James Harrison

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. RATING: PG-13
Re: James Harrison
Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:52 pm
  • peachesenregalia wrote:Harrison's physicality is not the issue. First of all, he's a dirty Stealer, and the fans would have beef. Secondly, he's a flag magnet. He's a flagnet.



    Like Breno right, thats why he's still playing for us.

    Wait you think PC and JS cares about dirty Stealer and you think they care about Flag magnet and flagnet?

    Breno?

    DUH
    Carmon1274
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 499
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm


Re: James Harrison
Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:05 pm
  • No. Please, no.

    Arguably the dirtiest player in the NFL over the last 10 years who is now 34. Sounds like a horrible idea to me.
    User avatar
    JGfromtheNW
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1054
    Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:37 am
    Location: Bellinghome


Re: James Harrison
Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:20 pm
  • Gah, my eyes! Like 2girls1cup, I can never un-see this thread.
    Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

    He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
    User avatar
    SmokinHawk
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 5625
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
    Location: Back in Seattle


Re: James Harrison
Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:34 pm
  • SmokinHawk wrote:Gah, my eyes! Like 2girls1cup, I can never un-see this thread.


    You should check out 1guy1cup.


    ***SHUDDERS***
    Image

    Go Hawks.
    User avatar
    SouthSoundHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2108
    Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am


Re: James Harrison
Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:52 pm
  • Nope. Over the hill asshole ex-Stealer. That dude would not mentor anyone except in how to be a dissident prick IMHO.
    User avatar
    Slick
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 610
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:52 am
    Location: Bellevue, WA


Re: James Harrison
Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:19 am
  • JGfromtheNW wrote:No. Please, no.

    Arguably the dirtiest player in the NFL over the last 10 years who is now 34. Sounds like a horrible idea to me.



    Whatttttt

    when Hawk fans love Dockett and Suh in a seahawk uniform?
    Carmon1274
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 499
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm


Re: James Harrison
Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:20 am
  • Slick wrote:Nope. Over the hill asshole ex-Stealer. That dude would not mentor anyone except in how to be a dissident prick IMHO.



    And Sherman is acting like a prick also so............
    Carmon1274
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 499
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm


Re: James Harrison
Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:19 am
  • IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
    Sarlacc83 wrote:
    IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
    Really?? Give me a break. It's not the best idea on .NET, but saying it's one of the worst is laughable. Do I think he could come in as an every down player? No, and I said as much in my original post. But he fits the intimidating and physical mentality and style of this team's play, and despite his age would be an upgrade over Leroy Hill (did you watch him play this year?) I stand by what I originally wrote.

    There's a difference between Vince Young and James Harrison. Young is a total head case that cannot play quality football anymore. Harrison is a psycho but still plays good football the majority of the time.


    No he doesn't. He fits the mold of dumb brick being hurled at someone else's head. He's also part of a 3-4 defense so he's not a schematic fit. You can stand by it, but you might as well suggest we sign Ben Roethlisberger, too. When it comes to hated Steelers, Harrison is one of the worst.


    So then regardless of whether or not they're a player that would help improve our team (Harrison aside, this is a separate issue) you would not take a Steeler on this team next year simply from principle? What about Mike Wallace?


    Note how I said hated Steelers. Wallace doesn't fall into that category because A) He's a genuinely good young player and more importantly B) he wasn't around for super sham XL.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 14635
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: James Harrison
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:02 am
  • Sarlacc83 wrote:
    IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
    So then regardless of whether or not they're a player that would help improve our team (Harrison aside, this is a separate issue) you would not take a Steeler on this team next year simply from principle? What about Mike Wallace?


    Note how I said hated Steelers. Wallace doesn't fall into that category because A) He's a genuinely good young player and more importantly B) he wasn't around for super sham XL.


    I hate the Steelers as much as anybody, and will for the rest of my life. Much of it stems from Super Bowl XL and how that went down. However, I also realize this hated is almost completely unreasonable. The Steelers did not talk a lot of trash leading up to the Super Bowl, nor did they afterwards. They weren't dirty during that game. They took advantage of an "unfair" situation and won the game as a result. I know that my hatred should be more towards the ref crew that was in the stadium that day. Not the players that were on the field.

    Since then I have learned to hate Rapistberger for new reasons, like he's one of the worst humans on the planet. However, to say that you would not take a player from the Steelers Super Bowl XL team if they were still a good player and would upgrade the Hawks, simply because they were a member of that team is just fucking stupid.
    Image

    "There is no delay of game. We did not let the team know we were scratching our balls"
    User avatar
    IBleedBlueAndGreen
    * NET Injury Guru *
     
    Posts: 1584
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am
    Location: Poulsbo, WA


Re: James Harrison
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:17 am
  • IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
    Sarlacc83 wrote:
    IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
    So then regardless of whether or not they're a player that would help improve our team (Harrison aside, this is a separate issue) you would not take a Steeler on this team next year simply from principle? What about Mike Wallace?


    Note how I said hated Steelers. Wallace doesn't fall into that category because A) He's a genuinely good young player and more importantly B) he wasn't around for super sham XL.


    I hate the Steelers as much as anybody, and will for the rest of my life. Much of it stems from Super Bowl XL and how that went down. However, I also realize this hated is almost completely unreasonable. The Steelers did not talk a lot of trash leading up to the Super Bowl, nor did they afterwards. They weren't dirty during that game. They took advantage of an "unfair" situation and won the game as a result. I know that my hatred should be more towards the ref crew that was in the stadium that day. Not the players that were on the field.

    Since then I have learned to hate Rapistberger for new reasons, like he's one of the worst humans on the planet. However, to say that you would not take a player from the Steelers Super Bowl XL team if they were still a good player and would upgrade the Hawks, simply because they were a member of that team is just fucking stupid.


    The only person saying stupid things is the person suggesting Harrison would be an upgrade on this team for the reason I already mentioned. He's not a scheme fit. And he's old. Give it up. You knew you were going to get flak for this and now you're getting all pissy when you got what you expected (because you knew it was a bad idea in the first place.)
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 14635
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: James Harrison
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:25 am
  • Sarlacc83 wrote:
    The only person saying stupid things is the person suggesting Harrison would be an upgrade on this team for the reason I already mentioned. He's not a scheme fit. And he's old. Give it up. You knew you were going to get flak for this and now you're getting all pissy when you got what you expected (because you knew it was a bad idea in the first place.)


    Wrong, I still think that he would be an upgrade over an obviously slowed Leroy Hill. Are there better options out there, yes obviously there are. However I would still take Harrison on this team for a two year deal.

    I'm not getting pissy because people disagree with my stance on Harrison. That's fine. I'm calling you out on your ridiculous idea that you wouldn't take a former Steelers player on principle because they played in Super Bowl XL. The argument has changed from my OP. Cheers.
    Image

    "There is no delay of game. We did not let the team know we were scratching our balls"
    User avatar
    IBleedBlueAndGreen
    * NET Injury Guru *
     
    Posts: 1584
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am
    Location: Poulsbo, WA




It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2014 11:45 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online