| Author |
Message |
|
TripHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE.  Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:22 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 463
|
Trrrroy wrote:
Man, we hosed those stupid San Diego nit-wits. That hair is worth a late first rounder at least.
Exactly. I mean, look who our new coach is now. Hollywood Pete Carroll took one look at Hass and decided we needed an upgrade!
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
hawkcrazzed
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:23 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:55 am
Posts: 857
Location: Toronto Canada
|
|
OMG this guy has hair he must be a good Qb jk. but he is a big guy and prob can take some shots so for a punching bag till they get it right ok but way to much to give up
_________________
God Bless America and God Bless the SEATTLE SEAHAWKS - TEZ
|
|
| |
|
|
|
twisted_steel2
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:41 am
Posts: 3720
Location: South End
|
woofu wrote: Mass hysteria, dogs and cats living together, real old testament stuff,,,,,,  Hahaha, when I read that I heard Bill Murray's voice. Too funny I guess I'll take a wait and see approach. If he plays well, good trade, if not... well it wasn't. It's all up to Whitehurst to live up to it. We have no idea if it was a good value or not at this point because we are paying for his potential. Let's see what happens.
_________________
You're the new Oakland Raiders; class-less and dirty (with trash-talking players, and an unapologetic head coach), no respect for the game, with a stadium filled with obnoxious/rude fans dressed up in corny Halloween costumes/flare. -49er fan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
woofu
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:11 am
Posts: 574
|
|
Hey, twice a year your girlfriends will want to watch the AZ game with you.
I can hear the girl talk now,,, "who's cuter,, Matt L. or Charlie?"
_________________
I like the player and I want to bring him in,,
,,just show me the Starfax.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MysterMatt
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:23 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:12 am
Posts: 5987
|
jerseyhawk wrote: Well i hate saying i told you so......but now all you people who said getting whitehurst wouldn;t be a big deal well i hope your happy......that 40th pick could of got us Marshall maybe and now we get a third stringer who never played in one game as a pro yet and we give up next year's third ..........so i believe my post was perfect .... worse not better....god i hope he pans out or we dropped the ball on this one ..........well welcome aboard Whitehurst you better do good really fast or i'll be showing you ur exit just as quick........  Sorry, but this post is dumb. How do you know we would have gotten Marshall for our #40? I'd tell you to go pleasure yourself, but you already are.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nanomoz
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:24 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4204
Location: UT
|
AbsolutNET wrote: This is less than we gave up for Hass, no? We moved from 10 to 17 in the first round and got a 7th for Hasselbeck. So, it's probably comparable on the point chart. However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know.
_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:24 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9705
|
Shadowhawk wrote: One thing about Whitehurst: he's a tough SOB. I remember the first preseason game in San Diego last year when the Chargers had one last chance to drive down and win the game. The Hawks were blitzing on every play and Whitehurst kept getting the crap beat out of him every single time he dropped back to pass. But he'd get back up and call another play like nothing had happened. Looked pretty good on that drive, though of course it was against our 3rd stringers.
I don't mind that we traded for him but despise the fact that we dropped 20 spots in the second round and traded next year's 3rd. I've never been a fan of Carroll and Schneider and so far they are doin nothing to change my opinion. That's the only part of your post that I saw. _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SundayNiteBlackout
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:24 pm |
|
| National Guard 09-Present |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1036
Location: Seattle, WA
|
nanomoz wrote: Whitehurst looks like the offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus and a Baldwin brother. With a dash of Viggo Mortenson for good measure. _________________ 80% of Planet Earth is covered by water.....The rest is covered by EARL THOMAS!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nanomoz
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:25 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4204
Location: UT
|
SundayNiteBlackout wrote: nanomoz wrote: Whitehurst looks like the offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus and a Baldwin brother. With a dash of Viggo Mortenson for good measure. Touche'.
_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DrinkinTheLimerade
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:25 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:52 am
Posts: 102
Location: Yelm, WA
|
|
The only thing that was going to make a first round pick for Marshall even somewhat palatable was that we still had that number 40 pick so close to the first round, now that is gone. Who is Whitehurst going to throw too? Housh will be doubled, Branch will be broken and Deon needs more game experience. If we keep this same horrendous line even Carlson is going to be gone as a target as well because he'll be sitting back trying to help keep the QB upright.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AbsolutNET
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:25 pm |
|
| * NET X's & O's Guru * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 6793
Location: PNW
|
nanomoz wrote: AbsolutNET wrote: This is less than we gave up for Hass, no? We moved from 10 to 17 in the first round and got a 7th for Hasselbeck. So, it's probably comparable on the point chart. However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know. I thought we gave up a 3rd? _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fox0r
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:26 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 1850
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
|
Now San Diego can move to pick up Jahvid Best like they wanted. I almost feel like this is a big "FU" from Pete Carroll for WA State taking Sark and ruining his year this past year and now he's out to stick it to the state's most beloved team.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yoonhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:27 pm |
|
| * NET Attorney * |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:58 am
Posts: 624
Location: Bellevue, WA
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdlemnigJ-sGranted, it's from his college days, but he seems to have good mobility for his size and a pretty quick release. I'm not a fan of the move, but i'll remain hopeful that he turns out to be really good. Can any of our resident scouts provide better analysis of his game?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
woofu
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:11 am
Posts: 574
|
|
Marshall for #60??
_________________
I like the player and I want to bring him in,,
,,just show me the Starfax.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nanomoz
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:28 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4204
Location: UT
|
AbsolutNET wrote: nanomoz wrote: AbsolutNET wrote: This is less than we gave up for Hass, no? We moved from 10 to 17 in the first round and got a 7th for Hasselbeck. So, it's probably comparable on the point chart. However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know. I thought we gave up a 3rd? Oh, ya, you're right. My bad. Hass was probably more expensive then. However, if we had the option of moving back from 6 to 17, I'd like that better than 40-60.
_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OneLofaTatupu
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:29 pm |
|
| * NET Shrink * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:04 pm
Posts: 1513
Location: Seattle, WA
|
MysterMatt wrote:
4) If Locker or some other true elite QB is available to us in the 2011 draft, we can still take him because we aren't totally married to Whitehurst.
and we might even be in position to take Locker, because we'll probably suck it up mightily again this year.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DynoHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 517
|
nanomoz wrote: SundayNiteBlackout wrote: nanomoz wrote: Whitehurst looks like the offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus and a Baldwin brother. With a dash of Viggo Mortenson for good measure. Touche'. Don't know if ya'll watch survivor, but he kinda has that younger brother of Coach the Dragon Slayer vibe going. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MysterMatt
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:31 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:12 am
Posts: 5987
|
|
Not getting Marshall isn't really the end of the world, and who knows? Maybe on draft day Denver will realize the #60 is the best offer they can get. Anyways, having the 6 and the 14 gives us a ton of flexibility, so I'm just not going to panic for now.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:31 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7706
|
nanomoz wrote: However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know. You know, 'SC to San Diego is really not that far. Maybe Pete Carroll saw more of Whitehurst than we can ever know. All I know for sure is, Whitehurst is apparently now a Seahawk. That means he's got my 100% support. And really, all we gave up was next year's 3rd? I don't have that much of a problem with it. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6183
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
AbsolutNET wrote: nanomoz wrote: AbsolutNET wrote: This is less than we gave up for Hass, no? We moved from 10 to 17 in the first round and got a 7th for Hasselbeck. So, it's probably comparable on the point chart. However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know. I thought we gave up a 3rd? We did. We moved down from 10 to 17 and gave up a 3rd. Based on the value chart, we gave up the #33 pick for Hass. _________________  Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
