Its beginning to feel alot like 2005..

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Its beginning to feel alot like 2005..
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:45 am
  • I remember the slow start.. Then all of a sudden the team clicked in this gear that I have never seen before..
    User avatar
    GoldenTater81
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 324
    Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:38 pm


  • Our offense still has a long, long way to go. It needs to be more consistent and cut down on the mistakes. Lots of progress in this game, though, and that's a good sign.

    Don't be surprised to see a step or two back on Thursday, though. That 49ers D is a completely different animal than what the Seahawks just faced.
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7901
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


  • I thought that power ranking graph thread I've been seeing was kind of a funny anomaly but it's a damn eerie coincidence what is happening now. Got to get rolling on the road though to match that 05 magic!
    NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!
    User avatar
    12th_Bob
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1745
    Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm


  • volsunghawk wrote:Our offense still has a long, long way to go. It needs to be more consistent and cut down on the mistakes. Lots of progress in this game, though, and that's a good sign.

    Don't be surprised to see a step or two back on Thursday, though. That 49ers D is a completely different animal than what the Seahawks just faced.


    Image
    Image

    "The Seahawks showed today that they regarded me highly and I appreciate that, and I will continue to show how much I regard Paul Allen and the Seattle Seahawks with my play." - Richard Sherman
    User avatar
    Aros
    [[ .NET Godfather ]]
     
    Posts: 7889
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
    Location: Just 6 miles from Richard Sherman!


  • Where's the line graph?!
    User avatar
    12evanf
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2610
    Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am


Re: Its beginning to feel alot like 2005..
Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:16 am
  • Wtb graph thread
    Badjujus
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 21
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:53 pm


Re: Its beginning to feel alot like 2005..
Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:20 am
  • volsunghawk wrote:Our offense still has a long, long way to go. It needs to be more consistent and cut down on the mistakes. Lots of progress in this game, though, and that's a good sign.

    Don't be surprised to see a step or two back on Thursday, though. That 49ers D is a completely different animal than what the Seahawks just faced.


    Yeah, but their offense is a day old turd sandwich compared to the defense we just played. I still like our odds. This team is walking with a swagger right now.
    So you're admitting I'm a celeb...
    User avatar
    CANHawk
    * Gangnameister *
     
    Posts: 11192
    Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
    Location: PoCompton, BC Canada


Re: Its beginning to feel alot like 2005..
Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:23 am
  • the graph thread won't be possible until tomorrow, when the latest nfl.com power rankings come out.
    Rzzzzz...
    User avatar
    peachesenregalia
    * NET Starfish *
     
    Posts: 10421
    Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
    Location: Helm's Deep


Re: Its beginning to feel alot like 2005..
Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:29 am
  • We have the defense to take us to the Superbowl, but our offense will need to get a lot better.
    "Are we rockin' and rollin' or what?!''

    -- Seattle coach Pete Carroll, celebrating with his coaches after the Seahawks pulled off a trade with the Jets, netting running back Leon Washington on Saturday, via Seahawks.com
    User avatar
    MLOhawks
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3010
    Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:35 pm
    Location: Seattle, WA - USA


Re: Its beginning to feel alot like 2005..
Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:26 pm
  • Aros wrote:
    volsunghawk wrote:Our offense still has a long, long way to go. It needs to be more consistent and cut down on the mistakes. Lots of progress in this game, though, and that's a good sign.

    Don't be surprised to see a step or two back on Thursday, though. That 49ers D is a completely different animal than what the Seahawks just faced.


    Image


    Heh, I'm fine with that. When I post after a loss, I'm a kool-aid drinker or a fan who's not invested in the team and unwilling to hold players/coaches/owners accountable.

    And when I post after a win, I'm a downer.
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7901
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


  • 12th_Bob wrote:I thought that power ranking graph thread I've been seeing was kind of a funny anomaly but it's a damn eerie coincidence what is happening now. Got to get rolling on the road though to match that 05 magic!


    Badjujus wrote:Wtb graph thread



    Oh, you're talking about the thread I started a few weeks ago...

    http://seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=52128&start=0

    here's the graph...

    Image
    Image Image
    Image
    ImageImage
    User avatar
    djTOY2000
    Eli Positioner Extraordinaire
     
    Posts: 1635
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:02 pm
    Location: Phoenix AZ (aka Seattle south)


  • Is it also beginning to feel a lot like 2010? Through 6 games in 2010 we were 4-2 going 3-0 at home and 1-2 on the road (we were also 1-1 in the division, whereas now we're 0-2). Yeah yeah, this defense is better and it's our third year in the schemes and all that. I know. My point is, let's not go crazy yet. 2005? I'm excited, too, but I also remember, NOT THREE WEEKS AGO, when we came off a win against Green Bay only to make fools of ourselves in St. Louis.
    "I'm gonna call him--what do you call the guy on the trampoline?--Harry Houdini or something like that." -Warren Moon on Golden Tate
    User avatar
    WindCityHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1124
    Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:51 pm


  • Smells like 2012 to me SWEET :th2thumbs: :thirishdrinkers:
    Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(
    User avatar
    grizbob
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 2274
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am
    Location: St George, UT



  • yes in 2005 we had a better offense but we didnt have a defense that came close to this one. yes we had 50 sacks that year but we gave up a lot of yardage
    User avatar
    hawkfan333
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 276
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 5:58 pm


  • I think by the end of the '13 season, this team will be better than our '05 team. In fact, much better.

    Attitude and toughness the 05 team lacked. Hutch was the soul of that team (IMO) and now every other player plays with the same controlled anger that Hutch played with. That carries us deep. More and better FAs will want to play here in Egypt. This team has shed that soft image that we were stuck with and that will be the difference. If you were a top-tier free agent WR, would you rather play for us.. or against us? LOL.

    Our draft class for next year? Oh man...I can't wait. I can't recall a draft in the history of this franchise that we enter with such freedom. BPA 1-7, I say. Thanks for keeping our seat warm, SF.
    Having your views challenged is a lot more healthy than simply jabbering on with people who think exactly the same way as you.
    User avatar
    HawkWow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5006
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
    Location: The 5-0


  • Hey, someone posted the Debbie Downer pic. Is there a Predictable Priscilla meme out there?
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11233
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • I keep wanting to sing that to the tune of: "it's beginning to look a lot like Christmas"
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 7849
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm


  • GoldenTater81 wrote:I remember the slow start.. Then all of a sudden the team clicked in this gear that I have never seen before..


    Disagree. We were blowing people out in 2005. We have won or lost these games (with the exception of Dallas) by a few points. 2005 team was an offensive powerhouse. 2012 team is really good but really raw...
    My Tapatalk for Ipad is bigger than yours. Size matters.
    User avatar
    MeanBlueGreen
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1114
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:56 pm
    Location: Redwood City, California


  • The 2005 defense only gave up 16.9 pts/G, good for 7th in the NFL.

    They were 5th against the run and 1st in sacks.

    The 2005 defense was a pretty good defense.

    Offensively these two Seahawk teams don't even compare.
    cesame
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1610
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:36 pm


  • MeanBlueGreen wrote:
    GoldenTater81 wrote:I remember the slow start.. Then all of a sudden the team clicked in this gear that I have never seen before..


    Disagree. We were blowing people out in 2005. We have won or lost these games (with the exception of Dallas) by a few points. 2005 team was an offensive powerhouse. 2012 team is really good but really raw...


    Our '05 offense was amazing ... no question. But we weren't blowing teams out, by and large. We won, what, 3 or 4 games on very late and sometimes long FGs, courtesy of old JB.

    At least, that's my recollection.

    Later in the season, though, we seemed unstoppable on offense. Especially SA runs inside the opponent 10-yard line. Money, baby!
    HawkHack
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 270
    Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 9:28 pm


  • For me, 2005 felt like 2005 when we dismantled the Eagles on MNF. A prime time game on the road that most pundits thought would be a tough battle. If we can do the same to the 49ers this week, then perhaps 2012 will feel a lot like 2012 in a future post as well.
    User avatar
    rjdriver
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1022
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:11 am
    Location: Utah


  • HawkHack wrote:
    MeanBlueGreen wrote:
    GoldenTater81 wrote:I remember the slow start.. Then all of a sudden the team clicked in this gear that I have never seen before..


    Disagree. We were blowing people out in 2005. We have won or lost these games (with the exception of Dallas) by a few points. 2005 team was an offensive powerhouse. 2012 team is really good but really raw...


    Our '05 offense was amazing ... no question. But we weren't blowing teams out, by and large. We won, what, 3 or 4 games on very late and sometimes long FGs, courtesy of old JB.

    At least, that's my recollection.

    Later in the season, though, we seemed unstoppable on offense. Especially SA runs inside the opponent 10-yard line. Money, baby!


    I like stats:


    Week Date Opponent Result Game site Record Recap Attendance
    1 September 11, 2005 at Jacksonville Jaguars L 26-14 ALLTEL Stadium 0-1 Recap 65,204
    2 September 18, 2005 Atlanta Falcons W 21-18 Qwest Field 1-1 Recap 66,030
    3 September 25, 2005 Arizona Cardinals W 37-12 Qwest Field 2-1 Recap 64,843
    4 October 2, 2005 at Washington Redskins L 20-17 (OT) FedEx Field 2-2 Recap 90,215
    5 October 9, 2005 at St. Louis Rams W 37-31 Edward Jones Dome 3-2 Recap 65,707
    6 October 16, 2005 Houston Texans W 42-10 Qwest Field 4-2 Recap 66,196
    7 October 23, 2005 Dallas Cowboys W 13-10 Qwest Field 5-2 Recap 67,046
    8 Bye
    9 November 6, 2005 at Arizona Cardinals W 33-19 Sun Devil Stadium 6-2 Recap 43,542
    10 November 13, 2005 St. Louis Rams W 31-16 Qwest Field 7-2 Recap 67,192
    11 November 20, 2005 at San Francisco 49ers W 27-25 Monster Park 8-2 Recap 63,590
    12 November 27, 2005 New York Giants W 24-21 (OT) Qwest Field 9-2 Recap 67,102
    13 December 5, 2005 at Philadelphia Eagles W 42-0 Lincoln Financial Field 10-2 Recap 67,637
    14 December 11, 2005 San Francisco 49ers W 41-3 Qwest Field 11-2 Recap 66,690
    15 December 18, 2005 at Tennessee Titans W 28-24 The Coliseum 12-2 Recap 69,149
    16 December 24, 2005 Indianapolis Colts W 28-13 Qwest Field 13-2 Recap 67,855
    17 January 1, 2006 at Green Bay Packers L 23-17 Lambeau Field 13-3 Recap 69,928
    My Tapatalk for Ipad is bigger than yours. Size matters.
    User avatar
    MeanBlueGreen
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1114
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:56 pm
    Location: Redwood City, California


  • Long live the prophecy!!!
    "I want to drink Ranier Beer out of a mug made from Jim harbaugh's hollowed out skull." CANHAWK
    User avatar
    sam1313
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1767
    Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 pm
    Location: Las Vegas, Nevada


  • We are even following the trend for power rankings in 2005.. eerie.
    User avatar
    GoldenTater81
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 324
    Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:38 pm


  • It’s hard to compare teams from different eras and time may have left a favorable glow on the ’05 season but…

    The reality is the only thing they had in common at week six was their record. We really had a MUCH more congenial schedule in ’05 and hindsight lets us tell how good/bad those teams we won/lost against really were.

    By week six we had lost two games against the only winning teams on our schedule the 12-4 Jaguars and the 10-6 Redskins, both on the road. We scored 14 points and 17 points respectfully and lost by 12 points in Jacksonville and 6 points in Washington.

    The only team close to a winning record (in those first six games) was a home win against the 8-8 Falcons which we barely beat by 3 and only scored 21 points. The rest of the schedule helped immensely to our overall stats in scoring 37 points each against the 5-11 Cardinals and the 6-10 Rams and 42 points against the 2-14 Texans.

    Besides beating up on the “NFC Worst” the ’05 team never really went on a scoring binge until the shutout win against the 6-10 Eagles, Monday Night, on the road in week 13. In the end they only beat three more teams with winning records a 3 point win over the 9-7 Cowboys at home in week 7, the now infamous New York overtime game at the Clink in week 12, and another very satisfying home win against the 14-2 Colts.

    All in all that ’05 team only played five teams with winning records that year, lost two, and only beat one by more than three points and that was in week 16. While it’s not for certain yet, except for the Panthers, we may have already played five teams that end up with winning records; with an offense that has yet to get both their feet on the ground…
    "Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides; cuius fidei merces est videre quod credis."
    Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.
    (St. Augustine of Hippo)

    "Perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim."
    (“Ovid”)
    User avatar
    FidelisHawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 327
    Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:39 am


  • FidelisHawk wrote:It’s hard to compare teams from different eras and time may have left a favorable glow on the ’05 season but…

    The reality is the only thing they had in common at week six was their record. We really had a MUCH more congenial schedule in ’05 and hindsight lets us tell how good/bad those teams we won/lost against really were.

    By week six we had lost two games against the only winning teams on our schedule the 12-4 Jaguars and the 10-6 Redskins, both on the road. We scored 14 points and 17 points respectfully and lost by 12 points in Jacksonville and 6 points in Washington.

    The only team close to a winning record (in those first six games) was a home win against the 8-8 Falcons which we barely beat by 3 and only scored 21 points. The rest of the schedule helped immensely to our overall stats in scoring 37 points each against the 5-11 Cardinals and the 6-10 Rams and 42 points against the 2-14 Texans.

    Besides beating up on the “NFC Worst” the ’05 team never really went on a scoring binge until the shutout win against the 6-10 Eagles, Monday Night, on the road in week 13. In the end they only beat three more teams with winning records a 3 point win over the 9-7 Cowboys at home in week 7, the now infamous New York overtime game at the Clink in week 12, and another very satisfying home win against the 14-2 Colts.

    All in all that ’05 team only played five teams with winning records that year, lost two, and only beat one by more than three points and that was in week 16. While it’s not for certain yet, except for the Panthers, we may have already played five teams that end up with winning records; with an offense that has yet to get both their feet on the ground…


    This is a really good post. Thank you! After thinking about it, I do recall having some feelings about our inability to close out teams (Holmgrenism) and allowing inferior opponents to hang in there and eek out victories. Some of those games really stunk - I recall many up by 10 1st halves followed by consecutive 3 and outs in the 3rd qtr.

    Don't get me wrong - that was a great team for us - in comparison to this team I do think it has a bunch of excellent attributes. Defense, running game, and clutch offense. That's a terrific recipe!
    Image
    User avatar
    nsport
    * NET Sports Handicapper *
     
    Posts: 1416
    Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am


  • WindCityHawk wrote:Is it also beginning to feel a lot like 2010? Through 6 games in 2010 we were 4-2 going 3-0 at home and 1-2 on the road (we were also 1-1 in the division, whereas now we're 0-2). Yeah yeah, this defense is better and it's our third year in the schemes and all that. I know. My point is, let's not go crazy yet. 2005? I'm excited, too, but I also remember, NOT THREE WEEKS AGO, when we came off a win against Green Bay only to make fools of ourselves in St. Louis.



    This is nothing like 2010, IMO. In both our losses to start that year we lost by 17 points and were quite dominated by Denver and St. Louis They year our 2 losses came down to the final drive. We are much more competive this year than in 2010. Remember also the San Deigo game-- Only reason we won was because of a superhero performance by Leon Washington with 2 returns for TD. Our defense was pretty poor that year. Our offense wasn't much better than what we got now..

    Interesting Note-- 2012 Points for= 110, Points against= 93, a +17 differential.
    2010 Points for= 120, Points against= 107, a +13 differential.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2363
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • Yeah,
    In all actuality the only thing the ’05 team had over this one, was a veteran offense that could put up a lot of points against much inferior teams, a much easier schedule (I think so far), and a RB with a nose for the endzone.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to have that offense on this team, but the stats skew how good they really were, that and our memories wax fondly on that season… :)
    "Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides; cuius fidei merces est videre quod credis."
    Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.
    (St. Augustine of Hippo)

    "Perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim."
    (“Ovid”)
    User avatar
    FidelisHawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 327
    Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:39 am




It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:25 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information