Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:02 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm
Posts: 1573
Hows that half a title (not even AP) treating UW? Everyone know Miami would have spanked the pups that year. Maybe you all can find another title to make up, where the Boise Tribune named UW champs. Oh and make another statue in honor of a racist coach. Nice touch UW.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:16 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11288
Location: Graham, WA
CPHawk wrote:
Hows that half a title (not even AP) treating UW? Everyone know Miami would have spanked the pups that year. Maybe you all can find another title to make up, where the Boise Tribune named UW champs. Oh and make another statue in honor of a racist coach. Nice touch UW.


boyyy stop

_________________
Image
Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:58 am 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15413
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
CodeWarrior wrote:
How are all those national championships treating the Ducks? I mean, you guys have so many I'm surprised there's still room in the rafters at Autzen!

I can post videos, too! A video the Ducks just... don't have.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLJEwtZMr0Q


Ok Dallas 49er fan. You guys won a title decades ago. Congratulations. I'm surprised that video wasnt in black and white.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:09 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:02 pm
Posts: 565
JSeahawks wrote:
CodeWarrior wrote:
How are all those national championships treating the Ducks? I mean, you guys have so many I'm surprised there's still room in the rafters at Autzen!

I can post videos, too! A video the Ducks just... don't have.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLJEwtZMr0Q


Ok Dallas 49er fan. You guys won a title decades ago. Congratulations. I'm surprised that video wasnt in black and white.


Ha! Calling dawgs a has-been? Please. Oregon is a never was.

_________________
Formerly known as Seahawk425.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 2:55 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm
Posts: 932
And so it goes round and round and round. UW fans closely hold onto their past success, which is something to be proud of, like a child and his blanket. Oregon fans have acted like they are a big time program for almost twenty years, but the majority of that time Oregon fielded lazy teams, with no heart, no discipline and underachieved greatly. Now they truly are the national power with the genius coach they thought they were the past decade.

Per the argument of the last twenty years, there is literally no way Miami beats UW in 1991. None, watched a lot of both teams, and went back over the years and watched the games I could find some more. UW would roll Miami.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:02 pm
Posts: 565
I'll give Oregon credit for improving no doubt. Phil Knight's money buys them the means to win. Respect Chip and the way he goes about his business. As a general assessment I don't care for the fans but what Husky does?

_________________
Formerly known as Seahawk425.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:28 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 1660
Location: Ballard
Is this what you're looking for?
Image
1/2 title or not, I can go look at it any time I want.
Yes, UW would have rolled Miami, just like they did in '94 in Miami.

-SH


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:38 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11288
Location: Graham, WA
lol hold on, is it OU vs. UW week?

_________________
Image
Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:05 am 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 332
I had to laugh at the Vegas line. UW is a 25 point dog. I don't disagree with it though.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:26 am 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6623
Throwdown wrote:
lol hold on, is it OU vs. UW week?


It is indeed. And, for some reason, Phil Knight gets to purchase Oregon at home for this game. I swear 13 out of the last 14 games have been in that ishthole, Oregon.

If the US needed an enema, the hose would go into Autzen.

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:46 am 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15413
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
SEC FAN wrote:
I had to laugh at the Vegas line. UW is a 25 point dog. I don't disagree with it though.


It does seem a bit low doesnt it? My prediction is 54-7. I'm not buying the amazing, new Washington defense. And with UW's offense I cant see them sustaining drives to keep Oregon off the field or scoring many points themselves. If the Huskies were healthy i'd probably say something like 38-28.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:02 am 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6623
JSeahawks wrote:
SEC FAN wrote:
I had to laugh at the Vegas line. UW is a 25 point dog. I don't disagree with it though.


It does seem a bit low doesnt it? My prediction is 54-7. I'm not buying the amazing, new Washington defense. And with UW's offense I cant see them sustaining drives to keep Oregon off the field or scoring many points themselves. If the Huskies were healthy i'd probably say something like 38-28.


C'mon, girl! It's rivalry week. Ask Phil to buy some vowels so you can talk isht! You going to let my enema joke stand, Akili?

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:50 am 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15413
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
pehawk wrote:
JSeahawks wrote:
SEC FAN wrote:
I had to laugh at the Vegas line. UW is a 25 point dog. I don't disagree with it though.


It does seem a bit low doesnt it? My prediction is 54-7. I'm not buying the amazing, new Washington defense. And with UW's offense I cant see them sustaining drives to keep Oregon off the field or scoring many points themselves. If the Huskies were healthy i'd probably say something like 38-28.


C'mon, girl! It's rivalry week. Ask Phil to buy some vowels so you can talk isht! You going to let my enema joke stand, Akili?


I just dont have the heart for it. Talking shit to Husky fans is like talking shit to a handicapped little sister.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:06 am 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6623
Since 2000 the Dawgs have hosted the Ducks only FOUR times. WHY?

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:13 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm
Posts: 1573
pehawk wrote:
Since 2000 the Dawgs have hosted the Ducks only FOUR times. WHY?



For the same reason UW is playing all their home games at the clink this year. Husky stadium sucks donkey balls.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:23 pm 
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: Lacey, WA
CPHawk wrote:
pehawk wrote:
Since 2000 the Dawgs have hosted the Ducks only FOUR times. WHY?



For the same reason UW is playing all their home games at the clink this year. Husky stadium sucks donkey balls.


Obviously you've never been to Husky Stadium.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:48 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15413
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Spounge84 wrote:
CPHawk wrote:

For the same reason UW is playing all their home games at the clink this year. Husky stadium sucks donkey balls.


Obviously you've never been to Husky Stadium.


I was there for every game during Seahawks stadium construction. Great location, crappy stadium. I expect the new Husky stadium to be beautiful though.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:07 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm
Posts: 1573
The track made the visitors section just crap. Unlike Autzen or Clink, where there are no bad seats, Husky stadium had tons of bad seats. I'm actually excited to see the new stadium.

Oh and to answer you question without sarcasm pehawk, the Pac 10 scheduled games. When they went from missing a team yearly to not missing any some teams had to play at locations a couple extra times. UO had to go to WSU a bunch of extra times.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:47 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm
Posts: 1501
JSeahawks wrote:
I just dont have the heart for it. Talking shit to Husky fans is like talking shit to a handicapped little sister.


Every year I hate you for about a week.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:18 pm 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6623
jkitsune wrote:
JSeahawks wrote:
I just dont have the heart for it. Talking shit to Husky fans is like talking shit to a handicapped little sister.


Every year I hate you for about a week.


A week?

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.