Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

49ers no longer 0 fers

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:03 pm
  • Back to quest for 6 statements :)
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. :les:
    Member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 22463
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:14 pm
  • 1-9ers. :)
    adeltaY
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 919
    Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:22 pm
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:38 pm
  • Awesome. My Niners won the poop bowl. Hahaha.

    Feels good to win. But it was the Gnats
    User avatar
    rlkats
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1549
    Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 7:42 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:39 pm
  • chris98251 wrote:Back to quest for 6 statements :)




    Wouldn’t it be funny if my Niners beat the hawks in a couple of weeks?

    I know pipe dream but man would it be awesome. Lol
    User avatar
    rlkats
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1549
    Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 7:42 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:56 pm
  • rlkats wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Back to quest for 6 statements :)




    Wouldn’t it be funny if my Niners beat the hawks in a couple of weeks?

    I know pipe dream but man would it be awesome. Lol

    No my friend, that would suck, LOL.
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!

    I SO do not care about your fantasy team and who's on it!
    Sports Hernia
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23309
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: The pit


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 7:07 pm
  • rlkats wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Back to quest for 6 statements :)




    Wouldn’t it be funny if my Niners beat the hawks in a couple of weeks?

    I know pipe dream but man would it be awesome. Lol

    With how injured we have just become in the last week, it's more possible than anybody would have thought a week ago, I'll give you that much...
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    * Spelling High Lord *
     
    Posts: 31076
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Bothell, WA


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 7:19 pm
  • Well when we do win, no injury excuses, half of our team is on IR :-)
    SF49r
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 443
    Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:30 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 7:27 pm
  • adeltaY wrote:1-9ers. :)


    :179417:
    User avatar
    hawknation2017
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1154
    Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:44 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 7:30 pm


  • :P
    User avatar
    hawknation2017
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1154
    Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:44 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:14 pm
  • hawknation2017 wrote:

    :P



    I told you. The poo poo bowl lol
    User avatar
    rlkats
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1549
    Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 7:42 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:16 pm
  • Sports Hernia wrote:
    rlkats wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Back to quest for 6 statements :)




    Wouldn’t it be funny if my Niners beat the hawks in a couple of weeks?

    I know pipe dream but man would it be awesome. Lol

    No my friend, that would suck, LOL.



    Man the shack would be livid hahahahaha
    User avatar
    rlkats
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1549
    Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 7:42 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 9:55 pm
  • rlkats wrote:
    Sports Hernia wrote:
    rlkats wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Back to quest for 6 statements :)




    Wouldn’t it be funny if my Niners beat the hawks in a couple of weeks?

    I know pipe dream but man would it be awesome. Lol

    No my friend, that would suck, LOL.



    Man the shack would be livid hahahahaha


    It shall be. :stirthepot:
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:02 pm
  • NINEster wrote:
    rlkats wrote:
    Sports Hernia wrote:
    rlkats wrote:


    Wouldn’t it be funny if my Niners beat the hawks in a couple of weeks?

    I know pipe dream but man would it be awesome. Lol

    No my friend, that would suck, LOL.



    Man the shack would be livid hahahahaha


    It shall be. :stirthepot:


    Just like the last 8 times they played? :stirthepot:
    "Soon, the super karate monkey death car would park in my space. But Jimmy has fancy plans, and pants to match."

    - Excerpt from Jimmy James: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
    User avatar
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3619
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:44 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:38 am
  • rlkats wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:

    :P



    I told you. The poo poo bowl lol

    I'm actually pooping right now.

    Swipe wipe swipe wipe swipe wipe wipe swipe OH CRAP OOPS
    User avatar
    5_Golden_Rings
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1005
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:38 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:23 am
  • Maulbert wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    rlkats wrote:
    Sports Hernia wrote:No my friend, that would suck, LOL.



    Man the shack would be livid hahahahaha


    It shall be. :stirthepot:


    Just like the last 8 times they played? :stirthepot:



    Ouch. Hahahahaha
    User avatar
    rlkats
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1549
    Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 7:42 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:51 am
  • rlkats wrote:
    Maulbert wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    rlkats wrote:

    Man the shack would be livid hahahahaha


    It shall be. :stirthepot:


    Just like the last 8 times they played? :stirthepot:



    Ouch. Hahahahaha


    9th time is the charm. :mrgreen:

    Hey, I got my wish of beating the Giants if the Niners were going to be a 1 or 2 win team this year.

    Now, the hope is for a 2-14 finish with the win column finalized in two weeks. :stirthepot: :irishdrinkers:
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:16 am
  • Actually, there are a lot of disappointed 9er fans with the win.
    User avatar
    Bobblehead
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2003
    Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:52 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:52 am
  • Bobblehead wrote:Actually, there are a lot of disappointed 9er fans with the win.


    Dumb.

    There was a very real danger of 0-16.

    That "stink" ain't worth any draft pick IMO, unless it's Joe Montana/Tom Brady 2.0.
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:03 am
  • NINEster wrote:
    Bobblehead wrote:Actually, there are a lot of disappointed 9er fans with the win.


    Dumb.

    There was a very real danger of 0-16.

    That "stink" ain't worth any draft pick IMO, unless it's Joe Montana/Tom Brady 2.0.


    More like Alex Smith or Jim Drunkenmiller.

    Hey I could have said Elvis Grbac. :)
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. :les:
    Member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 22463
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:15 am
  • chris98251 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    Bobblehead wrote:Actually, there are a lot of disappointed 9er fans with the win.


    Dumb.

    There was a very real danger of 0-16.

    That "stink" ain't worth any draft pick IMO, unless it's Joe Montana/Tom Brady 2.0.


    More like Alex Smith or Jim Drunkenmiller.

    Hey I could have said Elvis Grbac. :)


    I was talking about hypotheticals, not what will actually happen. It's not like Niner fans wax poetic over the 2004 season, considering Montana/TB 2.0 did actually come out in the following draft but was passed over.... :x

    Classic diversionary tactics of .NET. :D

    BTW, I'm one of the few Niner fans who want a win next Sunday even if it costs us a few draft spots. It'd probably be worth it even if we had to pick 16th! :stirthepot: :mrgreen:
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:29 am
  • Bobblehead wrote:Actually, there are a lot of disappointed 9er fans with the win.

    These people need to be bitchslapped tbh. The Browns get the first pick almost every year, and look how great they are for it...
    User avatar
    5_Golden_Rings
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1005
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:38 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:03 am
  • 5_Golden_Rings wrote:
    Bobblehead wrote:Actually, there are a lot of disappointed 9er fans with the win.

    These people need to be bitchslapped tbh. The Browns get the first pick almost every year, and look how great they are for it...


    Interesting fact: The 2016 season was the first time the Browns earned the #1 overall pick since the 1999 season, their first season back in the NFL as an expansion team. True, they haven't been very good in that span, but the Chargers and Texans have both earned the #1 pick twice between the last 2 times the Browns did it. Got any other myths you want to propagate?
    "Soon, the super karate monkey death car would park in my space. But Jimmy has fancy plans, and pants to match."

    - Excerpt from Jimmy James: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
    User avatar
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3619
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:44 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:06 am
  • NINEster wrote:
    Classic diversionary tactics of .NET. :D

    BTW, I'm one of the few Niner fans who want a win next Sunday even if it costs us a few draft spots. It'd probably be worth it even if we had to pick 16th! :stirthepot: :mrgreen:


    Do you truly believe this 1-9ers JV team has a chance in hell to beat the Seahawks?

    :P
    User avatar
    hawknation2017
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1154
    Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:44 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:26 am
  • hawknation2017 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    Classic diversionary tactics of .NET. :D

    BTW, I'm one of the few Niner fans who want a win next Sunday even if it costs us a few draft spots. It'd probably be worth it even if we had to pick 16th! :stirthepot: :mrgreen:


    Do you truly believe this 1-9ers JV team has a chance in hell to beat the Seahawks?

    :P


    I can't believe the Niners covered the spread in week 2.

    That's the shocking part in all of this.

    Wouldn't be unreasonable to think they could cover it again.
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:08 am
  • Blasted Giants!

    I can absolutely believe that the Seahawks' atrocious offense won't cover a spread. When you have Bevell, you have the nemesis of all fans and all of Vegas.
    "We have an opportunity to win multiple Super Bowls."
    -Russell Wilson
    User avatar
    Threedee
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1563
    Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:08 pm
    Location: Federal Way, WA


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:32 am
  • Maulbert wrote:
    5_Golden_Rings wrote:
    Bobblehead wrote:Actually, there are a lot of disappointed 9er fans with the win.

    These people need to be bitchslapped tbh. The Browns get the first pick almost every year, and look how great they are for it...


    Interesting fact: The 2016 season was the first time the Browns earned the #1 overall pick since the 1999 season, their first season back in the NFL as an expansion team. True, they haven't been very good in that span, but the Chargers and Texans have both earned the #1 pick twice between the last 2 times the Browns did it. Got any other myths you want to propagate?

    Point is they pick early every year. Since 2000 they have finished with 6 wins or fewer 14 times. 14 times they have had an opportunity to pick high (excluding trades). Where are their wins?

    Draft position matters little compared to the way the franchise operates.
    Last edited by KitsapGuy on Sun Dec 03, 2017 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Reason: Attack The Post, Not The Poster
    User avatar
    5_Golden_Rings
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1005
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:38 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 8:38 am
  • If the Niners lose to the Bears, with Garoppolo starting, is it time for them to abdicate from the NFL? Maybe they could have some success on the J.C. circuit against Foothill and San Jose Community College.
    User avatar
    hawknation2017
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1154
    Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:44 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:07 pm
  • 2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:
    User avatar
    hawknation2017
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1154
    Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:44 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:18 pm
  • hawknation2017 wrote:If the Niners lose to the Bears, with Garoppolo starting, is it time for them to abdicate from the NFL? Maybe they could have some success on the J.C. circuit against Foothill and San Jose Community College.


    Seriously, you make this joke about the 49ers when the NFL allows the Browns to play week after week?
    "Soon, the super karate monkey death car would park in my space. But Jimmy has fancy plans, and pants to match."

    - Excerpt from Jimmy James: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
    User avatar
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3619
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:44 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:45 pm
  • hawknation2017 wrote:2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:


    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:46 pm
  • Garoppolo looked legitimate. I think he might have converted 7 or so third and longs. Very impressive. Still, the 49ers lack of talent is crippling, and the penalties, my god. But he looks better than any 49er QB in a long while.
    User avatar
    5_Golden_Rings
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1005
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:38 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:06 pm
  • Da Bears fans must be praying that Trubisky grows after this rookie season.
    "We have an opportunity to win multiple Super Bowls."
    -Russell Wilson
    User avatar
    Threedee
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1563
    Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:08 pm
    Location: Federal Way, WA


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:27 pm
  • Hope they beat Houston on a last-minute FG.
    User avatar
    hawknation2017
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1154
    Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:44 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:28 pm
  • NINEster wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:


    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Is Jed willing to pay Garoppolo $20 million a year?
    User avatar
    hawknation2017
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1154
    Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:44 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:24 pm
  • NINEster wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:


    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Yeah they have Goff, Wilson, and Gabbert lol and Grab a ho :240039:

    Truly scary in S.F after one start and in AZ right now since Gabbert is crushing it on his third of 4th team, pity those other teams could not figure out he was Great wasn't one of them S.F.
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. :les:
    Member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 22463
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:57 pm
  • hawknation2017 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:


    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Is Jed willing to pay Garoppolo $20 million a year?


    Well he was willing to pay three head coaches at the same time totally around 20 million per year, so I wouldn't think it would be a problem. I think his problem is more incompetence and being too much of a p*ssy** than greed.

    **The famous instant when Jim Harbaugh allegedly told him to leave a team meeting because it was "for men only;" his inability to stand up to Baalke; his inability to face Harbaugh like a man and instead circumvent him behind his back; etc.





    chris98251 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:


    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Yeah they have Goff, Wilson, and Gabbert lol and Grab a ho :240039:

    Truly scary in S.F after one start and in AZ right now since Gabbert is crushing it on his third of 4th team, pity those other teams could not figure out he was Great wasn't one of them S.F.

    Garoppolo has looked good every time he's stepped on a football field so I'm not really sure comparing him to Gabbert is reasonable.
    User avatar
    5_Golden_Rings
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1005
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:38 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:39 pm
  • 5_Golden_Rings wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:


    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Is Jed willing to pay Garoppolo $20 million a year?


    Well he was willing to pay three head coaches at the same time totally around 20 million per year, so I wouldn't think it would be a problem. I think his problem is more incompetence and being too much of a p*ssy** than greed.

    **The famous instant when Jim Harbaugh allegedly told him to leave a team meeting because it was "for men only;" his inability to stand up to Baalke; his inability to face Harbaugh like a man and instead circumvent him behind his back; etc.





    chris98251 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:2-10.

    One more win & they'll really screw up their draft ranking. :2thumbs:


    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Yeah they have Goff, Wilson, and Gabbert lol and Grab a ho :240039:

    Truly scary in S.F after one start and in AZ right now since Gabbert is crushing it on his third of 4th team, pity those other teams could not figure out he was Great wasn't one of them S.F.

    Garoppolo has looked good every time he's stepped on a football field so I'm not really sure comparing him to Gabbert is reasonable.


    Gabbert starting over Palmer next week, you brought subject up not us. I am sure that this is a set up for a division sweep next season now that you have Grab a Ho as your franchise QB :)
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. :les:
    Member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 22463
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:45 am
  • chris98251 wrote:
    5_Golden_Rings wrote:
    hawknation2017 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Is Jed willing to pay Garoppolo $20 million a year?


    Well he was willing to pay three head coaches at the same time totally around 20 million per year, so I wouldn't think it would be a problem. I think his problem is more incompetence and being too much of a p*ssy** than greed.

    **The famous instant when Jim Harbaugh allegedly told him to leave a team meeting because it was "for men only;" his inability to stand up to Baalke; his inability to face Harbaugh like a man and instead circumvent him behind his back; etc.





    chris98251 wrote:
    NINEster wrote:
    Fine with me.

    If SF wins games going forward with the personnel they have against the teams they are playing that means Garoppolo is the baller QB for real.

    Would much rather have that position locked down than relying on a top 5 pick.

    Which we might still get anyways :)

    The NFC West has QBs now......not just Wilson. :irishdrinkers:


    Yeah they have Goff, Wilson, and Gabbert lol and Grab a ho :240039:

    Truly scary in S.F after one start and in AZ right now since Gabbert is crushing it on his third of 4th team, pity those other teams could not figure out he was Great wasn't one of them S.F.

    Garoppolo has looked good every time he's stepped on a football field so I'm not really sure comparing him to Gabbert is reasonable.


    Gabbert starting over Palmer next week, you brought subject up not us. I am sure that this is a set up for a division sweep next season now that you have Grab a Ho as your franchise QB :)


    Nah, Qbs aren't enough to win games. You need some defense too, and some play makers. But, 49ers fans know poor QBing, and we know good QBing. Seen the later for roughly three decades with Montana, Young and Garcia, and seen the former for about two decades. The last time the 49ers had a QB who could quickly go through progressions and hit that key slant under pressure on third and 9 was Jeff Garcia. It's a "layup," but the QBs who can't consistently hit them don't last (exhibit A: Colin Kaepernick).
    User avatar
    5_Golden_Rings
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1005
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:38 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:58 am
  • I LOVE your avatar 5 Golden Rings!
    Richard Sherman wrote:People look forward to writing us off. Our demise was greatly overstated.
    User avatar
    original poster
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 819
    Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:55 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:36 am
  • Honestly, trying really, really hard not to buy into hyperbole with Garoppolo.

    I love everything I've seen from him and it would be really easy to proclaim him the next great Niners QB...

    ...but I'm not going to do that. One start in which he didn't throw a TD.

    However....I can say this and it isn't hyperbole....

    I haven't seen a QB in red and Gold look that comfortable in the pocket, deliver with that kind of precision, or just look like he belongs there more than Garoppolo since Steve Young. No joke.

    Now next week it could all fall apart and he could look horrible, but for one week he looked fantastic. The release...oh my god the release. Its one of the fastest I've ever seen that in itself is preventing sacks. His feet are fantastic and he's more decisive than any 49er QB I've seen in decades.

    If you don't believe me...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hADLqB2XEU

    As I said, I'm making no proclamations for his future, but right now I'm pretty damn happy with him.

    The other thing I'll say is this....Good QBs make the players around them better. That was on display on Sunday. Both Marquise Goodwin and Trent Taylor had career games.

    Even if Garoppolo is the real deal, they are several pieces away so don't take this as "Niners gonna roll the west in 2018" or anything. Thats a long way off, but it looks right now like they might have solved the hardest position on the field to fill.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5756
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:55 am
  • Marvin what are your thoughts on Adrian Colbert, that guy has been lighting it up at FS very impressive for a 7th round corner. I think we may have something there. Also heard he had the same coach who developed Earl Thomas in college.
    SF49r
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 443
    Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:30 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:17 am
  • SF49r wrote:Marvin what are your thoughts on Adrian Colbert, that guy has been lighting it up at FS very impressive for a 7th round corner. I think we may have something there. Also heard he had the same coach who developed Earl Thomas in college.


    Like Garoppolo, Colberts sample size is really small, but every time he plays he seems to make an impact. He's been far more impactful than I'd expect for a 7th rounder and I'll be interested to see him moving forward.

    I had hoped that Ward could play that Earl Thomas role in this D but he was a disappointment before he got hurt. Maybe Colbert can be that guy? (and before a Seattle fan says anything, I'm referring to the role he plays, not his skill level in the Thomas comparison).
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5756
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:08 pm
  • Witherspoon is finally putting it together too and Reid and Tartt have been handling the 'kam' spot very well. I think if Colbert keeps improving and we grab one of the top CBs opposite witherspoon we'll have ourselves a secondary.
    SF49r
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 443
    Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:30 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:11 pm
  • Marvin49 wrote:Honestly, trying really, really hard not to buy into hyperbole with Garoppolo.

    I love everything I've seen from him and it would be really easy to proclaim him the next great Niners QB...

    ...but I'm not going to do that. One start in which he didn't throw a TD.

    However....I can say this and it isn't hyperbole....

    I haven't seen a QB in red and Gold look that comfortable in the pocket, deliver with that kind of precision, or just look like he belongs there more than Garoppolo since Steve Young. No joke.

    Now next week it could all fall apart and he could look horrible, but for one week he looked fantastic. The release...oh my god the release. Its one of the fastest I've ever seen that in itself is preventing sacks. His feet are fantastic and he's more decisive than any 49er QB I've seen in decades.

    If you don't believe me...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hADLqB2XEU

    As I said, I'm making no proclamations for his future, but right now I'm pretty damn happy with him.

    The other thing I'll say is this....Good QBs make the players around them better. That was on display on Sunday. Both Marquise Goodwin and Trent Taylor had career games.

    Even if Garoppolo is the real deal, they are several pieces away so don't take this as "Niners gonna roll the west in 2018" or anything. Thats a long way off, but it looks right now like they might have solved the hardest position on the field to fill.


    He's good, but this would be my concern about him...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6H8AYVygTE

    He's not built "sturdy" ... His frame reminds me of Jim Zorn, Hugh Millen, Brock Huard, Marc Wilson, RG3, et. Great arm, great release, but he's not "thick enough" to make me think he'll be durable. Marino had that quick release but he was also built like a brick shithouse. Garoppolo is not, he's got those long limbs that fall awkwardly. That would worry me as a fan.
    User avatar
    The_Z_Man
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1747
    Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:57 pm
    Location: Tucson, AZ


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:20 pm
  • original poster wrote:I LOVE your avatar 5 Golden Rings!

    Lol thanks. It's hilarious, right? I believe someone actually posted it here, and that's where I got it.
    User avatar
    5_Golden_Rings
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1005
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:38 am


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:29 pm
  • Marvin49 wrote:
    SF49r wrote:Marvin what are your thoughts on Adrian Colbert, that guy has been lighting it up at FS very impressive for a 7th round corner. I think we may have something there. Also heard he had the same coach who developed Earl Thomas in college.


    Like Garoppolo, Colberts sample size is really small, but every time he plays he seems to make an impact. He's been far more impactful than I'd expect for a 7th rounder and I'll be interested to see him moving forward.

    I had hoped that Ward could play that Earl Thomas role in this D but he was a disappointment before he got hurt. Maybe Colbert can be that guy? (and before a Seattle fan says anything, I'm referring to the role he plays, not his skill level in the Thomas comparison).


    Some might take your meaning that way, but deep down, I think most every football fan, regardless of fandom, knows the only safety in the league who might, and I say MIGHT, be in the same stratosphere as Earl Thomas in this league is Eric Berry.
    "Soon, the super karate monkey death car would park in my space. But Jimmy has fancy plans, and pants to match."

    - Excerpt from Jimmy James: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
    User avatar
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3619
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:44 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:38 am
  • Maulbert wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:
    SF49r wrote:Marvin what are your thoughts on Adrian Colbert, that guy has been lighting it up at FS very impressive for a 7th round corner. I think we may have something there. Also heard he had the same coach who developed Earl Thomas in college.


    Like Garoppolo, Colberts sample size is really small, but every time he plays he seems to make an impact. He's been far more impactful than I'd expect for a 7th rounder and I'll be interested to see him moving forward.

    I had hoped that Ward could play that Earl Thomas role in this D but he was a disappointment before he got hurt. Maybe Colbert can be that guy? (and before a Seattle fan says anything, I'm referring to the role he plays, not his skill level in the Thomas comparison).


    Some might take your meaning that way, but deep down, I think most every football fan, regardless of fandom, knows the only safety in the league who might, and I say MIGHT, be in the same stratosphere as Earl Thomas in this league is Eric Berry.


    After seeing what's happened to the Chiefs defense this year, I think Berry is better than we thought he was.
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:53 am
  • The_Z_Man wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:Honestly, trying really, really hard not to buy into hyperbole with Garoppolo.

    I love everything I've seen from him and it would be really easy to proclaim him the next great Niners QB...

    ...but I'm not going to do that. One start in which he didn't throw a TD.

    However....I can say this and it isn't hyperbole....

    I haven't seen a QB in red and Gold look that comfortable in the pocket, deliver with that kind of precision, or just look like he belongs there more than Garoppolo since Steve Young. No joke.

    Now next week it could all fall apart and he could look horrible, but for one week he looked fantastic. The release...oh my god the release. Its one of the fastest I've ever seen that in itself is preventing sacks. His feet are fantastic and he's more decisive than any 49er QB I've seen in decades.

    If you don't believe me...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hADLqB2XEU

    As I said, I'm making no proclamations for his future, but right now I'm pretty damn happy with him.

    The other thing I'll say is this....Good QBs make the players around them better. That was on display on Sunday. Both Marquise Goodwin and Trent Taylor had career games.

    Even if Garoppolo is the real deal, they are several pieces away so don't take this as "Niners gonna roll the west in 2018" or anything. Thats a long way off, but it looks right now like they might have solved the hardest position on the field to fill.


    He's good, but this would be my concern about him...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6H8AYVygTE

    He's not built "sturdy" ... His frame reminds me of Jim Zorn, Hugh Millen, Brock Huard, Marc Wilson, RG3, et. Great arm, great release, but he's not "thick enough" to make me think he'll be durable. Marino had that quick release but he was also built like a brick shithouse. Garoppolo is not, he's got those long limbs that fall awkwardly. That would worry me as a fan.


    Interesting take. Could be very accurate, but seeing that critique first from a Hawks forum...... :mrgreen:

    Joe Montana gave the Niners 10 seasons as a starter, and missed quite a bit of action (knocked out of '86 and '90 playoff games against Giants), had back surgery and missed some games in '86. He was a tough SOB but he definitely missed action. He wasn't going to be Eli Manning on the durability level (who should have died in Candlestick several years ago but didn't...).

    If Montana could survive the '80s, I wager Jimmy G with some luck can have a real NFL career. Kinda interesting how that OL suddenly learned how to pass protect last weekend.

    RG3 if he played like Kirk Cousins would be fine. But he tried to play like Cam Newton.

    On behalf of all Niner fans, we're content to see Shanalynch roll the dice in that respect.
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:54 am
  • Michael Bennett - "I'm glad he didn't come in the game sooner".

    Bennett usually has accurate comments about Niner QBs (Kap vs. Gabbert).
    NINEster
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1453
    Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:06 pm


Re: 49ers no longer 0 fers
Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:13 pm
  • The_Z_Man wrote:
    Marvin49 wrote:Honestly, trying really, really hard not to buy into hyperbole with Garoppolo.

    I love everything I've seen from him and it would be really easy to proclaim him the next great Niners QB...

    ...but I'm not going to do that. One start in which he didn't throw a TD.

    However....I can say this and it isn't hyperbole....

    I haven't seen a QB in red and Gold look that comfortable in the pocket, deliver with that kind of precision, or just look like he belongs there more than Garoppolo since Steve Young. No joke.

    Now next week it could all fall apart and he could look horrible, but for one week he looked fantastic. The release...oh my god the release. Its one of the fastest I've ever seen that in itself is preventing sacks. His feet are fantastic and he's more decisive than any 49er QB I've seen in decades.

    If you don't believe me...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hADLqB2XEU

    As I said, I'm making no proclamations for his future, but right now I'm pretty damn happy with him.

    The other thing I'll say is this....Good QBs make the players around them better. That was on display on Sunday. Both Marquise Goodwin and Trent Taylor had career games.

    Even if Garoppolo is the real deal, they are several pieces away so don't take this as "Niners gonna roll the west in 2018" or anything. Thats a long way off, but it looks right now like they might have solved the hardest position on the field to fill.


    He's good, but this would be my concern about him...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6H8AYVygTE

    He's not built "sturdy" ... His frame reminds me of Jim Zorn, Hugh Millen, Brock Huard, Marc Wilson, RG3, et. Great arm, great release, but he's not "thick enough" to make me think he'll be durable. Marino had that quick release but he was also built like a brick shithouse. Garoppolo is not, he's got those long limbs that fall awkwardly. That would worry me as a fan.


    Its possible, but I think he's sturdier than you think. He's 6'2, 226lbs. Thats not huge obviously but it isn't exactly scrawny either. He did get hurt last year but that was the first time he'd ever been hurt and he was a 4 year starter in college.

    Every guy gets dings at some point. Remains to be seen if he can hold up. You mention Marino but Marino also wasn't very mobile. He could move around in the pocket as can Jimmy but Marino was never escaping or buying time.
    Marvin49
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5756
    Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:34 pm


Next


It is currently Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:33 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests