Seneca Wallace

Vetamur

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
7,176
Reaction score
16
Why is Seneca the worst? Despite being undersized and of limited QB talent through hard work and other talents he has had a 10 year career in the NFL. Yeah, nearly all as a back up. So? I wouldnt have guessed hed still be playing at this point when he was a Seahawk.
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
He was underrated here as a backup. Never took sacks, never fumbled, went roughly 200 attempts without an INT, while not having any WR's or running game to assist.

Seneca was a good game manager.
 

425HawkSpark

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
438
Location
Seattle
The famous senica move was to panic and run 5 yards loss out of bounds. He was never successfull. He was never more than a backup.
 

Vetamur

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
7,176
Reaction score
16
Never more than a back up.. And never expected to be more than a back up. And since when does carving out a 10 year career as a back up make you "the worst"?
Some people are hard to please..
 

razor150

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2009
Messages
2,078
Reaction score
0
Well, he is better at football then all of us combined. So maybe he isn't the worst. He was a good back up for us, so there is that.
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
425HawkSpark":o5ezistm said:
The famous senica move was to panic and run 5 yards loss out of bounds. He was never successfull. He was never more than a backup.

He did that once...and that's it.

He did in 2008 (IIRC that was the year) have 6 dropped TD passes. Most over 30 yards. That's also the year he went nearly 200 attempts without an INT. You're clearly mistaken.

Seneca even played reasonably well in Cleveland. He was a game manager, so much so Delhomme coined him "checkdown Charlie".

I hate the revisionist history.
 

Shadowhawk

New member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,513
Reaction score
0
It didn't help matters either when Jim Mora basically ordered Wallace not to run in 2009 when Hasselbeck was hurt. His rationale was that he didn't want to risk Wallace getting hurt, which was understandable, but you have a quarterback whose best asset at the time was his running ability and you don't let him run?
 

Seahawk Sailor

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
22,963
Reaction score
1
Location
California via Negros Occidental, Philippines
1. Wallace was much better than folks here remember.

2. Mora completely ruined him, giving us the guy who ran out of bounds for a five yard loss.

3. People remember recent history (#2) better, and thus he was much better than folks here remember (#1).
 
Top