Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:20 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am
Posts: 1286
Location: Los Angeles, CA
From my observations, the one major weakness of this particular defense has been defending the no-huddle offense, particularly against elite QB's. We saw Aaron Rodgers employ it this season (as well as Kolb on his final drive against us) and I saw it happen to us several times last season as well. We rely heavily on different substitution packages based on the offensive formations. Elite QB's like Brady, Rodgers, and Manning can effectively "lock" a particular defensive personnel package on the field that they recognize is a mismatch by employing the no-huddle offense, preventing substitutions.

I believe that Brady and company will be using the no-huddle offense quite a bit this Sunday. I am a bit worried how the defense is going to handle that and how many "12 men on the field" penalties there will be as well as valuable timeouts being wasted.

Anybody else concerned?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:22 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1396
Yes. Brady has been running the no huddle offense all season long. He runs dinks, and dunks the ball up the field, and takes advantage of the underneath man. Things could get ugly very fast if our offense does not step it up.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:24 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 2267
Well in order for the no huddle work you must get first downs. If you look at the Carolina game they had like 3, 3-out's to start the game, Only had like 10 plays the first quarter and a half. my point is the no-huddle is meaningless unless than can convert, If the defense is able to continue it's improved play on 3rd down than I think we've got a chance to limit the damage.

However, I agree, we more than most are built around numerous packages and if the no-huddle get's rolling than it will be tough to get guys in and out without getting gassed.

I wonder if we'll enploy a nickle look as our base package this week to combat that.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:26 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1396
jlwaters1 wrote:
Well in order for the no huddle work you must get first downs. If you look at the Carolina game they had like 3, 3-out's to start the game, Only had like 10 plays the first quarter and a half. my point is the no-huddle is meaningless unless than can convert, If the defense is able to continue it's improved play on 3rd down than I think we've got a chance to limit the damage.

However, I agree, we more than most are built around numerous packages and if the no-huddle get's rolling than it will be tough to get guys in and out without getting gassed.

I wonder if we'll enploy a nickle look as our base package this week to combat that.

Their is a HUGE difference between Cam Newton and Tom Brady as passers. We're facing arguably the best QB in the game, an experienced vet at running no huddle offenses. This game worries the hell out of me.


Last edited by Spin Doctor on Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:29 am 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8853
Location: Covington, Washington
Brought it up in several threads. Yes I am concerned but that article posted from the Boston paper speaks to the fact that the Pats will not go 100% no huddle, because of the impact it could have on their defense as well. So they will use it but maybe not exclusively.

I would expect them to use it early to take the crowd out of the game. This is a very challenging game for the defense. I also expect Hernandez to return this game, putting more pressure on the defense. Maybe our big hogs can provide pass rush? Big Red, Mebane and Branch will have to play their butts off.

_________________
Image
Leon Washington 2010-2012 Sidney Rice 2011-2013 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:33 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1396
drdiags wrote:
Brought it up in several threads. Yes I am concerned but that article posted from the Boston paper speaks to the fact that the Pats will not go 100% no huddle, because of the impact it could have on their defense as well. So they will use it but maybe not exclusively.

I would expect them to use it early to take the crowd out of the game. This is a very challenging game for the defense. I also expect Hernandez to return this game, putting more pressure on the defense. Maybe our big hogs can provide pass rush? Big Red, Mebane and Branch will have to play their butts off.

I saw another stat that basically said most of our pass rush has came from our back up D-Lineman. When they are in the game then Brady can audible to a run and exploit the size of Jones, and Irvins tendency to over pursue. When our big boys are in they can pass it and we'll likely not get to the passer. Interesting condundrum to be sure.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:36 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4250
Well, the good news is that it's not going to come as a surprise since the Pats go to it often. meaning lots of tape and lots of time to gameplan for it.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:39 am 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 11083
Location: PoCompton, BC Canada
I didn't know there were any Asians on the team...

_________________
I <3 Nunchucks


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:58 am 
* NET Nobody *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 7597
No Huddle is a huge concern but I think it could be countered with the Big Nickel or Bandit packages where we basically have a lot of DBs on the field.

I think one of the biggest problems NE will present is with small, quick receivers like Edelman and Welker. Not to mention Lloyd so we need Trufant and Jeron Johnson to step up in this game.

_________________
RELEASE THE KRAKEN! (FREE BROWNER!)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:34 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am
Posts: 1286
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Kam for the most part has been playing well this season, but I would say he hasn't been "Pro Bowl level" because he hasn't been as strong in coverage as last year, particularly against big TE's. He struggled against Witten in the Dallas game and if he hadn't dropped so many balls, Kam would have looked even worse.

I am a little worried about how he will be able to handle Gronk and Hernandez this week...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:40 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 1363
There's a few ways to neutralize this:
1) Noise (we'll have a lot of that)
2) Pressure/Sacks- as soon as he goes on his back, it's very difficult to run the next play in a no huddle. Primarily because everyone has to move backwards and usually they have to call a play for 2nd or 3rd and longer.
3) Incomplete passes- It's all about flow. If we can knock some balls down then we will succeed.


I think Brady is going to get pick 6'd this game. It's just a hunch I have..I had the same hunch that the Vikes were going to beat the 9ers.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:33 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:29 pm
Posts: 1181
Batted passes. If the dline can continue to bat down passes over the middle like they did against Cam, this will improve our chances.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense's Chink in the Armor?
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:41 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 3081
hoxrox wrote:
Batted passes. If the dline can continue to bat down passes over the middle like they did against Cam, this will improve our chances.


like when Don Mebane bulldozed right thru that lineman and batted that pass? Yes please.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.