Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare vs Battlefield 1

The Lounge is for non-sport-related topics other than politics, war and religion. Order up your favorite beverage, kick back and enjoy the conversation! RATING: PG-13
  • With the two heavy hitters set to be released later this year, which one do you think is the better product? I guess I should have made this a poll.

    Infinity Ward's Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare


    or

    DICE's Battlefield 1


    The inclusion of MW4 remastered with Infinite Warfare does help a bit, but personally I'm just so sick and tired of the space shooters. They've been done to death. I'm still trying to finish Black Ops III. Give me the boots on the ground that is Battlefield 1.
    Image
    San Fransisco. Still partying like it's 1981.
    User avatar
    Mistashoesta
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 923
    Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:22 am


  • Infinite warfare looks dumb.

    Gives us back the COD we loved, not this halo jr BS
    Image
    3elieve
    User avatar
    Throwdown
    * NET Baller *
     
    Posts: 21095
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Graham, WA


  • I think this is gonna be a big statement to Activision about making repetitive yearly games that no one wants (though I wish it happened sooner). The hugely negative response on the COD release trailer is pretty telling. Black ops 3 is a fun game but the thruster jump futuristic nonsense has to stop.

    I read Infinite Warfare is going to have a personal (customizable?) ship for the space fights (which no one wants) - that's 100% going to be a cash grab for them to sell random BS. I miss the days of big companies selling full complete games without cutting content originally made to sell on 3 later DLC's.
    User avatar
    mistaowen
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2130
    Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:54 pm


  • I'll be getting BF1. I lost what little remaining interest I had in CoD after MW3. I had so much more fun with BF3 and 4.
    Just hope that BF1 doesn't have a ton of issues at launch like BF4 did.
    AAR - CJ Prosise RB/WR/??? - Notre Dame
    User avatar
    TriCHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1490
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:52 pm
    Location: CtPa Town


  • the futuristic stuff sucks. go back to old stuff.
    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions 2014.02.02 Seahawks 43 Broncos 8
    User avatar
    Cyrus12
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2936
    Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:20 am
    Location: BC Canada


  • I found MW3 fun, but it wasn't as good as the ones after, afterwards things just went to hell for COD
    Image
    3elieve
    User avatar
    Throwdown
    * NET Baller *
     
    Posts: 21095
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Graham, WA


  • I quit playing both these franchises a couple years ago.

    It's obvious after iteration #12 that they've run out of fresh ways to play these games. For an older gamer it's also a frustrating experience because I can't commit to playing 3-4 nights a week to just be mediocre.

    Day #1 of release: "Hey I like these new maps."
    Day #3: "Hey look, we're playing an entire team of prestige 10's already."
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 8522
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


  • CoD needs to stop it with all of the futurization stuff, there's enough sci-fi shooters out there that already do it well and decent grounded shooters are few and far between.

    Never played the BF series much besides 1942, but I got BF4 for my PS4 and really enjoyed it. There seems to be a lot more older and mature gamers playing it while CoD is run amok with teenagers and adults that act like teenagers.
    User avatar
    253hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2474
    Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 1:36 am
    Location: PNW


  • I'd given up on multiplayer shooters... Heh, a stupid long time ago. It might've been like CoD: MW (The first one).

    Destiny Taken King bundle on super-clearance got me back into the genre -- Tentatively, at least. I did really like it (Probably PvE more than PvP). So, that led me on to BlOps3, which seemed basically like CoD going, 'Hey, let's do a Destiny sort of thing?' with the various Spec classes.

    In conclusion... it was a'ight. Kinda meh. Decent time sink. Got a prestige or two, then got bored. Back to NBA 2k##.

    I -want- to like one...
    User avatar
    TravTex
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 1729
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:38 am
    Location: San Antonio, TX


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:I quit playing both these franchises a couple years ago.

    It's obvious after iteration #12 that they've run out of fresh ways to play these games. For an older gamer it's also a frustrating experience because I can't commit to playing 3-4 nights a week to just be mediocre.

    Day #1 of release: "Hey I like these new maps."
    Day #3: "Hey look, we're playing an entire team of prestige 10's already."


    Lol bro, same here I played the first night, had stuff to do and then by night 4 me and my friends were up against super killers I never had that least amount of fun in my life.
    Image
    3elieve
    User avatar
    Throwdown
    * NET Baller *
     
    Posts: 21095
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Graham, WA


  • BF1 for me. Been done with COD for awhile. Most BF games are great and have longer then a year shelf-life for multiplayer.
    hawksincebirth wrote:
    So Russell has leverage but marshawn doesn't ? I thought its next man up. Hey we got t jack and bj Daniels right ??
    User avatar
    Cartire
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4772
    Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am




It is currently Thu May 26, 2016 4:56 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NET LOUNGE ]




Information
  • Who is online