| Author |
Message |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest...  Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:05 pm |
|
| NET Ring Of Honor |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 20385
Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014
|
|
Teblow can just GO.
_________________ 
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4554
Location: The 5-0
|
FlyingGreg wrote: And the idiot Deadskins fans show up again...love this a$$ clown:
"Is Russell Wilson half the player RGIII is? Uh, no.
Are the Seattle Seahawks ever going to win a Superbowl? Uh, no.
Are the Washington Redskins the superior team in the NFL? Uh, yes."
I gently reminded him we've beaten the Skins three straight times in the playoffs, and that it was Wilson who tied Manning's TD pass record for a rookie and not RGIII, even though he was in an offense that ran the ball more than anyone else in the NFL.
Denial... Denial...and nerves. His offense was white bread, at best, but I have to say Griffin impressed me this past year. He's a better passer than I gave him credit for coming into the 12 draft. In fact, if I had a do-over, I'd say he's worth A 1st rd pick. As in ONE first rd pick, but I'd still be nervous every minute he's on the field. Wilson? in hindsight, I'd say he's the guy you give 3 1sts and your first born for. These Skin fans are going to try to convince themselves their (idiot) FO made a good deal in getting Griffin. It was actually a GREAT deal....for the Rams. Griff's a good kid, a true competitor and I wish him well (in his next occupation). I predicted he wouldn't see a full season this year...and I predict this is the last contract he will see in the NFL. I wish the Rams would have taken him (and Skin fans will too).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:34 pm |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 21404
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
Last I checked, half of your "passes" being screens and shovels to the RB doesn't qualify as proving you can pass. I need to see more RG3 before judging him to be the next "Peyton Brady" QB superhero.
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:41 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 9805
|
|
Tebow completed 75% of his passes last year. Russell Wilson was way lower than that.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:45 pm |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 21404
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
Well hell, you just changed MY mind, Scotte!
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:50 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 9805
|
RolandDeschain wrote: Well hell, you just changed MY mind, Scotte! Conversion, one man at a time, is the Tebow Way. Now that the Hawks have 35 running backs, Wilson is superfluous. Tebow is the only answer.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4554
Location: The 5-0
|
Scottemojo wrote: Tebow completed 75% of his passes last year. Russell Wilson was way lower than that. Very true (6/8?).  Like many of our picks this draft, Tebow also has "off field issues". I say we bring him in. Anyone have any film on this guy?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
General Manager
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm
Posts: 1942
|
|
Maybe you can go to Canada and see him play.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 700
|
Basis4day wrote:
All that is available is that they inquired about the cost of Tebow in a trade, not that they offered those picks. You are making an incorrect inference that if a team checks the price of an item, that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount.
There is a huge difference between what I said..."The hawks were willing to trade picks for your boy Tebow" (and that is the truth, again P&J called knowing they would have to give up picks, and they still picked up the phone)
from what you wrote...
"that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount" (never going to happen, where did that even come from?)
They did not want Tebow. They wanted to know his value.
They were checking his value, but did not want the player? do you think we are 5 years old, do you have any clue how dumb that sounds? Calling for an item, asking the price, then saying "psych" I never wanted him. Why would you even offer that up?
You claim "They did not want Tebow, They wanted to know his value" Really? Everything online says they were looking into the player, nothing about the Seahawks looking at his value? Do you just make crap up? Give a source please of P or J saying "We are looking into Tim's value, not the player" LOL
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4554
Location: The 5-0
|
General Manager wrote: Maybe you can go to Canada and see him play. They have Arena Football in Canada?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
General Manager
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:32 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm
Posts: 1942
|
|
Provide us a link where Pete or John ever validated that rumor.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:40 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 700
|
What rumor, and if they validated the rumor - Its no longer a rumor 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2630
|
Spokane wrote: Basis4day wrote:
All that is available is that they inquired about the cost of Tebow in a trade, not that they offered those picks. You are making an incorrect inference that if a team checks the price of an item, that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount.
There is a huge difference between what I said..."The hawks were willing to trade picks for your boy Tebow" (and that is the truth, again P&J called knowing they would have to give up picks, and they still picked up the phone)
from what you wrote...
"that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount" (never going to happen, where did that even come from?)
They did not want Tebow. They wanted to know his value.
They were checking his value, but did not want the player? do you think we are 5 years old, do you have any clue how dumb that sounds? Calling for an item, asking the price, then saying "psych" I never wanted him. Why would you even offer that up?
You claim "They did not want Tebow, They wanted to know his value" Really? Everything online says they were looking into the player, nothing about the Seahawks looking at his value? Do you just make crap up? Give a source please of P or J saying "We are looking into Tim's value, not the player" LOL
Sigh. Take a deep breath. Again, show me online where it states that the FO offered Picks for Tebow. I don't know why you're getting so worked up. You keep saying it's online. Post the link where it says we offered picks for Tebow. You can't. We didn't. And no one said, "psych." There is a difference between offering picks for a player, and asking what it would cost to acquire that player.Our FO has consistently stated that they will weigh every option to improve the team. (AKA Measure Value). That is pretty much entirely what John Scheider's job is.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2630
|
Spokane wrote: What rumor, and if they validated the rumor - Its no longer a rumor Post the link stating they offered picks for Tebow.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:30 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11136
|
|
I'm still rooting for the guy. Mostly because it will drive many of you nuts.
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 700
|
Basis4day wrote: Spokane wrote: What rumor, and if they validated the rumor - Its no longer a rumor Post the link stating they offered picks for Tebow. What else were they going to trade for him? cash? The fact JS picked up the phone and called the Jets to acquire Suckerfish Tebow showed that he was willing to trade SOMETHING for Tebow (JS knows trades are not free). The Seahawks wanted Tebow, JS called on tebow, however the the draft picks that JS had in mind (or cash) was lower then the Jets wanted. A simple deal that died. But It is in Seahawks history that we did want him, but the numbers did not add up for the deal.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
morgulon1
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:07 am
Posts: 3480
Location: Spokane, Wa
|
CANHawk wrote: FlyingGreg wrote: And the idiot Deadskins fans show up again...love this a$$ clown:
"Is Russell Wilson half the player RGIII is? Uh, no.
Are the Seattle Seahawks ever going to win a Superbowl? Uh, no.
Are the Washington Redskins the superior team in the NFL? Uh, yes."
I gently reminded him we've beaten the Skins three straight times in the playoffs, and that it was Wilson who tied Manning's TD pass record for a rookie and not RGIII.
Denial... Yeah, I saw that too. You think we're in their head at all..? LOL. They'd better get used to losing to Seattle in the playoffs for the forseeable future. IF they make the playoffs.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:20 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7498
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: I'm still rooting for the guy. Mostly because it will drive many of you nuts. You rooting for Tebow doesn't drive me nuts. It seems appropriate, honestly. Not that it's going to do any good. The guy is still going to suck.  _________________  Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:47 pm |
|
| * NET Eeyore * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10314
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
Fantastic, I do not want to see Tebow anywhere near the Seahawk facilities.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkRiderFan
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider on Tim Tebow interest... Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:56 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 300
|
|
They said this morning that there were teams who inquired about Tebow....those same teams contacted Tebow / his agent to see if he would be willing to play TE. Tebow said no, and so much for the trade interest. I suspect if our FO made any inquiries, it was under those conditions.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
