
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
SoCalHawk wrote:So Cancer won coach of the year? Gotcha.
TDOTSEAHAWK wrote:SoCalHawk wrote:So Cancer won coach of the year? Gotcha.
Ahhh...
Arians did not have cancer. Don't be an ignorant troll.
Arians was an assistant coach who pulled the team together for 11 wins on short notice.
He deserved it.
kearly wrote:I loved the comparison between Arians/Carroll in 2012 and Jauron/Belichick in 2001. Arians gets an award that will be forgotten a few months from now, but Carroll will go down in history among the greats. I'll take that tradeoff.
Plus, it makes rooting against the Cardinals more fun.
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
SoCalHawk wrote:
Ignorant troll? Give me a break, you know exactly what I meant. You need to learn the definition of a troll.
TDOTSEAHAWK wrote:SoCalHawk wrote:
Ignorant troll? Give me a break, you know exactly what I meant. You need to learn the definition of a troll.
From wikipedia, ''In Internet slang, a troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."
So in an internet forum you posted an inflammatory comment with the primary intent of readers to discuss Chuck Pagano's condition as opposed to Bruce Arians' success.
Troll.
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
razgriz737 wrote:TDOTSEAHAWK wrote:SoCalHawk wrote:
Ignorant troll? Give me a break, you know exactly what I meant. You need to learn the definition of a troll.
From wikipedia, ''In Internet slang, a troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."
So in an internet forum you posted an inflammatory comment with the primary intent of readers to discuss Chuck Pagano's condition as opposed to Bruce Arians' success.
Troll.
What he posted doesn't fit that definition. Quit derailing the thread.
TDOTSEAHAWK wrote:I am trying to discuss Arians' accomplishments this season and not Chuck Pagano so I don't understand how I derailed conversation. Please enlighten me.
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
Rat wrote:Eh, Arians was deserving. He came into a difficult situation with a roster that didn't have much talent and finished the year with 11 wins and a playoff berth.
If we're going to say that Luck is overrated and didn't deserve all the OROY love he got this year, we have to believe that Arians did a great job.
TDOTSEAHAWK wrote:SoCalHawk wrote:
Ignorant troll? Give me a break, you know exactly what I meant. You need to learn the definition of a troll.
From wikipedia, ''In Internet slang, a troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."
So in an internet forum you posted an inflammatory comment with the primary intent of readers to invoke an logically fallacious emotional response and discuss Chuck Pagano's condition as opposed to Bruce Arians' success.
Troll.
SoCalHawk wrote:TDOTSEAHAWK wrote:SoCalHawk wrote:
Ignorant troll? Give me a break, you know exactly what I meant. You need to learn the definition of a troll.
From wikipedia, ''In Internet slang, a troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."
So in an internet forum you posted an inflammatory comment with the primary intent of readers to invoke an logically fallacious emotional response and discuss Chuck Pagano's condition as opposed to Bruce Arians' success.
Troll.
Ugh. You are one of those. No point in arguing with your type.
Anyway, to those that are interested in talking football, do you think that if Pagano would have been suspended, or been away for another reason other than cancer, that Arians wins?
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
razgriz737 wrote:"Arians, recently hired by #Cardinals, got 36.5 votes. Pagano got 5.5. #Seahawks Carroll got 5. #Vikings Frazier got 3. #NFL"
kearly wrote:Everyone putting the cancer sympathy tag on Arians misfired. Pagano soaked up that crowd. And besides, these awards are voted on by the media. They should rename these awards "best rookie story of the year or best coaching story of the year." Not a ton of difference between these awards and winning an ESPY.
Axx wrote:kearly wrote:Everyone putting the cancer sympathy tag on Arians misfired. Pagano soaked up that crowd. And besides, these awards are voted on by the media. They should rename these awards "best rookie story of the year or best coaching story of the year." Not a ton of difference between these awards and winning an ESPY.
If it was best story, Wilson would have won.
Tech Worlds wrote:Axx wrote:kearly wrote:Everyone putting the cancer sympathy tag on Arians misfired. Pagano soaked up that crowd. And besides, these awards are voted on by the media. They should rename these awards "best rookie story of the year or best coaching story of the year." Not a ton of difference between these awards and winning an ESPY.
If it was best story, Wilson would have won.
Stop trolling please
Axx wrote:
how does wilson not have the best story? being a short 3rd rounder projected to be a career back up.
RG3 had a overall better year than Wilson, Wilson's final games were much better though.
But its Rookie of the year, not Rookie of the post-season.
rainger wrote:Also too many people are putting stock in the 2 and 14 season last year. That was not the team. That was the suck for luck team that purposly used a QB that is not even 5th string in college and did some bizarre things to ensure they losts games.
It is currently Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:53 am