| Author |
Message |
|
Rocket
|
Post subject: Seneca -> Largent  Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:29 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:12 pm
Posts: 465
Location: The Rain Forest
|
|
I postulate that Mr. Wallace, if converted to a receiver from the get go, could have become another #80.
Thoughts?
_________________
Tebow?
"Uh, no."
John Schneider
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:34 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 10230
Location: King In The North
|
I mean, it's not unpossible but  _________________   Tanzania¹²
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:41 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 6648
|
|
Drinking again, Rick?
_________________
"Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:41 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15600
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
I'm thinking closer to Taco Wallace.
I think he would have been an Antwaan Randle El type receiver.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 2008
|
|
He always looked better at WR than QB but that's not sayin much...
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:43 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16622
Location: Guy in White ? = Seahawks.....Guy in black?...all other NFL teams
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawkstorian
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:48 pm |
|
| * NET Staff * |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
Posts: 2204
Location: Spokane
|
|
Of course, no one can prove you wrong ... but I doubt you'll find many takers there.
_________________
This post is intended for entertainment purposes only.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:50 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7759
|
|
I think he would have been a decent WR, but Largent? no.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1195
|
|
Seneca had such a wasted career. He could have played in this league at multiple positions but we just let him waste away because we didnt want to risk an injury. Makes me sick just thinking about it. I wish he was drafted by a different team
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:06 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15600
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
ensett wrote: Seneca had such a wasted career. He could have played in this league at multiple positions but we just let him waste away because we didnt want to risk an injury. Makes me sick just thinking about it. I wish he was drafted by a different team I'm guessing that was more a Seneca thing then a Seahawk thing. Dude wanted to be a QB. Its not like he went to Cleveland and all of a sudden started lining up all over the place. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Snohomie
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:23 pm |
|
| * NET Draft Guru * |
|
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3515
Location: Bellingham, WA
|
|
Didn't we avoid placing Seneca as the holder on FG attempts because of his hands? I think he had the all-around athleticism but I'm not sure he had starting WR type hands.
_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
canzag
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:25 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:53 am
Posts: 492
|
|
I compare him to former Hawk Kerry Joseph-great athlete.If hewants to play QB fulltime he should give Canada a shot.His game is perfect up here.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rocket
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:32 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
|
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:12 pm
Posts: 465
Location: The Rain Forest
|
bestfightstory wrote: Drinking again, Rick? Good answer. Off target, but still good. I was watchin' the snippet of the Carolina GoToTheShow game, and had a vision. A sober vision.
_________________
Tebow?
"Uh, no."
John Schneider
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:44 pm |
|
| * NET Radish * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
Posts: 14442
Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
Want to know more about Wallace? Talk to morgolun, he's met him. And as I recall he wanted to be a QB and that's it.  _________________  Still missing you everyday pal.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jkitsune
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:19 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm
Posts: 1514
|
|
IMO, this is just another example of backup adulation. I've never understood it, but the backup who has a couple good plays is always a future hall of famer.
Until he plays regularly.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8213
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
I doubt it. But nothing we can do about it now.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Verndog
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:54 pm
Posts: 1590
Location: Auburn, Wa
|
|
I think Brian Bosworth could have become another John L Williams.
_________________
"Improvement" can come from who you play-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nsport
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:24 pm |
|
| * NET Sports Handicapper * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am
Posts: 980
|
|
Both were 5'11", 180+, but really? Steve Largent used to commute to practice field in Jim Zorn's old beat up VW Bug. I don't see Seneca ever having the moxy that Largent had.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
tooshort
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:46 pm
Posts: 753
Location: in "The" mouth
|
This should probably be merged with my Bruce Irvin; "Greatest Seahawks receiving TE ever, currently playing wrong position?" thread  _________________  Said Wilson: " before I got back to the tunnel, walking off the field, I got so excited for the next opportunity, next year We have a great football team."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca -> Largent Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:48 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 6952
Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
Nothing is stopping him from wearing 80 so I guess you are right.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: BGHawk, Bigpumpkin, BlueTalon, CEHawk, ferg82, FlyingGreg, Google [Bot], hawkfansteve, IcedHawk, JaiSeaSea, JimmyNightshade, LudwigsDrummer, nitticanuck, oregonhawkfan, PlinytheCenter, seahawks08, seahawksTopGear, Smoke and Beers, Sonichellboy, Speakinhawk68, sturg78, sutz, TDBinOLY, therealjohncarlson, Tical21, tom95, VancitySeahawk, vin.couve12, yeash28 and 101 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
