Star Wars

The Lounge is for non-sport-related topics other than politics, war and religion. Order up your favorite beverage, kick back and enjoy the conversation! RATING: PG-13
  • Why is Abrams getting love or hate on the plot of Star Trek? He didn't write it, he directed it. JJ Abrams comes off as a cool nerd and uses fanboy attention on his projects. He will treat Star Wars with more love than Lucas did with his monstrosities.

    Super 8 wasn't a great movie, but it FELT like an old school Spielberg movie, well mostly. And that was its intended goal. It wasn't as good as ET or Close Encounters, but it was a hell of a lot better than AI. The same attention will be paid to Star Wars, it will feel a lot more like the original movies.

    If the plot sucks, that's on the writer.
    User avatar
    12evanf
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2637
    Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am


  • Unfortunately, it's too late to cast the original trio but damn what I would give to see them adapt Timothy Zahn's Heir to the Empire trilogy.

    Edit: Fixed a typo.
    Last edited by Sarlacc83 on Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15631
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


  • Sarlacc83 wrote:Unfortunately, it's too late to cast the original trio but damn what I would give to see them adapt the Timothy Zahn;s Heir to the Empire trilogy.


    Seconded.
    FIRE CABLE! 6 Home Games 9 False Starts By Linemen Lack Of Discipline
    Image
    User avatar
    BASF
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1566
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:07 pm


  • I just hope they avoid the abortion that is the 20-books-too-long Yuuzhan Vong series. Most of those were utter crap and boring as hell. Pretty much anything by Zahn is a win, though.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • 12evanf wrote:Why is Abrams getting love or hate on the plot of Star Trek? He didn't write it, he directed it.


    Because he works with too many hack writers and brings them onto his projects.

    He will treat Star Wars with more love than Lucas did with his monstrosities.


    Hilarious how much goodwill Abrams gets by NOT being the last guy.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • MontanaHawk05 wrote:Because he works with too many hack writers and brings them onto his projects.

    The writer was chosen before the director for this project.

    MontanaHawk05 wrote:Hilarious how much goodwill Abrams gets by NOT being the last guy.

    I liked Abrams from the announcement of the Disney buy. You can go look it up (I know you're a big fan of that).

    Star Trek nerds have always been way more particular than Star Wars nerds. I don't think Abrams was a good fit for Star Trek, he's too raw and focuses more on emotions and action than the tech-aspect. Star Wars is perfect for him.

    George Lucas focused on CGI and effects and butchered his own masterpiece. Any director could raise that bar.
    User avatar
    12evanf
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2637
    Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am


  • MontanaHawk05 wrote:Hilarious how much goodwill Abrams gets by NOT being the last guy.


    This is normally a poor argument, but in this case, I'd say it's somewhat fair and justified. A tremendous number of random pieces of luck and happenstance came together to make the original Star Wars trilogy what it was, and George Lucas not having control over most of it was critically important. The best thing he ever did for his franchise was to sell it. I'll be very curious to see what all Disney does with it.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • 12evanf wrote:Star Trek nerds have always been way more particular than Star Wars nerds. I don't think Abrams was a good fit for Star Trek, he's too raw and focuses more on emotions and action than the tech-aspect. Star Wars is perfect for him.


    I could care less about tech. Everyone thinks the Abrams detractors are just upset about the tech stuff. The script for that movie was terrible, just plain poorly written and kept pulling me out of the movie with "why did that just happen?" questions that even ordinary people would ask. And Abrams made some choices that made little sense and distracted from things, turning it from a "this is how the future could really be" movie of ideas into just another slick, superficial "don't think too hard" popcorn movie. That's a loss that a lot of Trekkies were frustrated with.

    RolandDeschain wrote:
    MontanaHawk05 wrote:Hilarious how much goodwill Abrams gets by NOT being the last guy.


    This is normally a poor argument, but in this case, I'd say it's somewhat fair and justified. A tremendous number of random pieces of luck and happenstance came together to make the original Star Wars trilogy what it was, and George Lucas not having control over most of it was critically important. The best thing he ever did for his franchise was to sell it. I'll be very curious to see what all Disney does with it.


    I do believe Lucas originally had Han Solo looking more like Greedo and C3PO being an alien garbage salesman or some ridiculous stuff. I loved seeing Lawrence Kasdan hired to help with Episode VII. I think Abrams will be a good fit for Star Wars.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • RolandDeschain wrote:I just hope they avoid the abortion that is the 20-books-too-long Yuuzhan Vong series. Most of those were utter crap and boring as hell. Pretty much anything by Zahn is a win, though.

    They've already said the movies will be an original story and won't be based on any of the existing EU works.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6880
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


  • I know, Jay; I was just referring to future stuff down the line.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • My deepest fear about this choice is that "JJ" secretly stands for Jar Jar...
    “If somebody thinks they're a hedgehog, presumably you just give them a mirror and a few pictures of hedgehogs and tell them to sort it out for themselves.”
    Vetamur
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 6121
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:41 pm


  • Vetamur wrote:My deepest fear about this choice is that "JJ" secretly stands for Jar Jar...


    Lol! Abrams would get poisoned in his sleep.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • Vetamur wrote:My deepest fear about this choice is that "JJ" secretly stands for Jar Jar...


    I dunno, I'd pay good money to go and just watch the audience's reaction to that. Could be the greatest con job in the history of movies.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15631
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


  • Sarlacc83 wrote:Unfortunately, it's too late to cast the original trio but damn what I would give to see them adapt Timothy Zahn's Heir to the Empire trilogy.

    Edit: Fixed a typo.


    The Heir to the Empire trilogy IS Episode 7 8 and 9 to me. I get that it's impossible now, and that really sucks, but to me that was the next inevitable part of the story presented in Lucas' original three.
    Colt 45 and two zig zags.
    User avatar
    peachesenregalia
    * NET Starfish *
     
    Posts: 11191
    Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
    Location: Helm's Deep


  • Read a lil blurb where Terance Stamp (peaches body and appearence double) ripped Lucas for his direction in Star Wars. No one worked opposite Natalie - instead she was a spot on a greenscreen.

    Lucas sucks.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11413
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • pehawk wrote:Read a lil blurb where Terance Stamp (peaches body and appearence double) ripped Lucas for his direction in Star Wars. No one worked opposite Natalie - instead she was a spot on a greenscreen.

    Lucas sucks.


    It's true! i look a lot like Zod!!
    Colt 45 and two zig zags.
    User avatar
    peachesenregalia
    * NET Starfish *
     
    Posts: 11191
    Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
    Location: Helm's Deep


  • pehawk wrote:instead she was a spot on a greenscreen.

    Lucas sucks.


    Who WASN'T a spot on a green screen? Pretty much the entire newer trilogy was filmed that way, and the fact that it made even actors we KNOW are good actors, like Liam Neeson, act poorly...Tells you a lot about depending on your entire cast sitting inside in front of a green screen.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • pehawk wrote:Read a lil blurb where Terance Stamp (peaches body and appearence double) ripped Lucas for his direction in Star Wars. No one worked opposite Natalie - instead she was a spot on a greenscreen.

    Lucas sucks.


    Watch the Red Letter Media reviews of the prequels. They pretty thoroughly torch George Lucas for sitting behind monitors for pretty much the entire shoot while sometimes standing up to hand out basic directions before returning to his seat.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15631
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


  • He's never been an "actor's director". Gave minimal guidance in Ep 4. Ep 5 was directed by a guy with a much better relationship with performers. Watching Portman in later movies left me stunned how little Lucas got out of her in the prequels.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • I am a huge fan of Abrams even if I am not always a fan of his movies (Star Trek was awesome though- Montana you are on crack).

    I don't know if he fits Star Wars per se. I think he'd be perfect for Indiana Jones but that series can't survive without Harrison Ford. The original Star Wars films always had a campy charm to it, and all 3 of the originals contained "alien horror" elements that helped give the universe a much more savage feel. In that sense, I think Star Wars would probably be more suited to someone like Peter Jackson or Sam Raimi who have experience with top end special effects and horror/monster genre stuff- and both even have a bit of the same horror-cheesiness that Lucas had before he started to suck. Like Jackson and Raimi, Abrams has some horror/monster film background which will go well with re-introducing the series to the weird but awesome bestiary of the original trilogy.

    Bottom line, I don't think Disney could have done much better than Abrams. And if Abrams says no, and options 2,3,4, and 5 all say no, you might be down to guys like Michael Bay, or an unproven director that could prove an even bigger disaster. We all thought that Star Wars would become a joke. Maybe it still will. But at least Abrams gives us a solar flare of hope.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11406
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • Also, I wouldn't expect Abrams to stick with Star Wars long. I'd say 3 movies, tops, probably 2. Disney wants to turn it into a James Bond type franchise, and as with long series like James Bond and Harry Potter, you can expect the director to change every couple of movies, even if the previous director did an awesome job.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11406
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • Maybe Disney won't be a cheap piece of crap, and will pay a good director enough money to direct 7 or 8 of 'em. Pipe dream, I suppose...
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • kearly wrote:Also, I wouldn't expect Abrams to stick with Star Wars long. I'd say 3 movies, tops, probably 2. Disney wants to turn it into a James Bond type franchise, and as with long series like James Bond and Harry Potter, you can expect the director to change every couple of movies, even if the previous director did an awesome job.


    Abrams will move on after two movies indeed, but it won't be just because of Disney keeping the rotation fresh. Abrams has ADD and can't stay focused on any one project for long. Leaves a trail of unfinished projects in his wake ("What About Brian", "Six Degrees", "Undercovers", "Alcatraz") and his successful ones get taken on by others.

    And "Trek" was horribly forced writing and sheeny melodrama. I cannot fathom how so many smart media consumers on this board enjoyed that movie. It's like a body-snatchers conspiracy.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • Montana right now in this thread:

    Image
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • You, on the other hand...

    Image
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • I've not even seen the Star Trek movie, nor do I know more than a tiny bit about Star Trek. Since I haven't claimed to, I'm not sure how I can have my head up there in this thread?
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • OK, fine, I'll change the victims of recto-cranial inversion to Pehawk and Kearly. :P
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • That works! Though, I don't know how much merit there is in that accusation. I'm serious when I say I know nothing about Star Trek, lol. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt! :)
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26681
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • I'm not even going to argue. I don't have to. Based on what critics and audiences thought (95%, one of the highest Rotten Tomato scores of 2009, and one of the highest rated summer blockbusters ever), you might as well be Baghdad Bob on this one Brandon. :)
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11406
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • Montana's new nickname should be Baghdad Bob, for awhile at least.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11413
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • kearly wrote:I'm not even going to argue. I don't have to. Based on what critics and audiences thought (95%, one of the highest Rotten Tomato scores of 2009, and one of the highest rated summer blockbusters ever), you might as well be Baghdad Bob on this one Brandon. :)


    All that shows is that 95% of critics don't understand what Trek is. There were plenty of critics, FWIW, who admitted as an aside that XI showed little depth or greater purpose and had a swiss cheese plot, but were apparently fine with that since it was a reboot. Curiosity, the suck of "Nemesis", and its reboot nature helped it a lot.

    Once XII proves just as stupidly written and it starts sinking in with people that Abrams has little on his mind besides typical popcorn action and cheap emotion, I'll bet the critical honeymoon will die down considerably. Abrams might manage to keep the box office bubble going with the whole tired "it is Khan?" shtick, though you'll probably see more critics take shots at the movie purely out of annoyance over it.

    If you want a more insightful review, read [url]http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090506/REVIEWS/905069997]Roger Ebert's dissenting opinion[/url]. Gives it a fair shake.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • Image
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11406
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • Montanahawk05, you must realize Star Trek has the most ubercritical fans in every culture on the planet and you are telling all 999 gagillion of them that they are wrong? At this point all i can think of is that your expectations were completely unrealistic. Saying that your opinion is in the minority is a massive understatement.

    Shy.
    Just remember, football is 80% mental and 40% physical.
    Little Giants (1994) – Steve Emtman
    User avatar
    ShyCheetah
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 345
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:06 pm
    Location: Caprica City, Caprica


  • ShyCheetah wrote:Montanahawk05, you must realize Star Trek has the most ubercritical fans in every culture on the planet and you are telling all 999 gagillion of them that they are wrong? At this point all i can think of is that your expectations were completely unrealistic. Saying that your opinion is in the minority is a massive understatement.

    Shy.


    I know my opinion is in the minority. And I don't often go "screw everyone else, they're wrong" on things. But since we're talking about something that doesn't matter much, then I feel pretty comfortable in my opinion even if it is in the minority.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • Montana, you are the you're wrong guy, that's you.

    I'm curious, can you rank the films? Or top 5 so we have context?
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11413
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • pehawk wrote:Montana, you are the you're wrong guy, that's you.

    I'm curious, can you rank the films? Or top 5 so we have context?


    Wrath of Khan (2)
    First Contact (8)
    Undiscovered Country (6)
    Voyage Home (4)
    Search for Spock (3)
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • I'd go;

    Kahn
    Abrams
    Galaxy Quest (unofficial)
    Undiscovered Country
    Search for Spock
    First Contact
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11413
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • Galaxy Quest was a way smarter movie than XI.

    Just got done watching the "Lost" pilot, which Abrams wrote AND directed, and remembered how awesome it was on every level. So it's not like he can't do great work. He just didn't do it here.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • Well, Abrams was also assigned with reenergizing the base AND bringing in new audiences. Have to factor that in. That was accomplished. I think his 2nd one will be a lil more aligned with what we're accustom too.

    I'm hoping its darker than the other ones.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11413
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • I don't think we'll know if he REALLY brought in new audiences until we see the box office returns for XII, and see how much of XI's success was just curiosity. Of course, like I said, JJ's stupid "is it Khan?" campaign will probably keep the returns inflated.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11520
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


Star Wars
Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:55 pm
  • So, Carrie Fisher is now confirmed for the new movie. Harrison Ford was earlier. Now all we're waiting on is Mark Hamill. Cool stuff.

    http://io9.com/5988790/carrie-fisher-confirms-shes-returning-to-star-wars

    P.S.: looked for the old thread about J.J. Abrams directing it but couldn't find it. Think it's fallen past the edge of the .NET world. I'll merge this one with that if it's found.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    Les Norton - gone but never forgotten. Rest in blue and green peace, my friend.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18926
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


Re: Star Wars
Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:38 pm
  • "change all the depends on detention level four, all the depends on detention level four" lol...still would be cool though.
    NoChops
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1459
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:21 pm


Re: Star Wars
Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:08 pm
  • Hahahaha
    "I don't know what you're talking about." GT
    User avatar
    TriCHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1357
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:52 pm
    Location: Tri-Cities, WA


Re: Star Wars
Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:10 pm
  • As long as they don't bring back the actor who played R2-D2; he's probably grown taller since then.
    nategreat
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1345
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am


Re: Star Wars
Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:14 pm
  • I just hope she wears a gold bikini in the new movies ;)
    "Are we rockin' and rollin' or what?!''

    -- Seattle coach Pete Carroll, celebrating with his coaches after the Seahawks pulled off a trade with the Jets, netting running back Leon Washington on Saturday, via Seahawks.com
    User avatar
    MLOhawks
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3375
    Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:35 pm
    Location: Seattle, WA - USA


Re: Star Wars
Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:09 am
  • Of course Mark Hamil will be in the new ones. What else does he have to do, be the voice of the Joker some more?
    HawkGA
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1882
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:29 pm


Re: Star Wars
Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:13 am
  • ...I have a very bad feeling about this.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15631
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Star Wars
Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:31 am
  • Thats good. I loathed the idea of going full-tilt about Solo and Luke's offspring.

    Is JarJar in for sure? Anyone hear?
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11413
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Star Wars
Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:40 am
  • HawkGA wrote:Of course Mark Hamil will be in the new ones. What else does he have to do, be the voice of the Joker some more?


    I know, right? I can't imagine his plate is so full that he can't block off some time in the coming years to be part of something ridiculously huge, not to mention something that launched what career he has had.
    President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013
    User avatar
    JesterHawk
    * Smackmeister *
     
    Posts: 7192
    Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm


Re: Star Wars
Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:48 am
  • pehawk wrote:

    Is JarJar in for sure? Anyone hear?


    Yep. Part will be played by Andy Serkis, per IMDB.
    Colt 45 and two zig zags.
    User avatar
    peachesenregalia
    * NET Starfish *
     
    Posts: 11191
    Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
    Location: Helm's Deep


Next


It is currently Thu Nov 27, 2014 11:50 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NET LOUNGE ]




Information
  • Who is online