49ers OC claims he didn't use real offense during 42-13 loss

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. RATING: PG-13
  • Lets see.... Chance to seal up the division? Hold the 2 seed? Hardouche's 49th birthday?

    Sure ya did Roman.. Sure ya did.

    That's why he went deep on the first play and threw to the end zone along the sidelines twice and got Davis JACKED UP.

    Lol!!! What an ass! Harbs is rubbing off!
    Eh... Whatever...
    User avatar
    loafoftatupu
    I'M JIMMY!
     
    Posts: 5300
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
    Location: Auburn, WA


  • You guys are funny. ;-)

    All he said was that he dialed back the playcalling. He didn't say they weren't trying to win. His point was only that they weren't going to show off their entire offense for playoff teams to prepare for.

    ...and it worked.

    Yes, they lost in Seattle...but all they had to do was beat Arizona to take the NFCW. Even if they lost both games, they'd still have been a wildcard. More importantly tho they rolled out that offense vs. Green Bay (MUCH more of the Pistol). 550+ yards and 45 points. Kaep with 263 yards passing with 2 TDs and 181 yards rushing with an additional 2 TDs. In Atlanta the following week the Falcons had no answers either. The offense played very well in the Super Bowl as well...just a bit too late.

    Look...as a Niner fan it pains me to say that the Seahawks are good. They are. You guys tho are making WAY, WAY to much out of ONE GAME.

    NONE of these are excuses as teams should be up for every game, but the below are all FACTORS in the way that game played out.


    1) Justin Smith was out. That first TD by Lynch was right at his spot and is one of the reasons the Niners didn't resign Ricky Jean-Francios and DID sign Glenn Dorsey.

    2) Aldon Smith was hurt. He had 19.5 sacks during the season but NONE in the final 3 games and playoffs. Some say it's because Justin Smith is the reason he gets those sacks. Right...as if no other OLB has had a really good DE lined up next to them. As far as I know tho, none has ever had 33.5 sacks in his first 2 years. Aldon was hurt. It was revealed just a few weeks ago that he played the end of the season with a torn labrum. It's no coincidense that the 49ers pass D fell apart after both Justin and Aldon were hurt. No pressure on the QB. It started in the second half vs NE and continued all the way through the Super Bowl. Even when Justin came back, he was essentially playing with one arm.

    3) Fatigue: The 49ers D almost never substitutes. Most of their defenders play the entire game. NE's strategy the week before (and in every game really) is to run a HUGE number of plays so the defense simply can't keep up. In this case, the D was on the field for NINETY snaps. Thats nuts. Follow that with a short week and then going into the Clink where the 'hawks were playing like their hair was on fire....predictable results.

    4) Vernon Davis was injured in that game as well. He never came back after that hit by Chancellor (sp?).


    The Seahawks won that game...fair and square. Not saying otherwise....but you guys seem to be of the mindset that it was the "changing of the guard" game or something. That ONE game is the thing you cling to more than anything else despite the fact that you BARELY beat a team that the 49ers beat hadily twice (Packers), LOST to the team the 49ers beat in the playoffs (Atlanta...and I've read on here a few times that the Niners had a week off and played them at home...um, no), and are STILL 1-3 vs Harbaugh and actually only split the series this season.

    I've seen the thumping of the chest about how you guys "owned" Kaepernick. Against that D in that building he did in fact have his worst showing as a pro, but his QB rating was only 72 in his SIXTH career start. To put that in perspective, what was Wilsons QB rating in his SEVENTH career start in SF? 38.7. Wilson has the makings of a great young QB, but you guys seem to think that he's the only one who improved as the season progressed.

    Was the win by Seattle impressive? Of course it was. Does it keep the 49ers up at night? Not really. While Seattle is thumping its chest about a game that got out of hand in December, the 49ers are driven by a game they lost in FEBRUARY. If you guys are expecting 42-13 again, you are in for a big letdown.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Marvin49 wrote:You guys are funny. ;-)

    All he said was that he dialed back the playcalling. He didn't say they weren't trying to win. His point was only that they weren't going to show off their entire offense for playoff teams to prepare for.

    ...and it worked.



    Indeed it did. After all, they won the Super Bo...

    Oh, they were actually getting blown off the field on national TV (again) by the Ravens until the power outage gave them time to regroup? Nevermind.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 14382
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


  • QuickLightning wrote:You guys could also look at the snap counts before you jump to conclusions. I was reading earlier (after the divisional round of the playoffs) that they ran something like 10% of their plays from the pistol in the Seattle, New England and Arizona games, then ran something like 60% of the snaps from the pistol in the Packers game.

    Most of the common winners do this towards the end of the year anyways, it's not new. The Giants, Packers, Patriots would all dial back and try to run generic towards the end if the division was a lock and save their game planning for the post season.

    I'd say it worked out amazingly well. Did you see how badly they embarrassed Green Bay?


    But here's the problem the 49ers DIDN'T have the division locked up. Not even close. If it wasn't for ST Louis and their Delay of Game (which cost them the win vs SF) SF wouldn't have even won the division. It's ludicrious that SF would dial it all back and not care about winning in SEA, when infact there was a strong possiblity they'd play each other again in the playoffs.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2363
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • Sarlacc83 wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:You guys are funny. ;-)

    All he said was that he dialed back the playcalling. He didn't say they weren't trying to win. His point was only that they weren't going to show off their entire offense for playoff teams to prepare for.

    ...and it worked.



    Indeed it did. After all, they won the Super Bo...

    Oh, they were actually getting blown off the field on national TV (again) by the Ravens until the power outage gave them time to regroup? Nevermind.


    Clever....and in no way addresses my point.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • I call baloney.

    What a putz. Take the loss like a man, Roman. The attitude displayed by Roman in the article is not something that is reserved for the the 49ers, the league is filled with sore losers, but gimme a break.

    I'll say this though, for as much flack as he's getting me and everyone else here, the dude can draw up some plays. He's very innovative in the run game, especially.
    Image
    User avatar
    SirTed
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 718
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:25 am
    Location: Queen Anne


  • jlwaters1 wrote:
    QuickLightning wrote:You guys could also look at the snap counts before you jump to conclusions. I was reading earlier (after the divisional round of the playoffs) that they ran something like 10% of their plays from the pistol in the Seattle, New England and Arizona games, then ran something like 60% of the snaps from the pistol in the Packers game.

    Most of the common winners do this towards the end of the year anyways, it's not new. The Giants, Packers, Patriots would all dial back and try to run generic towards the end if the division was a lock and save their game planning for the post season.

    I'd say it worked out amazingly well. Did you see how badly they embarrassed Green Bay?


    But here's the problem the 49ers DIDN'T have the division locked up. Not even close. If it wasn't for ST Louis and their Delay of Game (which cost them the win vs SF) SF wouldn't have even won the division. It's ludicrious that SF would dial it all back and not care about winning in SEA, when infact there was a strong possiblity they'd play each other again in the playoffs.


    They won the division in the end, didn't they? All they had to do was beat Arizona...

    The fact that the Seahawks and Niners could have gone head to head in the post season gives even more backing to the story. You don't want the Seahawks to see more of the Pistol just a few weeks before a single elimination game comes up in the NFC Championship.

    I swear, most of you act like you've never watched a season of football before. This is extremely COMMON and most of the top teams do it.
    QuickLightning
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 116
    Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:20 am


  • jlwaters1 wrote:
    QuickLightning wrote:You guys could also look at the snap counts before you jump to conclusions. I was reading earlier (after the divisional round of the playoffs) that they ran something like 10% of their plays from the pistol in the Seattle, New England and Arizona games, then ran something like 60% of the snaps from the pistol in the Packers game.

    Most of the common winners do this towards the end of the year anyways, it's not new. The Giants, Packers, Patriots would all dial back and try to run generic towards the end if the division was a lock and save their game planning for the post season.

    I'd say it worked out amazingly well. Did you see how badly they embarrassed Green Bay?


    But here's the problem the 49ers DIDN'T have the division locked up. Not even close. If it wasn't for ST Louis and their Delay of Game (which cost them the win vs SF) SF wouldn't have even won the division. It's ludicrious that SF would dial it all back and not care about winning in SEA, when infact there was a strong possiblity they'd play each other again in the playoffs.


    Quicklightning is 100% correct.

    Green Bay hadn't seen what the 49ers did to them ion film and is a big reason the 49ers embarassed them. THAT was the point. In the interviews with GB players after the game they were all stunned because they hadn't seen that stuff on film.


    You guys are really missing the point. Its not like he's saying the 49ers conceded that game. He's not saying they weren't trying to win....he was only saying that they didn't roll out their entire bag of tricks. They did the same think vs Arizona the following week and got off to a slow start. They were trying to win those games...they were just scaling back the playbook.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • QuickLightning wrote:
    jlwaters1 wrote:
    QuickLightning wrote:You guys could also look at the snap counts before you jump to conclusions. I was reading earlier (after the divisional round of the playoffs) that they ran something like 10% of their plays from the pistol in the Seattle, New England and Arizona games, then ran something like 60% of the snaps from the pistol in the Packers game.

    Most of the common winners do this towards the end of the year anyways, it's not new. The Giants, Packers, Patriots would all dial back and try to run generic towards the end if the division was a lock and save their game planning for the post season.

    I'd say it worked out amazingly well. Did you see how badly they embarrassed Green Bay?


    But here's the problem the 49ers DIDN'T have the division locked up. Not even close. If it wasn't for ST Louis and their Delay of Game (which cost them the win vs SF) SF wouldn't have even won the division. It's ludicrious that SF would dial it all back and not care about winning in SEA, when infact there was a strong possiblity they'd play each other again in the playoffs.


    They won the division in the end, didn't they? All they had to do was beat Arizona...

    The fact that the Seahawks and Niners could have gone head to head in the post season gives even more backing to the story. You don't want the Seahawks to see more of the Pistol just a few weeks before a single elimination game comes up in the NFC Championship.

    I swear, most of you act like you've never watched a season of football before. This is extremely COMMON and most of the top teams do it.


    Then why pull it out in various forms during the regular season and then again against Green Bay? Then it's on tape, and obviously, they want to beat Seattle in the potential NFC Champ game.

    However, fine, if you want to argue this is common, go ahead and do so. Because it makes your team look even more arrogant and stupid if they're going to do it against their biggest division rival.
    Last edited by Sarlacc83 on Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 14382
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


  • QuickLightning wrote:
    jlwaters1 wrote:
    QuickLightning wrote:You guys could also look at the snap counts before you jump to conclusions. I was reading earlier (after the divisional round of the playoffs) that they ran something like 10% of their plays from the pistol in the Seattle, New England and Arizona games, then ran something like 60% of the snaps from the pistol in the Packers game.

    Most of the common winners do this towards the end of the year anyways, it's not new. The Giants, Packers, Patriots would all dial back and try to run generic towards the end if the division was a lock and save their game planning for the post season.

    I'd say it worked out amazingly well. Did you see how badly they embarrassed Green Bay?


    But here's the problem the 49ers DIDN'T have the division locked up. Not even close. If it wasn't for ST Louis and their Delay of Game (which cost them the win vs SF) SF wouldn't have even won the division. It's ludicrious that SF would dial it all back and not care about winning in SEA, when infact there was a strong possiblity they'd play each other again in the playoffs.


    They won the division in the end, didn't they? All they had to do was beat Arizona...

    The fact that the Seahawks and Niners could have gone head to head in the post season gives even more backing to the story. You don't want the Seahawks to see more of the Pistol just a few weeks before a single elimination game comes up in the NFC Championship.

    I swear, most of you act like you've never watched a season of football before. This is extremely COMMON and most of the top teams do it.


    ok....you are my new hero of this site. EXACTLY. In particular the part about possibly meeting Seattle in the playoffs.

    Roman has been known to do this. Sometimes it doesn't work out well for them, but it is in fact something he will do from time to time.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Sarlacc83 wrote:Then why pull it out in various forms during the regular season and then again against Green Bay? Then it's on tape, and obviously, they want to beat Seattle in the potential NFC Champ game.

    However, fine, if you want to argue this is common, go ahead and do so. Because it makes your team look even more arrogant and stupid if they're going to do it against their biggest division rival.


    Was Green Bay caught off guard and made to look like a fool when they game planned for the 49ers offense shown in weeks 15-17 and they came out with the Pistol instead, yes or no?

    That's all you need to answer for how "stupid" this plan was.

    The simple fact is that it worked and teams do it every year all the way back to the 80s and likely before that too. It's nothing new to the NFL.
    QuickLightning
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 116
    Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:20 am


  • QuickLightning wrote:
    Sarlacc83 wrote:Then why pull it out in various forms during the regular season and then again against Green Bay? Then it's on tape, and obviously, they want to beat Seattle in the potential NFC Champ game.

    However, fine, if you want to argue this is common, go ahead and do so. Because it makes your team look even more arrogant and stupid if they're going to do it against their biggest division rival.


    Was Green Bay caught off guard and made to look like a fool when they game planned for the 49ers offense shown in weeks 15-17 and they came out with the Pistol instead, yes or no?

    That's all you need to answer for how "stupid" this plan was.

    The simple fact is that it worked and teams do it every year all the way back to the 80s. It's nothing new to the NFL.


    This.

    I'm sorry if this destroys the illusion of the perfect win last december, but that doesn't make it any less true.
    Last edited by Marvin49 on Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Marvin49 wrote:You guys are funny. ;-)

    All he said was that he dialed back the playcalling. He didn't say they weren't trying to win. His point was only that they weren't going to show off their entire offense for playoff teams to prepare for.

    ...and it worked.

    Yes, they lost in Seattle...but all they had to do was beat Arizona to take the NFCW. Even if they lost both games, they'd still have been a wildcard. More importantly tho they rolled out that offense vs. Green Bay (MUCH more of the Pistol). 550+ yards and 45 points. Kaep with 263 yards passing with 2 TDs and 181 yards rushing with an additional 2 TDs. In Atlanta the following week the Falcons had no answers either. The offense played very well in the Super Bowl as well...just a bit too late.

    Look...as a Niner fan it pains me to say that the Seahawks are good. They are. You guys tho are making WAY, WAY to much out of ONE GAME.

    NONE of these are excuses as teams should be up for every game, but the below are all FACTORS in the way that game played out.


    1) Justin Smith was out. That first TD by Lynch was right at his spot and is one of the reasons the Niners didn't resign Ricky Jean-Francios and DID sign Glenn Dorsey.

    2) Aldon Smith was hurt. He had 19.5 sacks during the season but NONE in the final 3 games and playoffs. Some say it's because Justin Smith is the reason he gets those sacks. Right...as if no other OLB has had a really good DE lined up next to them. As far as I know tho, none has ever had 33.5 sacks in his first 2 years. Aldon was hurt. It was revealed just a few weeks ago that he played the end of the season with a torn labrum. It's no coincidense that the 49ers pass D fell apart after both Justin and Aldon were hurt. No pressure on the QB. It started in the second half vs NE and continued all the way through the Super Bowl. Even when Justin came back, he was essentially playing with one arm.

    3) Fatigue: The 49ers D almost never substitutes. Most of their defenders play the entire game. NE's strategy the week before (and in every game really) is to run a HUGE number of plays so the defense simply can't keep up. In this case, the D was on the field for NINETY snaps. Thats nuts. Follow that with a short week and then going into the Clink where the 'hawks were playing like their hair was on fire....predictable results.

    4) Vernon Davis was injured in that game as well. He never came back after that hit by Chancellor (sp?).


    The Seahawks won that game...fair and square. Not saying otherwise....but you guys seem to be of the mindset that it was the "changing of the guard" game or something. That ONE game is the thing you cling to more than anything else despite the fact that you BARELY beat a team that the 49ers beat hadily twice (Packers), LOST to the team the 49ers beat in the playoffs (Atlanta...and I've read on here a few times that the Niners had a week off and played them at home...um, no), and are STILL 1-3 vs Harbaugh and actually only split the series this season.

    I've seen the thumping of the chest about how you guys "owned" Kaepernick. Against that D in that building he did in fact have his worst showing as a pro, but his QB rating was only 72 in his SIXTH career start. To put that in perspective, what was Wilsons QB rating in his SEVENTH career start in SF? 38.7. Wilson has the makings of a great young QB, but you guys seem to think that he's the only one who improved as the season progressed.

    Was the win by Seattle impressive? Of course it was. Does it keep the 49ers up at night? Not really. While Seattle is thumping its chest about a game that got out of hand in December, the 49ers are driven by a game they lost in FEBRUARY. If you guys are expecting 42-13 again, you are in for a big letdown.


    Don't be ridiculous. ATL did have answers for the "pistol" Kaepernick threw and ran for just over 250 yards. That's not domination. SF was also 33% on 3rd downs in that game. Again, not dominant. Just because you pimp-slapped an ill-prepared Packers team at HOME, doesn't mean that you were killing everyone with the "pistol" infact, in the Super Bowl it was largely shutdown. Without some serious breaks-- Ie. Fumbles and punt returns. 10 easy point got SF back into the game.

    I don't want to hear about the lack of substitution on SF defense. That's on them. It's no one's fault but their own that they don't trust anyone else to play. The lack of playing time for the young players will cost them in the years to come, IMO. I also don't want to hear the garbage about a "SHORT WEEK," and having to suffer through 90 plays against New England.

    Guess what- Seattle had it even worse in the first meeting between SF and Seattle in SF. Seattle played New England and won at home. Only to have to play SF on THURSDAY night football. Much shorter week than what SF had to deal with in SEattle. Yet, SEattle only lost 13-6 with plenty of opportunities to win.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2363
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • QuickLightning wrote:
    jlwaters1 wrote:
    QuickLightning wrote:You guys could also look at the snap counts before you jump to conclusions. I was reading earlier (after the divisional round of the playoffs) that they ran something like 10% of their plays from the pistol in the Seattle, New England and Arizona games, then ran something like 60% of the snaps from the pistol in the Packers game.

    Most of the common winners do this towards the end of the year anyways, it's not new. The Giants, Packers, Patriots would all dial back and try to run generic towards the end if the division was a lock and save their game planning for the post season.

    I'd say it worked out amazingly well. Did you see how badly they embarrassed Green Bay?


    But here's the problem the 49ers DIDN'T have the division locked up. Not even close. If it wasn't for ST Louis and their Delay of Game (which cost them the win vs SF) SF wouldn't have even won the division. It's ludicrious that SF would dial it all back and not care about winning in SEA, when infact there was a strong possiblity they'd play each other again in the playoffs.


    They won the division in the end, didn't they? All they had to do was beat Arizona...

    The fact that the Seahawks and Niners could have gone head to head in the post season gives even more backing to the story. You don't want the Seahawks to see more of the Pistol just a few weeks before a single elimination game comes up in the NFC Championship.

    I swear, most of you act like you've never watched a season of football before. This is extremely COMMON and most of the top teams do it.


    Are you kidding me. you seem to be overlooking the fact that the #2 seed was still in play. That if they lost to Seattle there was little hope of obtaining it. Sure Minn won GB and SF got the #2 seed anyway, but that occured in week 17. Don't tell me Harbs didn't want to take that seed. To act like that was of no consequence, really is overlooking a major peice to this.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2363
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • jlwaters1 wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:You guys are funny. ;-)

    All he said was that he dialed back the playcalling. He didn't say they weren't trying to win. His point was only that they weren't going to show off their entire offense for playoff teams to prepare for.

    ...and it worked.

    Yes, they lost in Seattle...but all they had to do was beat Arizona to take the NFCW. Even if they lost both games, they'd still have been a wildcard. More importantly tho they rolled out that offense vs. Green Bay (MUCH more of the Pistol). 550+ yards and 45 points. Kaep with 263 yards passing with 2 TDs and 181 yards rushing with an additional 2 TDs. In Atlanta the following week the Falcons had no answers either. The offense played very well in the Super Bowl as well...just a bit too late.

    Look...as a Niner fan it pains me to say that the Seahawks are good. They are. You guys tho are making WAY, WAY to much out of ONE GAME.

    NONE of these are excuses as teams should be up for every game, but the below are all FACTORS in the way that game played out.


    1) Justin Smith was out. That first TD by Lynch was right at his spot and is one of the reasons the Niners didn't resign Ricky Jean-Francios and DID sign Glenn Dorsey.

    2) Aldon Smith was hurt. He had 19.5 sacks during the season but NONE in the final 3 games and playoffs. Some say it's because Justin Smith is the reason he gets those sacks. Right...as if no other OLB has had a really good DE lined up next to them. As far as I know tho, none has ever had 33.5 sacks in his first 2 years. Aldon was hurt. It was revealed just a few weeks ago that he played the end of the season with a torn labrum. It's no coincidense that the 49ers pass D fell apart after both Justin and Aldon were hurt. No pressure on the QB. It started in the second half vs NE and continued all the way through the Super Bowl. Even when Justin came back, he was essentially playing with one arm.

    3) Fatigue: The 49ers D almost never substitutes. Most of their defenders play the entire game. NE's strategy the week before (and in every game really) is to run a HUGE number of plays so the defense simply can't keep up. In this case, the D was on the field for NINETY snaps. Thats nuts. Follow that with a short week and then going into the Clink where the 'hawks were playing like their hair was on fire....predictable results.

    4) Vernon Davis was injured in that game as well. He never came back after that hit by Chancellor (sp?).


    The Seahawks won that game...fair and square. Not saying otherwise....but you guys seem to be of the mindset that it was the "changing of the guard" game or something. That ONE game is the thing you cling to more than anything else despite the fact that you BARELY beat a team that the 49ers beat hadily twice (Packers), LOST to the team the 49ers beat in the playoffs (Atlanta...and I've read on here a few times that the Niners had a week off and played them at home...um, no), and are STILL 1-3 vs Harbaugh and actually only split the series this season.

    I've seen the thumping of the chest about how you guys "owned" Kaepernick. Against that D in that building he did in fact have his worst showing as a pro, but his QB rating was only 72 in his SIXTH career start. To put that in perspective, what was Wilsons QB rating in his SEVENTH career start in SF? 38.7. Wilson has the makings of a great young QB, but you guys seem to think that he's the only one who improved as the season progressed.

    Was the win by Seattle impressive? Of course it was. Does it keep the 49ers up at night? Not really. While Seattle is thumping its chest about a game that got out of hand in December, the 49ers are driven by a game they lost in FEBRUARY. If you guys are expecting 42-13 again, you are in for a big letdown.


    Don't be ridiculous. ATL did have answers for the "pistol" Kaepernick threw and ran for just over 250 yards. That's not domination. SF was also 33% on 3rd downs in that game. Again, not dominant. Just because you pimp-slapped an ill-prepared Packers team at HOME, doesn't mean that you were killing everyone with the "pistol" infact, in the Super Bowl it was largely shutdown. Without some serious breaks-- Ie. Fumbles and punt returns. 10 easy point got SF back into the game.

    I don't want to hear about the lack of substitution on SF defense. That's on them. It's no one's fault but their own that they don't trust anyone else to play. The lack of playing time for the young players will cost them in the years to come, IMO. I also don't want to hear the garbage about a "SHORT WEEK," and having to suffer through 90 plays against New England.

    Guess what- Seattle had it even worse in the first meeting between SF and Seattle in SF. Seattle played New England and won at home. Only to have to play SF on THURSDAY night football. Much shorter week than what SF had to deal with in SEattle. Yet, SEattle only lost 13-6 with plenty of opportunities to win.


    Right...because the Pistol is all about Kaepernick. SMDH. THAT'S THE POINT GENIUS.

    Atlanta had just seen Kaep run for 181 yards vs Green Bay. They'd just seen Seattle run all over them using the Pistol the week before. They comitted to shutting down the run.

    The 49ers knew they would do this. Instead, after a slow start, Frank Gore and LaMichael James ran for 124 and 3 TDs. All three TDs were read-option plays. Atlanta committed to not letting Kaep run which opened up the run game for Gore and James.

    As fot the rest...you are making my point.

    1) Yes...the fact that they don't substitute IS the Niners fault and why they are looking for depth this year. Its only pertinent tho because of who they played the week before.

    2) The 'Hawks played the Pats AT HOME...not in NE in December. Even so...what happened in that next game for Seattle? THEY LOST.


    As I said before...none of these are excuses because you should get up for every game, but any Niner fan would tell you that they were downright sluggish in that game.
    Last edited by Marvin49 on Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • jlwaters1 wrote:Are you kidding me. you seem to be overlooking the fact that the #2 seed was still in play. That if they lost to Seattle there was little hope of obtaining it. Sure Minn won GB and SF got the #2 seed anyway, but that occured in week 17. Don't tell me Harbs didn't want to take that seed. To act like that was of no consequence, really is overlooking a major peice to this.


    AGAIN...its no tthat they were trying to lose. They just scaled back the offense.

    People...its really a simple concept. The fact that it spoils your illusion doesn't make it less true.

    It doesn't even mean that the score would have been any different had they NOT scaled back.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    Sarlacc83 wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:You guys are funny. ;-)

    All he said was that he dialed back the playcalling. He didn't say they weren't trying to win. His point was only that they weren't going to show off their entire offense for playoff teams to prepare for.

    ...and it worked.



    Indeed it did. After all, they won the Super Bo...

    Oh, they were actually getting blown off the field on national TV (again) by the Ravens until the power outage gave them time to regroup? Nevermind.


    Clever....and in no way addresses my point.

    You don't have a point. You patrol our board seeking to right any injustices at the expense of your team. You add nothing.

    Green Bay got run on by Kaepernick because their man coverage scheme for that game was insanely stupid of Dom Capers. The rest of your excuses are just that. Excuses. We were tired. Our coach doesn't sub much. We lack depth at tight end. It was noisy. Our OLB (who got sacks with a torn labrum but no sacks after Justin's injury) had an owwie.

    As for your excuses why you lost, and there is no changing of the guard in the NFC West, think about this. Every game we lost last year adds up to a 26 point margin. 6 losses by a combined 26 points. Your single loss to us? 29 points, with a garbage time TD. The Hawks are one of the youngest teams in the NFL. That has gotten even more dangerous in the pass rush and added Harvin. And had the number one scoring D. Of course we think we are changing the guard. And you wouldn't be here if you weren't worried about it too.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 10571
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


  • Scottemojo wrote:You don't have a point. You patrol our board seeking to right any injustices at the expense of your team. You add nothing.

    Green Bay got run on by Kaepernick because their man coverage scheme for that game was insanely stupid of Dom Capers. The rest of your excuses are just that. Excuses. We were tired. Our coach doesn't sub much. We lack depth at tight end. It was noisy. Our OLB (who got sacks with a torn labrum but no sacks after Justin's injury) had an owwie.

    As for your excuses why you lost, and there is no changing of the guard in the NFC West, think about this. Every game we lost last year adds up to a 26 point margin. 6 losses by a combined 26 points. Your single loss to us? 29 points, with a garbage time TD. The Hawks are one of the youngest teams in the NFL. That has gotten even more dangerous in the pass rush and added Harvin. And had the number one scoring D. Of course we think we are changing the guard. And you wouldn't be here if you weren't worried about it too.


    In my post I said that the Seahawks were good. Never argued otherwise.

    The "point" I was making that you call nonexistant was simply that the 43-13 win wasn't everything you guys seem to think it is. Do you really think that if they played again the score would be the same? Do you really think that the factors I listed played no role whatsoever in the outcome of the game? If you do then I feel sorry for you. You are in for a rude awakening.

    The Niners and Seahawks are gonna battle this year in a big way. Its gonna be a tough division. To read the posts on this site tho you'd think it was a forgone conclusion that the Seahawks are the better team. All you have to do is look at the score of that last game. That proves everything, right?

    The problem is that it doesn't. It proves nothing. You still lost the division. You are still 1-3 vs Harbaugh. You still only split the division series. You were still 3-5 on the road. You still lost to the team the Niners eliminated in the playoffs.

    The problem with annoining yourself the king in the offseason is that very often it doesn't happen in the REGULAR season.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • I HATE the 49er fans. They bring NOTHING.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9924
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • pehawk wrote:I HATE the 49er fans. They bring NOTHING.


    I'm pretty sure the feeling is mutual.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • It might have the slightest chance of being believable if we hadn't creamed the Cardinals 58-0 and Bills 50-17 in the previous two games. What an idiot.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2226
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    pehawk wrote:I HATE the 49er fans. They bring NOTHING.


    I'm pretty sure the feeling is mutual.


    No, not really. I'm a NFL fan, so I discuss other topics. You 49er fans simply post to defend the "honor" of your team. All you can do is tilt windmills, sweetie.

    Contribute to the board in general, buttercup.
    Last edited by pehawk on Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9924
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • Marvin49 wrote:You guys are funny. ;-)

    All he said was that he dialed back the playcalling. He didn't say they weren't trying to win. His point was only that they weren't going to show off their entire offense for playoff teams to prepare for.

    ...and it worked.

    Yes, they lost in Seattle...but all they had to do was beat Arizona to take the NFCW. Even if they lost both games, they'd still have been a wildcard....


    No, Marvin, you guys are funny. For the last three months all we've heard from 49er fans about their loss to the Hawks is "well, they had to fly across country after playing a road game" and "the defense doesn't substitute and was on the field for 90 plays." Now all of a sudden it doesn't matter if they got the #2 seed or even win the division? Please.

    The only evidence you have presented that SF dialed back their offense to save it for the playoffs is that fewer plays were called for the Pistol formation. The author of that Yahoo piece makes the assumption that this was done because they didn't want to show their hand for the postseason, but the reality is that there are many possible reasons why this was done. Maybe New England's defensive personnel matched up well against a Pistol. Maybe they knew the crowd noise in Seattle would have Kaepernick curled up in the fetal position crying for his mommy all game long. There are a lot of reasons why Roman may have gameplanned differently the last few weeks of the season. You're making the assumption that it was done just to save it for the playoffs just because it makes your OC look good. In that regard you're no more objective than anyone else on this board.

    Here are the facts: the Niners called fewer plays in the Pistol formation over the last three weeks of the season. They had not locked up the #2 seed or the division until week 17. It seems likely that they changed their gameplan for reasons that had nothing to do with "saving it for the postseason," because doing that before they had locked up even a division title could have easily put them in a much riskier position and jeopardized their postseason chances.
    User avatar
    Shadowhawk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 1150
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    pehawk wrote:I HATE the 49er fans. They bring NOTHING.


    I'm pretty sure the feeling is mutual.


    Then leave.

    If the tables were turned and our OC said this after you guys whooped us, you'd call BS too.

    I'm still waiting to hear your DC's excuse for getting 42 put up on him. Did he just drop back into cover 4 every play?
    Image
    User avatar
    AbsolutNET
    * NET X's & O's Guru *
     
    Posts: 8687
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
    Location: PNW


  • The Outfield wrote:It might have the slightest chance of being believable if we hadn't creamed the Cardinals 58-0 and Bills 50-17 in the previous two games. What an idiot.


    Seriously?

    Wow....2 Titans. LOL.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • pehawk wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:
    pehawk wrote:I HATE the 49er fans. They bring NOTHING.


    I'm pretty sure the feeling is mutual.


    No, not really. I'm a NFL fan, so I discuss other topics. You 49er fans simply post to defend the "honor" of your team. All you can do is tilt windmills, sweetie.

    Contribute to the board in general, buttercup.


    Awwww....you called me sweetie. ;-)
    Last edited by Marvin49 on Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • AbsolutNET wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:
    pehawk wrote:I HATE the 49er fans. They bring NOTHING.


    I'm pretty sure the feeling is mutual.


    Then leave.

    If the tables were turned and our OC said this after you guys whooped us, you'd call BS too.

    I'm still waiting to hear your DC's excuse for getting 42 put up on him. Did he just drop back into cover 4 every play?


    Seahawks beat the Niners fair and square that day. I think I've said that more than once.

    The D never showed up to play that day and the pass defense was never the same after the second half comeback by NE.

    All I have been trying to say here is that the 42-13 loss doesn't mean all you guys seem to think it means. I'm not suggesting the Niners should have won a game they were blown out in. I'm not suggesting that the 49ers taked the game. OF COURSE they wanted to win it. Seeing the way Kaep reacted after the game is more evidense that they were dissappointed by the result.

    All thats being said is that the 49ers scaled back the offense. This isn't the first time the issue has come up...this is just the first time it was the OC who admitted it. Notice that he didn't use that as an excuse. The WRITER did.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    The Outfield wrote:It might have the slightest chance of being believable if we hadn't creamed the Cardinals 58-0 and Bills 50-17 in the previous two games. What an idiot.


    Seriously?

    Wow....2 Titans. LOL.


    Yeah, and what other teams beat both of these teams by a similar amount? Oh, none? Not even the 49ers?
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2226
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • Marvin49 wrote:All I have been trying to say here is that the 42-13 loss doesn't mean all you guys seem to think it means. I'm not suggesting the Niners should have won a game they were blown out in. I'm not suggesting that the 49ers taked the game. OF COURSE they wanted to win it. Seeing the way Kaep reacted after the game is more evidense that they were dissappointed by the result.

    All thats being said is that the 49ers scaled back the offense. This isn't the first time the issue has come up...this is just the first time it was the OC who admitted it. Notice that he didn't use that as an excuse. The WRITER did.


    Enlighten us. What does it mean?
    Stoned Cold
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 255
    Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:28 pm


  • Marvin49, try adding to a thread which doesn't involve you fluffing Harbaugh and the gang. That's my point, sugarpants.

    Its GREAT when other fans come and contribute to Seahawks posts and general NFL posts. But, from what I can tell, being a 49er can is a gimmick, like being a Raider fan. I've been to games each place, and each place the fans knew ZERO about the NFL. They're the "girlfriends" of the NFL...all they know is their local team and regurgitate what their man tells them.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9924
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • The Outfield wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:
    The Outfield wrote:It might have the slightest chance of being believable if we hadn't creamed the Cardinals 58-0 and Bills 50-17 in the previous two games. What an idiot.


    Seriously?

    Wow....2 Titans. LOL.


    Yeah, and what other teams beat both of these teams by a similar amount? Oh, none? Not even the 49ers?


    Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Its bullshit. They already had shown it all, everything. Nothing the Niners brought in the playoffs was new and the Hawks practice against that style of offense everyday. ESPECIALLY when SF is coming to town. Harbs knew this, Roman knew this. They went after the pass and lost big.

    Every Niner fan mentions JSmith being out of that game as the reason the Hawks punted like once and had multiple clock burning drives ending in scores with a 94% 3rd down conversion rate. That may be true, but if it is, the Niners are flipping SCREWED. No one mentions that Sherman was the only starting corner and Jeremy Lane was going against Crabtree at times. The Jason Jones was out for the season to boot.

    Nothing the Niners did to GB was "new", while different than their first game, I think it is pretty safe to say that GB has a crap defense at actually stopping people and that they get after the passer and are opportunistic. The Niners were using Kaep like that before he was even named the starter on spot duty. God I wish we could have had GB at home to start the playoffs.

    If the Niners were really trying to protect their playbook, they would have ran Gore like crazy in the first half regardless of the score. They would not have had trouble getting plays in because of the noise because they would have been running the ball as planned. They were in no position to protect their playbook in that game. If Harbs thinks he was? Then he is more of an idiot that I could ever imagine.
    Eh... Whatever...
    User avatar
    loafoftatupu
    I'M JIMMY!
     
    Posts: 5300
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
    Location: Auburn, WA


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    The Outfield wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:
    Seriously?

    Wow....2 Titans. LOL.


    Yeah, and what other teams beat both of these teams by a similar amount? Oh, none? Not even the 49ers?


    Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.


    That game was Buffalo @ San Francisco. Our game was Seattle @ Buffalo. There's a difference. Plus, you forgot about the Cardinals that the 49ers could only put 27 points on (if you can't do the math, that's less than half of 58)
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2226
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • Marvin49 wrote:Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.



    Amazing... And they still couldnt beat the Rams. I am in admiration of the Niners Awesomeness constantly.
    Eh... Whatever...
    User avatar
    loafoftatupu
    I'M JIMMY!
     
    Posts: 5300
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
    Location: Auburn, WA


  • pehawk wrote:Marvin49, try adding to a thread which doesn't involve you fluffing Harbaugh and the gang. That's my point, sugarpants.

    Its GREAT when other fans come and contribute to Seahawks posts and general NFL posts. But, from what I can tell, being a 49er can is a gimmick, like being a Raider fan. I've been to games each place, and each place the fans knew ZERO about the NFL. They're the "girlfriends" of the NFL...all they know is their local team and regurgitate what their man tells them.


    Oh please. All this crap I read about what fans of other teams supposedly knows about the fanbases of other teams is pure comedy.

    I do like your nicknames BTW. ;-)

    I've been a 49er fan since 1984. I saw the golden years and I saw them crash. I've followed the NFL in general since I was 11. I didn't come to your holy site to talk about the NFL in general. There are many other sites I'd choose before coming to this one if that were my goal. I'm here to talk to Seattle Seahawk fans about what is becoming one of the biggest rivalries in the NFL.

    Seahawk fans come to Niner boards as well and I debate them just as I do here.

    Now please get off the high horse.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • The Outfield wrote:Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.


    That game was Buffalo @ San Francisco. Our game was Seattle @ Buffalo. There's a difference. Plus, you forgot about the Cardinals that the 49ers could only put 27 points on (if you can't do the math, that's less than half of 58)[/quote]

    Actually your game vs. was at virtually a neutral site.

    Really...is this what we've come down to? Margin of victory? Is this college football now? The Niner dominated the Cards in both meetings....but I guess that's not good enough. You have to win by 40+ points for it to be impressive. SMH.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Kinda proving my point.

    What I said is al true; I've been to many NFL cities and Oakland/SF rank last in knowledgable fans. Its just a gimmick, way to fit in with the rest. Its pathetic. Buffalo and KC ranked the best, FWIW.

    Keep fluffing, Marvin.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9924
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    The Outfield wrote:Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.


    That game was Buffalo @ San Francisco. Our game was Seattle @ Buffalo. There's a difference. Plus, you forgot about the Cardinals that the 49ers could only put 27 points on (if you can't do the math, that's less than half of 58)


    Actually your game vs. was at virtually a neutral site.

    Really...is this what we've come down to? Margin of victory? Is this college football now? The Niner dominated the Cards in both meetings....but I guess that's not good enough. You have to win by 40+ points for it to be impressive. SMH.[/quote]

    When we're debating whether or not SF tried to win, then yes margin of victory in the two previous games matters.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2226
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • loafoftatupu wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.



    Amazing... And they still couldnt beat the Rams. I am in admiration of the Niners Awesomeness constantly.


    Nope....but they did only lose 4 games, 1 less than the Seahawks.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Seahawks obviously did the same thing through the whole Mora/Greg Knapp era.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18499
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    loafoftatupu wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.



    Amazing... And they still couldnt beat the Rams. I am in admiration of the Niners Awesomeness constantly.


    Nope....but they did only lose 4 games, 1 less than the Seahawks.


    That 1 game (that the 49ers didn't lose) was a tie against the Rams... not that impressive, lol
    Last edited by The Outfield on Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2226
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • pehawk wrote:Kinda proving my point.

    What I said is al true; I've been to many NFL cities and Oakland/SF rank last in knowledgable fans. Its just a gimmick, way to fit in with the rest. Its pathetic. Buffalo and KC ranked the best, FWIW.

    Keep fluffing, Marvin.


    With stats like that, how could anyone argue against the point?

    Someone could just as easily say Seahawks fans are 90% bandwagon as has been proven on sites like Reddit where the subscriber rate of their subreddit jumped more than 3x this year and half of them don't even know who this "Matt Hasselhoff" character is.
    QuickLightning
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 116
    Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:20 am


  • pehawk wrote:Kinda proving my point.

    What I said is al true; I've been to many NFL cities and Oakland/SF rank last in knowledgable fans. Its just a gimmick, way to fit in with the rest. Its pathetic. Buffalo and KC ranked the best, FWIW.

    Keep fluffing, Marvin.


    Its always funny to me how on every site I ever go to the fans of the teams they hate the most are always the "least knowledgable fans".
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • The Outfield wrote:That 1 game (that the 49ers didn't lose) was a tie against the Rams... not that impressive, lol


    ...yet enough to win the NFC West.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • loafoftatupu wrote:Its bullshit. They already had shown it all, everything. Nothing the Niners brought in the playoffs was new and the Hawks practice against that style of offense everyday. ESPECIALLY when SF is coming to town. Harbs knew this, Roman knew this. They went after the pass and lost big.

    Every Niner fan mentions JSmith being out of that game as the reason the Hawks punted like once and had multiple clock burning drives ending in scores with a 94% 3rd down conversion rate. That may be true, but if it is, the Niners are flipping SCREWED. No one mentions that Sherman was the only starting corner and Jeremy Lane was going against Crabtree at times. The Jason Jones was out for the season to boot.

    Nothing the Niners did to GB was "new", while different than their first game, I think it is pretty safe to say that GB has a crap defense at actually stopping people and that they get after the passer and are opportunistic. The Niners were using Kaep like that before he was even named the starter on spot duty. God I wish we could have had GB at home to start the playoffs.

    If the Niners were really trying to protect their playbook, they would have ran Gore like crazy in the first half regardless of the score. They would not have had trouble getting plays in because of the noise because they would have been running the ball as planned. They were in no position to protect their playbook in that game. If Harbs thinks he was? Then he is more of an idiot that I could ever imagine.

    I think running the ball went out the window once the 'Hawks went 17+ points on the 49ers after the special teams breakdown in the 42-13 loss. I think all OC's to a certain extent change up the game plans for each opponent. You can run a lot of regular pistol formation pass plays, or you can run the *same* pass and run plays from regular one back or weak I formations too. It's stil basically the same pass or run concept play. For example a sweep from a one back formation is the same concept as a sweep from a pistol formation. So what I think is he just called the plays from formations *other than* the pistol formation, and still had the same basic plays in that he would have in any game against any opponent in the regular season.

    Giedi
    Giedi
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 5:03 am


  • QuickLightning wrote:
    pehawk wrote:Kinda proving my point.

    What I said is al true; I've been to many NFL cities and Oakland/SF rank last in knowledgable fans. Its just a gimmick, way to fit in with the rest. Its pathetic. Buffalo and KC ranked the best, FWIW.

    Keep fluffing, Marvin.


    With stats like that, how could anyone argue against the point?

    Someone could just as easily say Seahawks fans are 90% bandwagon as has been proven on sites like Reddit where the subscriber rate of their subreddit jumped more than 3x this year and half of them don't even know who this "Matt Hasselhoff" character is.


    LOL. "Matt Hasselhoff".
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • loafoftatupu wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.



    Amazing... And they still couldnt beat the Rams. I am in admiration of the Niners Awesomeness constantly.

    yeah, even in their best seasons, they couldn't do it consistenty.

    Giedi
    Giedi
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 5:03 am


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    The Outfield wrote:That 1 game (that the 49ers didn't lose) was a tie against the Rams... not that impressive, lol


    ...yet enough to win the NFC West.


    Again... by half a game? Not that impressive.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2226
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • The Outfield wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:
    The Outfield wrote:That 1 game (that the 49ers didn't lose) was a tie against the Rams... not that impressive, lol


    ...yet enough to win the NFC West.


    Again... by half a game? Not that impressive.


    ...and yet still a half game better than the team that supposedly IS impressive.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


  • Marvin49 wrote:
    The Outfield wrote:Yeah, and what other teams beat both of these teams by a similar amount? Oh, none? Not even the 49ers?


    Right....

    All the Niners did was beat Buffalo 45-3 and become the first and only team in NFL history to both rush and pass for 300 yards in the SAME GAME. Real Titan that one.

    As for the Cards, the Niners did something the Seahawks did not....SWEEP THEM.


    We beat the Rams, something the Niners couldn't do. See, two can play that game.

    Also, using the Harb's record against the Seahawks is funny. Last I checked you guys beat a Tarvaris Jackson led Seahawks twice, the guy who couldn't wrest the starting job in Buffalo away from Fitzgerald, and then even had trouble doing that in Seattle. The only reason Seattle got swept in 2011 is because Tavaris Jackson even though he had 2 opportunities to win the game in the 4th quarter choked the chance away, as evidenced when he threw the ball away on 4th down to save a sack on Seattle's last possession. The next year in San Fransisco you had trouble beating a rookie led scaled back offense, then got shellacked in Seattle when the offense was opened up while your offense scored 3 more points then it did at home.
    Last edited by razor150 on Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
    User avatar
    razor150
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1813
    Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:22 am


Next


It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:59 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online