Joey13091 wrote:I just don't think the vikings can make it very far not having a passing game.
Shock2k wrote:Joey13091 wrote:I just don't think the vikings can make it very far not having a passing game.
Technically we don't know if they have a passing game yet.
hawk45 wrote:Me thinky Rodgers is going to put up 7s to the Vikes 3s though.
SeeHawkRun wrote:Who are we really rooting for in this game? I mean, I'd rather face Atlanta in their dome than SF in Candlestick...But I'd love the chance at a home game for the NFC Championship. Anyone else? I guess I'm rooting for Minnesota to eliminate the chance at having to play GB in their stadium.
hawk45 wrote:If I'm Frazier I'm getting Webb a couple of short completions off of play action at some point, although I get that the temptation to hand off every time is large.
-The Glove- wrote:GB was not prepared for the zone-read. I want them in Lambeau! I don't think anyone runs it better than the Seahawks
hawk45 wrote:-The Glove- wrote:GB was not prepared for the zone-read. I want them in Lambeau! I don't think anyone runs it better than the Seahawks
I almost agree with this. I trust our corners to hold Rodgers under his typical 4 TD performance.
Then again, GB may not be prepared because they prepared for Ponder instead of Webb.
SeeHawkRun wrote:I'm torn between wanting Green Bay to lose and wanting to be the team that beats them...
hawker84 wrote:not sure who everyones for here tonight, but i'm not seeing a viking victory at all tonight. soon to be 14 - 3..