| Author |
Message |
|
Carmon1274
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison  Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:50 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 161
|
|
I would love Harrison to be a Seahawk for 2 year contract.
The reason is because he is a Vet. and can teach Irvin and (Someone from the draft). Mentor and help them out.
JH is a still a good Pass Rusher, and we still seem to have problems Rushing the QB with Irvin and Clemons.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Carmon1274
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:52 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 161
|
peachesenregalia wrote: Harrison's physicality is not the issue. First of all, he's a dirty Stealer, and the fans would have beef. Secondly, he's a flag magnet. He's a flagnet. Like Breno right, thats why he's still playing for us. Wait you think PC and JS cares about dirty Stealer and you think they care about Flag magnet and flagnet? Breno? DUH
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JGfromtheNW
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:05 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:37 am
Posts: 187
|
|
No. Please, no.
Arguably the dirtiest player in the NFL over the last 10 years who is now 34. Sounds like a horrible idea to me.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SmokinHawk
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:20 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 4841
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
|
|
Gah, my eyes! Like 2girls1cup, I can never un-see this thread.
_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro
He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am
Posts: 719
|
SmokinHawk wrote: Gah, my eyes! Like 2girls1cup, I can never un-see this thread. You should check out 1guy1cup. ***SHUDDERS***
_________________
Go Hawks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Slick
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:52 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:52 am
Posts: 442
Location: Beacon Hill, Seattle, WA
|
|
Nope. Over the hill asshole ex-Stealer. That dude would not mentor anyone except in how to be a dissident prick IMHO.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Carmon1274
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:19 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 161
|
JGfromtheNW wrote: No. Please, no.
Arguably the dirtiest player in the NFL over the last 10 years who is now 34. Sounds like a horrible idea to me. Whatttttt when Hawk fans love Dockett and Suh in a seahawk uniform?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Carmon1274
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:20 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 161
|
Slick wrote: Nope. Over the hill asshole ex-Stealer. That dude would not mentor anyone except in how to be a dissident prick IMHO. And Sherman is acting like a prick also so............
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:19 am |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10477
Location: Portland, OR
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote: Sarlacc83 wrote: IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
Really?? Give me a break. It's not the best idea on .NET, but saying it's one of the worst is laughable. Do I think he could come in as an every down player? No, and I said as much in my original post. But he fits the intimidating and physical mentality and style of this team's play, and despite his age would be an upgrade over Leroy Hill (did you watch him play this year?) I stand by what I originally wrote.
There's a difference between Vince Young and James Harrison. Young is a total head case that cannot play quality football anymore. Harrison is a psycho but still plays good football the majority of the time.
No he doesn't. He fits the mold of dumb brick being hurled at someone else's head. He's also part of a 3-4 defense so he's not a schematic fit. You can stand by it, but you might as well suggest we sign Ben Roethlisberger, too. When it comes to hated Steelers, Harrison is one of the worst. So then regardless of whether or not they're a player that would help improve our team (Harrison aside, this is a separate issue) you would not take a Steeler on this team next year simply from principle? What about Mike Wallace? Note how I said hated Steelers. Wallace doesn't fall into that category because A) He's a genuinely good young player and more importantly B) he wasn't around for super sham XL.
_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:02 am |
|
| * NET Injury Guru * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am
Posts: 1182
Location: Poulsbo, WA
|
Sarlacc83 wrote: IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
So then regardless of whether or not they're a player that would help improve our team (Harrison aside, this is a separate issue) you would not take a Steeler on this team next year simply from principle? What about Mike Wallace?
Note how I said hated Steelers. Wallace doesn't fall into that category because A) He's a genuinely good young player and more importantly B) he wasn't around for super sham XL. I hate the Steelers as much as anybody, and will for the rest of my life. Much of it stems from Super Bowl XL and how that went down. However, I also realize this hated is almost completely unreasonable. The Steelers did not talk a lot of trash leading up to the Super Bowl, nor did they afterwards. They weren't dirty during that game. They took advantage of an "unfair" situation and won the game as a result. I know that my hatred should be more towards the ref crew that was in the stadium that day. Not the players that were on the field. Since then I have learned to hate Rapistberger for new reasons, like he's one of the worst humans on the planet. However, to say that you would not take a player from the Steelers Super Bowl XL team if they were still a good player and would upgrade the Hawks, simply because they were a member of that team is just fucking stupid. _________________  The NFL need to start fining QB's that throw the ball across my middle... #DangerZone -Kam Chancellor
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:17 am |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10477
Location: Portland, OR
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote: Sarlacc83 wrote: IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
So then regardless of whether or not they're a player that would help improve our team (Harrison aside, this is a separate issue) you would not take a Steeler on this team next year simply from principle? What about Mike Wallace?
Note how I said hated Steelers. Wallace doesn't fall into that category because A) He's a genuinely good young player and more importantly B) he wasn't around for super sham XL. I hate the Steelers as much as anybody, and will for the rest of my life. Much of it stems from Super Bowl XL and how that went down. However, I also realize this hated is almost completely unreasonable. The Steelers did not talk a lot of trash leading up to the Super Bowl, nor did they afterwards. They weren't dirty during that game. They took advantage of an "unfair" situation and won the game as a result. I know that my hatred should be more towards the ref crew that was in the stadium that day. Not the players that were on the field. Since then I have learned to hate Rapistberger for new reasons, like he's one of the worst humans on the planet. However, to say that you would not take a player from the Steelers Super Bowl XL team if they were still a good player and would upgrade the Hawks, simply because they were a member of that team is just fucking stupid. The only person saying stupid things is the person suggesting Harrison would be an upgrade on this team for the reason I already mentioned. He's not a scheme fit. And he's old. Give it up. You knew you were going to get flak for this and now you're getting all pissy when you got what you expected (because you knew it was a bad idea in the first place.)
_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen
|
Post subject: Re: James Harrison Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:25 am |
|
| * NET Injury Guru * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am
Posts: 1182
Location: Poulsbo, WA
|
Sarlacc83 wrote:
The only person saying stupid things is the person suggesting Harrison would be an upgrade on this team for the reason I already mentioned. He's not a scheme fit. And he's old. Give it up. You knew you were going to get flak for this and now you're getting all pissy when you got what you expected (because you knew it was a bad idea in the first place.)
Wrong, I still think that he would be an upgrade over an obviously slowed Leroy Hill. Are there better options out there, yes obviously there are. However I would still take Harrison on this team for a two year deal. I'm not getting pissy because people disagree with my stance on Harrison. That's fine. I'm calling you out on your ridiculous idea that you wouldn't take a former Steelers player on principle because they played in Super Bowl XL. The argument has changed from my OP. Cheers. _________________ The NFL need to start fining QB's that throw the ball across my middle... #DangerZone -Kam Chancellor
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
