... for millions has been compromised.

I plan on switching to... oh wait, theres no real competition for them huh?

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2425215,00.asp

source wrote:Adobe said Thursday that it recently suffered a massive security breach which compromised the IDs, passwords, and credit card information of nearly three million customers.
...
(more relavent)
Arkin said the unknown attackers made off with encrypted credit and debit card numbers, "[a]t this time, we do not believe the attackers removed decrypted credit or debit card numbers from our systems."

The software firm also said "source code for numerous Adobe products" was stolen in a separate intrusion that could be related to the theft of customer information.

So it sounds like they didn't go Full Sony and keep everything in plain text (thank God!). Hopefully that stolen source code makes it into some open source alternatives

I cant remember ever buying anything from Adobe

CreativeCloud subscriber here... We'll see how this turns out.

Anguish wrote:CreativeCloud subscriber here... We'll see how this turns out.

More like maxed out credit card owner, now.

RolandDeschain wrote:

Anguish wrote:CreativeCloud subscriber here... We'll see how this turns out.

More like maxed out credit card owner, now.

Company card, they'll get a LOT before that one maxes out. Jackpot!

I'm a MS Office guy, so I have no clue why Adobe would have anyone's credit card? Anyone care to elaborate?

many silly people drop 400$ on photoshop so they can put squidward's head on colin kaeper......nevermind

m0ng0 wrote:many silly people drop 400$ on photoshop so they can put squidward's head on colin kaeper......nevermind

Avatar was made exclusively with Adobe products; their visual effects turned out alright.

So, it's for "unicorns and rainbows", not business then?

Anguish wrote:CreativeCloud subscriber here... We'll see how this turns out.

As am I. Got an email from Adobe yesterday saying that they reset my password due to this.

m0ng0 wrote:many silly people drop 400$ on photoshop so they can put squidward's head on colin kaeper......nevermind

Wait... Individual people actually PAY for Photoshop?

Mind = blown

RolandDeschain wrote:

m0ng0 wrote:many silly people drop 400$ on photoshop so they can put squidward's head on colin kaeper......nevermind

Avatar was made exclusively with Adobe products; their visual effects turned out alright.

I thought you just ripped it off from a graphic related to that "Priest" movie...

Their new subscription service (believe their entire suite for $40/month or what 3grand to buy it?) is a good reason to store payment info with them.

E.C. Laloosh wrote:

RolandDeschain wrote:

m0ng0 wrote:many silly people drop 400$ on photoshop so they can put squidward's head on colin kaeper......nevermind

Avatar was made exclusively with Adobe products; their visual effects turned out alright.

I thought you just ripped it off from a graphic related to that "Priest" movie...

Not HIS avatar... the MOVIE Avatar

Anguish wrote:

E.C. Laloosh wrote:

RolandDeschain wrote:

m0ng0 wrote:many silly people drop 400$ on photoshop so they can put squidward's head on colin kaeper......nevermind

Avatar was made exclusively with Adobe products; their visual effects turned out alright.

I thought you just ripped it off from a graphic related to that "Priest" movie...

Not HIS avatar... the MOVIE Avatar

Lord almighty.....

Also, my avatar is the original book cover for Stephen King's first Dark Tower book, The Gunslinger. http://www.amazon.com/The-Gunslinger-Da ... gunslinger

my avatar used a little photoshop to clean up some noise but thats it and I certainly did not pay for it

m0ng0 wrote:my avatar used a little photoshop to clean up some noise but thats it and I certainly did not pay for it

You're welcome...

m0ng0 wrote:my avatar used a little photoshop to clean up some noise but thats it and I certainly did not pay for it

Well, at least your making up for the piracy with a little free advertising.

Anguish wrote:

m0ng0 wrote:my avatar used a little photoshop to clean up some noise but thats it and I certainly did not pay for it

You're welcome...

Didn't you just say you're company pays for your license?

ClumsyLurk wrote:

Anguish wrote:

m0ng0 wrote:my avatar used a little photoshop to clean up some noise but thats it and I certainly did not pay for it

You're welcome...

Didn't you just say you're company pays for your license?

I did. The next logical question would be; who owns the company that pays for my license?

BTW, where's Roland when I need him? 2 posts in a row...

I'm here. What are you expecting of me? I told you; I refuse to do reacharounds anymore.

Anguish politely let me know that I'm slacking off in my duties as the grammar Nazi up in here, and I have to agree. Time to shame some people.

HoustonHawk82 wrote:Well, at least your making up for the piracy with a little free advertising.

ClumsyLurk wrote:Didn't you just say you're company pays for your license?

You two geniuses have these reversed. Come on, guys. "You're" is a contraction for "you are", as in, "at least you are making up for the piracy"; while "your" infers ownership, as in, "Didn't you just say your company pays for your license?" The company is what's being referred to, so his company, her company, your company. You don't say "you are company" when referring to someone's company. Try saying it aloud. "Didn't you just say you are company pays for your license?"

If you have trouble remembering it, then just ask yourself if you can stick "you are" in there and have it still sound alright. It'll either sound fine, or ridiculous. If it sounds ridiculous, then you need to use "your".

IT'S NOT THAT HARD.

Grammar Nazi, out.

*Gentlemanly bow*

OMG, I can't believe I let that slip by.

Is there an emoticon for hanging one's head in shame?

you're (you are)
your (possession)

It must have been the Vicodin.

HoustonHawk82 wrote:Is there an emoticon for hanging one's head in shame?

Not really. You can go with the following, (surrounded by colons) which get halfway there, though: (34853_doh) (dummy) (white_flag)

Anguish wrote:

LMAO!

RolandDeschain wrote:Anguish politely let me know that I'm slacking off in my duties as the grammar Nazi up in here, and I have to agree. Time to shame some people.

HoustonHawk82 wrote:Well, at least your making up for the piracy with a little free advertising.

ClumsyLurk wrote:Didn't you just say you're company pays for your license?

You two geniuses have these reversed. Come on, guys. "You're" is a contraction for "you are", as in, "at least you are making up for the piracy"; while "your" infers ownership, as in, "Didn't you just say your company pays for your license?" The company is what's being referred to, so his company, her company, your company. You don't say "you are company" when referring to someone's company. Try saying it aloud. "Didn't you just say you are company pays for your license?"

If you have trouble remembering it, then just ask yourself if you can stick "you are" in there and have it still sound alright. It'll either sound fine, or ridiculous. If it sounds ridiculous, then you need to use "your".

IT'S NOT THAT HARD.

Grammar Nazi, out.

Jesus please, I'm on a mobile. Anguish really needed you for that?

Anguish wrote:

ClumsyLurk wrote:

Anguish wrote:

m0ng0 wrote:my avatar used a little photoshop to clean up some noise but thats it and I certainly did not pay for it

You're welcome...

Didn't you just say you're company pays for your license?

I did. The next logical question would be; who owns the company that pays for my license?

BTW, where's Roland when I need him? 2 posts in a row...

Nice, I'll remember that when I'm peddling my gimps. How large is your company?

haha I use photoshop 2 CS9, adobe does not even care to protect it anymore....its like atari getting bent because someone still steals pacman