The Bengals

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. RATING: PG-13
The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:04 am
  • They kind of fascinate me.

    The talent they have is indeed top 5, without a doubt. Yet, no one takes them seriously as contenders? Their coach is great, IMO, he's dealt a rough hand every year with poor ownership and management. I REALLY thought they should've taken a flyer on Geno or Barkley this past draft. I think Dalton what keeps them from ever being considered great.

    Random musing today, sorry. I really want to be kearly...but keep my good looks.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:09 am
  • Dalton needs to move a step beyond game manager but I have them to win their division and it very well should be either them or Houston vs Denver in the AFC Championship, IMO.
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:14 am
  • bestfightstory wrote:Dalton needs to move a step beyond game manager but I have them to win their division and it very well should be either them or Houston vs Denver in the AFC Championship, IMO.


    Of course they'll win the division, its the Hard Knocks factor. Last time they went 6-0 in the AFC North after a Hard Knocks year.

    IMO, the reason they'll never be a true blue contender is because of their ownership and front office. A well run organization would've brought in another QB to compete with the ginger. Hell, his skills dont even jive well with their talent and WR and TE. They need a stronger arm, hypothetically.

    I have a soft spot in my heart for the Bengals. I like Marvin and sympathize with perennial losing franchises.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:31 am
  • I don't think they make the playoffs.

    1. Pittsburgh
    2. Baltimore
    3. Cincinatti
    4. Cleveland

    Don't trust Dalton.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18560
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:39 am
  • Cleveland's winning this year. The stepford GM and coach are gone.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:58 am
  • From a betting angle I think Cleveland, like Cincy and St Louis of recent years will be one of the best teams ATS. I know I will be monitoring them verrrrry closely. They are going to be a competitive squad.
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:02 am
  • As long as you have a QB with the last name Dalton or Weeden then I'll see you at the bottom of the division.
    "I'm too drunk to taste this chicken"- Colonel Sanders
    User avatar
    BigNastyyy
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 114
    Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:58 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:03 am
  • bestfightstory wrote:From a betting angle I think Cleveland, like Cincy and St Louis of recent years will be one of the best teams ATS. I know I will be monitoring them verrrrry closely. They are going to be a competitive squad.


    Agreed.

    They already have the talent...and now they add a great DC and Weeden (the Englishseahawks FAVORITE) in year two. Every team in that division should be 8 wins.

    Holmgren and Shurmer we're just horrific and seemed uninterested.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:10 am
  • BigNastyyy wrote:As long as you have a QB with the last name Dalton then I'll see you at the bottom of the division.



    Like last year?
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:12 am
  • pehawk wrote:
    bestfightstory wrote:From a betting angle I think Cleveland, like Cincy and St Louis of recent years will be one of the best teams ATS. I know I will be monitoring them verrrrry closely. They are going to be a competitive squad.


    Agreed.

    They already have the talent...and now they add a great DC and Weeden (the Englishseahawks FAVORITE) in year two. Every team in that division should be 8 wins.

    Holmgren and Shurmer we're just horrific and seemed uninterested.


    I'd be shocked if every team in that division was at 8+ wins.

    The Bengals might win the division (because of the brilliance of AJ Green, who makes Dalton look passable as a QB), but I think we'll see a 9-8-7-6 kind of distribution. Highly doubt any team makes double-digits in the win column. And that 6 wins might be too generous for Cleveland (who, let's face it, are going to finish last again).
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8083
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:19 am
  • I think you're selling Cleveland short, vols. But we'll see. They have talent where you want it, and at QB a dude who can at least make all the throws. I had a VERY low opinion of the tone Holmgren set there. I think Holmy and Shurmur's absense will help alot.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:33 am
  • pehawk wrote:I think you're selling Cleveland short, vols. But we'll see. They have talent where you want it, and at QB a dude who can at least make all the throws. I had a VERY low opinion of the tone Holmgren set there. I think Holmy and Shurmur's absense will help alot.


    I agree with you on Holmgren/Shurmur being a disaster there, but I think of it in the same way that I think of central Oklahoma. A tornado passes through and makes the place a disaster area. Then a second tornado passes through the existing disaster area, leaving - yup, you guessed it - disaster. Holmgren and Shurmur were that SECOND tornado, imo.

    I think the Browns are trapped in a loop, unfortunately for them. They keep hiring and firing regimes, meaning that they're starting over constantly. They keep having to determine their new "identity" and then go out and get the players to fit it. I don't think much of any of their skill position players, honestly. They've got some interesting guys on D, but they've been constantly hampered by bad coaching.

    Maybe Norv will work magic with Weeden, but I'm doubtful. Maybe Horton will be able to bring his creativity to the Cleveland D. But I'm not a believer in Chudzinski at all.
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8083
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:37 am
  • Vols, but they have the GREATEST Auburn QB of all-time there, right?

    You made me laugh with the tornado analogy. Good work, il Duce.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:41 am
  • Vegas Over/Under for wins

    Pittsburgh 9
    Baltimore 8.5
    Cincinatti 8.5
    Cleveland 6


    Division Odds

    Pittsburgh 9/5
    Baltimore 9/5
    Cincinnati 2/1
    Cleveland 8/1
    Last edited by bestfightstory on Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:46 am
  • So Vegas is closer to my view of the Browns than vols. Thats really all I need, vols, I win sir.

    Besides, you're an SEC guy.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:47 am
  • Cleveland as 8.5 feels wrong, just because of Weeden.

    Did Cincy clean up their linebacker deficit?
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 11076
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:52 am
  • Scottemojo wrote:Cleveland as 8.5 feels wrong, just because of Weeden.

    Did Cincy clean up their linebacker deficit?


    I could play Will with that line. I know, I know, you're the founding member of the Tim Ruskell fan club, so this is hard to hear.

    But, DL makes the LB's, not the other way around.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:03 pm
  • Yeah, well that D-line isn't making Burfict and Maualuga any faster. Burfict is a liability when teams pass, and Rey is a liability most of the rest of the time. a deficit at MLB could leave them a bit soft underneath.

    Who do they have at RB?
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 11076
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:05 pm
  • pehawk wrote:So Vegas is closer to my view of the Browns than vols. Thats really all I need, vols, I win sir.

    Besides, you're an SEC guy.


    Heh, I think the under on Cleveland is a damn fine bet.

    (and because I'm an SEC guy, I know what winning looks like... and I don't see a lot of it in the AFC North this season :mrgreen: )
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8083
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:11 pm
  • Scottemojo wrote:Yeah, well that D-line isn't making Burfict and Maualuga any faster. Burfict is a liability when teams pass, and Rey is a liability most of the rest of the time. a deficit at MLB could leave them a bit soft underneath.

    Who do they have at RB?


    They have the rookie from UNC so we don't know.

    8.5 for Cleveland? That's a an under I'd take all day.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9227
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:51 pm
  • I agree on 8.5 seeming awfully high for Cleveland-it's just hard to imagine on risking money when their ceiling is likely 9.

    I'm going to look at my sheet (Hilton) again. 6.5 seems right. But I will look.
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:54 pm
  • AJ Green is a beast, and their front 7 is legit, but I just don't see Dalton being able to take his game to the next level. They will continue to be a mediocre team for the foreseeable future.
    NinerBuff
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 288
    Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:02 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:07 pm
  • You guys have good eyes. Cleveland's line is 6 with -130 on the over. And +110 under.
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:33 pm
  • bestfightstory wrote:You guys have good eyes. Cleveland's line is 6 with -130 on the over. And +110 under.


    I'd take the over on that. Everyone else?
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9930
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:47 pm
  • I would go heavily on Cincy Over and to win division. I think they get 10 wins.

    I would go under on Pitt and Baltimore.

    Cleveland? 6 seems right to me. I think they will be very competitive but not sure how many more wins they earn. After looking at their schedule I found seven wins fairly easily but keep in mind I have Pitt and Balt undervalued.
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:31 pm
  • pehawk wrote:
    bestfightstory wrote:You guys have good eyes. Cleveland's line is 6 with -130 on the over. And +110 under.


    I'd take the over on that. Everyone else?

    Just don't see it yet. They might get to 7 though given that division is close. Thing is Baltimore will be better than people think even then the division is Cincinniati's to win. If Pittsburgh falls off a cliff, which is possible because their defense is OLD then I could see Cleveland possibly getting to 9-7 if all the planets align. More realistically they are probably 6-10 maybe 7-9.
    43-8...it's all about that action boss....
    next man up.
    User avatar
    MizzouHawkGal
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7472
    Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
    Location: Kansas City, MO


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:31 pm
  • Cincy went 10-6 last year, with 8.7 estimated wins and the 12th ranked DVOA. Their weighted DVOA ranked 7th, sandwiched between Chicago and Washington. Their running game is almost dead average, and their pass game is below the NFL median, even though it has a positive DVOA. Overall, their offense is essentially average, but that's more than enough to win when your defense ranked 3rd in weighted defense (ours ranked just 7th).

    I was a Dalton skeptic during the 2011 draft, but I think he's proven me wrong. He showed real progress during the 2012 season when it came to progressing through reads and facilitating the offense.

    I thought Cincy had a pretty nice draft. I was all for drafting Tyler Eifert at #25, had he reached us. Giovanni Bernard has that Chris Polk gene that I like in RBs. I wasn't a fan of Hunt and Williams, but both have the athleticism to prove me very wrong. Later on they'd add LB Sean Porter and Cobi Hamilton, two flawed but exciting football players that I really like. Porter is kind of like a hybrid of Bruce Irvin and KJ Wright, in that he's got a lot of reach and physicality like Wright but excels as a 3-4 type rusher like Irvin (probably) would. Hamilton can be nitpicked for technique but has size, speed, and college production in the SEC.

    Not every pick the Bengals made was a homerun, but I think their draft places comfortably in the top 10 this year, based on my own evaluations. Their best picks happened to be areas where they needed help the most too (TE, RB, LB, WR). Cincy has drafted as well as any team not named the Seahawks over the last 4 years, too. So keep an eye on them.

    This is a young team with the kind of physicality and youth you just don't see anywhere other than Seattle. Their division is crumbling around them. Yes, they did over-achieve last year a bit, but this isn't a team I'd bet against at all, at least in terms of making the playoffs.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11039
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


Re: The Bengals
Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:35 pm
  • Re Margus Hunt. With the defense they field, they can afford to add a project with quirky intangible upside.

    I didn't want him as a Seahawk, but I will be fascinated to see how he develops in Cincy.
    "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
    "BFS is kicking ass in here." -kearly (8/9/2013)
    User avatar
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8511
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


Re: The Bengals
Fri Jun 28, 2013 4:51 am
  • Bengals are my AFC pick of 2014 season, but hawks will beat them in Super Bowl. :179422:
    Watching Beast Mode run the ball.
    Catching a Bo Jackson baseball. Kingdome, centerfield, over the cannon.
    Jim Presley with a full count, 2 out, down by 3, bottom of the 9th Grand Slam.

    My favorite all time sports memory
    "The Seattle Seahawks are Super Bowl CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!"
    User avatar
    JaiSeaSea
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 289
    Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 11:32 pm


Re: The Bengals
Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:28 pm
  • I will take the Bengals seriously when Hernandez posts bail and they sign him........ Seriously not only is he really good but nobody will want to tackle him
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3389
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


Re: The Bengals
Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:00 pm
  • mikeak wrote:I will take the Bengals seriously when Hernandez posts bail and they sign him........ Seriously not only is he really good but nobody will want to tackle him

    Man, the jokes are never going to stop concerning Hernandez he really is an idiot. On the otherhand I think Kearly has it right Dalton is pretty good and that team does have some serious talent. They just need to put it all together regardless I think the division is their's this year.
    43-8...it's all about that action boss....
    next man up.
    User avatar
    MizzouHawkGal
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7472
    Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
    Location: Kansas City, MO


Re: The Bengals
Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:45 pm
  • After spending years annoyed by Norv here where all my friends love the Chargers, he will elevate the Browns O.

    Take the over.

    I expect them to be one of the surprising teams this year.
    Los Angeles Rams' fan who lives in San Diego.

    "They call it Sack City because you'd rather live in a SACK."
    User avatar
    RedAlice
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 657
    Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:47 am
    Location: San Diego


Re: The Bengals
Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:12 pm
  • Can the Bengals draft new uniforms?


    Go Browns. T. Richardson is a beast
    User avatar
    rjdriver
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1054
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:11 am
    Location: Utah




It is currently Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:51 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: b3liever, Google [Bot] and 10 guests