FlyingGreg wrote:And the idiot Deadskins fans show up again...love this a$$ clown:
"Is Russell Wilson half the player RGIII is? Uh, no.
Are the Seattle Seahawks ever going to win a Superbowl? Uh, no.
Are the Washington Redskins the superior team in the NFL? Uh, yes."
I gently reminded him we've beaten the Skins three straight times in the playoffs, and that it was Wilson who tied Manning's TD pass record for a rookie and not RGIII, even though he was in an offense that ran the ball more than anyone else in the NFL.
Denial...
RolandDeschain wrote:Well hell, you just changed MY mind, Scotte!
Scottemojo wrote:Tebow completed 75% of his passes last year. Russell Wilson was way lower than that.
Basis4day wrote:
All that is available is that they inquired about the cost of Tebow in a trade, not that they offered those picks. You are making an incorrect inference that if a team checks the price of an item, that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount.
There is a huge difference between what I said..."The hawks were willing to trade picks for your boy Tebow" (and that is the truth, again P&J called knowing they would have to give up picks, and they still picked up the phone)
from what you wrote...
"that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount" (never going to happen, where did that even come from?)
They did not want Tebow. They wanted to know his value.
They were checking his value, but did not want the player? do you think we are 5 years old, do you have any clue how dumb that sounds? Calling for an item, asking the price, then saying "psych" I never wanted him. Why would you even offer that up?
You claim "They did not want Tebow, They wanted to know his value" Really? Everything online says they were looking into the player, nothing about the Seahawks looking at his value? Do you just make crap up? Give a source please of P or J saying "We are looking into Tim's value, not the player" LOL
General Manager wrote:Maybe you can go to Canada and see him play.
Spokane wrote:Basis4day wrote:
All that is available is that they inquired about the cost of Tebow in a trade, not that they offered those picks. You are making an incorrect inference that if a team checks the price of an item, that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount.
There is a huge difference between what I said..."The hawks were willing to trade picks for your boy Tebow" (and that is the truth, again P&J called knowing they would have to give up picks, and they still picked up the phone)
from what you wrote...
"that they automatically offer to pay a certain amount" (never going to happen, where did that even come from?)
They did not want Tebow. They wanted to know his value.
They were checking his value, but did not want the player? do you think we are 5 years old, do you have any clue how dumb that sounds? Calling for an item, asking the price, then saying "psych" I never wanted him. Why would you even offer that up?
You claim "They did not want Tebow, They wanted to know his value" Really? Everything online says they were looking into the player, nothing about the Seahawks looking at his value? Do you just make crap up? Give a source please of P or J saying "We are looking into Tim's value, not the player" LOL
Spokane wrote:What rumor, and if they validated the rumor - Its no longer a rumor
Basis4day wrote:Spokane wrote:What rumor, and if they validated the rumor - Its no longer a rumor
Post the link stating they offered picks for Tebow.
CANHawk wrote:FlyingGreg wrote:And the idiot Deadskins fans show up again...love this a$$ clown:
"Is Russell Wilson half the player RGIII is? Uh, no.
Are the Seattle Seahawks ever going to win a Superbowl? Uh, no.
Are the Washington Redskins the superior team in the NFL? Uh, yes."
I gently reminded him we've beaten the Skins three straight times in the playoffs, and that it was Wilson who tied Manning's TD pass record for a rookie and not RGIII.
Denial...
Yeah, I saw that too. You think we're in their head at all..? LOL. They'd better get used to losing to Seattle in the playoffs for the forseeable future.
MontanaHawk05 wrote:I'm still rooting for the guy. Mostly because it will drive many of you nuts.
Spokane wrote:Basis4day wrote:Spokane wrote:What rumor, and if they validated the rumor - Its no longer a rumor
Post the link stating they offered picks for Tebow.
What else were they going to trade for him? cash? The fact JS picked up the phone and called the Jets to acquire Suckerfish Tebow showed that he was willing to trade SOMETHING for Tebow (JS knows trades are not free). The Seahawks wanted Tebow, JS called on tebow, however the the draft picks that JS had in mind (or cash) was lower then the Jets wanted. A simple deal that died.
But It is in Seahawks history that we did want him, but the numbers did not add up for the deal.
Seahawk Sailor wrote:We have five friggin' pages discussing a supposed interest in a player whom the decision maker summed up with "Uh, no," today?
General Manager wrote:There is no evidence that the FO even contacted the Jets about Tebow it was a rumor that was never validated by the front office.
FlyingGreg wrote:Tebow...not surprised in the least. He's NOT an NFL caliber QB. Not even close.
kigenzun wrote:
Tim Tebow becoming an NFL starter again, is likely to magically happen The Day After the Earth Stands Still, and the Universe itself spins around 'Him'.
ROFLMAO!!!
SalishHawkFan wrote:kigenzun wrote:
Tim Tebow becoming an NFL starter again, is likely to magically happen The Day After the Earth Stands Still, and the Universe itself spins around 'Him'.
ROFLMAO!!!
Well, technically, according to Einstein.....
ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
Seahawk Sailor wrote:Don't be confused, Rick. Just let this aborted manbearpig amalgom of a thread just die the death it was supposed to before it was resurrected by blowhardedness.
mrblitz wrote:could tebow play strong safety?
PlinytheCenter wrote:Picture yourself in a quiet meadow...watching squirrels eating wild asparagus.
RolandDeschain wrote:Even the indoor Omaha Beef QB thinks Tebow can learn some good things from him. Let this Tebow thread die, already.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/omaha-beef ... 37777.html
Scottemojo wrote:Now that the Hawks have 35 running backs, Wilson is superfluous. Tebow is the only answer.
It is currently Tue Apr 24, 2018 7:12 am