I don't think all of them are always valid.


    Giants only scored 3 more points on the Niners than the Pats scored on us. The Niners gave up a lot less yardage too.

    Also, Chicago only has the best DVOA because they had a bye this week (I think).
    "I want to drink Ranier Beer out of a mug made from Jim harbaugh's hollowed out skull." CANHAWK
    User avatar
    sam1313
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1777
    Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 pm
    Location: Las Vegas, Nevada




It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:48 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information