| Author |
Message |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)  Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:46 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9789
|
cboom wrote: Composure, decision making, and the balls thrown all factor into my thoughts. The fact that he's only played one game at the professional level apparently doesn't. _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:54 pm |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11700
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either.
_________________  "Never Say Never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion" - Michael Jordan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
cboom
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:03 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:05 pm
Posts: 34
|
Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:10 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3554
|
cboom wrote: Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials. The Rice PI was not nit picky, far from it. He was actually interfered with twice on that play. _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:13 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1189
Location: Victoria BC
|
|
This has obviously become the cboom personal thread. Lets make it a sticky.
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 581
|
cboom wrote: Lords of Scythia wrote: If you can touch it you can catch it. I'd be happy to throw a few balls for you and see if you can back this up. A guy can't be expected to catch a 100 mile an hour fast ball just because he got his finger tips on it. Wilson had guys open and had a chance to win the game. He choked it away with bad throw after bad throw. That's an old coaching cliche'. It does seem sort of asinine and ridiculous.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 581
|
cboom wrote: Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials. I beg to differ. Wilson drew the fouls. A PI is the same as a catch. He did drive us down the field. This was set up by the PIs on our dbs - refs have this makeup call instinct. Wilson had that one garbage-time pick and no other turnovers. The kid played a solid game. And you're talking about a rookie in his first game....?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:25 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 6646
|
|
At least 66% QB R. ilson's fault. He initiated the play with a poor throw that increased the level of difficulty Edwards had to contend with when attempting to make the catch. A better throw, and corresponding miss by Edwards would bump up his % of 'fault'.
_________________
"Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:33 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 581
|
|
What was the best fight in history? One with Ali I'm guessing.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BASF
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:07 pm
Posts: 1153
|
|
| |
|
|
|
edogg23
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:05 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 316
|
Lords of Scythia wrote: cboom wrote: Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials. I beg to differ. Wilson drew the fouls. A PI is the same as a catch. He did drive us down the field. This was set up by the PIs on our dbs - refs have this makeup call instinct. Wilson had that one garbage-time pick and no other turnovers. The kid played a solid game. And you're talking about a rookie in his first game....? Lateral.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
VHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:44 am
Posts: 2512
Location: Naples, FL
|
|
The only people blaming Wilson on those throws are Seahawk fans.Good WR's make that catch and that is the bottom effin line.I have talked to numerous sports fans and every damn one says the same damn thing......"Braylon should have caught that ball". Colin Cowherd that is always mocking the Seahawks say's that RW is legit and that the WR's let him down and that dude always talkin trash about the Hawks......C'mon man.
_________________
Wolf grey all day every day.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
StaffAmerica74
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:02 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 741
|
|
Dear Hugh Millen,
Welcome to .net ive heard these hate filled rants for over a month now on kjr. Get ready to eat your microphone.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:25 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 581
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AF_Hawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 1340
Location: Marysville, WA
|
cboom wrote: Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all. Sorry to bump such an old thread. Still stand by this statement? _________________  
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:03 am |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16463
Location: Bothell
|
AF_Hawk wrote: cboom wrote: Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all. Sorry to bump such an old thread. Still stand by this statement? Wow. Thanks for the lulz! This thread is even better 3/4ths the way through the year. _________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:06 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6443
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
cboom baby, we're all waiting for you to come back!! Don't be butthurt dude. Man up and admit you were so very, very wrong. It won't hurt. Honestly.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:14 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 2214
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
come back cboom come back.... to error is human, to trash talk dangeruss is deserving of a severe lashing... come get your medicine...
_________________
On to the Next Episode
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Aros
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:34 am |
|
| [[ .NET Godfather ]] |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 5428
Location: Maple Valley, WA
|
|
I like the part when HawksFTW says "This is going in my sig, so we can all make fun of you later." And cboom responds:
"Will you at least be man enough to leave it there when he gets benched?"
LMAO!! You can't make this stuff up!
_________________  "WE ALL WE GOT! WE ALL WE NEED!"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:10 am |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
|
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3554
|
Aros wrote: I like the part when HawksFTW says "This is going in my sig, so we can all make fun of you later." And cboom responds:
"Will you at least be man enough to leave it there when he gets benched?"
LMAO!! You can't make this stuff up!  _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
