Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ NFL NATION ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:59 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am
Posts: 597
What would you give for JJ Watt?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 5:14 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm
Posts: 1745
zip, he is good no doubt but how much does he improve Seattle? Not by much if at all on D.

_________________
NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 5:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 904
Sidney rice


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 5:24 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Ft. Meade, MD
Easily a 1st round pick, and then cut Red, since Watt would take his spot, and we'd need Red's salary.

Just like the Harvin trade, there's very little chance of getting someone that good late in the 1st round.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:41 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 9878
Why would Houston trade away their best player? Just to help Seattle?

_________________
42-13, 29-3, and 23-17 and a Lombardi trophy from THIS century, deal with it niner trolls

SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:53 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2748
Sports Hernia wrote:
Why would Houston trade away their best player? Just to help Seattle?


Everyone has a price.

I wouldn't. Price would be too steep to be beneficial. You'd need to give them something better than Thomas and Sherman to make them entertain the idea.

Remember when some folks around here honestly thought the Jets would trade us Revis for Flynn straight up because they needed a QB?

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 5:17 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:37 pm
Posts: 349
A 6 for 1 hypothetical special:

Houston's JJ Watt, in exchange for...

Seattle's TJack, Robert Turbin, Paul McQuistan, Breno Giacomini, Sidney Rice, & Red Bryant.

Think about it... they need a new Quarterback who will have the respect of his fellow players, they need to keep Adrian Foster fresh legs for the playoffs, they need offensive line help, a 3rd receiver to go with Andre Johnson & DeAndre Hopkins, and a replacement DE/DT.

We get to keep BJ Daniels as the backup QB, bring in Christine Michael more often, bring in the future OL now in Bowie & Bailey, start Jermaine Kearse (and hopefully draft Odell Beckham Jr.), and get a real 'Monstar' on our DLine to perfectly compliment Bennett + all our speedy guys. And we get major salary relief for 2014 to pay our 'core'.

Awww... shucks... you mean they said no, negatorio, no friggin' wayyy Jose?!?
Wait! It could happen... :th2thumbs:


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 5:48 pm 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 17548
Location: Graham, WA
3 Firsts

_________________
Image
3elieve


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 5:56 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: The 5-0
Throwdown wrote:
3 Firsts


Most realistic.

I was thinking 2 1sts and a 3rd...but that would likely not be enough to get it done.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:02 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:40 pm
Posts: 1907
Any Dlinemen of their choosing except for Bennett or Rice and 2 first rounders. Realistically it would probably take 3 first rounders and a bit more.

Would rather get a star oline or LB though for less if we're just throwing out suggestions.

_________________
20% off Karmaloop & 10% off PLNDR, rep code: DUCK20

Want to save money? Get cash back from online purchases through Ebates! Referral link here!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:47 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:38 am
Posts: 628
How can you say he wouldn't make a difference for us? He is hands down the most dominant defensive player in the league. It would take an RG3 haul minimum imo.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:53 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: The 5-0
It would be akin to having a modern day Tez back on the team. Or a Reggie White.

Yeah, in today's draft, that's 3 1sts for sure. And probably a bargain at that.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 10:05 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:07 pm
Posts: 1309
I'd give them T-Jack, Sidney Rice, Clinton McDonald, and Tony McDaniel.

Plus, 1st and 5th in 2014, 2nd and 3rd in 2015.

T-Jack would fit well in their offensive system as its almost a cookie cutter of the Seahawks O, Sidney Rice would benefit from two WRs that are much better than him (No team would want to face Johnson/Rice/Hopkins plus Daniels/Foster/Tate). McDonald/McDaniel are cheap options but effective options to ease their pain a bit on losing Watt.

Bryant wouldn't be part of the trade because of his contract, in my scenario he would take a restructure to make it work.

Seahawks D-Line would look like:

LEO: Clemons, Avril, Schoefield, Mayowa
3T: J.J. Watt,
NT: Brandon Mebane, Jordan Hill
5T: Red Bryant, Michael Bennett

Good Bye Opposing Rushing Offenses, Hello Dominant Interior Pressure

Drop Clemons and Avril, let Michael Bennett walk to restructure Watt. Re-structure Bryant to remain with the team to about Mebane's contract.

Schoefield, Mayowa are the LEOs. Bruce Irvin at SAM. Switch K.J. Wright and Bobby Wagner. Gregg Scruggs would be back, hopefully along with a healthier Jesse Williams and Korey Toomer for the depth.

_________________
#3 taught Doubters, GREATNESS can be a product of HARD WORK.
#25 taught America, that we're ALL just CLASSLESS jerks.
#24 taught the Media, to REAP what you SOW.
#12 taught the NFL, TO BE LOUDER.

YOU WANTED THIS NOISE, AMERICA.
DON'T PLAY WITH DYNAMITE, IF YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE BOOM.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 10:18 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am
Posts: 597
Sports Hernia wrote:
Why would Houston trade away their best player? Just to help Seattle?


Hypothetical.

hy·po·thet·i·cal [hahy-puh-thet-i-kuhl] adjective
1. assumed by hypothesis; supposed: a hypothetical case.
2. of, pertaining to, involving, or characterized by hypothesis: hypothetical reasoning.
3. given to making hypotheses.
4. Logic.
a.(of a proposition) highly conjectural; not well supported by available evidence.
b.(of a proposition or syllogism) conditional.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 8:20 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 9878
CallMeADawg wrote:
Sports Hernia wrote:
Why would Houston trade away their best player? Just to help Seattle?


Hypothetical.

hy·po·thet·i·cal [hahy-puh-thet-i-kuhl] adjective
1. assumed by hypothesis; supposed: a hypothetical case.
2. of, pertaining to, involving, or characterized by hypothesis: hypothetical reasoning.
3. given to making hypotheses.
4. Logic.
a.(of a proposition) highly conjectural; not well supported by available evidence.
b.(of a proposition or syllogism) conditional.

Um yeah, I know the definition of the word.
It would never happen. Why don't we go trade all of our crappy players and practice squad players for all pros. Fantasy football trades are not reality.

_________________
42-13, 29-3, and 23-17 and a Lombardi trophy from THIS century, deal with it niner trolls

SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical Question Only
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:36 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:27 pm
Posts: 1877
Location: Bay Area, CA
Rice and 3rd round pick.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ NFL NATION ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AlaskaHAWK, Lawke and 28 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.