| Author |
Message |
|
CPHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:46 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm Posts: 1574
|
|
Rams will win 9 games and are a good team. That said they aren't in the same class as Seattle and San Fran. Admit it or not, but those are the two best teams right now on paper in the NFC. I'm sure the saints and bears will have something to say about it, but IMO your blind or blind by hate, if you believe StL is on the same level as the 9ers.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:50 am |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6443
|
|
The Bears??
What??
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CPHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:10 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm Posts: 1574
|
|
Yeah rhey are my dark horse team going into next year, they get Tillman back and have signed some nice FA. Besides in the NFC north if the packers lose Jennings who's going to challenge them? The lions with Schwartz as HC, or the Vikings with no Qb?
Yeah the falcons should be decent as well, but I think they take a step back this year to 10-6.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
TheLargentLine
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:12 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:35 pm Posts: 189 Location: Olympia
|
|
interesting that you decided to go with the Bears and Saints instead of, oh idk, Packers and Falcons? Although I suppose both the Bears and Saints have a shot at the playoffs
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CPHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:17 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm Posts: 1574
|
|
Yeah rhey are my dark horse team going into next year, they get Tillman back and have signed some nice FA. Besides in the NFC north if the packers lose Jennings who's going to challenge them? The lions with Schwartz as HC, or the Vikings with no Qb?
Yeah the falcons should be decent as well, but I think they take a step back this year to 10-6.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
AbsolutNET
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:24 am |
|
| * NET X's & O's Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am Posts: 6788 Location: PNW
|
|
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter Free-agent OT Jake Long is leaving St. Louis later this afternoon without a contract from the Rams.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:38 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1390
|
|
I once left the gondola guy in Venice because he wouldn't come down more in price. Once I was 20 steps away he yelled out - ok we got a deal.........
I don't see Long going anywhere but St Louis but as always there is a chance that I am wrong
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
BlueTalon
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 11:29 am |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am Posts: 6798 Location: Eastern Washington
|
The Radish wrote: 757Niner wrote: 12th_Bob wrote: Still happy Steven Jackson is gone and they might need to add a couple more pieces but with that pass rush and adding Cook and maybe Long to LT I think it'll be tougher for Seattle to beat them than San Fran. 49ers are heading for a Superbowl hangover and couldn't beat the Rams last season. Rams probably could have swept the division last season and I think they could be a tougher out than the 49ers right now. Hangover, huh? We'll see about that. As far as the Rams, the reason we didn't beat them last year was released last week. His name is David Akers. Why are you here? Go tell your own fans how excited you are. Or don't they like you either? We're here to talk about what we like and ninnirs aren't on that list. WTF? Did he sneeze in your corn flakes or something? Normally you are Mr. They-are-welcome-here-as-long-as-they're-civil. Today you are Mr. Crotchety Grumpypants. Go back to bed, get up and start over. 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: Rams are bigger threat this season Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:27 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am Posts: 2089
|
CPHawk wrote: Yeah the falcons should be decent as well, but I think they take a step back this year to 10-6. And you're basing that on what exactly? Their run game should improve with Steven Jackson replacing Michael Turner. Gonzalez is returning for another year. Exactly why do you think their record will drop from 13-3 to 10-6? I'm curious.
_________________ "Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |