Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE SPORTS BAR ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:27 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:20 am
Posts: 132
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
This is a GREAT exposé by Geoff Baker: http://seattletimes.com/html/mariners/2 ... 08xml.html


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:46 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm
Posts: 2986
I think you could re title this to something like "mariners front office has giant dump taken on them night before winter meets and should probably all quit." But I guess it's wordy and could be further shortened if in the shack.

Great piece by Baker and just this morning I was happy to discover he moved off the mariners blog since he usually annoys the hell out of me but this here is some serious journalism. He got a lot names connected to a lot quotes and I bet Armstrong is glad he's retiring now.

This puts big pressure on the organization going into winter meetings and could hurt them. If we're really lucky maybe the absentee ownership axes them. Well I guess you can't do i at this moment maybe. But its fun to think about and I supported Z for quite while past most people. Interested to see the response and wonder how a certain 2B feels. Well probably pretty good for 240 million reasons.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:48 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:45 pm
Posts: 649
Location: Seattle
WOW great read. Jack Z is an idiot. I wounder what Griffey says about him.

_________________
GO HAWKS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:55 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:01 pm
Posts: 830
Location: Bensalem, PA
I wonder how such a classy, well run organization could possibly have 12 straight playoff missing years? That's a head scratcher.

_________________
Hawks fan in Iggles country


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:33 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:40 pm
Posts: 1899
Ugh, they're like the Tampa Bay Bucs of the MLB but instead of the coach that's the problem, it's the entire front office.

As much as I like Nintendo, I wish they would give the team to someone who cares about the city and would run the organization well. Not surprised with all this considering how they screwed the return of the Sonics. Just give the team to Chris Hansen.

_________________
20% off Karmaloop & 10% off PLNDR, rep code: DUCK20

Want to save money? Get cash back from online purchases through Ebates! Referral link here!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:43 pm 
NET Rookie
Online

Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:23 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Washington
Wow. Best article I have read in a long time. If this was in the shack I could go on and on. :229031_banghead:


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:08 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:28 pm
Posts: 39
Disturbing article to say the least. Thank God for football, seahawks look unstoppable and the Huskies just made a huge upgrade with their new Head Coach.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:11 am 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10462
Location: Pasco, WA
All I gotta say is, does this news really surprise anyone? I mean it has seemed pretty clear for the last few years that there has been dysfunction in the M's FO.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:01 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
Posts: 5461
Location: Kansas City, MO
Blitzer88 wrote:
All I gotta say is, does this news really surprise anyone? I mean it has seemed pretty clear for the last few years that there has been dysfunction in the M's FO.

When I still lived in Washington back before 2006 as a part of a class I took for a Management degree I talked with Lincoln and Armstrong in person....they are the exact reason I hope baseball dies and the reason I no longer care about the Mariners. Until Lincoln is out it won't matter what the Mariners do he's like Jerry Jones and the Cowboys.

_________________
43-8...it's all about that action boss....
next man up.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:39 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 9135
Location: Renton Wa.
Well not a surprise, just supports everyones thoughts, only thing thats a bit of an eye opener is how Jerry Jones they are about feeling they can beat up on people emotionally and verbally.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:51 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 17254
Location: Graham, WA
Jesus Christ, now the Cano deal looks like desperation.

_________________
Image
3elieve


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:05 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
Posts: 5461
Location: Kansas City, MO
Throwdown wrote:
Jesus Christ, now the Cano deal looks like desperation.

It's my primary thought but they still have time to make other moves to get another premier hitter hopefully right handed then you may intrigue me.

_________________
43-8...it's all about that action boss....
next man up.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:43 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:22 pm
Posts: 871
All 3 of these idiots need to go asap, they have ruined baseball in Seattle.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:54 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
getnasty wrote:
All 3 of these idiots need to go asap, they have ruined baseball in Seattle.


We have to remember that Armstrong and Lincoln were here for the ARod-Griffey-Buhner-Martinez years. They rebuilt the team with Ichiro and won a record number of games. Inexplicably they were unable to adapt moving forward after such a tremendous job from 1991-2004 (easily our best ever "era" of baseball)

They are entrenched in a certain way of doing things (one that is passing them by...but you can see how a Cano is exactly the player they think solves everything... They just need 3 of them).

Armstrong is gone. Hopefully this article wakes ownership to a need for more change.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:08 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1840
Assuming Baker is correct it sounds as if Z is as phony as a 3 dollar bill. They Ms to have a good team it starts at the top. The owners need to clean house ASAP.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:47 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 5370
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Happypuppy wrote:
Assuming Baker is correct it sounds as if Z is as phony as a 3 dollar bill. They Ms to have a good team it starts at the top. The owners need to clean house ASAP.

The "ownership" is a corporation. The only thing they're going to do is have a committee look at the profit & loss statement and if it looks acceptable then they won't do a damn thing.

_________________
Image
You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:56 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9530
Location: Monroe, WA
I have found that the longer the streak of mediocrity and losing lasts, the higher up the food chain one has to go to root out the problem.

I once thought Z might be the answer. It now seems obvious he's at the root of the problem. If 'ownership' lets him continue in charge it says what they think about the Mariners.

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:57 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
SeatownJay wrote:
Happypuppy wrote:
Assuming Baker is correct it sounds as if Z is as phony as a 3 dollar bill. They Ms to have a good team it starts at the top. The owners need to clean house ASAP.

The "ownership" is a corporation. The only thing they're going to do is have a committee look at the profit & loss statement and if it looks acceptable then they won't do a damn thing.


An ownership that just invested 240 million in a player isn't sitting around.

This club is at its tipping point (which is why I'm excited about Cano). No matter what Armstrong and Jack Z are now in a spotlight. No hiding... Even if it works they may (probably) won't be around to celebrate it


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:12 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
Posts: 2971
Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest
I believe that most of this is true. There is smoke here about, for example, the shift to acquiring players that hit dingers. Also, Chuck and Howard have long been incompetent in GM and managerial hires.

And the sheer number of screwups in the Josh Lueke mold set a pattern of inability to properly GM for Jack Z.

_________________
"Well, I like the 49ers because they're pure of heart, Seattle because they've got something to prove, and the Raiders because they always cheat."

-Lisa Simpson

Well, at least Lisa got two of three right.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:12 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
Smelly McUgly wrote:
I believe that most of this is true. There is smoke here about, for example, the shift to acquiring players that hit dingers. Also, Chuck and Howard have long been incompetent in GM and managerial hires.

And the sheer number of screwups in the Josh Lueke mold set a pattern of inability to properly GM for Jack Z.



Its not a shift...these guys ran the team when we had 3 guys of 30+ and led the lead in homers (Tino junior and bones..with Edgar close)...they were running the show when we won 116. They bought Sexson and Beltre. The last ten years have been about diminishing return. Last three years about trusting the kids (and failing to offer appropriate support)

They like big hitting and pitching. Theyve tried to get a big hitter in here for three years and Now they have.

Key will be what's next. I'd love to see them gone. But let's not be so forgetful of who these guys are

Seriously Ms fans...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:42 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 9815
If I'm not mistaken Howard Lincoln wasn't in the position of power that he current holds, until 2001ish......

_________________
42-13, 29-3, and 23-17 and a Lombardi trophy from THIS century, deal with it niner trolls

SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:01 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 9135
Location: Renton Wa.
Pat Gillick and Lou got us those wins, Lou and Pat had historic clashes with Armstrong and Lincoln but winning kept a lot under wraps, Pat and Lou both left becasue of Lincoln and Armstrong.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
Sports Hernia wrote:
If I'm not mistaken Howard Lincoln wasn't in the position of power that he current holds, until 2001ish......


He and Armstrong have pretty much run the show since 1993... I think he became ultimate leader in 2003?


Last edited by Uncle Si on Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:11 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
chris98251 wrote:
Pat Gillick and Lou got us those wins, Lou and Pat had historic clashes with Armstrong and Lincoln but winning kept a lot under wraps, Pat and Lou both left becasue of Lincoln and Armstrong.


Its not about who got the wins. Trust me I'm not trying to give them any credit. (Those clashes being Lou never feeling he had enough hitting to win)

I'm saying their experiences in management are deep in the big hitter-ace pitcher mentality because of those successes

Thus a Cano-Ibanez-Morales/King-Iwa-Price team is their perfect scenario


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:57 pm 
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:47 am
Posts: 1616
Location: Spokangeles
Uncle Si wrote:
Sports Hernia wrote:
If I'm not mistaken Howard Lincoln wasn't in the position of power that he current holds, until 2001ish......


He and Armstrong have pretty much run the show since 1993... I think he became ultimate leader in 2003?


Yes. He retired from running Nintendo of America around the release of the Gamecube in the US. I always admired him as the CEO of NOA--took his directives from Japan well but still saw how unique the US market was and made the right moves in the video game business.

Just goes to show that being a good leader in one field doesn't mean you can do the same in another.

_________________
...and with one kiss of his bicep he proved, without a shadow of doubt, that he was every bit as much of a DBag as his coach, and most of his team's fanbase. Finally, he could call himself a Niner!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:51 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:23 pm
Posts: 14
shouldnt be a surprise at all. fans have been calling for howie and chucky to step down for years now


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:27 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10040
This is an awesome expose.
Jack's moves have reeked of old baseball thinking combined with desperation. The M's have rushed players to the bigs, then punished those same players for not producing. The ignoring of advanced metrics while in the same division as the A's is such a contrast in thinking.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1840
Scottemojo wrote:
This is an awesome expose.
Jack's moves have reeked of old baseball thinking combined with desperation. The M's have rushed players to the bigs, then punished those same players for not producing. The ignoring of advanced metrics while in the same division as the A's is such a contrast in thinking.


Excellent post. It is the best piece of Sports investigative journalism in a long time in our area. Remember" in Jack we trust" ?

I would not sign anyone else until first we get the best GM we can so we don't get saddled with a bunch of bad deals.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:01 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
Happypuppy wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
This is an awesome expose.
Jack's moves have reeked of old baseball thinking combined with desperation. The M's have rushed players to the bigs, then punished those same players for not producing. The ignoring of advanced metrics while in the same division as the A's is such a contrast in thinking.


Excellent post. It is the best piece of Sports investigative journalism in a long time in our area. Remember" in Jack we trust" ?

I would not sign anyone else until first we get the best GM we can so we don't get saddled with a bunch of bad deals.



A contrast that the Rangers and Angels have used to get to World Series...(just saying advanced metrics has its place in different organizations, and very rarely is it used to win championships)

I'm all for change, and running an organization like the A's (or Rays, or even the Cardinals). But we just committed to 240$ (million) in one player. As much as we want change in Jack Z, he is doing the bidding of Lincoln, who is going nowhere. Do we really want that change now?

The team needs atleast 2 more additions to compliment Cano.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:37 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1840
Uncle Si wrote:


A contrast that the Rangers and Angels have used to get to World Series...(just saying advanced metrics has its place in different organizations, and very rarely is it used to win championships)

I'm all for change, and running an organization like the A's (or Rays, or even the Cardinals). But we just committed to 240$ (million) in one player. As much as we want change in Jack Z, he is doing the bidding of Lincoln, who is going nowhere. Do we really want that change now?

The team needs atleast 2 more additions to compliment Cano.



How about this. If it does not show incompetence I do not not what does.

"By mid-day Friday, Seattle had heard that some team bid nine years and $225 million for Robinson Cano, so the Mariners upped their bid to $240 million and 10 years before apparently realizing the initial bid had come from themselves, too."

http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/texas- ... urking.ece


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:08 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
Happypuppy wrote:
Uncle Si wrote:


A contrast that the Rangers and Angels have used to get to World Series...(just saying advanced metrics has its place in different organizations, and very rarely is it used to win championships)

I'm all for change, and running an organization like the A's (or Rays, or even the Cardinals). But we just committed to 240$ (million) in one player. As much as we want change in Jack Z, he is doing the bidding of Lincoln, who is going nowhere. Do we really want that change now?

The team needs atleast 2 more additions to compliment Cano.



How about this. If it does not show incompetence I do not not what does.

"By mid-day Friday, Seattle had heard that some team bid nine years and $225 million for Robinson Cano, so the Mariners upped their bid to $240 million and 10 years before apparently realizing the initial bid had come from themselves, too."

http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/texas- ... urking.ece



there's no question of the incompetence. there is two decades of frustration thats easily trackable. why is every attempt to find some sort of rationality in all this somehow defending these two... its just not.

we've married ourselves to Cano. Like it or not. I've been hoping for a change at the top since Lou was tossing bases in the Kingdome. But we are here, as an organization.

given that, do we really want to wholesale change right before the winter meetings? this is not a rhetorical question... i'm really asking.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:12 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10040
Uncle Si wrote:
Happypuppy wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
This is an awesome expose.
Jack's moves have reeked of old baseball thinking combined with desperation. The M's have rushed players to the bigs, then punished those same players for not producing. The ignoring of advanced metrics while in the same division as the A's is such a contrast in thinking.


Excellent post. It is the best piece of Sports investigative journalism in a long time in our area. Remember" in Jack we trust" ?

I would not sign anyone else until first we get the best GM we can so we don't get saddled with a bunch of bad deals.



A contrast that the Rangers and Angels have used to get to World Series...(just saying advanced metrics has its place in different organizations, and very rarely is it used to win championships)

I'm all for change, and running an organization like the A's (or Rays, or even the Cardinals). But we just committed to 240$ (million) in one player. As much as we want change in Jack Z, he is doing the bidding of Lincoln, who is going nowhere. Do we really want that change now?


The team needs atleast 2 more additions to compliment Cano.


I thought they needed 2 RH bats more than anything. Cano does nothing to change that.

Personally, I think it is a mistake to assume advanced metrics is exclusive to low payroll. Boston, anyone?
But far beyond those philisophical directions, if it's true that Seattle has a culture of no dissension from the lower ranks combined with a couple of guys who micromanage the manager, there will NEVER be success in Seattle.

The Cano signing isn't the mistake, it's just a single piece of evidence that these guys are idiots. If they actually did outbid themselves, it takes on a whole new layer of ineptitude, because that would be a mistake made exclusively out of fear.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:23 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
Scottemojo wrote:
Uncle Si wrote:
Happypuppy wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
This is an awesome expose.
Jack's moves have reeked of old baseball thinking combined with desperation. The M's have rushed players to the bigs, then punished those same players for not producing. The ignoring of advanced metrics while in the same division as the A's is such a contrast in thinking.


Excellent post. It is the best piece of Sports investigative journalism in a long time in our area. Remember" in Jack we trust" ?

I would not sign anyone else until first we get the best GM we can so we don't get saddled with a bunch of bad deals.



A contrast that the Rangers and Angels have used to get to World Series...(just saying advanced metrics has its place in different organizations, and very rarely is it used to win championships)

I'm all for change, and running an organization like the A's (or Rays, or even the Cardinals). But we just committed to 240$ (million) in one player. As much as we want change in Jack Z, he is doing the bidding of Lincoln, who is going nowhere. Do we really want that change now?


The team needs atleast 2 more additions to compliment Cano.


I thought they needed 2 RH bats more than anything. Cano does nothing to change that.

Personally, I think it is a mistake to assume advanced metrics is exclusive to low payroll. Boston, anyone?
But far beyond those philisophical directions, if it's true that Seattle has a culture of no dissension from the lower ranks combined with a couple of guys who micromanage the manager, there will NEVER be success in Seattle.

The Cano signing isn't the mistake, it's just a single piece of evidence that these guys are idiots. If they actually did outbid themselves, it takes on a whole new layer of ineptitude, because that would be a mistake made exclusively out of fear.



I get why outbidding yourself is a mistake... but why is signing the top free agent in the MLB sign they are idiots?

Again, i'm just trying to round this conversation out. Cano is a Mariner. whats next?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:48 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3087
We are the Washington Redskins of the MLB with even less success. Just a straight up incompetent organization. I want to like the Ms, but I can't look at them with anything but slight disdain after their very public opposition to the Seattle basketball arena. I can't truly like this team until the current leadership is completely eradicated.

I read the article, and there's nothing about it that surprised me.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:52 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10040
It doesn't mean they are idiots. To my eye, it means they are desperate. If they accidentally outbid themselves, then they are idiots.

But mostly, it just appears that intellectual dishonest, and in the case of the guy accused of rape, actual dishonesty, is part of the way they do business. So thinking that the Cano move may be undone by some other crappy move is both kneejerk, but still likely accurate.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:08 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
Scottemojo wrote:
It doesn't mean they are idiots. To my eye, it means they are desperate. If they accidentally outbid themselves, then they are idiots.

But mostly, it just appears that intellectual dishonest, and in the case of the guy accused of rape, actual dishonesty, is part of the way they do business. So thinking that the Cano move may be undone by some other crappy move is both kneejerk, but still likely accurate.


No argument from me... And the desperation started with their attempts to sign Fielder

I guess I'm just all in on this because.... Well really what choice is there. It either blows up in our face and the end of Jack Z and Lincoln follow...or it works and we start winning games.

But like a long boring poker game, at least now its all in


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:10 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 1627
This piece should have been written a few years earlier. I rememeber when Baker and USSM were going back and forth and it seemed Baker was more interested in maintaining access to the program over hard hitting journalism. I am pleased that he published this at all though.

_________________
|~=[==~||~==]=~|
||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 3:08 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1840
Cano is a piece but I am not that keen on the Price rumors if true. The cost I am hearing us steep. We lost some good players last time for an arm.

We can move Franklin and we have a log jam at first with Smoak and Montero. Maybe package both for a out fielder.

I hate to give up in Ackerly but he is not an outfielder. He is a pretty decent infielder. We could keep franklin and move him if a good deal was to be had.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:37 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:28 pm
Posts: 39
The Cano move is to little to late. Mariners should have signed Fielder a couple of years ago, instead of trading for Montero. The Cano deal had to be done for PR reasons, need to get those butts in the seats. The whole article just shows what a mess the front office is IMO and should of been reported years ago.

Anyone know of a good Mariner forum?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:43 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:28 pm
Posts: 39
Uncle Si wrote:
Smelly McUgly wrote:
I believe that most of this is true. There is smoke here about, for example, the shift to acquiring players that hit dingers. Also, Chuck and Howard have long been incompetent in GM and managerial hires.

And the sheer number of screwups in the Josh Lueke mold set a pattern of inability to properly GM for Jack Z.



Its not a shift...these guys ran the team when we had 3 guys of 30+ and led the lead in homers (Tino junior and bones..with Edgar close)...they were running the show when we won 116. They bought Sexson and Beltre. The last ten years have been about diminishing return. Last three years about trusting the kids (and failing to offer appropriate support)

They like big hitting and pitching. They've tried to get a big hitter in here for three years and Now they have.

Key will be what's next. I'd love to see them gone. But let's not be so forgetful of who these guys are

Seriously Ms fans...


They have been trying to get a big hitter on the cheap. Should have pony up for Fielder rather then trade for Montero. Now they are desperate and go all out on the wrong player. The Cano deal is going to bite the Mariners in the butt, without a doubt.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 8:45 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
Posts: 5461
Location: Kansas City, MO
haroldseattle wrote:
The Cano move is to little to late. Mariners should have signed Fielder a couple of years ago, instead of trading for Montero. The Cano deal had to be done for PR reasons, need to get those butts in the seats. The whole article just shows what a mess the front office is IMO and should of been reported years ago.

Anyone know of a good Mariner forum?

Try Mariner Central.

_________________
43-8...it's all about that action boss....
next man up.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:35 pm 
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 778
Location: Great Falls, Montana
http://www.marinercentral.com/forum/ind ... -the-show/

haroldseattle wrote:
Anyone know of a good Mariner forum?


*edit* didn't see KC's post

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:56 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 9815
Uncle Si wrote:
Sports Hernia wrote:
If I'm not mistaken Howard Lincoln wasn't in the position of power that he current holds, until 2001ish......


He and Armstrong have pretty much run the show since 1993... I think he became ultimate leader in 2003?


Could be, I could be a year or 2 off when took over the CEO type position.

_________________
42-13, 29-3, and 23-17 and a Lombardi trophy from THIS century, deal with it niner trolls

SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:01 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:59 pm
Posts: 277
Location: Pewyallup
"In Jack we trust." Boy do I feel like an idiot. He sure seemed like he had all the right ideas upon initial hire. I'm happy for Wedge - seemed like a humble guy in a bad spot trying to do right by his players.

_________________
"The problem with the internet is, that one can never trust the authenticity of a source." - Abraham Lincoln


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:27 am 
* NET Draft Guru *
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3589
Location: Bellingham, WA
Uncle Si wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
It doesn't mean they are idiots. To my eye, it means they are desperate. If they accidentally outbid themselves, then they are idiots.

But mostly, it just appears that intellectual dishonest, and in the case of the guy accused of rape, actual dishonesty, is part of the way they do business. So thinking that the Cano move may be undone by some other crappy move is both kneejerk, but still likely accurate.


I guess I'm just all in on this because.... Well really what choice is there. It either blows up in our face and the end of Jack Z and Lincoln follow...or it works and we start winning games.


If poor personnel moves and losing would've gotten Howard and Chuck fired, they'd have been gone years ago.

As for change right now, absolutely. If not properly managed (ie not getting more pieces), the Cano deal won't be enough now and will be an anchor around our necks down the road. Do we really want to give these guys more time to offer deals that will hamstring the a competent FO (if/when we ever get one)?

_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:29 am 
* Capt'n Dom *
* Capt'n Dom *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8809
Location: Granite Falls, WA
Question.. Who fires Howard?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:00 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 4188
Tech Worlds wrote:
Question.. Who fires Howard?



He's the CEO and (perhaps) majority owner of Nintendo. I believe owner who recently died had taken his majority stakes and handed them over in 2004.

Howard only goes if there is a major change at Nintendo, the Ms are sold, or he retires/passes on


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:21 am 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 4649
The suggestions and involvement by Lincoln and Armstrong by themselves don't necessarily constitute meddling. They demonstrate a desire to win at some level. But if you feel your manager is doing so poorly and missing so many of these obvious suggestions, then you probably hired the wrong guy and that's still on you.

Or (and this is sure what it sounds like was going on) the reason for incessant suggestions is that you've hired a crap GM who builds a farm system full of young guys not one of whom pop at the major league level, you haven't wanted to expand payroll so you can get proven players in to ease the young players in or increase their success, and so basically you've asked your manager to do the impossible, it's not working, and you somehow think the answer is to pester him to death with suggestions that amount to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Jack Z is no great shakes and that has been plenty obvious. The rest of the stuff about him throwing guys under the bus...eh...I mean it's interesting but the main thing to me is that he sucks at his job and needs to go.

As far as the Cano deal goes, yeah it's probably a desperation move but that doesn't mean I poo on it. ALL of these crazy deals become albatrosses down the road so that doesn't disqualify it. Cano is a legit superstar we overpaid like we have to do to get guys to Seattle, so what. We weren't spending anything anyways. The offense will be better. If they open the wallet again out of desperation and get another bat or two the offense might even be decent. I would definitely rather it not be Jack Z pulling the trigger on the deals but we can evaluate them as they happen.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:56 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am
Posts: 2045
...and people still bother to support this "team".

Maybe they should take a look across the street and take a page from the 'hawks book on how to run a quality organization. I couldn't care less about this team, and won't until they blow everything up and start from scratch (excluding players that bust their ass for the city/fans).

My M's hate is still sitting on the rack, collecting dust, and hasn't been touched in a few years. I can't wait to actually wear it (I love the hat), but I can in no way support the bullshit that is the Seattle Mariners. I'll go to High School games down the street and gladly spend my money to support those kids. Plus it never hurts to get out of the house and watch crazy parents do their thing.

_________________
Image

Go Hawks.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tension in the Mariners front office
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:26 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9530
Location: Monroe, WA
SouthSoundHawk wrote:
My M's hate is still sitting on the rack, collecting dust, and hasn't been touched in a few years.

Interesting typo there, or was it.....

;)

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE SPORTS BAR ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.