BJ Daniels

BJ Daniels was released by the 49ers, do the seahawks sign him?

revenge-ish for Harper?

Why in god's name would we sign BJ Daniels?

to stick it to the niners?

PS maybe, we did just open up a spot

HereToRead":z002tce7 said:

to stick it to the niners?

Click to expand...

How would we be sticking it to them? They just cut this guy.

maybe they want him on their PS? so if seattle signs him, they cant do that?

a la Harper

HereToRead":268uc5vh said:

maybe they want him on their PS? so if seattle signs him, they cant do that?

a la Harper

Click to expand...

And who would we cut to make this would-be fleecing happen?

im not advocating the move, im just wondering if people think it will happen

HereToRead":3193fzpp said:

im not advocating the move, im just wondering if people think it will happen

Click to expand...

Um no...why would we do that?

Makes no sense to sign him. We are good at QB.

The Texans should sign him. They play the Niners this week.

Looks like they released Daniels and might sign Skelton.

Skelton is a stand-up guy...
http://www.cincyjungle.com/2013/5/31/43 ... ort-claims

HereToRead":24mt89gv said:

maybe they want him on their PS? so if seattle signs him, they cant do that?

a la Harper

Click to expand...

And how has that strategy worked out for the Noners?

HunnyBadger":iqwxalss said:

Looks like they released Daniels and might sign Skelton.

Skelton is a stand-up guy...
http://www.cincyjungle.com/2013/5/31/43 ... ort-claims

Click to expand...

Must have an upcoming game vs the Cards.

Throwdown":r6s4e58x said:

PS maybe, we did just open up a spot

Click to expand...

If they wanted to, they couldn't sign him to the practice squad unless he cleared waivers.

Basically, if any player with less than four years experience is cut they go to waivers, and teams can pick that player up off of waivers, with the team with the worst record in the previous year getting first dibs, and going down from there. If a team picks up a player off of waivers they can't put him on their practice squad, as by rule they have to open up a spot for him on their 53 man roster. If a player clears waivers he is free to sign onto a team's practice squad that he wants.

Long story short is that if Daniels doesn't clear waivers he has to be put on someone's 53 man roster, and if he does clear waivers, he's most likely just going to be a FA or be resigned to the 9ers practice squad.

I'm just saying, he wouldn't have a shot at the 53 until next preseason, we could've released Konz in anticipation for the next 24 hours.

I dunno it's just mindless speculation on my part.

Don't need him. TJ is just fine as backup. We can find our own 7th rd QB in next years draft if we can't re-sign TJ.

TJ is basically the perfect back-up for this team, and I think we should keep him for as long as he's reasonably priced. I have a feeling there might be a perception in the league that he's only suited for our system, so that helps our cause. QBs have a long shelf life in this league, especially back-ups who don't see much action. Don't necessarily see the benefit of youth at this position as long as Russell is on his rookie deal.

And we apparently claimed him.

There PC and JS go again.

Don't I look the right frigging idiot.