Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ NFL NATION ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:39 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm
Posts: 2112
Looks terrible, I'm glad we got Russell last year. People would be pissed with Barkley in a seahawks uni.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:19 pm 
* Master Chief *
* Master Chief *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 7408
Location: CVN-68
What a noodle arm.

_________________
@SeahawkGreg

Image

"I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:58 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 8686
Location: Is Everything
Impossible. English said he would be the number one pick.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:55 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: The 5-0
There was never a chance Barkley would be drafted by the Hawks.

A better device to measure Wilson by would be Matt Flynn, who looked very good tonite. Bonehead play by Pryor (go figure) made Flynn look that much better.

I am plenty happy with Mr. Wilson (!) but it will be interesting watching both Flynn and Wilson going forward.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:24 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 7863
CALIHAWK1 wrote:
Impossible. English said he would be the number one pick.


It's good to know that my name gets mentioned like this when a guy looks bad in his first pre-season game. I feel like I've made it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:29 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 9234
Location: Renton Wa.
English > then Kiper.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:32 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 8686
Location: Is Everything
theENGLISHseahawk wrote:
CALIHAWK1 wrote:
Impossible. English said he would be the number one pick.


It's good to know that my name gets mentioned like this when a guy looks bad in his first pre-season game. I feel like I've made it.


Actually you and I have gone roumd and round on him since his junior year. Looking bad (in garbage time) and being behind Foles (who you trashed) on the depth chart are two different things.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:43 pm 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9923
At least theEnglish's evaluations are remembered. That's not a shot, its a good thing.

I didn't see the game, but it won't surprise me if he struggles initially. I think he'd be fine with a more established pro coach. At least intially thatll hurt him. Eventually he'll surpass his athletic ability, ala a Penninington, Krieg, Kitna, Fiedler, etc.

That was an odd team for him.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:19 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 7863
CALIHAWK1 wrote:
Actually you and I have gone roumd and round on him since his junior year. Looking bad (in garbage time) and being behind Foles (who you trashed) on the depth chart are two different things.


I don't remember going round and round with anyone on Barkley. I remember liking him a ton, and still do. If he fails in the NFL then I'll lose zero sleep.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:54 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10064
So a guy who has ran a drop back pro style for the last 8 years is struggling in a WAC attack read option? Say it isn't so!

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:17 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 9844
I almost suspect that Kelly traded (peanuts) for Barkley just to keep the fanbase / media pressure off his back until he can draft Marcus Mariota in 2014 or 2015.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:24 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm
Posts: 2112
pehawk wrote:
At least theEnglish's evaluations are remembered. That's not a shot, its a good thing.

I didn't see the game, but it won't surprise me if he struggles initially. I think he'd be fine with a more established pro coach. At least intially thatll hurt him. Eventually he'll surpass his athletic ability, ala a Penninington, Krieg, Kitna, Fiedler, etc.

That was an odd team for him.


Yeah, but Vick and Foles looked really good in the game. Philly is going to put up points, to bad their d is going to give up a bunch also.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:45 pm 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9923
CPHawk wrote:
pehawk wrote:
At least theEnglish's evaluations are remembered. That's not a shot, its a good thing.

I didn't see the game, but it won't surprise me if he struggles initially. I think he'd be fine with a more established pro coach. At least intially thatll hurt him. Eventually he'll surpass his athletic ability, ala a Penninington, Krieg, Kitna, Fiedler, etc.

That was an odd team for him.


Yeah, but Vick and Foles looked really good in the game. Philly is going to put up points, to bad their d is going to give up a bunch also.


Look at it this way; how would Kitna do in Chip's system? Pennington? Matt Flynn?

I disagree with kearly. While there's been regime changes in Philly, I'm sure the thought of "investing" in QB's, like short term bonds, is the motive. It's what Andy and friends did; convert 2-5th round QB's into 1st, 2nd's, CB's, anything.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:19 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 9844
pehawk wrote:
Look at it this way; how would Kitna do in Chip's system? Pennington? Matt Flynn?

I disagree with kearly. While there's been regime changes in Philly, I'm sure the thought of "investing" in QB's, like short term bonds, is the motive. It's what Andy and friends did; convert 2-5th round QB's into 1st, 2nd's, CB's, anything.


FWIW, I was mostly joking.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:49 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:41 pm
Posts: 295
All we know from these first preseason games is tjack is the ultimate back up and barkley should jump off a cliff. These games have no game planning at all, with a bunch of random players mashed together. According to the average .net poster rational Whitehurst should be a HOF QB.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:27 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 6431
cockeyhawk wrote:
All we know from these first preseason games is tjack is the ultimate back up and barkley should jump off a cliff. These games have no game planning at all, with a bunch of random players mashed together. According to the average .net poster rational Whitehurst should be a HOF QB.


With his 0 TD's and 2 INT's right? According to Niner's fans, Kaep is the greatest QB ever for leading a "perfect drive" against an elite defense on its first drive. And the only thing that matters is the 1st team.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
 Post Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:13 am 
* NET Starfish *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 10244
Location: Helm's Deep
cockeyhawk wrote:
All we know from these first preseason games is tjack is the ultimate back up and barkley should jump off a cliff. These games have no game planning at all, with a bunch of random players mashed together. According to the average .net poster rational Whitehurst should be a HOF QB.



Keep it up, man. Your posts are pure gold. Thank you.

_________________
Rzzzzz...


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ NFL NATION ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AlaskaHAWK, HansGruber, Kennedyin92, SalishHawkFan, Sports Hernia, wizard1183 and 23 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.