Trrrroy wrote:
Man, we hosed those stupid San Diego nit-wits. That hair is worth a late first rounder at least.
Exactly. I mean, look who our new coach is now. Hollywood Pete Carroll took one look at Hass and decided we needed an upgrade!
Trrrroy wrote:
Man, we hosed those stupid San Diego nit-wits. That hair is worth a late first rounder at least.
woofu wrote:Mass hysteria, dogs and cats living together, real old testament stuff,,,,,,
jerseyhawk wrote:Well i hate saying i told you so......but now all you people who said getting whitehurst wouldn;t be a big deal well i hope your happy......that 40th pick could of got us Marshall maybe and now we get a third stringer who never played in one game as a pro yet and we give up next year's third ..........so i believe my post was perfect .... worse not better....god i hope he pans out or we dropped the ball on this one ..........well welcome aboard Whitehurst you better do good really fast or i'll be showing you ur exit just as quick........
AbsolutNET wrote:This is less than we gave up for Hass, no?
Shadowhawk wrote:One thing about Whitehurst: he's a tough SOB. I remember the first preseason game in San Diego last year when the Chargers had one last chance to drive down and win the game. The Hawks were blitzing on every play and Whitehurst kept getting the crap beat out of him every single time he dropped back to pass. But he'd get back up and call another play like nothing had happened. Looked pretty good on that drive, though of course it was against our 3rd stringers.
I don't mind that we traded for him but despise the fact that we dropped 20 spots in the second round and traded next year's 3rd. I've never been a fan of Carroll and Schneider and so far they are doin nothing to change my opinion.
nanomoz wrote:Whitehurst looks like the offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus and a Baldwin brother.
SundayNiteBlackout wrote:nanomoz wrote:Whitehurst looks like the offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus and a Baldwin brother.
With a dash of Viggo Mortenson for good measure.
nanomoz wrote:AbsolutNET wrote:This is less than we gave up for Hass, no?
We moved from 10 to 17 in the first round and got a 7th for Hasselbeck. So, it's probably comparable on the point chart.
However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know.
AbsolutNET wrote:nanomoz wrote:AbsolutNET wrote:This is less than we gave up for Hass, no?
We moved from 10 to 17 in the first round and got a 7th for Hasselbeck. So, it's probably comparable on the point chart.
However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know.
I thought we gave up a 3rd?
MysterMatt wrote:
4) If Locker or some other true elite QB is available to us in the 2011 draft, we can still take him because we aren't totally married to Whitehurst.
nanomoz wrote:SundayNiteBlackout wrote:nanomoz wrote:Whitehurst looks like the offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus and a Baldwin brother.
With a dash of Viggo Mortenson for good measure.
Touche'.
nanomoz wrote:However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know.
AbsolutNET wrote:nanomoz wrote:AbsolutNET wrote:This is less than we gave up for Hass, no?
We moved from 10 to 17 in the first round and got a 7th for Hasselbeck. So, it's probably comparable on the point chart.
However: our coach and GM at the time watched Hasselbeck practice for at least a year and had pretty huge intel on him. What can our staff really know about Whitehurst? I guess we can't know.
I thought we gave up a 3rd?
SundayNiteBlackout wrote:Blitzer88 wrote:My buddy just called me and said that Brock Huard is just going off about this deal.....
He thinks it's good or bad?
SmokinHawk wrote:Well.. He certainly looks the part. 27 isn't that old for a QB. I have a feeling we might be pleasantly surprised here, folks. He's big AND mobile. Great combination.
(from Seahawks Draft Blog)
volsunghawk wrote:We did. We moved down from 10 to 17 and gave up a 3rd. Based on the value chart, we gave up the #33 pick for Hass.
nanomoz wrote:Oh, ya, you're right. My bad. Hass was probably more expensive then.
However, if we had the option of moving back from 6 to 17, I'd like that better than 40-60.
nanomoz wrote:volsunghawk wrote:We did. We moved down from 10 to 17 and gave up a 3rd. Based on the value chart, we gave up the #33 pick for Hass.
Indeed. I corrected, ^above^, but this thread's like wild fire.
Moving from 40 to 60 in this draft seems huge to me. Really huge. I loved that high 2nd round pick--at 60, guys like Lamarr Houston, Branond Ghee and Chad Jones are likely gone.
jerseyhawk wrote: and second i don;t need to pleasure myself your girlfriend took care of me earlier today , could you plese tell her i want my money back...........
MontanaHawk05 wrote:nanomoz wrote:volsunghawk wrote:We did. We moved down from 10 to 17 and gave up a 3rd. Based on the value chart, we gave up the #33 pick for Hass.
Indeed. I corrected, ^above^, but this thread's like wild fire.
Moving from 40 to 60 in this draft seems huge to me. Really huge. I loved that high 2nd round pick--at 60, guys like Lamarr Houston, Branond Ghee and Chad Jones are likely gone.
...Damien Williams, Arrelious Benn, Jermaine Gresham, Brandon Lafell, Jahvid Best, Ryan Matthews...
nanomoz wrote:MontanaHawk05 wrote:nanomoz wrote:
Indeed. I corrected, ^above^, but this thread's like wild fire.
Moving from 40 to 60 in this draft seems huge to me. Really huge. I loved that high 2nd round pick--at 60, guys like Lamarr Houston, Branond Ghee and Chad Jones are likely gone.
...Damien Williams, Arrelious Benn, Jermaine Gresham, Brandon Lafell, Jahvid Best, Ryan Matthews...
Were you adding to my list, or naming guys that will be there at 60? I can't tell.
seattlesetters wrote:I'm aslo glad we probably won't be drafting Jimmy Clausen.
Blitzer88 wrote:SundayNiteBlackout wrote:Blitzer88 wrote:My buddy just called me and said that Brock Huard is just going off about this deal.....
He thinks it's good or bad?
I believe he sees it as bad...
HawkFan72 wrote:Guys like Hardesty are looking a lot better for the hawks now that we are at 60.
bestfightstory wrote:Okay. Now let's trade him to Denver for Marshall.
DynoHawk wrote:
Don't know if ya'll watch survivor, but he kinda has that younger brother of Coach the Dragon Slayer vibe going.
It is currently Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:12 pm