Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ THE NET LOUNGE ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:54 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 7443
Location: Monroe, WA
http://hint.fm/wind/

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:00 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3262
Very cool.

And something appears to be sucking just north of the US border. :lol:

This is why storms are so bad in TX/OK. Fronts from the NW meet the humidity from the gulf, and hell breaks loose.

_________________
That's weak sauce!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:05 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Oklahoma City
That is pretty damn cool. I just hope that it keeps the storms here, we need the precipitation.

_________________
2013 AAR: Chris Harper


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:06 am 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14103
Location: Kirkland, WA
I already had all the visual proof I needed that Oklahoma sucks years ago. Just look at it.

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:09 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Oklahoma City
RolandDeschain wrote:
I already had all the visual proof I needed that Oklahoma sucks years ago. Just look at it.

Image


Where was that taken?

_________________
2013 AAR: Chris Harper


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:21 am 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14103
Location: Kirkland, WA
No clue, it just came up on a Google Image search for Oklahoma. :)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:24 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Oklahoma City
Image

I like this one better Roland :lol:

_________________
2013 AAR: Chris Harper


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:31 am 
* NET Starfish *
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 8756
Location: Vaes Dothrak
naw, Oklahoma does suck. Cost of living's low though, so it's aiight.

_________________
FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:36 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Oklahoma City
peachesenregalia wrote:
naw, Oklahoma does suck. Cost of living's low though, so it's aiight.


Come on Peaches, you don't like Thundersleet or Quakeanadoes? I love the new names for the weather here :lol:

_________________
2013 AAR: Chris Harper


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:38 am 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14103
Location: Kirkland, WA
That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:43 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Oklahoma City
RolandDeschain wrote:
That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily.


I know man, I'm originally from Oregon, just had to show that there are some "scenic" areas here :thirishdrinkers:

_________________
2013 AAR: Chris Harper


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:46 am 
* Smackmeister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6383
So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?

_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:47 am 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14103
Location: Kirkland, WA
Just in case anybody wants to try, I'll throw a few WA-state pics up on here.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:18 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3262
JesterHawk wrote:
So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?


I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.

Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.

_________________
That's weak sauce!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:34 am 
* Smackmeister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6383
DTexHawk wrote:
JesterHawk wrote:
So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?


I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.

Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.


I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid.

Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible).

_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:38 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6165
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
RolandDeschain wrote:
Just in case anybody wants to try, I'll throw a few WA-state pics up on here.


I'll get back to you with some Colorado stuff... currently bogged down in work. :th2thumbs:

_________________
Image

Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:38 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3262
JesterHawk wrote:
DTexHawk wrote:
JesterHawk wrote:
So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?


I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.

Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.


I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid.

Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible).


I can't help you if you are constantly on the lookout for things that look like buttholes.

_________________
That's weak sauce!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:48 am 
* Smackmeister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6383
DTexHawk wrote:
JesterHawk wrote:
DTexHawk wrote:
I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.

Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.


I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid.

Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible).


I can't help you if you are constantly on the lookout for things that look like buttholes.


Happens everytime I see "Dallas" or a thread that Huggy has participated in. Both of which happened in quick succession before I posted this. My deepest apologies if you live in or near a butthole city. :)

_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:05 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14103
Location: Kirkland, WA
volsunghawk wrote:
RolandDeschain wrote:
Just in case anybody wants to try, I'll throw a few WA-state pics up on here.


I'll get back to you with some Colorado stuff... currently bogged down in work. :th2thumbs:


Pffft, Colorado's got nothing on WA state. The view of the mountains from Seattle is way more magnificent because of a) ocean, b) green plant life abound, and c) it's viewed from sea level. If you're in Denver, sure, the technical height of the nearby mountain ranges is taller than the Cascades for example, but a lot of the nearby stuff is only a few thousand feet above Denver. Even one of the highest points, Longs Peak, is an hour-and-a-half away from Denver at 14,000 feet. Same approximate height and a slightly longer drive to Mount Rainier from Seattle. Washington also has the only rain forest in North America.

I'm not bashing Colorado, I'm just saying Washington's the easy winner, here. How in the world are you going to compare against the additional things WA has over CO? I mean, Colorado has more of the winter trails, ski resorts, etc. obviously; but it's mostly more of the same, know what I mean?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:01 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15440
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
RolandDeschain wrote:
That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily.


Washington would definatly be in my top group. Along with in no particular order Oregon, Montana, New Hampshire, Florida, Colorado and California.

But imo, without doubt the most beautiful state in the continental united states (not counting Alaska, which easily would win) is Utah. And its not close in my opinion. Washington doesnt have anything that can compare to the Canyonlands, desert area's of Utah. Nor do any of Washington's mountain area's compare to the Provo or Salt Lake area's.

Utah:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ THE NET LOUNGE ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Msfann and 12 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.