NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:54 pm
  • McCarthy's halftime adjustments during the Green Bay game included neutralizing the DE's by having Rodgers get rid of the ball quickly. While this worked to a certain extent, Seattle seemed to be playing bend but don't break. The coverage was still tight, but the ball was getting in there for moderate gains. I was thinking that New England will see this and model their passing game this way since they are so good at the precision passing game anyway.

    I'm wondering, New England and Seattle fans, will this be the way Brady and Bill play this? Will Seattle be looking for this and have a plan for it? If so, what will the plan be to stop the passing attack? This is the only thing I'm worried about (well beside Seattle's passing game). I'd like any insight on this I can get if you don't mind. In the hours before the game, I've been thinking about this.
    User avatar
    hawksfanohio
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 436
    Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:26 pm
    Location: In A Van Down By The River


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:02 pm
  • McCarthy's halftime adjustment was talking the refs into looking the other way the second half on holding calls. Luckily for NE, the normal refs are already on retainer for screwing the haws.
    User avatar
    sturg78
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1062
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:02 pm
  • McCarthy also started running the ball harder.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11248
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:03 pm
  • That's true. There was an awful lot of holding, especially against Clemons in the 2nd half. However, Rodgers was still getting rid of the ball a lot quicker than in the 1st half.
    User avatar
    hawksfanohio
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 436
    Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:26 pm
    Location: In A Van Down By The River


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:14 pm
  • Their second half was about them running the balk ans us committing to getting to Rodgers. If the pats want to focus on stopping clem and Irvin, I say bring it. Mebane will destroy them.
    Give me some damn skittles...
    User avatar
    Basis4day
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3108
    Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:22 pm
  • Basis4day wrote:Their second half was about them running the balk ans us committing to getting to Rodgers. If the pats want to focus on stopping clem and Irvin, I say bring it. Mebane will destroy them.


    Ha ha! I like your answer. Mebane, almost forgot for a minute how devastating he can be and how quick he can be in the backfield. I realize Green Bay started running more in the 2nd half, but I was referring to that when they did pass, the ball was out a lot quicker and the routes a lot shorter than in the 1st half.
    User avatar
    hawksfanohio
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 436
    Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:26 pm
    Location: In A Van Down By The River


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:27 pm
  • yeah and they still only scored one TD (through an outrageous PI call), despite dominating second half TOP 18.43-11.17.
    themunn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2377
    Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:41 pm
  • Best guess: The Patriots will plan to run the ball and use quick passes to keep our pass rush at bay. The Seahawks will plan to stuff the run and keep the "yards after catch" figure down to force them into a deeper passing game, then open up the pass rush.

    It sounds weird when talking about the Pats, but the running game will actually be key here, probably. If the Seahawks can stuff the run without focusing on the run, that will really push the game in our favor. With Big Red and Mebane up front and the speed of Wright and Wagner behind them, it's completely doable too.
    User avatar
    aku
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 116
    Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:50 am


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:49 pm
  • I think Mr. Wagner needs to have his best game of the season.
    Image
    User avatar
    SNDavidson
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1437
    Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 6:28 pm
  • Thomas will probably play up closer, which means NE could strike deep. But I don't think they will. They won't have time.
    Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

    R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
    User avatar
    SalishHawkFan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4579
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 6:58 pm
  • SalishHawkFan wrote:Thomas will probably play up closer, which means NE could strike deep. But I don't think they will. They won't have time.


    Yup. I love how this discipline has involved every year.

    In 2010, it was just Red, Earl, and Clemons. We could stop the run and thus force offenses to be a little more predictable, and that fed some plays to Earl and Clemons. But it wasn't much.

    By 2011, they'd built the secondary to kill quick throws with press coverage and buy time for the initial pass rush. It kinda worked, but left our corners vulnerable to speedy receivers and forced Earl to generally stay deep. We also didn't have the speed or discipline at linebacker to cover the underneath stuff (thus our terrible ranking vs pass-catching RB's and scrambling QB's).

    Our additions in 2012 have been HUGE. Our D-line can now handle most of its business by itself, both run-stuffing and pass rush. Since that helps kill the deeper-developing routes, Thomas gets freed up to cover faster guys himself, run support, blitz the A-gap (he's good at this), or help our corners against the more complex route trees. It also frees up our linebackers, who now have the smarts and speed to shake off play-action and help cover the underneath routes.

    This is all generalities and it's all a lot more complicated, of course. But basically, we've now got the talent to address every area and free our guys up to reinforce each other or get creative. I think this is what we saw against Aaron Rodgers. This defense is beyond the "patching holes stage" and can take away every option quarterbacks have. Otherwise the Patriots wouldn't be resorting to the faintly-desperate quick tempo stuff. Hope theory becomes reality tomorrow.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11248
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:14 pm
  • Great commentary.

    I am hoping the weather will make passing harder than usual. If the weather makes long passes difficult, it will really free up Earl and Kam to help out elsewhere on the field...

    If this is a rushing contest, I like our chances, very much. I think we can shut down NE's rushing attack more than they can shut down ours.

    Forecast is for winds from the south at 10 MPH, which will probably lead to some swirling in the CLink. (When the winds are coming from the west, the stadium design blocks them fairly well, but winds from the south or especially north aren't blocked as much.)

    Forecast is also for rain during the game, as well as throughout warmups. High of 66, so not cold.

    It's actually kind of an ideal forecast for us, given our strengths.
    User avatar
    BocciHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 875
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:17 pm
  • sturg78 wrote:McCarthy's halftime adjustment was talking the refs into looking the other way the second half on holding calls. Luckily for NE, the normal refs are already on retainer for screwing the haws.

    what he said :13:
    Member of 38 Plus club. Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +
    User avatar
    rainger
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1647
    Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
    Location: Victoria BC


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:50 pm
  • New England tends to attack horizontally not vertically. They'll throw short, quick passes because they always throw short, quick passes.
    SteveF
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 2
    Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:41 pm


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sun Oct 14, 2012 12:21 am
  • You can't neutralize our defense. I'm sorry. So, new plan?
    User avatar
    MrCarey
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1678
    Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm


Re: NE's plan: Neutralize the DE's?
Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:42 am
  • I don't think they'll neutralize the whole defense, I was just worried about the ends getting time to get in there. If New England plays the horizontal game like Steve F is saying, then the ball will be out of Brady's hands fast. I think it's up to the linebackers to be quick to react to those quick routes. I think the linebackers, safeties, and corners will have to jump the routes and make Brady hold the ball so Irvin and Clemons can get in there, just like the Monday night game against Green Bay. Rodgers was stifled and he knows it, regardless of the whining over one call. Coverage on the tight ends are key matchups as well in the game this week.
    User avatar
    hawksfanohio
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 436
    Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:26 pm
    Location: In A Van Down By The River




It is currently Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:12 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online