| Author |
Message |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)  Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:46 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11206
|
cboom wrote: Composure, decision making, and the balls thrown all factor into my thoughts. The fact that he's only played one game at the professional level apparently doesn't. _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:54 pm |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 17333
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either.
_________________  3elieve
|
|
| |
|
|
|
cboom
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:03 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:05 pm
Posts: 114
|
Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:10 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 4157
|
cboom wrote: Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials. The Rice PI was not nit picky, far from it. He was actually interfered with twice on that play. _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:13 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1444
Location: Victoria BC
|
|
This has obviously become the cboom personal thread. Lets make it a sticky.
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 1239
|
cboom wrote: Lords of Scythia wrote: If you can touch it you can catch it. I'd be happy to throw a few balls for you and see if you can back this up. A guy can't be expected to catch a 100 mile an hour fast ball just because he got his finger tips on it. Wilson had guys open and had a chance to win the game. He choked it away with bad throw after bad throw. That's an old coaching cliche'. It does seem sort of asinine and ridiculous. _________________ CAN THE SEAHAWKS SURVIVE LOSING CLEMONS? http://cover32.com/seahawks/2014/04/16/ ... s-clemons/Follow me on Twitter: @George_OGorman
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 1239
|
cboom wrote: Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials. I beg to differ. Wilson drew the fouls. A PI is the same as a catch. He did drive us down the field. This was set up by the PIs on our dbs - refs have this makeup call instinct. Wilson had that one garbage-time pick and no other turnovers. The kid played a solid game. And you're talking about a rookie in his first game....? _________________ CAN THE SEAHAWKS SURVIVE LOSING CLEMONS? http://cover32.com/seahawks/2014/04/16/ ... s-clemons/Follow me on Twitter: @George_OGorman
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:25 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 8511
|
|
At least 66% QB R. ilson's fault. He initiated the play with a poor throw that increased the level of difficulty Edwards had to contend with when attempting to make the catch. A better throw, and corresponding miss by Edwards would bump up his % of 'fault'.
_________________
"Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
"BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:33 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 1239
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BASF
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:07 pm
Posts: 1425
|
|
| |
|
|
|
edogg23
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:05 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 387
|
Lords of Scythia wrote: cboom wrote: Throwdown wrote: first game ever and he drove 'em down the field to be in position for Baldwin and Edwards to drop game winners don't either. Drove them down field is a bit of a stretch. The ref's helped out a lot with those nit picky PI calls that would not have been called by the real officials. I beg to differ. Wilson drew the fouls. A PI is the same as a catch. He did drive us down the field. This was set up by the PIs on our dbs - refs have this makeup call instinct. Wilson had that one garbage-time pick and no other turnovers. The kid played a solid game. And you're talking about a rookie in his first game....? Lateral.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
VHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:44 am
Posts: 2524
Location: Naples, FL
|
|
The only people blaming Wilson on those throws are Seahawk fans.Good WR's make that catch and that is the bottom effin line.I have talked to numerous sports fans and every damn one says the same damn thing......"Braylon should have caught that ball". Colin Cowherd that is always mocking the Seahawks say's that RW is legit and that the WR's let him down and that dude always talkin trash about the Hawks......C'mon man.
_________________
Wolf grey all day every day.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
StaffAmerica74
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:02 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 760
|
|
Dear Hugh Millen,
Welcome to .net ive heard these hate filled rants for over a month now on kjr. Get ready to eat your microphone.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:25 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 1239
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AF_Hawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 2064
Location: Marysville, WA
|
cboom wrote: Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all. Sorry to bump such an old thread. Still stand by this statement? _________________  
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:03 am |
|
| * Natural Rubbing Action * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17580
Location: The beautiful PNW
|
AF_Hawk wrote: cboom wrote: Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all. Sorry to bump such an old thread. Still stand by this statement? Wow. Thanks for the lulz! This thread is even better 3/4ths the way through the year.
_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:06 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10149
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
cboom baby, we're all waiting for you to come back!! Don't be butthurt dude. Man up and admit you were so very, very wrong. It won't hurt. Honestly.
_________________ From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:14 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 3870
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
come back cboom come back.... to error is human, to trash talk dangeruss is deserving of a severe lashing... come get your medicine...
_________________
World Champs - Sounds good don't it
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Aros
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:34 am |
|
| [[ .NET Godfather ]] |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 7641
Location: Maple Valley, WA
|
|
I like the part when HawksFTW says "This is going in my sig, so we can all make fun of you later." And cboom responds:
"Will you at least be man enough to leave it there when he gets benched?"
LMAO!! You can't make this stuff up!
_________________  "We're about to be legendary." - Richard Sherman to the Seahawks sideline in the 3rd quarter of SBXLVIII
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:10 am |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
|
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 4157
|
Aros wrote: I like the part when HawksFTW says "This is going in my sig, so we can all make fun of you later." And cboom responds:
"Will you at least be man enough to leave it there when he gets benched?"
LMAO!! You can't make this stuff up!  _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rideaducati
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:59 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 1439
|
cboom wrote: Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all. If you've been around long enough to "see them all", maybe you have been around too long and senility is setting in. I say that because just last season Seattle started a much worse QB than Russell Wilson. Russell Wilson has thrown for more touchdowns in 12 games than Tarvaris threw all season. Tell me, if you're a Seahawk fan, that you have less confidence in Russell late in the game down by less than a touchdown than you did with Tarvaris. Russell also has more 4th quarter comeback wins in 12 games than Tarvaris has in his 7th year.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:01 am |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
|
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 4157
|
rideaducati wrote: cboom wrote: Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all. If you've been around long enough to "see them all", maybe you have been around too long and senility is setting in. I say that because just last season Seattle started a much worse QB than Russell Wilson. Russell Wilson has thrown for more touchdowns in 12 games than Tarvaris threw all season. Tell me, if you're a Seahawk fan, that you have less confidence in Russell late in the game down by less than a touchdown than you did with Tarvaris. Russell also has more 4th quarter comeback wins in 12 games than Tarvaris has in his 7th year. cboom hasn't checked in, in months. Good luck getting a response. _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Chukarhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:07 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:14 pm
Posts: 1516
|
|
there is a Cboom on the Seattle times Sehawks board, same guy I asssume
_________________  "God Bless Russell Wilson"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SmokinHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:11 am |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 5582
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
|
|
cboom must have left his home without his helmet on again.
_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro
He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
|
|
| |
|
|
|
samwize77
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:43 am
Posts: 880
|
|
I believe Cboom does have some credentials to back up his statements. He was second in his class at "ESPNS FOOTBALL SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND"....He finished second to a guy named Mike Carey. I wonder what that guy is up to these days?.....oh wait......
_________________
Oh DonkoSpurt We Hardly Knew Ye!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 902
Location: Everett, Wa
|
|
Worst QB. LOL Where Cbuum go?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HansGruber
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:41 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:39 pm
Posts: 1593
|
|
Oh god. I had forgotten this thread. From back just a few weeks ago when most of this board was calling Wilson a bust and screaming for Flynn. Kinda funny to look back now, just 12 weeks later, and just giggle.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MrCarey
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:08 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 1667
|
cboom wrote: Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all. Ahahahahaha, put in Flynn! He's our only hope!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:59 am |
|
| * Natural Rubbing Action * |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17580
Location: The beautiful PNW
|
|
I believe cboom wore out his welcome here shortly after arrival, so those looking for responses won't get any.
_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:04 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 3075
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
HansGruber wrote: Oh god. I had forgotten this thread. From back just a few weeks ago when most of this board was calling Wilson a bust and screaming for Flynn. Kinda funny to look back now, just 12 weeks later, and just giggle. You are the only one that forgot about this thread  - agree that it is funny to bring back up but the "worst qb quote" is classic and we should all be thankful for this contribution before cboom ran off. Lets face it when the Seahawks go to the superbowl within a few years this quote will be in the thread before that weekend........
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkAroundTheClock
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:18 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1290
Location: Olympia
|
|
Oh man! I started reading the thread without noticing the date. When I got to cboom's original post, it all came back to me. I thought, "Wait, is this guy referencing a thread from 3 months ago?!" Then I noticed the date! HA! That was a welcome LOL blast from the past.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:20 am |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
|
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 4157
|
HansGruber wrote: Oh god. I had forgotten this thread. From back just a few weeks ago when most of this board was calling Wilson a bust and screaming for Flynn. Kinda funny to look back now, just 12 weeks later, and just giggle. It was no where near most of the board, just a vocal minority. I believe MOST of the board had enough patience to look past a bad performance or two. _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Starrman44
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 810
Location: Canby, OR
|
|
I missed this thread when it started. You always have a vocal minority that wants to be first to call a guy a bum so that they can be right. Everyone who disagrees is a homer and drinks the kool-aid.
CBoom was pretty funny...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
5280Hawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:01 pm
Posts: 905
|
|
U banned bro?
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:15 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10149
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
HawksFTW wrote: It was no where near most of the board, just a vocal minority. I believe MOST of the board had enough patience to look past a bad performance or two. This. _________________ From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeaTown81
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:26 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 4587
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
For all the ripping cboom has received for this thread, amill87 doesn't come off looking too sharp either.
Let this thread be a lesson to all posters who feel the need to fight reality in an effort to protect their ego and previous statements. You are just leaving yourselves open to looking extremely stupid down the road.
And added props to Hasselbeck. Dude recently admitted the errors of his ways. And in my book comes off looking 1,000 times better than these goons.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando) Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:34 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
|
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 4157
|
SeaTown81 wrote: For all the ripping cboom has received for this thread, amill87 doesn't come off looking too sharp either.
Yeah, he exited pretty quickly when I asked him to list out the worst offensive performances of all time. I have no problem taking a stance, positive or negative, but at least have something to back it up. _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
