Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ THE NET LOUNGE ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:51 am 
* NET Starfish *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 10217
Location: Helm's Deep
Well, I actually wasn't meaning to single out Steve, but I can see how he fell under my umbrella about ignorant people. My bad. Sorry.

_________________
Rzzzzz...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:04 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3969
RolandDeschain wrote:
Sure, you can. Here, I'll do it right now.

Your statement is ignorant, DTex. :)

The rule is basically "attack the post, not the poster". I can even call your post utterly retarded.


I just fail to see that he "attacked" anyone.

Many are "ignorant" of many things they say on these boards, myself included, and saying so is different than calling someone "Stupid". IMO

Thin skins. :stirthepot:

_________________
And this post is not directed at anyone personally.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:30 am 
* Smackmeister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6894
DTexHawk wrote:
RolandDeschain wrote:
Sure, you can. Here, I'll do it right now.

Your statement is ignorant, DTex. :)

The rule is basically "attack the post, not the poster". I can even call your post utterly retarded.


I just fail to see that he "attacked" anyone.

Many are "ignorant" of many things they say on these boards, myself included, and saying so is different than calling someone "Stupid". IMO

Thin skins. :stirthepot:


We're in the 'thin skin' part of the forum. I can't even make a generalized comment about pushy, aggressive Texans who won't back down, I don't think. Maybe I can, but I won't test the line.

:thirishdrinkers:

_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:45 am 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11206
Here's hoping that cure proves fruitful. My understanding is that it's not just about killing the cancer cells, because any scorched-earth approach could do that, but finding something that leaves the patient healthy.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:59 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9534
Location: Monroe, WA
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
Here's hoping that cure proves fruitful. My understanding is that it's not just about killing the cancer cells, because any scorched-earth approach could do that, but finding something that leaves the patient healthy.

Yeah, it sounds like it uses the patient's own immune system to combat the cancerous cells. Still a little note there at the bottom where it is still hard to keep it from affecting healthy cells producing that protein, but hey, it sounds good.

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:07 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 2920
Location: Seattle, WA - USA
I don't generally as a rule think corporations are evil, but the ones that put profit ahead of healing people, are evil and need to be destroyed or at least exposed as vampires.

_________________
"Are we rockin' and rollin' or what?!''

-- Seattle coach Pete Carroll, celebrating with his coaches after the Seahawks pulled off a trade with the Jets, netting running back Leon Washington on Saturday, via Seahawks.com


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:22 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10041
Let's hope it isn't Monsanto that is developing this cure...

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:32 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm
Posts: 1584
We are a treatment culture, not a preventive culture. Best way to cure and prevent diseases is a healthy diet, like a legitimately healthy diet, not the "get more exercise while still buying meat and cheese from giant corporations that pump their food full of chemicals".

There have been plenty of more efficient medical advances in the world that have not caught on in the US because of the lack of profitability.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:33 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 6116
seahawk2k wrote:
We are a treatment culture, not a preventive culture. Best way to cure and prevent diseases is a healthy diet, like a legitimately healthy diet, not the "get more exercise while still buying meat and cheese from giant corporations that pump their food full of chemicals".

There have been plenty of more efficient medical advances in the world that have not caught on in the US because of the lack of profitability.


Like?

_________________
SUPER BOWL 48 CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!!

RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:41 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm
Posts: 1584
You are actually going to make me go back and cite everything I read?

Here's one that comes to mind(naturally), there is a much cheaper, safer, and more reliable method of performing a vasectomy that was discovered in India a few years ago and has met stiff resistance on the path to approval over here.

There are others I'll have to dig up.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:52 pm 
*NET FCC Liaison*
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 22635
Location: Kirkland, WA
I love how so many self-proclaimed health experts use the word "chemicals" as a synonym for "food cancer". If it's a chemical, it's bad. End of story. :roll:

_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.

*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science vs Cancer.
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:12 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10041
RolandDeschain wrote:
I love how so many self-proclaimed health experts use the word "chemicals" as a synonym for "food cancer". If it's a chemical, it's bad. End of story. :roll:

They type this while wearing synthetic clothing, walking on synthetic carpet, driving a half plastic car that spits pollutants into the air of the city they chose to live in, storing their food in cabinets made of glued together pressboard, and then freak out because somebody put wax on their apple.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ] 

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ THE NET LOUNGE ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DHawk, thanimal, twisted_steel2, Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.