| Author |
Message |
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem  Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
Largent80 wrote: Spokane wrote: Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him. We need him for what? I do not see one thing, not ONE. Because the one who matters (PC) said so. When the team leader says we need this type of guy, and Tebow is that exact guy, then we need him. Like I said above...Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:01 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16465
Location: SoCal
|
|
Hahaha...ok we need him, just like we have needed him since 1976.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:04 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 5013
|
Spokane wrote: Largent80 wrote: Spokane wrote: Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him. We need him for what? I do not see one thing, not ONE. Because the one who matters (PC) said so. When the team leader says we need this type of guy, and Tebow is that exact guy, then we need him. Like I said above...Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him. Are you serious? Sure, Tebow has the intangibles, but that doesn't change the fact that he can't pass. At all. I don't know if you know this but PC also likes his QBs to be able to throw the ball and read defenses. Can Tebow do that? Obviously not.
_________________
Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:06 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 10271
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
kidhawk wrote: Basis4day wrote: kidhawk wrote: I wonder how many times we can have this debate in one off season? This has to be at least the 4th thread to include acquiring Tebow and being rid of Flynn.
Anyone keeping track? It's OP's second post. Give him a little slack. I didn't ask for a ban or a thread lock or anything else, so exactly what "slack" am I supposed to give? All I'm doing is stating the uber obvious Spokane wrote:
Your complaining is cool if you are consistent and not a hater. So are you on the ball about complaining about the muti-uni threads? How about the FAs that have no shot at being a seahawk threads? Or how about the "this guy said this about that guy tweets"?
If so great!
But if you are consistently attacking one guy, you should know the hater tag, or the calm down tag will be handed out.
Seriously? Coming from the guy who swore he was done talking about Tebow in the thread he posted on this EXACT subject, who is now touting Tebow again...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:07 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7356
|
|
Pete doesn't want Tebow. I guarantee it. Did you see how easy we shut him down last year? Tebow made defense easy for the Hawks.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
|
I am being real, not some crazy random 1976 bring ups.
If anyone has an issue with what PC said, take it up with him.
I would take a high winning, playoff QB winning as a backup, and it sounds like PC is in the same boat.
This is not crazy talk, unless your agenda pushes you the other way.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LymonHawk
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:08 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 4750
Location: Skagit County, WA
|
Spokane wrote: Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him. Do you have a link where PC says he wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'?
_________________
If you're walking on thin ice, you might as well dance.................................................Mom
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
kidhawk wrote:
Seriously? Coming from the guy who swore he was done talking about Tebow in the thread he posted on this EXACT subject, who is now touting Tebow again...
First, stop stalking me and my post. 2nd I was told Dilfer did not suck, We don't get everything we are told.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:13 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 10271
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
Spokane wrote: kidhawk wrote:
Seriously? Coming from the guy who swore he was done talking about Tebow in the thread he posted on this EXACT subject, who is now touting Tebow again...
First, stop stalking me and my post. 2nd I was told Dilfer did not suck, We don't get everything we are told. No need to stalk you, I just happen to remember you saying it and thinking to myself at the time that it wouldn't last. Hey, it's a message board, I have never told you what to think or that you couldn't post anything, that's for the mods to decide. I can state my opinion even if it includes a topic being "tired". Also, if you don't mean something, perhaps you shouldn't put it in writing... Spokane wrote: So with my last Tebow post (unless he becomes a Hawk)... viewtopic.php?f=2&t=65599&start=120
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
LymonHawk wrote: Spokane wrote: Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him. Do you have a link where PC says he wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'? No where did I say "Pete said yes to Tebow" It is stated everywhere that Pete has said " I want a guy like Wilson" No other QB is as close to Wilson as Tebow. You should know that and not nit pick.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:16 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7356
|
Spokane wrote: LymonHawk wrote: Spokane wrote: Yes to Tebow as a Seahawk! He is what we need! Or do you know more then PC about the team? If so blab on why we don't need him. Do you have a link where PC says he wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'? No where did I say "Pete said yes to Tebow" It is stated everywhere that Pete has said " I want a guy like Wilson" No other QB is as close to Wilson as Tebow. You should know that and not nit pick. Tebow close to Wilson? Crack is whack.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:16 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
Scottemojo wrote: Pete doesn't want Tebow. I guarantee it. Did you see how easy we shut him down last year? Tebow made defense easy for the Hawks. Do you have a link where PC says he DOES NOT wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:17 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 5013
|
|
You still have yet to tell me why you think PC wants a QB that can't read defenses or pass the ball effectively
_________________
Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:20 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7356
|
Spokane wrote: Scottemojo wrote: Pete doesn't want Tebow. I guarantee it. Did you see how easy we shut him down last year? Tebow made defense easy for the Hawks. Do you have a link where PC says he DOES NOT wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'? I have a special source. My common sense. If Pete wanted Tebow, he could have drafted him. Or gotten him from the Broncos last year.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:24 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
SacHawk2.0 wrote: You still have yet to tell me why you think PC wants a QB that can't read defenses or pass the ball effectively Two words for you....T JACK Yeah, PC works outside of the box. Not to get into my stat slinger ways but again he was 75% this year. So at least call him out for the right reasons.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 1106
|
Spokane wrote: SacHawk2.0 wrote: You still have yet to tell me why you think PC wants a QB that can't read defenses or pass the ball effectively Two words for you....T JACK Yeah, PC works outside of the box. Not to get into my stat slinger ways but again he was 75% this year. So at least call him out for the right reasons. haha yea he sure was! 6 of 8 for 39 yards, or a 4.8 yard average. He killed it on those RB dump offs. Sorry dude, I know a lot of people really like Tebow for reasons other than his QB skills but he is not a viable NFL level QB.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:33 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 5013
|
|
TJACK>>>>>>Tebow
_________________
Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:33 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
Scottemojo wrote: Spokane wrote: Scottemojo wrote: Pete doesn't want Tebow. I guarantee it. Did you see how easy we shut him down last year? Tebow made defense easy for the Hawks. Do you have a link where PC says he DOES NOT wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'? I have a special source. My common sense. If Pete wanted Tebow, he could have drafted him. Or gotten him from the Broncos last year. So you know whats going on in Petes head?  How many players would Pete have taken or not drafted if he knew the outcome 3 years later? Please with the dumb comments!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:35 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 5013
|
Spokane wrote: Scottemojo wrote: Spokane wrote: [quote="Scottemojo"]Pete doesn't want Tebow. I guarantee it. Did you see how easy we shut him down last year? Tebow made defense easy for the Hawks. Do you have a link where PC says he DOES NOT wants Tebow? Or do you have a special 'source'? I have a special source. My common sense. If Pete wanted Tebow, he could have drafted him. Or gotten him from the Broncos last year. Please with the dumb comments![/quote] Says the guy that thinks he knows what PC wants/Tebow
_________________
Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: QB Problem Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
Missing_Clink wrote: he is not a viable NFL level QB. He won a playoff game right? He found a way to get hired as a NFL QB, twice and paid fat He was able to bring his team back from a losing score So hate aside, he is a viable NFL QB.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
