Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » NET NATION COMMUNITY CENTER » [ THE ARCHIVES ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 374 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 19  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:20 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:40 pm
Posts: 159
I guess im not sure why the focus is on JUST Hasslebeck? I saw so much garbage plays and costly penalties that it made me sick.

I mean seriously, the team self destructed on so many levels that it was embarressing.

I am not saying that he DIDNT play poorly, I'm just saying that its one area in a long list of problem areas for this team today.

_________________
Image

"Am I going MAD, or did the word "think" escape your lips? You were not hired for your brains, you hippopotamic land mass."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:21 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:56 pm
Posts: 1092
Location: Denver, Colorado
Zowert wrote:
MeanBlueGreen wrote:
Mot sure why he is obsessed with the play down the sideline. Very few throws over the middle and, missed a critical throw late in the 3rd that would have been a difference maker - guy was open by at least 5 years. Bummer. I'm a big Hass fan but watching him live, I have to question his reads on the receivers. Opening drive looked great until he threw the pick. Went downhill from there.


Its not that Hass is obsessed with those plays, those were the cards he was delt. Hass isnt necessarily allowed to call audibles like he used to under Holmgren. He gets the play calls and tries to execute them, that's all he can do. Most of the completions Hass made were up the middle anyway, so I dont know what youre talking about.


I'm talking about the fact that the majority of Matt's throws are to the sidelines on either swing passes or fade routes. I don't know what game you were watching today, but the one I saw today had him constantly challenging Brian Dawkins for some reason.

John Carlson was not his only choice today. In a 3 or 4 WR set, you have more than 1 choice yet it seemed he kept trying to go to Carlson.

_________________
My Tapatalk for Ipad is bigger than yours. Size matters.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:22 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 862
kidhawk wrote:
If you want to look objectively at hasselbeck, you have to do the same with Whitehurst and from what I've seen he's not the answer today, tomorrow, next year or ever. We wasted a pick on him and we'll still be looking for our qb of the future next year and the year after until someone figures this out. Hasselbeck is our only option at winning now.


How do you know this about Whitehurst without ever seeing him in a regular season situation? If you want to compare Whitehurst with Hasselbeck you put them under center with the same supporting cast. That's not something that's been done to this point.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1718
Location: Seattle
Stiletto wrote:
I guess im not sure why the focus is on JUST Hasslebeck? I saw so much garbage plays and costly penalties that it made me sick.

I mean seriously, the team self destructed on so many levels that it was embarressing.

I am not saying that he DIDNT play poorly, I'm just saying that its one area in a long list of problem areas for this team today.


THANK YOU! Where is the thread on how bad the defense played? They let the Broncos march right down the field on nearly every drive. There were some game changing penalties from the O-line. A bad fumble by a rookie and bone head plays from Curry. But nooooo, Hass gets the heat.

_________________
~ The Stache'


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:23 pm 
Zowert wrote:
warner28 wrote:
Some of us have been saying it, including last week, I gave him props but mostly because he did not screw things up last week, he did nothing special last week, anytime he has been tasked with picking the team up over the last couple years he has failed.

IMO, today was closer to Hass playing like Hass but even if last week is Hass, its still no one that is going to win you a playoff game.


He did NOTHING special last week? LOL! Were you even watching the game?

18/23 170 yards, 2 TD's and 1 rushing TD (1 int)

Hass had the best passer rating in week 1. Come on bro, you're just being a little negative.



He controlled the game, I did not say different. That was what he was asked to do and he did it, that is why I gave him props last year.

Against SF he was not asked to make the difficult throw, it was the defense (not him) that kept Seattle in the game and it was the defense that was the game changer.

As I said he had a good game, it was not a great game, today a good game probably would have been enough (and is about all he is capable of nowadays IMO) but he had a bad game instead.

Today when the team really needed a Pro Bowl performance he took a dump.


Top 
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:23 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:37 pm
Posts: 429
endzorn wrote:

I love the guy, always will...but when I watch him play it is painfully obvious that he is not the answer. At some point we need to find out what we have in Whitehurst.



Ruskell was an idiot for not getting us a future QB and letting him sit and learn while Hass plays out his contract. Green Bay, San Diego and Philly did this with really good QB's on their roster. We need to find out if CBJ is the guy going forward or if we need to draft a QB high in the upcoming draft. Hass' days are numbered here. His best attribute, his decision making, is not even very good anymore. Like you said, love the guy for what he has done, but it's time to move on. We aren't going anywhere with him this year and he doesn't deserve a new contract. Gotta find out if CBJ is the guy for this team and Bates offense.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:24 pm 
Zowert wrote:

Yes you are. THis whole thread is about how bad Matt sucks. I don't see an Aaron Curry, Walter Thurmond, or Seahawks defense thread.



Really? They have been ALL OVER THE PLACE. Want me to link them for you?

Aaron Curry is right under this one, the defense was all over the game day board.

Of course they are here, we have multiple threads. There is 1 Matt thread and dozens of other ones covering the very things you claim we aren't talking about, seriously, look around.


Last edited by MARTYREDwarner on Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:25 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1718
Location: Seattle
MeanBlueGreen wrote:
Zowert wrote:
MeanBlueGreen wrote:
Mot sure why he is obsessed with the play down the sideline. Very few throws over the middle and, missed a critical throw late in the 3rd that would have been a difference maker - guy was open by at least 5 years. Bummer. I'm a big Hass fan but watching him live, I have to question his reads on the receivers. Opening drive looked great until he threw the pick. Went downhill from there.


Its not that Hass is obsessed with those plays, those were the cards he was delt. Hass isnt necessarily allowed to call audibles like he used to under Holmgren. He gets the play calls and tries to execute them, that's all he can do. Most of the completions Hass made were up the middle anyway, so I dont know what youre talking about.


I'm talking about the fact that the majority of Matt's throws are to the sidelines on either swing passes or fade routes. I don't know what game you were watching today, but the one I saw today had him constantly challenging Brian Dawkins for some reason.


His TD pass, was up the middle. Two of his Branch passes, up the middle. 4/5 of Carlson's receptions were up the middle and William's sole catch, was towards the middle.

_________________
~ The Stache'


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:27 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1718
Location: Seattle
warner28 wrote:
Zowert wrote:

Yes you are. THis whole thread is about how bad Matt sucks. I don't see an Aaron Curry, Walter Thurmond, or Seahawks defense thread.



Really? They have been ALL OVER THE PLACE. Want me to link them for you?

Aaron Curry is right under this one, the defense was all over the game day board.

Of course they are here, we have multiple threads.


Yeah in the game day thread, of course. But not in the general thread.

_________________
~ The Stache'


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:29 pm 
Zowert wrote:
warner28 wrote:
Zowert wrote:

Yes you are. THis whole thread is about how bad Matt sucks. I don't see an Aaron Curry, Walter Thurmond, or Seahawks defense thread.



Really? They have been ALL OVER THE PLACE. Want me to link them for you?

Aaron Curry is right under this one, the defense was all over the game day board.

Of course they are here, we have multiple threads.


Yeah in the game day thread, of course. But not in the general thread.



Yes there is, several of them.

Look around man, there is a thread about defense, Curry, everything but Thurmond (whom is a rookie and frankly I expect mistakes). Everything else is all over the place, look around.


Top 
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:29 pm 
US Navy ET Nuc
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 3061
Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet
Zowert, my man. It does no good to use facts on the haters. They gonna hate.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:31 pm 
GeekHawk wrote:
Zowert, my man. It does no good to use facts on the haters. They gonna hate.



Okay, so you agree that Matt is the only one getting the blame then? Ignoring the FACT (you like facts) that there are plenty of threads questioning the defense, the coaching, Curry, and pretty much everything else on the main board.

But yeah, we are the one's singling Matt out, okay :roll:


Matt is the leader, he is the veteran, he is the CAPTAIN, he gets more credit and more blame, its how it works but he is NOT being singled out as Zowart claims. Its simply not happening.


Top 
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:31 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1718
Location: Seattle
warner28 wrote:
Zowert wrote:
warner28 wrote:
Some of us have been saying it, including last week, I gave him props but mostly because he did not screw things up last week, he did nothing special last week, anytime he has been tasked with picking the team up over the last couple years he has failed.

IMO, today was closer to Hass playing like Hass but even if last week is Hass, its still no one that is going to win you a playoff game.


He did NOTHING special last week? LOL! Were you even watching the game?

18/23 170 yards, 2 TD's and 1 rushing TD (1 int)

Hass had the best passer rating in week 1. Come on bro, you're just being a little negative.



He controlled the game, I did not say different. That was what he was asked to do and he did it, that is why I gave him props last year.

Against SF he was not asked to make the difficult throw, it was the defense (not him) that kept Seattle in the game and it was the defense that was the game changer.

As I said he had a good game, it was not a great game, today a good game probably would have been enough (and is about all he is capable of nowadays IMO) but he had a bad game instead.

Today when the team really needed a Pro Bowl performance he took a dump.


No matter what I say you're going to do your best to discredit Hass. You love to argue.

Your point was that Hass did nothing special in the game against the 49ers....... NOTHING? Really? It was his rushing TD that gave the Hawks momentum. He was responsible for 21 points in that game. If scoring the majority of points and leading a team to victory is "nothing special" then what is special to you?

_________________
~ The Stache'


Last edited by Zowert on Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:33 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:58 pm
Posts: 1165
Location: Boise
He wasn't good enough.. period.. why the debate? Hass himself said so.. geez I know some of are in love with him but the title of the thread has "objective" in it.. Get the point?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:34 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1718
Location: Seattle
warner28 wrote:
GeekHawk wrote:
Zowert, my man. It does no good to use facts on the haters. They gonna hate.



Okay, so you agree that Matt is the only one getting the blame then? Ignoring the FACT (you like facts) that there are plenty of threads questioning the defense, the coaching, Curry, and pretty much everything else on the main board.

But yeah, we are the one's singling Matt out, okay :roll:


Matt is the leader, he is the veteran, he is the CAPTAIN, he gets more credit and more blame, its how it works but he is NOT being singled out as Zowart claims. Its simply not happening.


Uhmmm yeah! LOL! Hass has a bad game and the haters come out to play. They're silent when he plays well. Why is there no Walter Thurmond thread in the general discussion forum? It was his fumble that turned the momentum to the Broncos.

_________________
~ The Stache'


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:34 pm 
Zowert wrote:

No matter what I say you're going to do your best to discredit Hass. You love to argue.

Your point was that Hass did nothing special in the game against the 49ers....... NOTHING? Really? It was his rushing TD that gave the Hawks momentum. He was responsible for 21 points in that game.



I gave him credit for that game, I believe the defense did more than him in San Francisco but I gave him credit for that game, he played a good game.

It was not a Pro Bowl performance IMO, I stand by that. But if you want to say it was a great performance and he won the game last week, fine. You win.

Think what you want to think about me with regards to Hass but no one is singling him out.

I am much more interested in your claim that we are singling him out because that is BS and you know it.


Top 
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:34 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:24 am
Posts: 2676
Zowert wrote:
Your point was that Hass did nothing special in the game against the 49ers....... NOTHING? Really? It was his rushing TD that gave the Hawks momentum. He was responsible for 21 points in that game.


Hmm, so when Hass does good he gets credit, but when he sucks its the team's fault. I smell a double standard.

_________________
I hate Tim Ruskell.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:35 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:58 pm
Posts: 1165
Location: Boise
God this is pathetic.. Haters are people that want more out of the pro bowl QB? come on.. no one is defending Thurmond.. He was garbage too.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:35 pm 
US Navy ET Nuc
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 3061
Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet
warner28 wrote:
Zowert wrote:
warner28 wrote:
Really? They have been ALL OVER THE PLACE. Want me to link them for you?

Aaron Curry is right under this one, the defense was all over the game day board.

Of course they are here, we have multiple threads.


Yeah in the game day thread, of course. But not in the general thread.


You promised that you would have me on 'ignore'. I was in Bend the last couple of days, and purposely didn't let you know.


Yes there is, several of them.

Look around man, there is a thread about defense, Curry, everything but Thurmond (whom is a rookie and frankly I expect mistakes). Everything else is all over the place, look around.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Objective look at Hasselbeck
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:37 pm 
Zowert wrote:
warner28 wrote:
GeekHawk wrote:
Zowert, my man. It does no good to use facts on the haters. They gonna hate.



Okay, so you agree that Matt is the only one getting the blame then? Ignoring the FACT (you like facts) that there are plenty of threads questioning the defense, the coaching, Curry, and pretty much everything else on the main board.

But yeah, we are the one's singling Matt out, okay :roll:


Matt is the leader, he is the veteran, he is the CAPTAIN, he gets more credit and more blame, its how it works but he is NOT being singled out as Zowart claims. Its simply not happening.


Uhmmm yeah! LOL! Hass has a bad game and the haters come out to play. They're silent when he plays well. Why is there no Walter Thurmond thread in the general discussion forum? It was his fumble that turned the momentum to the Broncos.



Because Thurmond is a ROOKIE day 2 draft pick whom made 1 mistake in his 2nd game of his career, Matt on the otherhand is a veteran who is the CAPTAIN of the team and made multiple mistakes today.

Is that a double standard? Probably but a fair one.

When Thurmond is in his 10th year as a Seahawk and a team captain and fumbles a punt return I expect a thread about it.


Top 
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 374 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 19  Next

Board index » NET NATION COMMUNITY CENTER » [ THE ARCHIVES ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.