Ducks still 2nd. USC 13 OSU 14 Stanford 18 Washington 23 UCLA 25
My power rankings woudl look like this:
Oregon Oregon St USC Arizona State UCLA Washington Stanford Arizona Cal Utah WSU Colorado
_________________
Throwdown
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:45 pm
* NET Baller *
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 11353 Location: Graham, WA
ahh ah muh gawdd lol
_________________ Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
dutchcoug
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:01 pm
NET Starter
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:19 am Posts: 306
Fixed it for you...
Oregon USC Washington Arizona State Oregon St UCLA Arizona Stanford Cal Utah Colorado WSU
CPHawk
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:29 pm
NET Veteran
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm Posts: 1574
UO SC, OS (tie) UA (much more complete team then they are getting credit for. O way better then anything Stanford has this year.) ASU UW SU UCLA UU Cal CU WSU
kearly
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:57 pm
* Mr Random Thought *
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7245
UW doesn't deserve to be ranked. I get that they are 3-1 and just beat the #8, but Stanford had no business being ranked that high and if you actually watch the games it's plainly evident that UW is a disaster on offense.
Good news for Oregon though. Just one more "ranked" team for them to destroy which helps further their case for entry in the title game.
_________________ "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
cesame
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:59 pm
NET Veteran
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:36 pm Posts: 1437
If Oregon goes undefeated they'd get in regardless
SEC FAN
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:11 pm
NET Starter
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:39 pm Posts: 332
cesame wrote:
If Oregon goes undefeated they'd get in regardless
Yep. Florida State looks like they may go undefeated if they can beat Florida. They do get to play at home for that one, but Oregon would have a tougher schedule.
pehawk
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:38 pm
* Report Button *
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6716
kearly wrote:
UW doesn't deserve to be ranked. I get that they are 3-1 and just beat the #8, but Stanford had no business being ranked that high and if you actually watch the games it's plainly evident that UW is a disaster on offense.
Good news for Oregon though. Just one more "ranked" team for them to destroy which helps further their case for entry in the title game.
True, but they deserve it. They win when they're suppose to; and get an upset every year at home. All while running the cleanest BCS program in the country (most likely).
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
CPHawk
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:28 pm
NET Veteran
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm Posts: 1574
FSU, IMO, will get in before Oregon. At this point, UO has to many self inflicted wounds, and at some point a team will take advantage of the generosity of UO. I don't see UO going undefeated, but I see them winning the Pac 12.
My hope is another Rose Bowl this year, then next year with 90% of the team back UO makes a run at a title.
Cadillac
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:43 pm
NET Rookie
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:54 am Posts: 195
Anyone who ranks Utah above 11 hasn't seen them play. I've watched every snap, and lent my presence to half of the games, and I can only describe this team as a community college intramural squad. I'm not sure what that would make Colorado, but one thing is for sure; the Rocky Mountain teams are in over their heads. The states of Utah and Colorado appreciate Larry Scott and the chance he has given us, but these teams would be middling in the MWC/WAC right now.
SmokeyHawk
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
UW doesn't deserve to be ranked. I get that they are 3-1 and just beat the #8, but Stanford had no business being ranked that high and if you actually watch the games it's plainly evident that UW is a disaster on offense.
Good news for Oregon though. Just one more "ranked" team for them to destroy which helps further their case for entry in the title game.
True, but they deserve it. They win when they're suppose to; and get an upset every year at home. All while running the cleanest BCS program in the country (most likely).
That's a little Pollyanna dont you think? I'm not saying they're dirty or anything but I'm sure they're operating in some grey area's just like every other big time college football program, especially now that they have Tosh Lupoi on their staff.
_________________
pehawk
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:16 pm
* Report Button *
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6716
No Jseahawks, I heard the opposite. That the Huskies take the rules TOO literal, play it too safe, etc. It wasn't a veiled shot at your Ducks or anyone else; I dont mask such things.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
JSeahawks
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
No Jseahawks, I heard the opposite. That the Huskies take the rules TOO literal, play it too safe, etc. It wasn't a veiled shot at your Ducks or anyone else; I dont mask such things.
Yea i know and didnt take it like that. I know youre a straight shooter. I just go by the mentality that i dont believe there are any truly clean programs in big time college sports. If they really are trying so hard to be clean, i would recommend trying to bend some rules.
_________________
pehawk
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:22 pm
* Report Button *
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6716
JSeahawks wrote:
pehawk wrote:
No Jseahawks, I heard the opposite. That the Huskies take the rules TOO literal, play it too safe, etc. It wasn't a veiled shot at your Ducks or anyone else; I dont mask such things.
Yea i know and didnt take it like that. I know youre a straight shooter. I just go by the mentality that i dont believe there are any truly clean programs in big time college sports. If they really are trying so hard to be clean, i would recommend trying to bend some rules.
I'm with ya on that. If true, they have to bend a tad to compete with the OSU Beavers of the world (that felt awesome to type). They need to get over the sanctions and potential Slick Rick scares, and play ball.
At the end of the day, the Dawgs cheated AND got a championship to show for it. That's what real programs do (there's the shot).
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
JSeahawks
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:41 pm
* NET Staff Alumni *
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm Posts: 3684 Location: Hagerstown, MD
The Huskies can liberally bend some rules and still be the cleanest program around, just sayin'.
_________________ You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
CPHawk
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:57 pm
NET Veteran
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm Posts: 1574
Back on point, and getting over UW fans made up bs about UO. It seems the only reason the Pac 12 is any good right now is thanks to Lane Kiffin.
Lane Kiffin said six Pac-12 teams in the AP top 25 was "the result of us not nailing recruiting over the last five years." Keep it classy Lane, nothing like always putting your foot in your mouth.
JSeahawks
Post subject: Re: Dawgs in at 23 in AP: And my pac 12 Power rankings
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
