Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ FANTASY ISLAND ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:45 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8144
Location: Pasco, WA
Damnit...I was so pumped and jacked to get it in the mail today....but of course it didn't come today so I have to wait till tomorrow.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:47 am 
* NET Guy Fieri Lover *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:00 am
Posts: 2798
Just finished the SP in 2 after-work sessions. It is way better than MW2. It's only like 6 hours, but holy shit there isn't a moment where you're not blown away...to those who have beaten it already...base jumping.


...plus the...eh..."end level", that was pretty sick.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:04 am 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:42 pm
Posts: 3938
Location: Pacific Ocean
6 Hours to beat a game? That's terrible in my eye. I'm not asking for a 20+ hour grind... but to be able to finish a game in one sitting is weaksauce.

Yes, I know all about the multi-player, but I think games should be able to stand as a single-player game. If not, why even bother offering single-player. That's why I think a game like TF2 is better than any other FPS out there. It is and always will be a multiple-player game that requires a true team to succeed.
/end rant.

_________________
"Go for Broke" - 442nd Japanese-American Battalion

Shaun Alexander #37 for the HoF - 119 Games 2176 Att 9429 Yards 4.3 YPC 100 TDs (112 TDs total) 2005 MVP

"YOU POST...TO WIN...thethread." JesterHawk


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:50 am 
* NET Guy Fieri Lover *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:00 am
Posts: 2798
sammyc521 wrote:
6 Hours to beat a game? That's terrible in my eye. I'm not asking for a 20+ hour grind... but to be able to finish a game in one sitting is weaksauce.

Yes, I know all about the multi-player, but I think games should be able to stand as a single-player game. If not, why even bother offering single-player. That's why I think a game like TF2 is better than any other FPS out there. It is and always will be a multiple-player game that requires a true team to succeed.
/end rant.


I feel the same way...all the HL games are closer to 15-20 I think and those are awesome. The story for this one is awesome, but yes, it kinda sucks to pay $60 for something that you finish in 2 days


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:41 am 
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 693
Location: Great Falls, Montana
I've tried this on the pc and I'd have to say the single player campaign was pretty good. I still believe that Battlefield Bad Company 2 is the better game overall though. I can't seem to get enough of that one.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:22 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:08 pm
Posts: 376
I'm getting a little better in multiplayer. I've had the most success using the Famas w/ acog scope attached. For my perks I'm using scavenger, hardened and second chance.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:22 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:56 am
Posts: 221
Location: Closer than you think...
Pretty solid game. I'd give it a solid A. The Combat Training, while generally worthless, is a pretty good way to get the hang of the multiplayer experience.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:40 pm 
* NET Draft Guru *
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: Bellingham, WA
How do you guys rate the multiplayer now that you've had a bit of time with it? Debating the upgrade from MW2 to Black Ops.

_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 10:04 pm 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:38 am
Posts: 1419
Location: San Antonio, TX
I'm debating Ops versus BC2.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:24 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1650
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
definitely Ops...

I liked BC2 over MW2... but nowadays, all I play is Ops...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:04 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8144
Location: Pasco, WA
Ops' multiplayer is much better.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:23 pm 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:38 am
Posts: 1419
Location: San Antonio, TX
So, I went with Bad Company 2. Been playing hardcore mode and having a blast. BC2: Vietnam drops sometime this month, I think. (Just yesterday morning I snuck around a corner and lo and behold was an entire 4-man squad sneaking along right ahead of me. Chuck a grenade, then go all Rambo on their asses as they tried to scatter. Bwahahaha...)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:25 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 943
Bad Company 2 is awesome- it seems more tactical (not very tactical, but at least MORE tactical), more in line with Ghost Recon, as opposed to Call of Duty. That's one of the reasons I like it. People can complain about "camping" all they want, but really, it's a war game- who is really going to go running around in the middle of the road? Haha... and there's nothing quite like blowing through most of the environment- blowing buildings to the ground never gets old.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:43 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:38 am
Posts: 1419
Location: San Antonio, TX
I tend to like running Recon. Throw out some motion sensors, skulk around. I just finished a round with 7 destroyed vehicles, haha. If you find a good sniper's nest, yeah, I guess one could be accused of camping, but really... once they get a bead on your location you can get hosed pretty fast.

Love the destructible everything. See some dude sneak into a building, punch an RPG through the wall...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:47 am 
* NET Draft Guru *
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: Bellingham, WA
I went with BC2, absolutely loving it so far. Though sometimes my team/squad frustrates me so badly. Nothing like playing rush with 10 snipers and 1 guy defending each objective.

_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 12:43 pm 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:38 am
Posts: 1419
Location: San Antonio, TX
Snohomie wrote:
I went with BC2, absolutely loving it so far. Though sometimes my team/squad frustrates me so badly. Nothing like playing rush with 10 snipers and 1 guy defending each objective.


Hey, Kyle. Catch me online, sometime (I think I still see you logging in occasionally), and we'll shoot at one another.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:10 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 1063
Location: Camano Island
anyone play on 360 regularly?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:46 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1650
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
almost every night... late late late night though... like 4am


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:42 pm
Posts: 3938
Location: Pacific Ocean
Feeling the itch to buy a shooter... Black Ops sounds like more of the same COD-online; I'm intrigued by Bad Company 2.

_________________
"Go for Broke" - 442nd Japanese-American Battalion

Shaun Alexander #37 for the HoF - 119 Games 2176 Att 9429 Yards 4.3 YPC 100 TDs (112 TDs total) 2005 MVP

"YOU POST...TO WIN...thethread." JesterHawk


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 12:38 pm 
* NET Draft Guru *
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: Bellingham, WA
Get it Sammy!

BC2 is a blast. It really sucks early on before you start getting good weapons and such, but I'm only level 12 or 13 and I've unlocked some quality weapons, last couple of nights I've been top-3 (of 20+) in room. Plus, you can just follow my strategy and pick up the kits (weapons and items) from dead people on the ground til you get good guns. FWIW, the first couple of pistols are actually legit.

Very team-oriented. Which is usually good, sometimes maddening when the entire room decides to go (recon) sniper and nobody worries about the objectives, but it's not that bad a problem usually.

(Trav - I swear, I haven't seen you logged in once on BC2. Send me a message if you see me online, I'm bad about checking that sort of thing but I'll keep my eyes peeled and we can blow stuff up!)

_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ FANTASY ISLAND ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.