I'm not a Roger fanboy, though. I think he has done a good overall job, (not great, but good/solid) but I've got issues with him. I think I am forced to present myself as more of a Goodell supporter than I really am because of how many people blame him for what are really the actions and decisions of the owners. You say I'm defending the game manipulation puppeteer, but Tagliabue is the commish that screwed us in XL. I'll tell you who I've got way more issues with; Dan Snyder and Jerruh Jones.
However, your point was specious because you're basing the fact that you can even make an argument as evidence to support that argument, and frankly, that's just not how stuff works. I get what you mean, but virtually every level-headed person in existence has some sort of belief or opinion on something that is way out there by the average person's standards, no matter how well-grounded that person is. In other words, if logical person A has an opinion, the opinion has merit because that person is logical, is what your argument amounts to; and it just doesn't work that way, in my opinion. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, but it's not something that can be relied upon.
Also, you're not trolling right now at all. I only accuse you of trolling when you ARE doing it, either intentionally or unintentionally.
Rams bet status: honored. Bradford still sucks.
RedAlice is right.
"VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama