Surprise rival for seahawks...

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. RATING: PG-13
Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:07 pm
  • Throwdown wrote:Lol he wants a gold star for being competitive, cute.


    Wilson was sacked 8 times by the Rams. Kappy was sacked 8 times by the Rams. Rams knocked Smith out which is why Kappy is even playing today.

    The Rams earned their gold star in the NFCW by owning the NFCW. Now they will earn respect NFL wide. It's so obvious its silly not to see it. They just probably went from strong irritation to see of you can do this.

    I know this will cause your panties to bind, but they may very well sweep the NFCW. You read it here first football fans.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:11 pm
  • Image
    "We're the 49ers, we can do whatever we want" - The Great Jim Harbaugh -
    User avatar
    Comeinpeace
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 128
    Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:11 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:25 pm
  • Lady Talon wrote:How did those unbeatable Rams go 3-7 outside the NFC West? Division rivals regularly play each other tough. Maybe Ogletree gets you 4 more wins this year? Maybe he will play so well you can pull out a win versus the Jets?


    You're missing the point, aren't you?

    The Rams O and O line SUCKED A$$ last season yet they STILL pulled off the NFCW domination and almost a winning season.

    I'm sure come game 8 you'll all be talking about what I am now, so you might as well focus on game one. By the time the Hawks roll into STL, you won't be so senselessly cocky.

    Hawks have a great team. Lots of wasted $$$ on stupid aquisitions, but they are still sweet. Rams HAD a decent team. Lots of very well spent money and draft choices and now they have the POTENTIAL to compete with the Hawks. The Niners are done.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:28 pm
  • Rams honestly dont scare me until at minimum they replace Bradford. They overachieved last year (especially in the division) and will settle at around 6-10 or 7-9 AFTER making some offseason upgrades. Not sure why people on here think they are even close to the talent of Seattle and San Fran
    User avatar
    therealjohncarlson
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3510
    Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:29 pm
  • RamzFanz wrote:
    Throwdown wrote:Lol he wants a gold star for being competitive, cute.


    Wilson was sacked 8 times by the Rams. Kappy was sacked 8 times by the Rams. Rams knocked Smith out which is why Kappy is even playing today.

    The Rams earned their gold star in the NFCW by owning the NFCW. Now they will earn respect NFL wide. It's so obvious its silly not to see it. They just probably went from strong irritation to see of you can do this.

    I know this will cause your panties to bind, but they may very well sweep the NFCW. You read it here first football fans.


    Ram logic. 3rd place is owning the NFC West.

    Your team finished with a losing record and had a -50 point differential (11th worst in the league). You werent that good and its not going to miraculously change based on a few unproven rookies.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18603
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:29 pm
  • so, nothing on losing by over two touchdowns to the butt fumbler and his disaster of a team? You have the answers to everything else...
    Last edited by Russell Wilson on Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:20 pm, edited 29-3 times in total.
    Last edited by NFC Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:14 pm, edited 23-17 times in total.
    Last edited by World Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Feb 2, 2014 7:14 pm, edited 43-8 times in total.
    User avatar
    Lady Talon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 757
    Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:55 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:38 pm
  • therealjohncarlson wrote:Rams honestly dont scare me until at minimum they replace Bradford. They overachieved last year (especially in the division) and will settle at around 6-10 or 7-9 AFTER making some offseason upgrades. Not sure why people on here think they are even close to the talent of Seattle and San Fran


    It's easy to say that now. Just wait, Bradford is going to give you plenty of reason to be afraid. It won't surprise me if he has a better year than Wilson in our new offense.
    mr.stlouis
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 154
    Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:00 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:41 pm
  • RamzFanz wrote:You're missing the point, aren't you?

    The Rams O and O line SUCKED A$$ last season yet they STILL pulled off the NFCW domination and almost a winning season.

    Actually, your O-line was remarkably consistent at an average (slightly above average, even) level. They ranked 14th in run blocking and 13th in pass protection per Football Outsiders. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/OL

    Whatever argument you're preparing to argue against this with, just stop; because whatever flaws DVOA has, it applies to all lines in the league.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:43 pm
  • therealjohncarlson wrote:Rams honestly dont scare me until at minimum they replace Bradford. They overachieved last year (especially in the division) and will settle at around 6-10 or 7-9 AFTER making some offseason upgrades. Not sure why people on here think they are even close to the talent of Seattle and San Fran


    You hang around on Hawks' forums and have no idea who the Rams are this season, yes? I get it. It's difficult. No bumper sticker logic.

    Here's some bumper sticker for you, Rams suck yet they owned the Hawks last season. Where does that leave you?
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:44 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:
    Ram logic. 3rd place is owning the NFC West.

    Your team finished with a losing record and had a -50 point differential (11th worst in the league). You werent that good and its not going to miraculously change based on a few unproven rookies.


    ...and no one said it would. Good for you. Baby steps.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:45 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:
    RamzFanz wrote:
    Throwdown wrote:Lol he wants a gold star for being competitive, cute.


    Wilson was sacked 8 times by the Rams. Kappy was sacked 8 times by the Rams. Rams knocked Smith out which is why Kappy is even playing today.

    The Rams earned their gold star in the NFCW by owning the NFCW. Now they will earn respect NFL wide. It's so obvious its silly not to see it. They just probably went from strong irritation to see of you can do this.

    I know this will cause your panties to bind, but they may very well sweep the NFCW. You read it here first football fans.


    Ram logic. 3rd place is owning the NFC West.

    Your team finished with a losing record and had a -50 point differential (11th worst in the league). You werent that good and its not going to miraculously change based on a few unproven rookies.


    Miraculously? Poor choice in words. I guess Cook and Long are unproven rookies, too. You are blatantly bias in your team. Being impracticle doesnt help your cause. Whatever, just go place back under the rock and don't remove it again.
    mr.stlouis
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 154
    Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:00 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:46 pm
  • RamzFanz wrote:
    therealjohncarlson wrote:Rams honestly dont scare me until at minimum they replace Bradford. They overachieved last year (especially in the division) and will settle at around 6-10 or 7-9 AFTER making some offseason upgrades. Not sure why people on here think they are even close to the talent of Seattle and San Fran


    You hang around on Hawks' forums and have no idea who the Rams are this season, yes? I get it. It's difficult. No bumper sticker logic.

    Here's some bumper sticker for you, Rams suck yet they owned the Hawks last season. Where does that leave you?


    First of all, you have no clue who the Rams are this season either, nobody does. Its not even August yet.

    And to answer your last question, it left us In the playoffs, while the Rams were sitting at home. Just like after this season. You have 45 posts in the last day and a half, don't you have a Rams forum you can go hang out on?
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18603
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:48 pm
  • mr.stlouis wrote:It's easy to say that now. Just wait, Bradford is going to give you plenty of reason to be afraid. It won't surprise me if he has a better year than Wilson in our new offense.


    Oh, give me a freaking break. How delusional are you? Let's compare their stats. I'll even cherry-pick Bradford's best stats regardless of what year they're from.

    Wilson: 64.1% completion rating, 7.9 yard average, 26 TDs, 10 ints, 33 sacks, 100 passer rating.
    Bradford: 60.00% completion rating, 6.7 yard average, 21 TDs, 6 ints (only played half the season in that year, though), 34 sacks, 82.6 passer rating.

    That's right, in 3 years, Bradford hasn't had a single major stat as good as the ones from Wilson's rookie season. Hell, in Bradford's half-season last year he STILL took more sacks (36) than Wilson did in a full 16 games in his ROOKIE year! Also remember that I picked Bradford's BEST stats from his whole NFL career to date, not all the ones from his best year.

    This isn't even debatable. Bradford has to improve by a good margin to even have a reasonable discussion about holding Wilson's jockstrap.

    Good Lord, some of you Rams fans are delusional. You have a nasty case of "Luck-itis"; Bradford was the #1 overall pick, so he has to be awesome. Yeah, right. :roll:
    Last edited by RolandDeschain on Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:49 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:
    RamzFanz wrote:You're missing the point, aren't you?

    The Rams O and O line SUCKED A$$ last season yet they STILL pulled off the NFCW domination and almost a winning season.

    Actually, your O-line was remarkably consistent at an average (slightly above average, even) level. They ranked 14th in run blocking and 13th in pass protection per Football Outsiders. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/OL

    Whatever argument you're preparing to argue against this with, just stop; because whatever flaws DVOA has, it applies to all lines in the league.


    That's mostly second half of the season play. You remember, where Bradford had a 101.2 red zone QB rating, better than Manning and Rodgers? No, no you don't. They were injured most of the first half. That's the O line you will see this season WITH J Long IF they stay healthy.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:50 pm
  • RamzFanz wrote:
    RolandDeschain wrote:
    RamzFanz wrote:You're missing the point, aren't you?

    The Rams O and O line SUCKED A$$ last season yet they STILL pulled off the NFCW domination and almost a winning season.

    Actually, your O-line was remarkably consistent at an average (slightly above average, even) level. They ranked 14th in run blocking and 13th in pass protection per Football Outsiders. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/OL

    Whatever argument you're preparing to argue against this with, just stop; because whatever flaws DVOA has, it applies to all lines in the league.


    That's mostly second half of the season play. You remember, where Bradford had a 101.2 red zone QB rating, better than Manning and Rodgers? No, no you don't. They were injured most of the first half. That's the O line you will see this season WITH J Long IF they stay healthy.


    Oh, well if you want to talk second half of the season, then the Seahawks roflstomped every other offense in the league and it's not even close. Also, if your line improved in the second half but still managed to rank 14th and 13th on the season, then your line finished in the top 7 or 8 in the latter part of the season.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:58 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:
    mr.stlouis wrote:It's easy to say that now. Just wait, Bradford is going to give you plenty of reason to be afraid. It won't surprise me if he has a better year than Wilson in our new offense.


    Oh, give me a freaking break. How delusional are you? Let's compare their stats. I'll even cherry-pick Bradford's best stats regardless of what year they're from.

    Wilson: 64.1% completion rating, 7.9 yard average, 26 TDs, 10 ints, 33 sacks, 100 passer rating.
    Bradford: 60.00% completion rating, 6.7 yard average, 21 TDs, 6 ints (only played half the season in that year, though), 34 sacks, 82.6 passer rating.

    That's right, in 3 years, Bradford hasn't had a single major stat as good as the ones from Wilson's rookie season. Hell, in Bradford's half-season last year he STILL took more sacks (36) than Wilson did in a full 16 games in his ROOKIE year! Also remember that I picked Bradford's BEST stats from his whole NFL career to date, not all the ones from his best year.

    This isn't even debatable. Bradford has to improve by a good margin to even have a reasonable discussion about holding Wilson's jockstrap.

    Good Lord, some of you Rams fans are delusional. You have a nasty case of "Luck-itis"; Bradford was the #1 overall pick, so he has to be awesome. Yeah, right. :roll:


    ...and the short bus rolls in.

    Go look at Bradford's rookie records on a HORRIBLE team. Now look at Wilson losing to Bradford once and almost twice while a rookie on an excellent team. Pretty much says it all.

    Wilson is a good QB on a great team. Not great, just good. Switch their teams over those seasons and Wilson is no one. Didn't the Rams sack him 8 times last season? Mr. Elusive? THREE interceptions?
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:04 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:Oh, well if you want to talk second half of the season, then the Seahawks roflstomped every other offense in the league and it's not even close. Also, if your line improved in the second half but still managed to rank 14th and 13th on the season, then your line finished in the top 7 or 8 in the latter part of the season.


    ...wait...didn't the Hawks pull off the win with just 1:45 left in the regular season? I mean, that's a win and all, good job, but the Rams O SUCKED. How is that "roflstomped" again?

    No worries, I see you're on a "we were great but it was just bad luck" high. I'm going to go smoke the "we sucked and still schooled you" stuff. It's a much better high because it's real.

    This season is coming. Enjoy your memories while you can.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:11 pm
  • LOL the short bus rolls in. You know what? Good QBs help their teams. Yours doesn't. Also, way to point out one game when he was referring to the second half of the season.

    You have no excuses for Bradford. Bad O-line? Already proved that wrong. No weapons at WR? Well, the Seahawks WR corps was considered a joke before Wilson came, and all of a sudden they were good and effective with him passing.

    Stop making excuses for him.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:15 pm
  • Lmao, Russel inherited a great team. He tied Manqueens rookie TD record, with receivers that you have shat on in this very thread, yet RW had the dream team to work with.

    Either you've lost your football marbles, or you've never had any.
    Last edited by Russell Wilson on Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:20 pm, edited 29-3 times in total.
    Last edited by NFC Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:14 pm, edited 23-17 times in total.
    Last edited by World Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Feb 2, 2014 7:14 pm, edited 43-8 times in total.
    User avatar
    Lady Talon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 757
    Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:55 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:15 pm
  • RamzFanz wrote:
    RolandDeschain wrote:
    mr.stlouis wrote:It's easy to say that now. Just wait, Bradford is going to give you plenty of reason to be afraid. It won't surprise me if he has a better year than Wilson in our new offense.


    Oh, give me a freaking break. How delusional are you? Let's compare their stats. I'll even cherry-pick Bradford's best stats regardless of what year they're from.

    Wilson: 64.1% completion rating, 7.9 yard average, 26 TDs, 10 ints, 33 sacks, 100 passer rating.
    Bradford: 60.00% completion rating, 6.7 yard average, 21 TDs, 6 ints (only played half the season in that year, though), 34 sacks, 82.6 passer rating.

    That's right, in 3 years, Bradford hasn't had a single major stat as good as the ones from Wilson's rookie season. Hell, in Bradford's half-season last year he STILL took more sacks (36) than Wilson did in a full 16 games in his ROOKIE year! Also remember that I picked Bradford's BEST stats from his whole NFL career to date, not all the ones from his best year.

    This isn't even debatable. Bradford has to improve by a good margin to even have a reasonable discussion about holding Wilson's jockstrap.

    Good Lord, some of you Rams fans are delusional. You have a nasty case of "Luck-itis"; Bradford was the #1 overall pick, so he has to be awesome. Yeah, right. :roll:


    ...and the short bus rolls in.

    Go look at Bradford's rookie records on a HORRIBLE team. Now look at Wilson losing to Bradford once and almost twice while a rookie on an excellent team. Pretty much says it all.

    Wilson is a good QB on a great team. Not great, just good. Switch their teams over those seasons and Wilson is no one. Didn't the Rams sack him 8 times last season? Mr. Elusive? THREE interceptions?

    Wilson also lost to Kolb, Alex Smith and Tannehill, using dumbass logic, he must really suck. But beat RGIII, Rodgers, Brady, using your same stupid logic, he is the gawdamm truth.
    As I recall, Wilson never took one snap with Bradford playing D. Let that sink in for a second while I find you missing chromosome, ewe fool.
    And on that same shitty 2010 team (your words, not mine), your wunderkind got beat by Charlie effin WHitehurst (using you stupid logic), and that was a shit Hawks team. What the hell is your point? Is Bradford worse than Charlie Whitehurst?

    So really, you didn't say shit. Except that you are a 26 year old dumb ass who was still jerkin to the JCP catalog the last time the Rams were any good, and thinks he gots some football savvy because he plays him some fantasy football.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 11241
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:22 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:
    mr.stlouis wrote:It's easy to say that now. Just wait, Bradford is going to give you plenty of reason to be afraid. It won't surprise me if he has a better year than Wilson in our new offense.


    Oh, give me a freaking break. How delusional are you? Let's compare their stats. I'll even cherry-pick Bradford's best stats regardless of what year they're from.

    Wilson: 64.1% completion rating, 7.9 yard average, 26 TDs, 10 ints, 33 sacks, 100 passer rating.
    Bradford: 60.00% completion rating, 6.7 yard average, 21 TDs, 6 ints (only played half the season in that year, though), 34 sacks, 82.6 passer rating.

    That's right, in 3 years, Bradford hasn't had a single major stat as good as the ones from Wilson's rookie season. Hell, in Bradford's half-season last year he STILL took more sacks (36) than Wilson did in a full 16 games in his ROOKIE year! Also remember that I picked Bradford's BEST stats from his whole NFL career to date, not all the ones from his best year.

    This isn't even debatable. Bradford has to improve by a good margin to even have a reasonable discussion about holding Wilson's jockstrap.

    Good Lord, some of you Rams fans are delusional. You have a nasty case of "Luck-itis"; Bradford was the #1 overall pick, so he has to be awesome. Yeah, right. :roll:



    Haha your retort was off base. I made a prediction of this season, and you went back to last season. How many times do I have to say this year's Rams and last year's are not comparable?

    This is a list of new starters on offense in comparison to last season this time last year.

    Last year ----this year

    Slot WR-Ammendola/Austin
    LT-Saffold/Long
    RT-Richardson/Saffold
    TE-Kendricks/Cook
    WO1-Gibson/Quick
    RB'S-Jackson/Commitee



    Dude, that is super close to being an upgrade across the board. That's 6 out of 11 starting spots rotated or changed all together. You know your Seahawks, but you don't know the Rams worth a darn. On top of that, I question your ability to come up with an original idea. Anyone can look up the stats. Im happy stats mean everything to you and losing in the Playoffs was so easily brushed off.
    mr.stlouis
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 154
    Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:00 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:23 pm
  • That would be chromosome number 21 correct? An extra one?
    "The life you lose may be your own" - Drunk dude at the bar
    User avatar
    loafoftatupu
    I'M JIMMY!
     
    Posts: 5885
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
    Location: Auburn, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:28 pm
  • loafoftatupu wrote:That would be chromosome number 21 correct? An extra one?

    His mom keeps it in her jewelry safe, next to the zirconias. In case he loses one of the others.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 11241
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:36 pm
  • In 2009 the 49ers were 5-1 within the division and where did that get them? Sitting at home watching the playoffs.
    In 2010 the 49ers were 4-2 within the division and where did that get them? Sitting at home watching the playoffs.

    Take a few deep breaths and wait for the season to start before your brain explodes.
    JSeahawks wrote:We might as well rename this site Seahawks&49ers.net.
    User avatar
    60niners
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 219
    Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:22 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:47 pm
  • Didn't the Raiders go 8-0 in their division and still missed the playoffs?
    Image
    3elieve
    User avatar
    Throwdown
    * NET Baller *
     
    Posts: 19208
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:54 pm
  • Throwdown wrote:Didn't the Raiders go 8-0 in their division and still missed the playoffs?

    8-0 in their division would mean they're playing in the AFCCG or the Super Bowl.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:01 pm
  • Throwdown wrote:Didn't the Raiders go 8-0 in their division and still missed the playoffs?

    That was 2010. They went 6-0 in the division and finished at 8-8. The only two non-divisional opponents they defeated were..... drumroll please.....

    The Rams and the Seahawks. Lol.

    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/t ... i/2010.htm
    JSeahawks wrote:We might as well rename this site Seahawks&49ers.net.
    User avatar
    60niners
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 219
    Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:22 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:07 pm
  • 60niners wrote:
    Throwdown wrote:Didn't the Raiders go 8-0 in their division and still missed the playoffs?

    That was 2010. They went 6-0 in the division and finished at 8-8. The only two non-divisional opponents they defeated were..... drumroll please.....

    The Rams and the Seahawks. Lol.

    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/t ... i/2010.htm

    Funny. I remember that game, we lost Red Bryant due to injury in it and they ran WILD. 239 yards rushing against us. :(
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 8:33 am
  • RolandDeschain wrote:LOL the short bus rolls in. You know what? Good QBs help their teams. Yours doesn't. Also, way to point out one game when he was referring to the second half of the season.

    You have no excuses for Bradford. Bad O-line? Already proved that wrong. No weapons at WR? Well, the Seahawks WR corps was considered a joke before Wilson came, and all of a sudden they were good and effective with him passing.

    Stop making excuses for him.


    Taking a team from 1 win to 7 as a rookie isn't helping? Taking an UFA who was cut from 2 teams and even cut from a practice squad and helping him become one of the best slot receivers in the game isn't helping? Helping a rookie receiver set a record by hitting him for a 50+ reception in 5 consecutive games isn't helping?

    Selling Bradford short with all of his accomplishments is just silly. As a rookie he out produced some great QBs and last season he outproduced his rookie season. All with almost no tools.

    Considering what he had, he hasn't had a bad season yet. 2011 the Rams had unprecedented injuries. 35 members of that team aren't even in the NFL anymore.

    Ah well, no reason to explain to you, you'll see.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 8:46 am
  • RamzFanz wrote:
    SoHo9erFan wrote:Blah, blah, blah. Sure, you guys actually get to field a halfway decent team this season. Doesn't mean you should expect a playoff birth. I am willing to bet you $1,000 dollars they will have a worse record than the 49ers. Swear to god. We can do it over paypal or something. I'm sure we can figure a legitimate way to make this bet worth. If you're so confident you should be willing to do it.

    How did the 49ers lose talent?? I'm not disagreeing, I just want to see how knowledgable you are about other teams outside the Rams. Because, as of right now, every fanbase in the league is behaving like you are. Everyone is ultra confident in TC, but by Week 10 I guarantee you that you won't be as optimistic as you are right now.


    As if Crabtree wasn't enough? Dude, they are using UDFA QB's as wide receivers they are so desperate right now. Go look.

    OK, I have $50 for seahawks.net if you do for ramsondemand.com.

    The bet I'll offer is this: Rams win more division games than the Niners.

    Bet?

    You have no idea how the NFL works.

    First of all, Crabtree will return in November. It's not like he is done for the year. He will play in the December 1 game at Candlestick. And since you weren't able to list anymore downgrades, I guess that means the 49ers will be the same successful team as last season.

    Second of all, the 49ers never have good WRs. In the PLAYOFFS the last two seasons (somehow Rams fans forgot how difficult it is to make the playoffs) we put out players like Ted Ginn Jr., Chad Hall, and an aging Randy Moss due to injuries. This isn't the first time the 49ers haven't fielded a competent WR core. Tom Brady won a SB with Deion Branch as his #1 and a bunch of no names as depth. I'm not comparing Kaep to Brady, but that proves that you don't need blue-chip players at WR to win a championship.

    Third of all, the 49ers have a top 3 running game in the NFL. Gore, Hunter, James, and Kaep have the ability to rush for over 200 yards in any game. We also have Vernon Davis and an impressive rookie at TE. It's not like the 49ers offense is going to struggle this season.

    Jeez, Rams fans have had to deal with complete shit at the skilled positions the last decade and they forgot what it was like to have marginal talent. Now that they have these young players out wide, they think they are the second coming.

    That's not how the NFL works.

    And no BET :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I love how you change the terms of the bet. You don't make the playoffs by winning the most games in the division. LOL so pathetic. You surprised the 49ers and Seahawks last season but both teams will be prepared to handle your mediocre team. And you won't win more than 4 games outside the division so I expect another subpar season for the Rams. 7-9 seems most realistic.
    SoHo9erFan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 499
    Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 2:40 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:25 am
  • SoHo9erFan wrote:...you won't win more than 4 games outside the division so I expect another subpar season for the Rams. 7-9 seems most realistic.


    Great, there's the line, I'll take the over for $50. Bet?
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:52 am
  • SoHo9erFan wrote:Jeez, Rams fans have had to deal with complete shit at the skilled positions the last decade and they forgot what it was like to have marginal talent. Now that they have these young players out wide, they think they are the second coming.


    Yep. They are the second coming. If the O line holds, it's going to be something to see.

    This is a three team race whether you understand it or not.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:58 am
  • RamzFanz wrote:
    SoHo9erFan wrote:Jeez, Rams fans have had to deal with complete shit at the skilled positions the last decade and they forgot what it was like to have marginal talent. Now that they have these young players out wide, they think they are the second coming.


    Yep. They are the second coming. If the O line holds, it's going to be something to see.

    This is a three team race whether you understand it or not.


    3 team? You change your opinion with every post. Thought the Rams had won already, and there was no contest. We're just waiting for the networks to lift the blackout and show us the 19-0 season you've told us is coming.
    Last edited by Russell Wilson on Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:20 pm, edited 29-3 times in total.
    Last edited by NFC Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:14 pm, edited 23-17 times in total.
    Last edited by World Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Feb 2, 2014 7:14 pm, edited 43-8 times in total.
    User avatar
    Lady Talon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 757
    Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:55 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:42 am
  • RamzFanz wrote:Taking a team from 1 win to 7 as a rookie isn't helping? Taking an UFA who was cut from 2 teams and even cut from a practice squad and helping him become one of the best slot receivers in the game isn't helping? Helping a rookie receiver set a record by hitting him for a 50+ reception in 5 consecutive games isn't helping?

    Selling Bradford short with all of his accomplishments is just silly. As a rookie he out produced some great QBs and last season he outproduced his rookie season. All with almost no tools.

    Considering what he had, he hasn't had a bad season yet. 2011 the Rams had unprecedented injuries. 35 members of that team aren't even in the NFL anymore.

    Ah well, no reason to explain to you, you'll see.

    Sigh. Of course he helped the team when he was drafted. Nobody is calling him a TERRIBLE quarterback, stop being so defensive. He is just average at best. Is it possible he may turn into a good QB? Sure, anything can happen; but if you haven't shown signs of brilliance after 3 years, it's pretty unlikely. Harbaugh was able to pull a rabbit out of his hat with Alex Smith, but that only worked with a suffocating defense, an elite running game, and a simple passing game that never went deep. The Stache© can try that with Bradford, but without a really dominant running game, it won't work like it did with Smith.

    In regards to the 5 consecutive 50+ yard reception games, how many of those travelled 20+ yards in the air?

    Also, what "great QBs" did he out-produce in his rookie season? Serious question, I want to know who you're referring to.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:12 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:Sigh. Of course he helped the team when he was drafted. Nobody is calling him a TERRIBLE quarterback, stop being so defensive. He is just average at best. Is it possible he may turn into a good QB? Sure, anything can happen; but if you haven't shown signs of brilliance after 3 years, it's pretty unlikely. Harbaugh was able to pull a rabbit out of his hat with Alex Smith, but that only worked with a suffocating defense, an elite running game, and a simple passing game that never went deep. The Stache© can try that with Bradford, but without a really dominant running game, it won't work like it did with Smith.

    In regards to the 5 consecutive 50+ yard reception games, how many of those travelled 20+ yards in the air?

    Also, what "great QBs" did he out-produce in his rookie season? Serious question, I want to know who you're referring to.


    "However, the Buccaneers posted 2–14 records in each of Young's two seasons with them, and Young's record as starter was 3–16. In his 19 games, he threw for only 11 touchdowns with 21 interceptions while completing fewer than 55% of his passes."

    I guess Young was well below average at best.

    If you aren't aware of all the rookie records Bradford set surpassing QB's like Manning, you should go read about them.

    Makes no difference, he will school the Hawks this season now that he has some kind of offensive weapons and line.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:14 pm
  • Lady Talon wrote:
    RamzFanz wrote:
    SoHo9erFan wrote:Jeez, Rams fans have had to deal with complete shit at the skilled positions the last decade and they forgot what it was like to have marginal talent. Now that they have these young players out wide, they think they are the second coming.


    Yep. They are the second coming. If the O line holds, it's going to be something to see.

    This is a three team race whether you understand it or not.


    3 team? You change your opinion with every post. Thought the Rams had won already, and there was no contest. We're just waiting for the networks to lift the blackout and show us the 19-0 season you've told us is coming.


    Well, you got me. Two team race. We all know the Niners are cooked.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:55 pm
  • I understand the animosity towards the Rams. You guys are scared and with good reason. I'll bet this much, my Rams have you more worried than the Niners/Seahawks worry me. At least the Rams aren't missing any starters. Not to mention the Rams have the most athletic team in this division. I'm sure you will feel overwhelmed with sorrow when you see the Rams this season as your "deep payoff" dreams begin to develope cracks.

    It's not gonna be your year, again, Niners/Seahawks. Drop the blatantly overconfident comments, you look foolish.

    If anything, Atlanta looks to have a better team than anyone in our division if their defense can step up.
    mr.stlouis
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 154
    Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:00 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:27 pm
  • 60niners wrote:
    Throwdown wrote:Didn't the Raiders go 8-0 in their division and still missed the playoffs?

    That was 2010. They went 6-0 in the division and finished at 8-8. The only two non-divisional opponents they defeated were..... drumroll please.....

    The Rams and the Seahawks. Lol.

    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/t ... i/2010.htm


    Haha you the worste receiving core in the division! enjoy your Super Bowl Hangover.
    mr.stlouis
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 154
    Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:00 am


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:31 pm
  • Draft Tavon Austin and Steadman Bailey and run Brian Quick out there, and all of a sudden the Rams are going to compete for the division?

    Look, the D-Line is strong, obviously, and Fisher can coach 'em up, but depending on a bunch of WRs, many of whom have not had the two full seasons that it usually takes the non-freaks like Julio Jones to become productive, as proof that your offense will be good is probably a bad idea.

    Plus if Sam Bradford fails this year, what will be the excuse then?
    "If given the opportunity without fear of incarceration, I would honestly beat the living **** out of Jerry Rice."

    --Internet tough guy HawkWow being a MAN on the internet
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3754
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:40 pm
  • Smelly McUgly wrote:Draft Tavon Austin and Steadman Bailey and run Brian Quick out there, and all of a sudden the Rams are going to compete for the division?

    Look, the D-Line is strong, obviously, and Fisher can coach 'em up, but depending on a bunch of WRs, many of whom have not had the two full seasons that it usually takes the non-freaks like Julio Jones to become productive, as proof that your offense will be good is probably a bad idea.

    Plus if Sam Bradford fails this year, what will be the excuse then?


    They'll just come back next year repeating the same mantra, albeit talking about how their receivers are taking a step forward this year due to reports from camp and that's going to bail out Bradford.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15443
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:49 pm
  • mr.stlouis wrote:If anything, Atlanta looks to have a better team than anyone in our division if their defense can step up.

    Okay, now this is ridiculous. Atlanta was and is an 11-5 team that overperformed last year.
    43-8...it's all about that action boss....
    next man up.
    User avatar
    MizzouHawkGal
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7807
    Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
    Location: Kansas City, MO


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:50 pm
  • Telling Seahawks fans they look foolish on their own forum is definitely a recipe for quality discussion, mr.stlouis. Particularly when their rookie QB won a playoff game and went 11-5, and things are only looking up.

    If you want to actually stay around here, stop being such a homer and expecting the Seahawks to tank when zero signs point toward that happening. What, losing Harvin dooms us? We did very well last year without him.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:27 pm
  • This thread is so awesome! :th2thumbs:
    User avatar
    MagHawk
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 67
    Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:30 am
    Location: Silverdale


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:15 pm
  • mr.stlouis wrote:I understand the animosity towards the Rams. You guys are scared and with good reason. I'll bet this much, my Rams have you more worried than the Niners/Seahawks worry me. At least the Rams aren't missing any starters. Not to mention the Rams have the most athletic team in this division. I'm sure you will feel overwhelmed with sorrow when you see the Rams this season as your "deep payoff" dreams begin to develope cracks.

    It's not gonna be your year, again, Niners/Seahawks. Drop the blatantly overconfident comments, you look foolish.

    If anything, Atlanta looks to have a better team than anyone in our division if their defense can step up.


    Cmon man now your getting way too blatant. You were actually doing a decent job trolling and youve just gone and ruined your entire days's work (Because I assume you dont have a real job this is your work)

    2/10 trolling job. Better luck next time.
    User avatar
    therealjohncarlson
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3510
    Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:40 pm
  • GSOT ll


    No Rams fan should ever utter those words or that acronym. It's disrespectful to the historical significance of going from worst to first when the odds were 200-1 against you (actual vegas odds).

    In comparison, this season is only 40-1 odds to win the Super Bowl. That's how much more this team is respected vs the GSOT.

    This Rams team is the beginning of something uniquely special. I call it FSOT - Fastest Show On Turf - because it is. BOTH sides of the ball are uniquely fast. INTENTIONALLY fast.

    Will we see offensive passing fireworks? We better hope so since that's where all the money went.

    Will it be GSOT? NO! Nothing can be.

    What it could (and dare I say "will") be is JUST AS COOL but in a different way. POWERFUL defense coupled with a fast paced, unpredictable, and FAST player offense that breaks the NFCW mold.

    If we only wanted to do what the Hawks and Niners were doing, we would come in third.

    EMBRACE the pass first offence because that is what the Rams could do best in the division. Unless, of course, you feel Richardson or Pead or Stacey or Gannaway is better than Lynch or Gore. AND, at the same time, we have a better D than Hawks or Niners.

    If I'm wrong, and we aren't pass first, we've already lost the division. Rams CAN'T out run them and they CAN'T out D them. They CAN put one hell of a D on the field and destroy their secondary with the fastest passing game in a hurry up offense.

    If your heart is set on being a big D first and run first team like them, we've already lost. Emulation may be the purest form of flattery, but it's no way to win a division when they do it better!

    BOOKMARK THIS THREAD. MARK MY WORDS. HOLD ME TO THEM.

    Shotty is lying (good for him). Fisher is Lying (good for him). The media is being sucked in (good for the Rams)! This is NOT a run first team hoping to win anything. They bet the entire house on the pass. Fisher came here for the pass. It WILL BE a pass first team.

    LET IT BE WRITTEN, LET IT BE SO
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:52 pm
  • Seriously RamzFanz, stop spamming the same big reply across multiple threads before you get banned.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:56 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:Telling Seahawks fans they look foolish on their own forum is definitely a recipe for quality discussion, mr.stlouis. Particularly when their rookie QB won a playoff game and went 11-5, and things are only looking up.

    If you want to actually stay around here, stop being such a homer and expecting the Seahawks to tank when zero signs point toward that happening. What, losing Harvin dooms us? We did very well last year without him.


    As a Rams fan, I agree.

    The Hawks are by far the strongest proven team in the NFCW.

    HOWEVER, the Rams are presenting the same dominating D (sack masters) with additional top tier D prospects AND an offense none of us has ever seen. And, by all accounts, it's looking awesome. Fast, consistent in their catching, and yards after the catch we haven't seen since Holt.

    It COULD be all smoke, but when we are talking about 8 players, I doubt it. They only need 3-4 of them to pan out to be far superior to last season.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:58 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:Seriously RamzFanz, stop spamming the same big reply across multiple threads before you get banned.


    Sorry dude. It was just two threads and they wrere both Rams related.

    Respect.
    FSOT- Fastest Show On Turf - 2013 RAMS
    Image
    User avatar
    RamzFanz
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 134
    Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:18 pm


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Fri Aug 02, 2013 12:02 am
  • RamzFanz wrote:HOWEVER, the Rams are presenting the same dominating D (sack masters) with additional top tier D prospects AND an offense none of us has ever seen. And, by all accounts, it's looking awesome. Fast, consistent in their catching, and yards after the catch we haven't seen since Holt.

    It COULD be all smoke, but when we are talking about 8 players, I doubt it. They only need 3-4 of them to pan out to be far superior to last season.


    You won't find a person on this forum that doesn't think your D-line is one of the top units in the NFL. I've personally said that at least 5 times in the past six months around here. I'll be curious to see how Bradford performs this year, now that he's got some decent receiving weaponry, and his O-line isn't bad. Really, combined with a very good defense, there's no excuse for him not to put up good, solid numbers for the year if he is who you think he is.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26413
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Surprise rival for seahawks...
Fri Aug 02, 2013 12:19 am
  • If you want to be honest about Rams camp this week, it is kind of like our games. One day sucked bad for the O, and the next day they looked good.

    That is per Fisher.

    There is a lot to be excited about this year. Yes, we could play perfect and have the luck fall our way and rock every game. But realistically, we are a team with a lot of hot young talent about to learn how to play and become good together against a tough division and some tough road games. Lots to look forward to....nothing to brag about yet in my perspective. You have to earn that.
    Los Angeles Rams' fan who lives in San Diego.
    User avatar
    RedAlice
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 704
    Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:47 am
    Location: San Diego


PreviousNext


It is currently Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:34 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online