How will our defense change/improve when Thurmond is back?

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • Sounds like Thurmond will probably be back for the Lions game on 10/28. Does he come in to replace Trufant in the nickel role? I know there are a lot of high hopes for Thurmond. Obviously he's not going to start over our two CB's...so how do you think he will be used?

    Realistically how much can his return improve our defense? Also can he help on special teams?
    Image

    Win Forever!
    User avatar
    JonRud
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1187
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:58 pm
    Location: New Jersey - Site of Super Bowl XLVIII


  • He will be a much needed improvement at nickel over Tru. It's sad to see, but Tru has lost a few steps. He gets burned by the small speedy guys. Hopefully we can find ways to keep him out there though, he is great in run support.

    Thurmond looked great last year before getting hurt again. Hopefully he hasn't rushed it and will be completely healed when he comes back.
    User avatar
    mistaowen
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1681
    Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:54 pm


  • "BUY THE SEAHAWKS DEFENSE IN EVERY FANTASY LEAGUE" -- NFL Network

    How good is WT3?
    His backup was Richard Sherman.
    yes, that good.
    this D is going to be so good.
    We are the 2014 Superbowl champions and it can never, ever be taken away.
    Greatest defense in NFL history.
    User avatar
    Seeker
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1343
    Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:21 pm


  • I think he provides a sizeable upgrade over Tru as CB3 but the bigger thing for me is that if, HEAVEN FORBID, either Sherman or Browner need a little time off I feel a hell of a lot better with WTIII filling in for one of them
    User avatar
    ErikG803
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 978
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:53 pm


  • I'm not so sure Thurmond is any sort of immediate upgrade over Trufant. Maybe down the ways a bit. But right away? Dude has barely played the past season and a half. Not sure if he'll be able to just step in an be great. Tru hasn't exactly been minced meat or anything. This isn't NE's secondary being replaced. I like Thurmond and all. But he hasn't lived up to the potential he came to the Hawks with.
    Hawkadeus
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 201
    Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:50 pm


  • WTIII was going to be a first round pick coming out of college if he didn't blow up his knee his last year at Oregon. He was as shut down and electric as a returner as you got. I was thrilled we drafted him despite the injuries and think that when he comes back to the line up, teams will be lucky to move the ball on third down.

    What is better is that gives us 4 legit CB in a dime package. 4 legit CBs covering receivers means more time for Bruce and Clemons to eat during obvious passing plays.
    User avatar
    sturg78
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1210
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm


  • Thurmond was damn good before he got hurt last year. Damn fast too. He immediately makes nickel and dime packages better.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10438
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • Well, the reality is Thurmond has played in 20 games in the last two years (’10 and ’11) just like Marcus, the big difference is he only had four starts compared to Trufant’s 20 starts.

    In those two years Walter had 49 total tackles and 9 passes defended no INTs in 53 plays.
    Marcus had more time on the field and had 103 tackles 11 passes defended 2 INTs in 114 plays.

    I’d say except for the PD/plays they are pretty close and it’s hard to say if PD’s would project out linearly…
    "Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides; cuius fidei merces est videre quod credis."
    Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.
    (St. Augustine of Hippo)

    "Perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim."
    (“Ovid”)
    User avatar
    FidelisHawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 329
    Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:39 am


  • While I always thought he had a lot of potential and maybe he still does, he really hasn't done much with the snaps that he has been given, and even looking on PFF he really has been average at best.

    Last year in coverage he was:
    Thrown at: 21
    Receptions against: 12
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 93.4

    2010 in coverage:
    Thrown at: 45
    Receptions Against: 26
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 91.8

    Browner and Sherman's numbers this year and last are just ridiculous, they are playing at an extremely high level we are really lucky to have them both.
    User avatar
    the ditch
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1607
    Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:05 am
    Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada


  • the ditch wrote:While I always thought he had a lot of potential and maybe he still does, he really hasn't done much with the snaps that he has been given, and even looking on PFF he really has been average at best.

    Last year in coverage he was:
    Thrown at: 21
    Receptions against: 12
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 93.4

    2010 in coverage:
    Thrown at: 45
    Receptions Against: 26
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 91.8

    Browner and Sherman's numbers this year and last are just ridiculous, they are playing at an extremely high level we are really lucky to have them both.


    FYI, I pulled my stats from Football Outsiders, was wondering where you got yours?
    "Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides; cuius fidei merces est videre quod credis."
    Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.
    (St. Augustine of Hippo)

    "Perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim."
    (“Ovid”)
    User avatar
    FidelisHawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 329
    Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:39 am


  • Thurmond has all the "potential" to be a very good CB,...however, I think he's one more injury away from possibly not being on the team or in the league,...he's really an enigma from a health standpoint,...
    User avatar
    Hamhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2089
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:05 pm
    Location: Kenmore WA


  • FidelisHawk wrote:
    the ditch wrote:While I always thought he had a lot of potential and maybe he still does, he really hasn't done much with the snaps that he has been given, and even looking on PFF he really has been average at best.

    Last year in coverage he was:
    Thrown at: 21
    Receptions against: 12
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 93.4

    2010 in coverage:
    Thrown at: 45
    Receptions Against: 26
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 91.8

    Browner and Sherman's numbers this year and last are just ridiculous, they are playing at an extremely high level we are really lucky to have them both.


    FYI, I pulled my stats from Football Outsiders, was wondering where you got yours?


    ProFootballFocus.com advanced stats.
    User avatar
    the ditch
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1607
    Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:05 am
    Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada


  • the ditch wrote:
    FidelisHawk wrote:
    the ditch wrote:While I always thought he had a lot of potential and maybe he still does, he really hasn't done much with the snaps that he has been given, and even looking on PFF he really has been average at best.

    Last year in coverage he was:
    Thrown at: 21
    Receptions against: 12
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 93.4

    2010 in coverage:
    Thrown at: 45
    Receptions Against: 26
    INTs: 0
    QB Rating Against: 91.8

    Browner and Sherman's numbers this year and last are just ridiculous, they are playing at an extremely high level we are really lucky to have them both.


    FYI, I pulled my stats from Football Outsiders, was wondering where you got yours?


    ProFootballFocus.com advanced stats.


    LOL Thanks, I love all the stats I can get my hands on, but not so much I’m willing to pay for them :P
    "Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides; cuius fidei merces est videre quod credis."
    Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.
    (St. Augustine of Hippo)

    "Perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim."
    (“Ovid”)
    User avatar
    FidelisHawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 329
    Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:39 am


  • It means more options in nickel and dime coverage, and gives us much needed DB depth if Trufant or god forbid one of our starting DB's gets hurt.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3543
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am




It is currently Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:38 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information