| Author |
Message |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 699
|
SacHawk2.0 wrote: Says the guy that thinks he knows what PC wants/Tebow I am only saying what Pete said. And he said he wants a Wilson JR. Tebow is not as good as Wilson, but they are as close as you will find.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:45 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10376 Location: Anchorage, AK
|
Spokane wrote: SacHawk2.0 wrote: Says the guy that thinks he knows what PC wants/Tebow I am only saying what Pete said. And he said he wants a Wison JR. Tebow is not as good as Wison, but they are as close as you will find. Pete also said that Tebow as a backup quarterback is a distraction and felt it was detrimental to Sanchez in NY.....but don't read anything into that, it doesn't fit your philosophy of what "pete" wants
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:46 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am Posts: 1137
|
Spokane wrote: Missing_Clink wrote: he is not a viable NFL level QB. He won a playoff game right? He found a way to get hired as a NFL QB, twice and paid fat He was able to bring his team back from a losing score So hate aside, he is a viable NFL QB. Quote my entire post and respond.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:48 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm Posts: 5193
|
|
No, they aren't as close as you'll find.
PC wants a point guard QB, which is what Wilson is. Aside from being able to run, good leadership skills and Jesus, they have nothing in common. RW tied the rookie record for TD passes and had a 100 QB rating on the year.
Tebow couldn't do that. Ever. He is unsound in a fundamental way in his mechanics and clearly doesn't read defenses well.
They aren't close. At all. And they never will be.
_________________ Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
Last edited by SacHawk2.0 on Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HunnyBadger
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:49 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:26 pm Posts: 97
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:52 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 699
|
kidhawk wrote: Spokane wrote: SacHawk2.0 wrote: Says the guy that thinks he knows what PC wants/Tebow I am only saying what Pete said. And he said he wants a Wison JR. Tebow is not as good as Wison, but they are as close as you will find. Pete also said that Tebow as a backup quarterback is a distraction and felt it was detrimental to Sanchez in NY.....but don't read anything into that, it doesn't fit your philosophy of what "pete" wants What do you think Pete would have said about TO ten years ago? "A distration" Still hired him. Its about need, not the media. And if Sanchez would let the media change him in any way, then the wind would be detrimental to him, who cares.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 699
|
HunnyBadger wrote: :snack: At least some one is enjoying this as much as me!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawksTopGear
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:54 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:24 am Posts: 80
|
|
Tebow is not close to RW, but if he is cut by the jets and we get a steal on a Flynn trade I have no qualms about bringing him in as a vet min backup.
No wildcat, just a backup.
I would never trade Flynn for Tebow and his current contract.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pinksheets
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm Posts: 2621 Location: Seattle
|
|
I don't see why being an effective passer isn't a key aspect of being a 'Wilson JR'.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:02 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 699
|
SacHawk2.0 wrote: PC wants a point guard QB, which is what Wilson is. Aside from being able to run, good leadership skills and Jesus, they have nothing in common.Do you have a link where PC says he wants guard QB? Or do you have a special 'source'?
RW tied the rookie record for TD passes and had a 100 QB rating on the year. Flynn, Tjack and who ever else PC has hired as a QB did not break the TD rookie record, So that means nothing
Tebow couldn't do that. Ever. He is unsound in a fundamental way in his mechanics and clearly doesn't read defenses well.
How many years have you been a QB coach? Many different styles get the job done in the NFL
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:04 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16615 Location: SoCal
|
Spokane wrote: LymonHawk wrote: Spokane wrote: Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him. Do you have a link where PC says he wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'? No where did I say "Pete said yes to Tebow" It is stated everywhere that Pete has said " I want a guy like Wilson" No other QB is as close to Wilson as Tebow. You should know that and not nit pick. WTF, are you Huggyprelag?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:08 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm Posts: 5193
|
|
There are multiple sources available where the term "Point Guard Quarterback" is used. I'm not going to do your homework for you though, but I will tell you that Google is your friend.
The point everyone here is trying to clue you in on is that Tebow can't pass for shit. That is a prerequisite to being "Wilson Jr."
_________________ Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
Last edited by SacHawk2.0 on Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 699
|
|
If I were ever to make an extra account, Prelag will be apart of the name! (to this day I have no clue what prelag is or who he was)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pinksheets
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm Posts: 2621 Location: Seattle
|
|
He is you, and you are he.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 699
|
SacHawk2.0 wrote: The point everyone here is trying to clue you in on is that Tebow can't pass for shit. That is a prerequisite to being "Wilson Jr."
He did everything he was asked. THE CLOWN JETS paid him 33 Million to throw the ball 8 times. That is on the Jets, case closed. Now for Tebow and his passing, the cowboy hit on 75% of his passes. So he can pass for shit  Again, when given the chance he hit his targets!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 699
|
pinksheets wrote: He is you, and you are he. I am ok with that, I was told I can't hold a candle to prelag. The dude must have been something else
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:17 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16615 Location: SoCal
|
|
Who cares what a clown pays to other clowns, they also drafted and paid Sanchez who can't play QB either. They both blow gigantic chunks and I don't want either of them associated with my winning Seahawk team.
So goodnight sweet prince.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:18 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm Posts: 5193
|
|
6 of 8 last year. A whole 8 attempts.
How about 2011 when, while on the Broncos and had a good running game and defense to support him?
48%
For nearly the whole season.
48%
_________________ Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:20 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7390
|
|
I am fine with a Tebow trade (assuming we can't do better, of course), mainly because you could release Tebow the second he reaches the VMAC and you wouldn't have to pay him a dime. Well, unless Tebow's "dead money" number with the Jets applies to us. If it did, then it would be $14 million in savings compared to $9.5 million for releasing Flynn. Anyway, it would give Seattle a clean escape from Flynn's contract, which would save us up to $15.5 million in cap space that will roll into future seasons.
Tebow isn't a good passer, but he is built for a team like ours that is physical, runs the ball, plays great defense, and is used to being surrounded by a tilt the field QB. Tebow may not be pretty to watch, but neither was T-jack and Pete got T-jack to win 5 of his last 8 games here, while playing hurt. And I know it's cliche, but Tebow really is a "winner." He's often a totally different QB in the 4th quarters of games. I compared Wilson to Tebow last May in terms of his background and intangibles. Both faced discrimination because of a trait. Pete wasn't scared by Wilson's height, maybe he won't be scared by Tebow's throwing problems. Maybe Pete can find ways to minimize Tebow's flaws, the same way Harbaugh did with Alex Smith.
Also, it's an extremely thin year in the draft for read option QBs. The few that are decent will probably be long gone by the time Seattle is willing to draft one.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
Last edited by kearly on Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:22 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm Posts: 5193
|
|
Peter Lalich!
_________________ Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |