Colts @ Ravens AFC wildcard matchup game thread

GCrow

New member
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
744
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Who's ready for the turnover machine to shine bright today?!?!
 

jkitsune

New member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
3,339
Reaction score
0
I'd rather have the Luck hypefest than the Lewis hypefest, but my best buddy is a Ravens fan so I guess I'm rooting for them.

Tipped pass? Maybe if Luck were taller.
 

jkitsune

New member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
3,339
Reaction score
0
What game was it where that happened to us on a muffed punt?
 

-The Glove-

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
7,689
Reaction score
0
How do you call Colts ball when you can't even see? Mike Carey's the worst.
 

Pstark3

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,428
Reaction score
0
Location
Bellevue
jkitsune":lpeggrs5 said:
What game was it where that happened to us on a muffed punt?
Chicago game I believe, Carey was the official for that game
 

-The Glove-

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
7,689
Reaction score
0
That's the dumbest rule ever. So pretty much, as a ref, whenever there is a fumble, you can signal the ball wherever you'd want it to be and it can't be reviewed? Sounds like it leaves too much room for refs to let their biases show.
 

Pstark3

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,428
Reaction score
0
Location
Bellevue
-The Glove-":1h16ncrs said:
That's the dumbest rule ever. So pretty much, as a ref, whenever there is a fumble, you can signal the ball wherever you'd want it to be and it can't be reviewed? Sounds like it leaves too much room for refs to let their biases show.
I honestly dont see any logic in making ANY play or penalty non-reviewable. It makes absolutely no sense at all. An attempt to hide mistakes?
 

-The Glove-

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
7,689
Reaction score
0
Pstark3":17jbh0k5 said:
-The Glove-":17jbh0k5 said:
That's the dumbest rule ever. So pretty much, as a ref, whenever there is a fumble, you can signal the ball wherever you'd want it to be and it can't be reviewed? Sounds like it leaves too much room for refs to let their biases show.
I honestly dont see any logic in making ANY play or penalty non-reviewable. It makes absolutely no sense at all. An attempt to hide mistakes?

Any type of play that has a significant impact on the game should be reviewable. But a change of possession on a fumble can't? I don't get it
 

Latest posts

Top