I need some Fantasy Help (Championship week)

For all of our NFL Fantasy and gaming enthusiasts. RATING: PG
  • just want to get some of your opinions on who I should start this week.

    Defenses
    San Francisco (vs. SEA)
    or
    Green Bay (vs. CHI)


    RB
    Marshawn (vs. SF) I love Marshawn but im pretty worried to start him vs SF
    or
    Mendenhall (vs. STL)


    WR
    D. Bowe (vs OAK)
    or
    G. Tate (picked him up when Rice went down, hoping for a big game but IDK vs SF)
    or
    D. Baldwin

    what do yall think?
    User avatar
    Lithium
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1913
    Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm


  • Since Forte and Cutler are still out i'd go with Green Bay.

    If youre a seahawks fan you gotta go with Marshawn.

    And i'd go with Bowe. Tate and Baldwin are both capable of having big games, but they're also capable of having really quiet games. I think Bowe brings more consistency.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18609
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • JSeahawks wrote:Since Forte and Cutler are still out i'd go with Green Bay.

    If youre a seahawks fan you gotta go with Marshawn.

    And i'd go with Bowe. Tate and Baldwin are both capable of having big games, but they're also capable of having really quiet games. I think Bowe brings more consistency.


    yeah thats how im leaning right now, and for the same reasons.

    im playing the top scorer in the league though so its gonna be tough.
    User avatar
    Lithium
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1913
    Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm


  • Id start packers defense and marshawn
    Image
    User avatar
    Minne
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1118
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 2:30 pm
    Location: Camano Island


  • Win-win on the defenses. Heart says Seattle's, but gut says Packers'. If we decimated the Bears on the road as bad as we did, just think about what a supercharged Green Bay offense, fired up about losing last week, will do to them. And they're long-time division rivals. I don't think either one will be a terrible choice, but for pure domination, I'd go with Green Bays', as much as it pains me as a Seahawks fan to admit it.

    With RB, you've again got a possible win-win, but not as likely. Marshawn could go on a tear after being shut down some against the Bears, but SF's defense is really good too. Better, in fact. And couple that with the fact that Mendenhall is on a team smarting from a Monday night thrashing, fighting for their division title against the hapless Rams, and you've got a winner there. Add the fact that a crippled Worthlessburger will only add to the run game, and you've got your answer here. Marshawn may well be a great choice for fantasy points this week, but Mendenhall in this case is a better one.

    None of the WR choices are stellar ones, but you work with whatcha got. And it might be a little easier choice to make. I don't think I'd trust any KC receiver, even if it is against Chokeland. All of those teams are right in the thick of a division title slugfest, and it's anyone's game. They've all had great games, and they've all had craptastic games. KC is coming down off the high of beating the previously unbeaten Green Bay Packers, and may have a letdown game. Chokeland is hot then cold. Or more cold then cold lately, but still. Tate and Baldwin aren't guarantees to do anything with Jackson throwing to them against the stiff 49ers defense, but they're probably better than KC's WRs. Tate's been on a considerable upswing here at the end of the year, but Baldwin might rebound from an off game last week and continue his dominance as our leading receiver. It's a push for me between the two of them, but I might go with Tate to continue a late-season surge.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    Les Norton - gone but never forgotten. Rest in blue and green peace, my friend.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18815
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • Seahawk Sailor wrote:Win-win on the defenses. Heart says Seattle's, but gut says Packers'. If we decimated the Bears on the road as bad as we did, just think about what a supercharged Green Bay offense, fired up about losing last week, will do to them. And they're long-time division rivals. I don't think either one will be a terrible choice, but for pure domination, I'd go with Green Bays', as much as it pains me as a Seahawks fan to admit it.

    With RB, you've again got a possible win-win, but not as likely. Marshawn could go on a tear after being shut down some against the Bears, but SF's defense is really good too. Better, in fact. And couple that with the fact that Mendenhall is on a team smarting from a Monday night thrashing, fighting for their division title against the hapless Rams, and you've got a winner there. Add the fact that a crippled Worthlessburger will only add to the run game, and you've got your answer here. Marshawn may well be a great choice for fantasy points this week, but Mendenhall in this case is a better one.

    None of the WR choices are stellar ones, but you work with whatcha got. And it might be a little easier choice to make. I don't think I'd trust any KC receiver, even if it is against Chokeland. All of those teams are right in the thick of a division title slugfest, and it's anyone's game. They've all had great games, and they've all had craptastic games. KC is coming down off the high of beating the previously unbeaten Green Bay Packers, and may have a letdown game. Chokeland is hot then cold. Or more cold then cold lately, but still. Tate and Baldwin aren't guarantees to do anything with Jackson throwing to them against the stiff 49ers defense, but they're probably better than KC's WRs. Tate's been on a considerable upswing here at the end of the year, but Baldwin might rebound from an off game last week and continue his dominance as our leading receiver. It's a push for me between the two of them, but I might go with Tate to continue a late-season surge.


    thanks for the reply.

    I personally think T-Jack and our Offense will be completely shut down vs. SF. I dont see Tate having a big game.
    I think Bowe is way more capable of a big game and Orton was pretty good vs. GB last week.

    I think im gonna sit all my hawks but Lynch. good thing I got Brady and Gronk! they are the only reason I made it this far lol.
    User avatar
    Lithium
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1913
    Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm


  • There any better free agent wide recievers on the wire then golden tate? how many team league? golden tate is more for deep leagues but he does decent
    Image
    User avatar
    Minne
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1118
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 2:30 pm
    Location: Camano Island


  • Hey, nice to see someone else make it to championship round.

    I would start Green Bay defense just because they are playing a team with not a good QB and without prime back in Forte.

    I would also start Lynch just because I have a gut feeling he will score a TD.

    I would also start Bowe cuz you know Oakland can't really cover.
    Image
    User avatar
    MANUNITED23
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1877
    Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:27 pm
    Location: Bay Area, CA


  • Minne wrote:There any better free agent wide recievers on the wire then golden tate? how many team league? golden tate is more for deep leagues but he does decent


    its a 12 team league, and yeah there are some decent WR's, I picked up Torrey Smith today.

    Tate has the most snaps of any seattle WR since Rice went down. So he is Seattle's #1 right now, that and he's my favorite player lol


    MANUNITED23 wrote:Hey, nice to see someone else make it to championship round.

    I would start Green Bay defense just because they are playing a team with not a good QB and without prime back in Forte.

    I would also start Lynch just because I have a gut feeling he will score a TD.

    I would also start Bowe cuz you know Oakland can't really cover.


    yeah thats what Im going with, thanks for the advice guys.
    User avatar
    Lithium
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1913
    Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm




It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:28 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ FANTASY ISLAND ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: Sarlacc83 and 2 guests