| Author |
Message |
|
Snohomie
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE.  Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:59 pm |
|
| * NET Draft Guru * |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3514
Location: Bellingham, WA
|
|
Man, most of these moves look really suspect.
I really hope Carroll and Co. know what they're doing. I'm willing to give them a shot, see how this all looks on the field... But these moves are head scratchers.
_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
OneLofaTatupu
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:59 pm |
|
| * NET Shrink * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:04 pm
Posts: 1513
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
| |
|
|
|
the ditch
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:00 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:05 am
Posts: 1477
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Trrrroy wrote: the ditch wrote: Agreed with everyone, way too much compensation, what were they thinking. They were probably thinking that Hass sucks, and Whitehurst has the ability to be a starter. I hope they're right, at least about Whitehurst. Fair enough. I guess we'll find out if he has the ability to be a starter or not.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RodeoChihuahua
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:01 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:57 am
Posts: 30
Location: Seattle
|
|
Un-proven and hes not that young... I don't get it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razor150
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:02 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:22 am
Posts: 1667
|
|
With a 2 year deal they don't think he is the future. They are taking a flyer out on him, but they aren't committing to him. They paid to much to get him. Starting to wonder if these guys know what they are doing. At this rate we will probably get trade our 6th and a pick next year for Marshall.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nanomoz
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:02 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4207
Location: UT
|
|
The more I think about it, the more I think we've been utterly hosed.
Man, that's expensive as hell. Wow. Dropping from 40 to 60 seems huge if we were going to wait for an OT or a safety.
:vomit:
_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chihawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:02 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 294
|
Hawkstorian wrote: chihawk wrote: The thing that is particularly strange with this is the report that we are signing him to a 2-year deal. If they think he is the future QB for the team, why would this only be a 2-year deal? That's the thing. We've given up high draft picks for only 2 years of a guy who won't even start the first year. Maybe it's a two-year extension to the tender he signed...making it at least a three-year deal. If not and Matt ends up starting this year, they plan on handing it over to Charlie when he has one year left....This makes no sense whatsoever.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bighawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 555
|
It is only 2 years to make sure he is as good as they think and if he is he will get a new deal. I love the trade because they are gonna trade Rob Sims for another draft choice. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:03 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9708
|
nanomoz wrote: The more I think about it, the more I think we've been utterly hosed.
Man, that's expensive as hell. Wow. Dropping from 40 to 60 seems huge if we were going to wait for an OT or a safety.
:vomit: Or a DT. Our offseason position is getting worse all the time. _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mckinja
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:03 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 2797
Location: Auburn, WA
|
|
I wonder if this could be a sign that we're looking to trade back in the 1st since apparently we've given up on getting Bradford or Clausen with the 6?
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SmokinHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:04 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 4749
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
|
Well.. He certainly looks the part. 27 isn't that old for a QB. I have a feeling we might be pleasantly surprised here, folks. He's big AND mobile. Great combination.  (from Seahawks Draft Blog)
_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro
He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
Last edited by SmokinHawk on Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TripHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 463
|
drdiags wrote: I dread what the Marshall deal will end up looking like. Probably six draft picks, three of our starters, a key to the city, and someone's first born.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Trrrroy
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:24 am
Posts: 2676
|
|
Look at the bright side, we'll be getting tons of trade offers.
Of course, they'll all be expecting to hose us.
_________________
I hate Tim Ruskell.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ErikG803
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 844
|
Mckinja wrote: I wonder if this could be a sign that we're looking to trade back in the 1st since apparently we've given up on getting Bradford or Clausen with the 6? Hopefully that's the case. Could you imagine the backlash if we traded a 1st rounder for Marshall at this point? 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chihawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 294
|
Mckinja wrote: I wonder if this could be a sign that we're looking to trade back in the 1st since apparently we've given up on getting Bradford or Clausen with the 6? ...or they are pretty sure Bradford goes 1 (Rams) and Clausen goes 4 (Redskins).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DrinkinTheLimerade
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:52 am
Posts: 103
Location: Seattle
|
|
I'm hoping this 2 year part has some how been incorrectly released, makes absolutely no sense to give that up for a 2 year contract. Hell, his first starting year with us could be his contract year.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Snohomie
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
| * NET Draft Guru * |
|
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3514
Location: Bellingham, WA
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: nanomoz wrote: The more I think about it, the more I think we've been utterly hosed.
Man, that's expensive as hell. Wow. Dropping from 40 to 60 seems huge if we were going to wait for an OT or a safety.
:vomit: Or a DT. Our offseason position is getting worse all the time. The advantage to this is that it relieves a lot of the pressure to take a QB this year. I have no clue if Whitehurst is the answer. But he's a talented QB who has been well coached for several years. At least there is a shot he is our answer. I would be a lot more comfortable passing on the QBs in this draft now...
_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razor150
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:22 am
Posts: 1667
|
bighawk wrote: It is only 2 years to make sure he is as good as they think and if he is he will get a new deal. I love the trade because they are gonna trade Rob Sims for another draft choice. They'll trade him for a 6th, book it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LeMec
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:06 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:43 am
Posts: 199
|
razor150 wrote: What a rip off. I'm sorry, but it is. We get a 7th for Wallace next year, a guy who while not great has actual game experience and is a decent game manager. Then we trade this much for a guy he hasn't even played a down? This team is buying high and selling low. Completely agree. My thoughts exactly!
_________________
I'm not a Sunday only 'Hawks Fan
Are you really a 'Hawks fan if you are not a .Net member?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MysterMatt
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst TRADED TO SEATTLE. Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:06 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:12 am
Posts: 5987
|
|
Here are my general thoughts:
1) If you compare with the Seneca trade, this deal sucks. Otherwise, it really isn't that bad...especially if he turns our to be starter-caliber.
2) The two year deal is to minimize risk. I mean, what if he doesn't pan out? It won't cost that much to let him go.
3) I'd take what we paid for Whitehurst (draft picks and $$$) over what we'd have to pay for Clausen. The FO clearly wasn't sold on Clausen, yet they understand they need to find a QB, so seeing if Whitehurst can pan out is a way of doing that while minimizing overall risk.
4) If Locker or some other true elite QB is available to us in the 2011 draft, we can still take him because we aren't totally married to Whitehurst.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
