Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:04 am 
NET Practice Squad
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 79
Short answer: #1 D.

One thing I think is overlooked is how much harder it is to field an historic #1 Defense in 2013/4 than it is to field an historic #1 Offense.

People talk about the '85 Bears and say we'll never equal them. What goes unsaid is that the 85 Bears could crush a receiver coming over the middle, pancake a back, and take down a QB without worrying about slapping his helmet, or otherwise contacting his head, neck, knees or ankles. In 2013/4, receivers look for--and often get--a holding/PI flag on every play. It's become a big soccer game out there.

We have overcome this, and being the most penalized team in the NFL, to field an historic defense. I mean, does anybody really respect how difficult it is for an offense to CONSTANTLY lean on its defense in a year; even more so when flag-happy officials are eager to penalize us and give opposing teams one fresh set of downs after another?

To the point of offense, it's no secret that teams are passing--and completing--more throws since the onset of these new pass-friendly rules. What Peyton Manning and the Broncos have done deserves real credit, but not without the disclaimer that it only happened AFTER it became virtually illegal to play a physical style of defense. Peyton was great before this, but only achieved legendary status once the league was softened up to start protecting QBs and the passing game. That hardly seems fair given the physicality and catch-at-all-costs style of play you see with guys like Wes Welker--he'll run headfirst into a wall or assassinate Aqib Talib, but blow him up and expect a drive-extending penalty.

It would be one thing if we happened to be the best D this year, but we are in the conversation for best defenses of all time--and may have won best secondary of all time. Does anyone appreciate how difficult it is to become historic on defense nowadays? And while it's still historic to break offensive records, that was bound to happen as the rules evolved. In short, it's harder to be an historic D than it is to be an historic O, and that's why I'll take the D.

One other thing in our favor: in the playoffs, officials have been calling very loose games. I recall John Clayton saying there were only 7 PI calls combined so far. I believe they will be even more sensitive to that, given what happened with the Seahawks-Steelers Superbowl. So in addition to losing home field (as do we) and the major altitude advantage, one more very important competitive advantage that the Broncos will lose THEIR "12th Man"--officials happy to throw a flag and extend drives.

Again, when the #1 O loses home field, altitude, and the officials--plus all the other qualifications--I'll take the #1 D any day.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:47 am 
NET Practice Squad
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 4:46 pm
Posts: 49
Well said. I think it would be best to have the #1 defense, coupled with the #2 offense. That would be a team!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:56 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:40 am
Posts: 665
Norcalhawklover wrote:
Well said. I think it would be best to have the #1 defense, coupled with the #2 offense. That would be a team!!!


That might be us next year. If Harvin is healthy and we keep Rice this offense can be downright nasty next year.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:59 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:48 am
Posts: 349
If the question is no.1 offense with Denver's D or the no.1 defense with the Hawks offense then I'd take the no.1 defense every time.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:36 am 
NET Veteran
Online

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm
Posts: 1804
#1 defense

Easier to win on the road with a good defense


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:45 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
Posts: 3364
Location: WA
#8 offense vs #22 defense all day

_________________
RockHawk wrote:
This has turned into nothing but a personal attack, which goes against our forum rules...... I'll allow it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:49 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 6428
Norcalhawklover wrote:
Well said. I think it would be best to have the #1 defense, coupled with the #2 offense. That would be a team!!!


Why not #1 on both sides of the ball


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Would you rather... #1 offense, or #1 defense?
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:54 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 1:36 am
Posts: 949
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Image


For real though, defense. Remember the great '07 Pats? The '02 Raiders? The '98 Vikings? The '11 Packers? How'd all that high power offense work out for them?


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AbsolutNET, AgentDib, Animalman, Appleegg1, austinslater25, Barthawk, Bigbadhawk, Bitter, Blitzer88, blue 22, bryantology79, CHawks4L, Chrome_Seahawk, DavidSeven, Dietrich, Digsbone, drdiags, DrDix, drrew, fishingfanatic, Geologic, GoHawks, Google [Bot], grizbob, hai, HawkFan72, HawkHouse, Hawknballs, HawkRiderFan, hawksfan515, hoxrox, indyhawk1984, Jville, KK84, Largent80, loafoftatupu, lobohawk, M2MG, McGruff, Mojambo, MPLogick, Msfann, NorCalSeahawk, NoTurnUnstoned, onanygivensunday, Polk738, razgriz737, RedAlice, rideaducati, rj503, RockHawk, Seahawkfan80, Seahawks4life, seahawksny, SeatownJay, SilkMonkey, smoothmaw, Snakeeyes007, SoulfishHawk, Storts, suppaball, Terpdragon, the ditch, TheHawkster, TheWalrus, Throwdown, TJH, tom sawyer, TriCHawk, twisted_steel2, two dog, UGotHawked, VivaEfrenHerrera, volsunghawk, warden, WillySchu, Yahoo [Bot], YaktownHawK, Zebulon Dak and 266 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.