It is currently Fri Apr 20, 2018 9:32 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF SEATTLE FOOTBALL[ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]
Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

Stanford vs Washington

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
Post Reply
Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • Onside kick?
    THIS SPACE FOR RENT
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 9902
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:
    ClumsyLurk wrote:ASJ is having a down year, no.?


    Square peg in a round hole in this offense.


    Took the words right out of my mouth, sir. Spot on. :th2thumbs:
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • Onsides kick... Get it, profit
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1745
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • SeatownJay wrote:Onside kick?


    Yes, you need a 3 and out anyhow..
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:38 pm
  • I think they played it right. Since Montgomery didn't score
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1745
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:42 pm
  • Just go for the TD. Period...end of story.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15446
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:42 pm
  • Man, dumb play call by Stanford. That off tackle play from the power formation has been working all night. Why go away from it?
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23756
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:43 pm
  • Here we go Keith... here is your shot to show the scouts what you got.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Why did the clock still run anyways?
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15446
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • That's a catch.
    THIS SPACE FOR RENT
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 9902
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Elbow hit...that's a catch.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15446
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Totally a catch!
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Hands landed at the same time inbounds and out of bounds. Not sure what the ruling is on that.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23756
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:45 pm
  • pehawk wrote:Why did the clock still run anyways?

    Because the penalty was declined.
    THIS SPACE FOR RENT
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 9902
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm
  • Looks incomplete to me
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1745
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm
  • Ball hit the grass. Sorry.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23756
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm
  • game not over yet.
    Joe
    joeseahawks
    *The Prophet*
     
    Posts: 2102
    Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:43 pm
    Location: NC

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:49 pm
  • Not a catch but they might get away with it.
    User avatar
    pinksheets
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2837
    Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm
    Location: Seattle

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm
  • Make a decision already!
    THIS SPACE FOR RENT
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 9902
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:Ball hit the grass. Sorry.


    Doesn't matter as long as Smith had control of it, which to me it appeared he did.
    User avatar
    Spounge84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1987
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:16 pm
    Location: Lacey, WA

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm
  • Spounge84 wrote:
    JSeahawks wrote:Ball hit the grass. Sorry.


    Doesn't matter as long as Smith had control of it, which to me it appeared he did.


    Yes it does, because it hit the grass before it hit his arms. It was lying on the ground between his arms then he scooped it up.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23756
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • God I hate these refs, and I hate our special teams. Good night sirs.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1745
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • oh that's phreaking bull####!!!!!!!!!
    mrblitz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1334
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • Damn. That's a crusher.
    Image
    2016/2017 Adopt-A-Rookie: CJ Prosise, Quill Griffin
    2016/2017 Adopt-A-UDFA: Lene Maiava, Jordan Roos
    User avatar
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2555
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm
    Location: Delaware

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • phyreaking @@@@oles
    mrblitz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1334
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • Not enough to overturn if those are the only angles. Not indisputable.
    User avatar
    DavidSeven
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5746
    Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • screw that bullshit, there wasn't enough evidence to overturn that
    The LOLs of the many outweigh the shame of the few
    User avatar
    Msfann
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1899
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • DavidSeven wrote:Not enough to overturn if those are the only angles. Not indisputable.


    The angle from behind it was obvious.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23756
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • Makeup call for "confirmed" catch where half of the receiver's body was dragging out of bounds before a single thread touched in bounds.
    User avatar
    minormillikin
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2791
    Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:32 pm
    Location: East Oly

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • Didn't see it definitively hit the ground, they must have had a different camera angle, feel like the Huskies kind of got hosed there.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1764
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:53 pm
  • Yeah, that's crazy to reverse the call w/ those angles. No idea how they had the balls to do that. ASJ kinda hosed us on that drive...
    Last edited by Laloosh on Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Adopt A Rookie: Nick Vannett, TE - Ohio State University
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8846
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:54 pm
  • They should have left it how they called it. There was not enough evidence to support that it hit the ground. Oh well, great game by the Dawgs. Oregon next.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:55 pm
  • Great game. Fun thread. I like you guys. Too bad I have to hate you for the next week.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23756
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:55 pm
  • The allegedly great TE ASJ should have caught the easy pass instead of relying on the 4th down play. Hit the ground anyways.

    4-1
    cesame
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2009
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:36 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:56 pm
  • This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1764
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:57 pm
  • Robbed.

    Why do Pac 12 refs suck so freaking bad? year after year it's a joke.

    Here's a hint for the Pac 12 refs: if a player is REALLY injured and not just faking it because they can't keep up with the offense, they dont roll around on the ground like a child in a sand box, repeatedly putting their weight on a possible injury. They lay prone not moving because movign makes it hurt. and if they are in such pain that they are writhing around on the ground,t hey aren't going to be ready to go in after one play off.

    get it together.

    but most importantly, this:

    This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.
    Image
    User avatar
    Hawknballs
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3507
    Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:59 pm
  • Special teams is directly responsible for 7 (I count 14) points today. Shouldn't have been down to begin with.

    And the refs. OHHH goodness the refs. I believe it was in the 2nd quarter we had that filthy block on special teams called a personal foul. That was atrocious. As was their presence the entire first half the of the game.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1745
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:59 pm
  • This team's going to be pissed off for next week's game against Oregon.
    THIS SPACE FOR RENT
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 9902
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:00 pm
  • SeatownJay wrote:This team's going to be pissed off for next week's game against Oregon.


    They will be really screwed if they have to play vs Oregon and the bs ref's again.
    The LOLs of the many outweigh the shame of the few
    User avatar
    Msfann
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1899
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:01 pm
  • Definitely thought there wasn't enough evidence to overturn that. We shouldn't have even needed a 4th down conversion though because ASJ should've caught that pass. :229031_banghead:
    Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???


    2013 Adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
    2014 Adopt-a-rookie: Kevin Norwood
    2015 Adopt-a-rookie: Kristjan Sokoli
    User avatar
    razgriz737
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2060
    Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
    Location: Spokane/Seattle

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:02 pm
  • We wont have time to be inept like we were today to still hang with the evil empire. Play like today and we'll be down by 21+ in the 2nd quarter.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1745
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:03 pm
  • The Ducks game is at home. We will come out and play well.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:05 pm
  • Holy shit. Why bother playing the game when the goddamn outcome is predetermined by the Pac 12? That so-called "official review" was ludicrous. What does it mean to be out of challenges, when the league has your frickin' back?!?
    User avatar
    GeekHawk
    US Navy ET Nuc
     
    Posts: 6370
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
    Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:10 pm
  • Personally I thought the ball hit the grass before it was controlled, by the back angle at-least. Tough way for it to end. You guys played a hell of a game though.
    Image
    User avatar
    jhern87
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 159
    Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 1:38 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:23 pm
  • While I could very easily argue there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call, thus making it a bad call, I would bet anybody 100/1 that the ball hit the ground first, so I can't bring myself to complain about it.

    The Huskies are the better team, I have no doubt, but made wayyyy too many mistakes. How many dumb penalties? How many drops? Four bad plays in the kicking game. Tonight was proof that no matter how incredible of a game you play, you can't beat a good team when you can't limit the mistakes.

    I want #7 for Stanford on the Hawks.

    Bring on the zeroes.
    I'm fly
    I should be in the sky with birds
    User avatar
    Tical21
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3699
    Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:37 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:28 pm
  • the call should've stood but TBH the game shouldn't have come down to it, stupid decisions to pooch kick, kickoff coverage, penalties, and dropped passes cost UW this game
    User avatar
    davidonmi
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2452
    Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:20 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Good game all, time to get pumped up for the Hawks game tomorrow. These Dawgs are only getting better.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:48 pm
  • The ball clearly hit the ground between his hands. It was the correct call. The refs didn't cost the game, it was dropped balls and special teams.
    Street
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 32
    Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:20 pm

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 12:20 am
  • It may have hit the ground but I didn't see enough evidence to overturn it. Even on a 60" plasma you could see ball but nothing to prove without a doubt that it touched.

    And that's the problem they have to know for sure to overturn it and you can't say for 100% sure that it did touch. They got hosed.

    If the ruling on the field originally was that it was dropped and then the replay came back saying it hit the ground that would have been fine. But the original call was a catch and there just wasn't enough proof to overrule the ruling on the field.
    The LOLs of the many outweigh the shame of the few
    User avatar
    Msfann
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1899
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 am

Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 2:23 am
  • Msfann wrote:It may have hit the ground but I didn't see enough evidence to overturn it. Even on a 60" plasma you could see ball but nothing to prove without a doubt that it touched.

    And that's the problem they have to know for sure to overturn it and you can't say for 100% sure that it did touch. They got hosed.

    If the ruling on the field originally was that it was dropped and then the replay came back saying it hit the ground that would have been fine. But the original call was a catch and there just wasn't enough proof to overrule the ruling on the field.


    Exactly. I don't see how anyone can argue with this.
    User avatar
    bigtrain21
    * NET GIF Master *
     
    Posts: 1694
    Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:48 am

PreviousNext
Expand view

Post Reply

It is currently Fri Apr 20, 2018 9:32 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests
.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF SEATTLE FOOTBALL[ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]
© 2016 Seahawks.NET
dotNET TwentySixteen template created by Anguish

Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.