Fade route on 4th and 3...

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:48 pm
  • I haven't seen this discussed here yet because obviously the play worked. But I was thinking, most of us would have been absolutely livid with that play call had it failed. It was 4th down, we only needed 3 yards for a first and I believe we were on the 10 yard line. He calls one of the lowest percentage pass plays you can call in the end zone?

    Again, we all know that it worked out, but this place would have been steaming about that call had Braylon not caught it.
    Ballz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 157
    Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:56 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:49 pm
  • It's been mentioned in a few other places here, but ya, I think you are correct. But, bottom line, it worked. Go Hawks.
    Image
    User avatar
    Jazzhawk
    * NET News Scoop *
    * NET News Scoop *
     
    Posts: 9011
    Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:50 pm
  • i was pissed with that play when the ball was in the air and then really happy once i saw it was caught but you are right could have easily not been caught
    User avatar
    hawkfan333
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 276
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 5:58 pm


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:52 pm
  • I'm not sure this wasn't a snap decision by Wilson when he saw Braylon had one-on-one coverage on the outside against a much shorter and inferior CB. He put the ball up there and trusted Edwards to come down with it. I agree that a more conservative play might have been the smarter option on 4th down, but the NE front 7 had been doing well limiting most of our shorter yardage plays on the day. RW took a shot and it paid off. I admire his guts.
    Colt 45 and two zig zags.
    User avatar
    peachesenregalia
    * NET Starfish *
     
    Posts: 11158
    Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
    Location: Helm's Deep


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:54 pm
  • Someone is pissing and moaning about a play that scored a TD?

    After many posters complained with our play calling being to conservative?

    There are about 25 things I could complain about in that game. But I would rather just take the 3 1/2 days we have to celebrate winning.

    :141847_bnono:
    Image
    On to week two. Week one was not a fluke!
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18655
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:55 pm
  • I was pretty pissed as well... That was the first time I recall it working this year... I am probably wrong.... but, it was pretty cool it worked! I am a total bevell hater though so thats why I disliked it...lol but my hope is that things will improve when russell gets more comfortable and can just take over. I kind of wonder if they are allowing him to do that yet? anybody who watches the film see him making adjustments? I havent really noticed that much...
    User avatar
    blue 22
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 706
    Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 7:56 pm


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:57 pm
  • The Radish wrote:Someone is pissing and moaning about a play that scored a TD?

    After many posters complained with our play calling being to conservative?

    There are about 25 things I could complain about in that game. But I would rather just take the 3 1/2 days we have to celebrate winning.

    :141847_bnono:


    How did that come across as pissing and moaning? I'm ecstatic we won the game. Just surprised that play was called in that situation. Pissing and moaning?!?! Really?
    Ballz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 157
    Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:56 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:58 pm
  • There was another play on the drive before the last where we turned it over on downs on a failed 3rd and 3 pass down the sideline that wasn't even close in any fashion. We were lucky to get the ball back with so little time left at the time. I vaguely remember it now, so I don't remember the specifics but I wish they'd run some higher % stuff in those situations. I mean get the first down, then take some shots.
    User avatar
    Shane Falco
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 844
    Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:09 pm
    Location: Puyallup, WA


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:58 pm
  • At the time I figured what did you have to lose? They weren't running on the Pats and they gambled that the edges would be open more than something quick across the middle.

    Yep, the coaches and players would be catching hell right now if that play had not worked. It's a fine high-wire balancing act. That play never worked Pete's first year with Bates. Same with the punt. Thank the defense for holding up late.

    I had prepared myself for defeat. There is no way my team hits a 47 yd bomb with 1:14 to go against one of the highly regarded teams. Never happens. Except this time it did. This season is a mystery to me.
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    R.I.P Les "PithyRadish" Norton 9/13/2014
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9404
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:59 pm
  • Here's the problem with complaining about this play....Edwards was only one player on the field. We don't know who the primary receiver was and what the original intent of the play was. Could the first read have been well covered? Did Wilson see something with Edwards coverage that made him decide to put it there? Was that the original plan all along? We don't know the answers to these, we can just be happy that it worked, because if it doesn't, we'd be arguing about who's fault it was...Pete, Darrel or Russel.
    Image

    :les: Check your PM's....We miss you :les:
    User avatar
    kidhawk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 14579
    Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:02 pm
  • kidhawk wrote:Here's the problem with complaining about this play....Edwards was only one player on the field. We don't know who the primary receiver was and what the original intent of the play was. Could the first read have been well covered? Did Wilson see something with Edwards coverage that made him decide to put it there? Was that the original plan all along? We don't know the answers to these, we can just be happy that it worked, because if it doesn't, we'd be arguing about who's fault it was...Pete, Darrel or Russel.


    The primary reciever was Braylon. Watch how quickly the ball is thrown after the snap. He didn't have time to make any other reads. I suppose he could have called that at the line, but you're right. We don't know.
    Ballz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 157
    Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:56 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:05 pm
  • You're right. I shouldn't have said pissing and moaning. But since you now are still talking about it wouldn't that be whining?

    :roll:

    Again I refuse to entertain any bad news when we only have until thursday to enjoy beating the freaking Patriots!!!
    Image
    On to week two. Week one was not a fluke!
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18655
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:07 pm
  • I saw nothing wrong with that play, whether it was called like that or not.... I don't see why more teams don't do that..the CB was clearly playing the fade, everyone on NE's bench thought fade, but Russ throws it short so only the guy with his head turned and looking at the ball could get it.

    Plus, if he drops it, it's a PI on the defense...what are we complaining about again? :beating:
    Image
    User avatar
    chawx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1111
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Salt Lake City, UT


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:13 pm
  • I agree that it was probably not the brightest call to make on 4th and 3 (why don't we ever run in these situations?). If NE's defensive back hadn't totally blown the coverage on Braylon, we'd have turned it over on downs.
    Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

    He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
    User avatar
    SmokinHawk
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 5732
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
    Location: Back in Seattle


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:16 pm
  • I always hate that call because it works about 10% of the time, but I also think that Wilson was supposed to look at the route underneath that was open IIRC. It definitely wasn't a single option play and Wilson needs to thank Edwards for bailing him out, imo. What worries me is that this is the type of play we seem to always go to in that situation - our OC needs to have something better than that put together, imo.
    Image
    User avatar
    AbsolutNET
    * NET X's & O's Guru *
     
    Posts: 8822
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
    Location: PNW


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:16 pm
  • Ballsy for sure. I liked it.
    Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"
    User avatar
    Zebulon Dak
    * The Producer *
    * The Producer *
     
    Posts: 14960
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
    Location: King In The North


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:17 pm
  • The problem at times with high percentage plays is that those are the ones the D expects. If you are going to hang touchdowns on the board and not field goals you gotta roll the dice, especially against a good team.

    I thought it was genius, I thought the underthrow was on purpose and Edwards did what he does the best, make the spectacular catch (cause he drops the easy ones now and again).

    Man, I love this team.
    User avatar
    Starrman44
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 814
    Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
    Location: Canby, OR


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:19 pm
  • Personally, I thought it was correct for the situation. There's something about going for the TD on 4th and short that seems to work pretty well - maybe because the Patriots front 7 were geared up to stuff the run and they got caught off guard?
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15609
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:23 pm
  • Here is a shot from the All-22's

    Image

    And as it develops further

    Image
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    R.I.P Les "PithyRadish" Norton 9/13/2014
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9404
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:34 pm
  • The Radish wrote:Someone is pissing and moaning about a play that scored a TD?

    After many posters complained with our play calling being to conservative?

    There are about 25 things I could complain about in that game. But I would rather just take the 3 1/2 days we have to celebrate winning.

    :141847_bnono:


    I wouldn't call this pissing and moaning, and he's 100% right. It's a very low percentage play and this place would have erupted into rage and fury had it not worked. Everyone is glad it did work out of course :th2thumbs:
    User avatar
    bellingerga
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5313
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
    Location: Beaverton, Oregon


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:37 pm
  • SmokinHawk wrote:I agree that it was probably not the brightest call to make on 4th and 3 (why don't we ever run in these situations?). If NE's defensive back hadn't totally blown the coverage on Braylon, we'd have turned it over on downs.


    Did he blow the coverage? My recollection was that it was great coverage but Russell threw it in a place where Braylon had to make an incredible adjustment and manuever to get to it. Not sure I would consider that blown coverage, the guy was with Edwards step by step, it was just an incredible adjustment on Edwards part to make that catch.
    User avatar
    bellingerga
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5313
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
    Location: Beaverton, Oregon


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:42 pm
  • Zebulon Dak wrote:Ballsy for sure. I liked it.

    :13:
    User avatar
    SanDiegoSeahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 609
    Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:25 am
    Location: eating@socal.coffee.table


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:43 pm
  • Looking at the All-22 pictures provided by the good doctordiags, I have to say, there's a lot of space on that field, as though the Patriots knew they had to be ready for anything. That's some nice work by the offense to keep the defense on their toes, and if so, it goes a long way to making this a higher percentage playcall.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15609
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:48 pm
  • bellingerga wrote:Did he blow the coverage? My recollection was that it was great coverage but Russell threw it in a place where Braylon had to make an incredible adjustment and manuever to get to it. Not sure I would consider that blown coverage, the guy was with Edwards step by step, it was just an incredible adjustment on Edwards part to make that catch.


    OR...in the huddle, Bevell tells Russ that they're overplaying the fade. Tell Braylon to sell the fade and as the ball is thrown, to come back to it. (Of course he said it in code: I-E Zebra 2, Cover Banana, 3 Bangers and Mash on 2)
    Image
    User avatar
    chawx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1111
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Salt Lake City, UT


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:58 pm
  • I hate fade routs. They are such low percentage. They also ran that awful fade to the sideline on 3rd and 2 on the 2nd to last possession, and RW3 threw it out of bounds. I am obviously thrilled that the TD worked out, but if that pass had not been caught, I would be leading the angry mob.
    User avatar
    Missing_Clink
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2541
    Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:03 pm
  • I hated it. I hate it now. It was a horrible play call, period. Yes, I know we scored, but it is possible to have a good outcome from a really shitty call, just like it's possible to have a really bad outcome from a great call.

    As others have said, I hate that call because it has such a low percentage of success. The upside to a fade is that it has a low percentage of interception but that shouldn't really matter on 4th down.

    I don't know. I hate the fade all the time, I REALLY hate it on 4th down. And to say that we don't know who the primary's are, etc is silly because Wilson didn't bother with one read on that play. Edwards was the only read.
    Image
    User avatar
    SirTed
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 748
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:25 am
    Location: Queen Anne


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:14 pm
  • not a bevell fan at all... to fricken predictable, and i was not happy with that 2 minute offense at the end of the game, why were we huddling????? do we have a two minute offense? just weird to me... against the niners - run, run pass on 3rd and long, get use to seeing that.... it's the scary niners better put the handcuffs back on
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4058
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:28 pm
  • It was great to get the catch (and the PI). On one of the talk shows, they were talking about Tate would have been a higher percentage target, but he was not quite open at the moment the ball was thrown.

    To be sure in the future, let's have sidney split the defenders from now on.

    Side note...Was braylon inbounds? I watched the replay on the jumbotron and then a dozen times when I got home. Didn't seem like 2 feet inbounds, but maybe his knee and elbow was inbounds? Oh well, whatever, ruled TD.
    User avatar
    seanoob
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 264
    Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:03 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:35 pm
  • The Radish wrote:You're right. I shouldn't have said pissing and moaning. But since you now are still talking about it wouldn't that be whining?

    :roll:

    Again I refuse to entertain any bad news when we only have until thursday to enjoy beating the freaking Patriots!!!


    GIAFB Radish. You of all people, with your 11000+ posts should know better by now. If you don't like the OP...move along. Save your $.02, maybe let it accrue some interest for another topic. No need to belittle. Live and let live.

    To the OP. I hate hate hate that play myself, especially on 4th down. When i saw what was going down i let out a very loud "F-bomb, this play never works....Yay! It worked!"

    But, even had it not worked we still would have had a first down due to the DPI, so we had that going for us.
    User avatar
    400WattHPSHawk
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1815
    Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:09 pm
    Location: Central Washington


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:44 pm
  • hawker84 wrote:not a bevell fan at all... to fricken predictable, and i was not happy with that 2 minute offense at the end of the game, why were we huddling????? do we have a two minute offense? just weird to me... against the niners - run, run pass on 3rd and long, get use to seeing that.... it's the scary niners better put the handcuffs back on


    I hate Bevell as much as the next, BUT, the huddle was part of the play design for the Sydney bomb, IMO. It added to getting the Pats to bite on the same formation, motion being used.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11254
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:52 pm
  • OMG, this so supports my belief that there's a whole pile of peeps on here who just love to bitch.

    Run it on 4th and short? Sure, why not? Marshawn was running them into the ground all day. Wait a tick... no he wasn't. They slammed the door in his face damn near every time he touched the rock (as is evident in his season low 40 yards rushing). And you think they were just going to ignore Marshawn in that situation!? Rly?! Uh, no. no doubt they were all keyed up to defend the run on that play, but instead a good QB threw a great ball to an above average reciever who ran an AWESOME route and the result was a touchdown. Good call, good strategy, good execution. How are you actually going to complain about that?!

    to quote Charlie Brown; Good Greif...
    WAR BEAVER!!
    User avatar
    CANHawk
    * Gangnameister *
     
    Posts: 11560
    Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
    Location: PoCompton, BC Canada


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:01 pm
  • They talked about this Monday on Brock and salk with coach Carroll, and said its a 50% chance of completing IIRC. Coach said it was not a designed play for Edwards but 1st option was Tate, but changed call at los. I think I'm remembering most of it right, bc I thought the 50% thing was high. And it might not have been Tate. Check out the podcast if you're really interested about the playcall, it was defiinitely discussed.
    User avatar
    largenutz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 884
    Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:56 pm
    Location: Denver, Colorado


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:02 pm
  • CANHawk wrote:OMG, this so supports my belief that there's a whole pile of peeps on here who just love to bitch.

    Run it on 4th and short? Sure, why not? Marshawn was running them into the ground all day. Wait a tick... no he wasn't. They slammed the door in his face damn near every time he touched the rock (as is evident in his season low 40 yards rushing). And you think they were just going to ignore Marshawn in that situation!? Rly?! Uh, no. no doubt they were all keyed up to defend the run on that play, but instead a good QB threw a great ball to an above average reciever who ran an AWESOME route and the result was a touchdown. Good call, good strategy, good execution. How are you actually going to complain about that?!

    to quote Charlie Brown; Good Greif...


    I think Vince Wilfork ate an elephant last week and grew another hundred pounds. That dude is massive. I wanted him so bad when he came out, I think we ended with Marcus Tubbs or something.

    Anyway, the way they threw that ball, if they knew how the D was playing it and the D played as expected, it was an easy interference call. The defender didn't even try to make an adjustment, and Braylon caught it just to be sure.

    At some point, if we are going to the playoffs, the training wheels gotta come off and we gotta believe that our guys are going to make the play. It starts with the guys in the Locker Room first and foremost (and that includes the coaches). They have to know before we do that they can trust other guys to make a play. They showed a lot of trust in Braylon in that situation and it just brings him into the fold a little more.

    If Braylon Edwards can get on track and give us something down the stretch it is going to make our receiving corp so much better. He has so much going for him from a physicality standpoint.
    User avatar
    Starrman44
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 814
    Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
    Location: Canby, OR


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:03 pm
  • CANHawk wrote:OMG, this so supports my belief that there's a whole pile of peeps on here who just love to bitch.

    Run it on 4th and short? Sure, why not? Marshawn was running them into the ground all day. Wait a tick... no he wasn't. They slammed the door in his face damn near every time he touched the rock (as is evident in his season low 40 yards rushing). And you think they were just going to ignore Marshawn in that situation!? Rly?! Uh, no. no doubt they were all keyed up to defend the run on that play, but instead a good QB threw a great ball to an above average reciever who ran an AWESOME route and the result was a touchdown. Good call, good strategy, good execution. How are you actually going to complain about that?!

    to quote Charlie Brown; Good Greif...


    I don't disagree about the amount of bitching that goes on around here but in this case I'm one of the bitches...so...

    What exactly made that a good route? Or a good throw? The fact that Wilson didn't throw it out of bounds or get it picked? The fact that Edwards caught it? I'm not trying to be shitty, but I think the fade is judged strictly on success. The throw and catch look different every time it's run. There's hardly a diagram except for "throw it high" .

    And my whole argument is that the all-time success rate of the fade is like 10%, so that's why I hate that call. I'm not advocating for a run to Marshawn, but for that to be the call on 4TH DOWN seems completely ridiculous to me.
    Image
    User avatar
    SirTed
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 748
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:25 am
    Location: Queen Anne


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:13 pm
  • I think fades are probably actually the best type of play in call in those situations. You more than likely will have a one on one match up and you usually will only do them with your bigger receivers. Plus they have the most potential for drawing a PI flag which actually occured this particular play.
    Status: Active lieutenant in the 12th Man Army
    User avatar
    12thMan1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 723
    Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:19 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:20 pm
  • Yeah, some peeps are forgetting, it seems, that the flag WAS thrown on that play. Braylon, to use a basketball term, drew the PI call. Some WRs are good at that. Plus, on that route, if the DB is strictly covering the man and not looking for the ball, the QB underthrows intentionally, and when the WR cuts back for the ball, the PI is nearly automatic. Conversely, if the DB is looking back for the ball, the WR can shake loose for an easy reception.

    So, the third possibility, one which actually was in play, was that we would have been 1st and goal at the 1 anyway.

    The call was not that bad IMHO.
    Talent can get you to the playoffs.
    It takes character to win when you get there.

    SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS
    User avatar
    sutz
    USMC 1970-77
     
    Posts: 10382
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
    Location: Monroe, WA


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:36 pm
  • 400WattHPSHawk wrote:
    The Radish wrote:You're right. I shouldn't have said pissing and moaning. But since you now are still talking about it wouldn't that be whining?

    :roll:

    Again I refuse to entertain any bad news when we only have until thursday to enjoy beating the freaking Patriots!!!


    GIAFB Radish. You of all people, with your 11000+ posts should know better by now. If you don't like the OP...move along. Save your $.02, maybe let it accrue some interest for another topic. No need to belittle. Live and let live.

    To the OP. I hate hate hate that play myself, especially on 4th down. When i saw what was going down i let out a very loud "F-bomb, this play never works....Yay! It worked!"

    But, even had it not worked we still would have had a first down due to the DPI, so we had that going for us.




    Wait, wait, WAIT!!! Hey 400watt are you trying to tell you I'm not allowed to post my views and you are? The difference is when I'm wrong I admit it. When you and the OP were wrong you refuse to admit it. Not only that you scream at anyone else that doesn't agree with you.

    If you read J.D.Robb like I do you will understand when I say "BITE ME". If you don't,,,well you should. :D

    This entire place including yours truly have bitch, pissed, and moaned, about the team and its play calling for 6 games. Jokes on us, we're 4-2. Sadly where calling good/bad plays are concerned we pretty much suck at it even tho we think we could run an NFL team way better than any of the coaching staffs.

    Again I say,,,,,the jokes on us!

    I just said its a short week, why spoil our 3 days before the next game whining about what COULD have gone wrong?

    I'm reminded of last week when they called the fake punt and ran it out of the end zone. I'm not saying you but lots of people screamed how that was a terrible call. I said at the time and still say,,,it was brilliant! Took time off the clock, gained us 20 yards, a free kick, and they still needed a TD to beat us.

    So both those plays went against our sensibility? And how dumb does it make us look to do whatever it is you are calling it, to complain now after the fact.

    You are great at making the calls AFTER THEY HAVE HAPPENED!

    How good would you be if you had to make a call right frickin now, without the beauty of hindsight?

    They made both calls, we won both games. Youse guys are really stretching complaining now.

    :roll:
    Image
    On to week two. Week one was not a fluke!
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18655
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:42 pm
  • And one more thing. I'm sitting here laughing at the fact that I'm being bitched at for bitching at someone else for bitching. lol

    boy that will make your head hurt. Or at least it does mine.

    Can we have peace now?

    Les
    Image
    On to week two. Week one was not a fluke!
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18655
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:43 pm
  • That fade to Braylon hung in the air for awhile and may have been defended by a better corner had it not been thrown early and so far behind Braylon. After seeing it again I think that play was brilliant and well calculated play.
    I think Edwards and Rice were both running fade routes. Russell read it well and chose to go with Edwards because he was 1 on 1 with the 5'10" rookie Dennard. Wilson knew he had a mismatch and he threw the pass early enough and with enough air that Braylon had time to fend off the rookie corner before coming back for the ball.
    Remember that Wilson and his Badgers beat up on Nebraska and Denard last year--final score was 48-17. Wilson is quite familiar with Dennard who was a nonfactor in that classic blowout.
    Russ Willstrong
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 803
    Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:31 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:48 pm
  • SirTed wrote:
    CANHawk wrote:OMG, this so supports my belief that there's a whole pile of peeps on here who just love to bitch.

    Run it on 4th and short? Sure, why not? Marshawn was running them into the ground all day. Wait a tick... no he wasn't. They slammed the door in his face damn near every time he touched the rock (as is evident in his season low 40 yards rushing). And you think they were just going to ignore Marshawn in that situation!? Rly?! Uh, no. no doubt they were all keyed up to defend the run on that play, but instead a good QB threw a great ball to an above average reciever who ran an AWESOME route and the result was a touchdown. Good call, good strategy, good execution. How are you actually going to complain about that?!

    to quote Charlie Brown; Good Greif...


    I don't disagree about the amount of bitching that goes on around here but in this case I'm one of the bitches...so...

    What exactly made that a good route? Or a good throw? The fact that Wilson didn't throw it out of bounds or get it picked? The fact that Edwards caught it? I'm not trying to be shitty, but I think the fade is judged strictly on success. The throw and catch look different every time it's run. There's hardly a diagram except for "throw it high" .

    And my whole argument is that the all-time success rate of the fade is like 10%, so that's why I hate that call. I'm not advocating for a run to Marshawn, but for that to be the call on 4TH DOWN seems completely ridiculous to me.


    You basterd, you're going to make me rant on the tablet!? Fine...

    It was a good route because Braylon. Put himself into a position to catch the ball, in bounds, in the endzone, with a good two yards of separation AND drawing a PI. If you don't think that's a great route, then your standards are way too high.

    It was a great throw because Rusty put the ball where only his man could catch it (in bounds), he put it there softly enough so his man could catch it, but fast enough so the db didn't have any time to adjust (but not so fast that it went through Braylon's famously suspect hands). If you don't think that was a great pass, your standards might be a bit too high.

    Everyone keeps moaning about "omg, fade route, I's so skurred", but that's a BIG BOY pass and Rusty dropped that back shoulder fade right where you need to. And he did it like a fricken BOSS! We've been wailing for a qb who can make that throw for YEARS, but now that we seem to have one, we want him to throw nothing but 3 yard ins. Shit, just can't please people these days.....
    WAR BEAVER!!
    User avatar
    CANHawk
    * Gangnameister *
     
    Posts: 11560
    Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
    Location: PoCompton, BC Canada


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:59 pm
  • 12thMan1 wrote:I think fades are probably actually the best type of play in call in those situations. You more than likely will have a one on one match up and you usually will only do them with your bigger receivers. Plus they have the most potential for drawing a PI flag which actually occured this particular play.


    In this case it was probably the best play to call given the matchup. The tall veteran receiver going 1 on 1 against the smaller rookie corner Dennard whose tendencies Wilson knew quite well from his game against Nebraska last year. Wilson studied quite a bit of tape on Dennard last year and let's just say he was prepared. He knew what he had before the ball was snapped. It was a good timing route and great effort by Edwards. What was genius about it was that Wilson got away with lofting a soft catchable ball because he threw it early and placed it low and outside.
    Russ Willstrong
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 803
    Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:31 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:13 pm
  • The underrated part of Wilson's game is his vision and how he sees a throw before his receivers break free. That vision and trust in your receivers is what will make him more like Rodgers and Brees than a Mike Vick.
    Russ Willstrong
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 803
    Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:31 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:11 pm
  • And of course Wilson gained a lot of confidence in Braylon Edwards during the preseason, with Edwards making big plays for him on 50-50 balls that Wilson threw up and Edwards went after and won. A guy makes plays like that for you, and as a QB, you are going to make sure to go to him when you need someone to flat out make a play, and that's what Wilson did. Who says preseason is meaningless.
    Steve2222 wrote: "I'm going to call a spade a spade. This is a 9 win team who is going to need luck getting into playoffs."
    User avatar
    olyfan63
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 823
    Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 pm
  • I haven't read the whole thread, so I don't know if anyone pointed this out ... but when I re-watched this catch, I noticed we're lucky Braylon caught the ball. Right before it hits his body, he seems to look down and close his eyes. No idea why. But we're lucky he caught it.

    EDIT: He may have been looking down for the sideline, but still ... he wasn't looking at the ball when he caught it.
    User avatar
    Fox0r
    * NET News Scoop *
    * NET News Scoop *
     
    Posts: 1874
    Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
    Location: Lynnwood, WA


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:40 pm
  • This may have already been posted but I'm not going to read 3 pages to find out...

    Stop with the Bevell hate.

    RW decided to go with the risky throw here, and it's probably cause he saw Braylon 1 on 1 and it worked in the preseason so he went for it. But the bottom line is the call here is for Braylon to draw the left side of the field away so when Tate cuts over he is wide for the first down. This is blatantly obvious. It was a great play call and it is a very high percentage play to Tate. But RW went with the fade.

    Stop trying to hate on Bevell when he called a great game.

    Wait till we lose, jesus.
    "Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu
    User avatar
    BigMeach
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 361
    Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:48 pm
  • It looks like a well designed play and the execution couldn't have been done better. I think the coaches deserve some credit for having the balls to do it. I think the aggressive play calling is what the offense needed. :mrgreen:

    Seattle is going into the games dictating their attitude and making great adjustments, I see them doing the same thing in San fran.

    :49ersmall:

    No more :179422:
    Image
    User avatar
    NavySeaHawk
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 68
    Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:20 pm


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:56 am
  • Wow! the same people who say it's the process, not the results are the ones saying quit bitching, it was a touchdown. But just because the play worked doesn't mean it wasn't a stupid call. I can see that 4th and 3 is probably too far to give it to Marshawn. That's low percentage too. But a fade? Ugh, when is Bevell gonna call some high percentage plays on 3rd or 4th and short?
    Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

    R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
    User avatar
    SalishHawkFan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4864
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:01 am
  • Salish you do realize it was not the intended throw right? The throw was supposed to be to Tate. Braylon's route was intended to clear the left side.
    RW chose that receiver.
    "Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu
    User avatar
    BigMeach
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 361
    Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:05 am
  • CANHawk wrote:OMG, this so supports my belief that there's a whole pile of peeps on here who just love to bitch.

    Run it on 4th and short? Sure, why not? Marshawn was running them into the ground all day. Wait a tick... no he wasn't. They slammed the door in his face damn near every time he touched the rock (as is evident in his season low 40 yards rushing). And you think they were just going to ignore Marshawn in that situation!? Rly?! Uh, no. no doubt they were all keyed up to defend the run on that play, but instead a good QB threw a great ball to an above average reciever who ran an AWESOME route and the result was a touchdown. Good call, good strategy, good execution. How are you actually going to complain about that?!

    to quote Charlie Brown; Good Greif...


    So basically you didn't actually read any of the posts of those that don't care for that play call.
    Image
    User avatar
    AbsolutNET
    * NET X's & O's Guru *
     
    Posts: 8822
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
    Location: PNW


Re: Fade route on 4th and 3...
Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:21 am
  • The point that it was a low % play is true but it was a pick the open guy route and the team likes using Edwards size.

    For me the reality was the team needed to score and then score again so the risky play was an option that was realistic in the situation.

    In the end your point is taken but the play worked and thus is moot.
    Until we develop a pass rush that will cause opposing teams to be forced to scheme to defend it we will never be able to completely take the final step. That was done and the final step was taken. The OLine still needs work.

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions at last after 38 seasons. Awesome!!!
    jammerhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1951
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:13 pm


Next


It is currently Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:16 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information