Throwdown wrote:I mean Jackson was notorious to my recollection from doing some nice things the first 2 weeks of the seaosn, then you'd never hear from him again the other 15 weeks.
kearly wrote:Nothing against Jackson, but the Lo-Jack apologists at field gulls drove me crazy with their stupidity and made me want to see him fail post-Seattle. The "b...b...b... but he had 6 sacks in 2010" argument was beyond lame.
MontanaHawk05 wrote:kearly wrote:Nothing against Jackson, but the Lo-Jack apologists at field gulls drove me crazy with their stupidity and made me want to see him fail post-Seattle. The "b...b...b... but he had 6 sacks in 2010" argument was beyond lame.
Well of course they're going to take the position opposite the average fan.
Hawk Strap wrote:Jackson sucks
It is currently Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:15 pm