Harvin vs Cruz

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. RATING: PG-13

Would you rather have Harvin at $12m or Cruz at $7m

Harvin $12m per year
57
79%
Cruz $7m per year
15
21%
Wallace $13m per
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 72

Harvin vs Cruz
Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:54 pm
  • Which WR would you rather have for the price
    Image
    User avatar
    Wenhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2138
    Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:58 pm
  • Harvin is so much more of a versatile offensive weapon than either Wallace or Cruz
    User avatar
    Hamhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2074
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:05 pm
    Location: Kenmore WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:18 pm
  • Harvin hands down. Extra 5 mil a year to play special teams and running back and a better WR on top of that. No question Harvin
    Image

    Anyone want to make me a new signature? I've held out hope long enough.
    95% of the time I'm viewing here and/or posting is being done on a mobile device. Pardon any spelling, punctuation, or grammar mistakes.
    User avatar
    The Yugoslavian
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 879
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 9:45 am
    Location: Bellevue, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:58 pm
  • Really depends on what you have around you on the team. For our specific needs, I think Harvin would be the best option.
    20% off Karmaloop & 10% off PLNDR, rep code: DUCK20
    User avatar
    dontbelikethat
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2126
    Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:40 pm


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:20 pm
  • I'd take Cruz if the guaranteed money is prorated at the same amount per year as Harvins.
    Stoned Cold
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 255
    Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:28 pm


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:10 am
  • I'll go with Harvin mainly because he is already on our team and he can do more things than Cruz can, but I am also a big fan of Cruz.
    Image
    User avatar
    Blitzer88
    * NET Eeyore *
     
    Posts: 10960
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Pasco, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 5:01 am
  • A little late for this, isn't it? :)

    Harvin, as was said above, is more versatile in our offense. Bevel knows him and probably lobbied to sign him because he knows how to use him.
    Talent can get you to the playoffs.
    It takes character to win when you get there.

    SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS
    User avatar
    sutz
    USMC 1970-77
     
    Posts: 10046
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
    Location: Monroe, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:05 am
  • Harvin, but Cruz isn't that much behind him for that price. The more talent we accrue for less money leaves us the ability to bring in even more talent. It compounds, and that's worth a lot.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18443
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:21 am
  • even though he's on our team now I'm still convinced Harvin is overrated and he'll need to prove it to me otherwise before I change my mind.
    I feel similar about Cruz, but he's also a guy with 2 1000 yard seasons under his belt in 2 years of real playing time, albeit he's a bit older than Harvin.
    At 7 million a year though I think I'd have to go with him, Harvin might be a better all-around weapon, but Cruz has scored 19 TDs in 2 seasons just as a WR, compared to Harvin's 29 as an all purpose guy in 4 years, you clearly can't deny he's a powerful weapon himself, and at a little over half the cost would be the superior pick up. However, I doubt he signs for as little as 7 million
    themunn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2376
    Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:29 am
  • I think Eli makes Cruz...NOT the other way around. Eli will always throw for 3,500-4,000...somebody's got to catch them. There's a reason the Giants dont invest in their WR's, they dont have to.

    The Hawks will be that way in a year or two. They'll realize Wilson's going to get his yards.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9925
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:17 am
  • I'm not sure I disagree that Eli can make a WR, but I disagree that the Giants haven't invested at WR. First, they gave Eli Plaxico Burress and Amani Toomer (and Shockey, who was as much WR as TE). Pretty good targets for a new QB, though Toomer was on the decline. Then, they spent a first on Hakeem Nicks (one of my favorite WRs) to replace Plax and just spent a 2nd last year on another WR I love, Rueben Randle (bias alert: LSU is my 2nd favorite team in CFB). Not to mention several midround guys. Eli has always had good targets. That said, I think Cruz is a poor man's Harvin, and with a real QB like Eli Harvin would put up monstrous numbers (hell, he was doing so with Christian Ponder).

    Sure, we'd benefit from the extra 5 mil, but I don't think our future cap situation is as dire as some think. I'd rather have the better player for RW's development. Cruz is more reliable, from a personality and a health perspective, but Harvin gives you the higher reward.
    Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.
    Snohomie
    * NET Draft Guru *
     
    Posts: 3591
    Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
    Location: Bellingham, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:18 am
  • Seahawk Sailor wrote:Harvin, but Cruz isn't that much behind him for that price. The more talent we accrue for less money leaves us the ability to bring in even more talent. It compounds, and that's worth a lot.

    This is exactly how i feel, both are at there respective value in the market, Harvin in most people's eye is versatile, therefore he is more expensive, but Cruz as a WR is very productive. And the compound, i feel like that is what happening to good teams who overpay in FA, end up sucking that seaon because they will then lose several key role players(ex. Bills, Cowboys, even 9ers in a way, and next year we will know the affect of having Harvin when we have plenty of key role players as FA next season.
    User avatar
    hai
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 474
    Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:26 pm
    Location: Vancouver, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:21 am
  • pehawk wrote:I think Eli makes Cruz...NOT the other way around. Eli will always throw for 3,500-4,000...somebody's got to catch them. There's a reason the Giants dont invest in their WR's, they dont have to.

    The Hawks will be that way in a year or two. They'll realize Wilson's going to get his yards.

    The reason the Giants don't have to invest in WR is one, Eli somehow can make throws, maybe not accurate but somehow it gets there. Two, Tom Coughlin was a former WR coach, so he knows his WR and what he wants, for god sakes Cruz was a undrafted FA like Baldwin. Coughlin knows his WR i guess, just a coincidence that the Giants have had a stellar WR corp for awhile now, how many clutch catches and superbowls, crazy.
    User avatar
    hai
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 474
    Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:26 pm
    Location: Vancouver, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:24 am
  • Harvin. Cruz has never been called the best player in the NFL.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9187
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:25 am
  • Snohomie wrote:I'm not sure I disagree that Eli can make a WR, but I disagree that the Giants haven't invested at WR. First, they gave Eli Plaxico Burress and Amani Toomer (and Shockey, who was as much WR as TE). Pretty good targets for a new QB, though Toomer was on the decline. Then, they spent a first on Hakeem Nicks (one of my favorite WRs) to replace Plax and just spent a 2nd last year on another WR I love, Rueben Randle (bias alert: LSU is my 2nd favorite team in CFB). Not to mention several midround guys. Eli has always had good targets. That said, I think Cruz is a poor man's Harvin, and with a real QB like Eli Harvin would put up monstrous numbers (hell, he was doing so with Christian Ponder).

    Sure, we'd benefit from the extra 5 mil, but I don't think our future cap situation is as dire as some think. I'd rather have the better player for RW's development. Cruz is more reliable, from a personality and a health perspective, but Harvin gives you the higher reward.


    Oops - I had zero clue Nicks was a 1st. Even with that, weren't those picks slightly in the rearview? And, it's not going to be something the Giants invest heavily in again?

    It's Harvin for the Seahawks which makes the most sense. The best way to assist Wilson is via the RB/HB/Flanker/Bush/Sproles/Cribbs/waterbug type position. The Seahawks will look ALOT like 2009's Saints, IMO.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9925
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:24 am
  • Save money on players & have an average 8-8 team with lots of wonderful cap space.
    OR:
    Aquire the best players available, paying them with smart contracts & go to the Super Bowl.

    Sounds like a simple answer to me.
    <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--> GO SEAHAWKS <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->
    User avatar
    CamanoIslandJQ
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 907
    Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:11 am
    Location: Camano Island, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:02 am
  • I think Harvin is better and got paid what he was worth, and I think Cruz is good but not nearly as valuable as a guy like Wallace or Harvin. For what the Seahawks need Harvin was a perfect fit, and despite his large salary he makes a ton of sense. Cruz would cost much less but would not bring the same level a versatility we are looking for in the slot.

    It's too close for me too vote, but I do know Mike Wallace is way overpaid.
    Image
    User avatar
    Wenhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2138
    Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:30 pm
  • CALIHAWK1 wrote:Harvin. Cruz has never been called the best player in the NFL.


    This. Nothing more needs to be said. Well done Cali
    Image

    Anyone want to make me a new signature? I've held out hope long enough.
    95% of the time I'm viewing here and/or posting is being done on a mobile device. Pardon any spelling, punctuation, or grammar mistakes.
    User avatar
    The Yugoslavian
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 879
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 9:45 am
    Location: Bellevue, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:40 am
  • The major fallacy in this poll is that you won't get Cruz for 7 mil/year. You'd send the offer sheet and the Giants would match it. You would end up a lot closer to Harvin's money before the Giants decide they would rather take the first rounder and let Cruz walk.
    President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013
    User avatar
    JesterHawk
    * Smackmeister *
     
    Posts: 7014
    Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:49 am
  • where i love Harvin's versatility and just raw talent, i think i'd choose Cruz... all that guy does is get open down field and make plays... RW loves to throw the deep ball, cruz has an uncanny ablility to get open down field, sounds like the perfect match..

    harvin just brings so much more to the offense though.. DC's are going to lose sleep game planning for this guy... i really don't think you can go wrong with either of these guys, just depends on what all you want to do on offense... i chose Cruz only because he comes cheaper, and has less character questions....
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3921
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:30 am
  • Harvin, he is a better overall weapon and I don't care about the money...
    travlinhawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 424
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:46 pm


Re: Harvin vs Cruz
Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:09 pm
  • Harvin... but his average salary is $11.167, which is not $12M. fwiw
    EastCoastHawksFan posted... "Trading for Harvin is by far the worst move John S has ever made." (March 18, 2014)

    your World Champion Seattle Seahawks.. how sweet is that!!
    User avatar
    onanygivensunday
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3067
    Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am




It is currently Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:55 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online