| Author |
Message |
|
SeatownJay
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington  Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 5247
Location: Hagerstown, MD
|
|
Onside kick?
_________________  You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
CallMeADawg
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am
Posts: 597
|
JSeahawks wrote: ClumsyLurk wrote: ASJ is having a down year, no.? Square peg in a round hole in this offense. Took the words right out of my mouth, sir. Spot on. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ClumsyLurk
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 1623
|
|
Onsides kick... Get it, profit
_________________
|~=[==~||~==]=~|
||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CallMeADawg
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am
Posts: 597
|
SeatownJay wrote: Onside kick? Yes, you need a 3 and out anyhow..
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ClumsyLurk
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 1623
|
|
I think they played it right. Since Montgomery didn't score
_________________
|~=[==~||~==]=~|
||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:42 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9922
|
|
Just go for the TD. Period...end of story.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:42 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 18444
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Man, dumb play call by Stanford. That off tackle play from the power formation has been working all night. Why go away from it?
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CallMeADawg
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:43 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am
Posts: 597
|
|
Here we go Keith... here is your shot to show the scouts what you got.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9922
|
|
Why did the clock still run anyways?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeatownJay
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 5247
Location: Hagerstown, MD
|
|
That's a catch.
_________________ You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9922
|
|
Elbow hit...that's a catch.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CallMeADawg
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am
Posts: 597
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 18444
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Hands landed at the same time inbounds and out of bounds. Not sure what the ruling is on that.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeatownJay
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:45 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 5247
Location: Hagerstown, MD
|
pehawk wrote: Why did the clock still run anyways? Because the penalty was declined. _________________ You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ClumsyLurk
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 1623
|
|
Looks incomplete to me
_________________
|~=[==~||~==]=~|
||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 18444
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Ball hit the grass. Sorry.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeseahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm |
|
| *The Prophet* |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:43 pm
Posts: 820
|
|
game not over yet.
_________________
Joe
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pinksheets
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 2809
Location: Seattle
|
|
Not a catch but they might get away with it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeatownJay
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 5247
Location: Hagerstown, MD
|
|
Make a decision already!
_________________ You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spounge84
|
Post subject: Re: Stanford vs Washington Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 1742
Location: Lacey, WA
|
JSeahawks wrote: Ball hit the grass. Sorry. Doesn't matter as long as Smith had control of it, which to me it appeared he did.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
