
(from Seahawks Draft Blog)
drdiags wrote: I dread what the Marshall deal will end up looking like.
Mckinja wrote:I wonder if this could be a sign that we're looking to trade back in the 1st since apparently we've given up on getting Bradford or Clausen with the 6?
Mckinja wrote:I wonder if this could be a sign that we're looking to trade back in the 1st since apparently we've given up on getting Bradford or Clausen with the 6?
MontanaHawk05 wrote:nanomoz wrote:The more I think about it, the more I think we've been utterly hosed.
Man, that's expensive as hell. Wow. Dropping from 40 to 60 seems huge if we were going to wait for an OT or a safety.
:vomit:
Or a DT.
Our offseason position is getting worse all the time.
bighawk wrote:It is only 2 years to make sure he is as good as they think and if he is he will get a new deal. I love the trade because they are gonna trade Rob Sims for another draft choice.
razor150 wrote:What a rip off. I'm sorry, but it is. We get a 7th for Wallace next year, a guy who while not great has actual game experience and is a decent game manager. Then we trade this much for a guy he hasn't even played a down? This team is buying high and selling low.
Snohomie wrote:Man, most of these moves look really suspect.
I really hope Carroll and Co. know what they're doing. I'm willing to give them a shot, see how this all looks on the field... But these moves are head scratchers.
Trrrroy wrote:Look at the bright side, we'll be getting tons of trade offers.
Of course, they'll all be expecting to hose us.
gonzhawk wrote:could someone help me understand how a third next year is considered like trading a 4th, or however you say it?
gonzhawk wrote:could someone help me understand how a third next year is considered like trading a 4th, or however you say it?
nanomoz wrote:The more I think about it, the more I think we've been utterly hosed.
Man, that's expensive as hell. Wow. Dropping from 40 to 60 seems huge if we were going to wait for an OT or a safety.
:vomit:
HawkFan72 wrote:I am so confused. We are creating a team full of backups and paying heavily to do it.
Blitzer88 wrote:My buddy just called me and said that Brock Huard is just going off about this deal.....
gonzhawk wrote:could someone help me understand how a third next year is considered like trading a 4th, or however you say it?
gonzhawk wrote:could someone help me understand how a third next year is considered like trading a 4th, or however you say it?
Blitzer88 wrote:My buddy just called me and said that Brock Huard is just going off about this deal.....
SmokinHawk wrote:Well.. He certainly looks the part. 27 isn't that old for a QB. I have a feeling we might be pleasantly surprised here, folks. He's big AND mobile. Great combination.
(from Seahawks Draft Blog)
SmokinHawk wrote:Well.. He certainly looks the part. 27 isn't that old for a QB. I have a feeling we might be pleasantly surprised here, folks. He's big AND mobile. Great combination.
(from Seahawks Draft Blog)
TheHawkster wrote:gonzhawk wrote:could someone help me understand how a third next year is considered like trading a 4th, or however you say it?
If you cant use it now, its considered devalued.
SeaTown81 wrote:Oh, and whoever started the rumor about Julius Jones being involved in the deal. I hate you.
woofu wrote:Mass hysteria, dogs and cats living together, real old testament stuff,,,,,,
It is currently Sun Apr 22, 2018 4:29 pm