Found this on the Eagles forums.

Its an article about home field advantage I found it rather interesting feel free to take a look post your thoughts

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/101 ... advantages

I expected the Seattle and Baltimore advantage and knew about Carolina's non advantage. Surprised by San Francisco's and Kansas City's performances for different reasons. San Francisco like New England or Green Bay I thought of as good road or away and Kansas City definitely is an underperformer compared to public perception.

The NFC West is 4 of the top 7. I guess that helps explain some of our road woes, and make this season's road record that much more impressive. Huh.

NFC West teams fans learned from Seattle how to get loud, now they are reaping the same benefits we have.

Part of our "home field advantage" is going on the road and playing 10am games. It hurts our road games and make the advantage look even better.

Well I am glad some of you found it interesting I know it was cool to see someone break it all down.

Homefield advantage generally disappears if a team isn't doing well over a long period of time because the bandwagon fans stop going to games.

I'm glad we passed Baltimore.
Balt was #1 the last time I saw an article like this.
We were #2.

Wasn't the last time that the Seahawks played with HFA in 2005?, yep

It's a skewed stat. Why should your road differential have bearing on your home-field advantage? You could lose by twenty in every road game and have a jacked-up HFA number according to this.

Well, all comments aside, it's nice that someone actually ran the numbers.

The interesting team on this list is the New England Patriots. Unsurprisingly, they have a great home game. Surprisingly, they are the only team that has done consistently well in recent years that is ranked low on that chart, because they play so well on the road.

Anyone notice every NFC west team was in the top 10?

KCHawkGirl":3r3psb46 said:

I expected the Seattle and Baltimore advantage and knew about Carolina's non advantage. Surprised by San Francisco's and Kansas City's performances for different reasons. San Francisco like New England or Green Bay I thought of as good road or away and Kansas City definitely is an underperformer compared to public perception.

Click to expand...

Keep in mind, this only goes back 13 years I think he said.

The Niners have been terrible outside of the last 3 years (which makes their fan base and the whole "what have you done" crap even more annoying) so that scews the perception of the last 3 years.

The Pats are just that damned good; probably why the media gives them so much love. Who knew ?

I also find it amusing that he went back to the Kingdome days and was alluding to the accoustics of our new stadium. The Kingdome was damned loud, but back then they actually penalized our team for it at times. So it would get loud, but not over the top like now when we know we can affect games. That and our teams really were that bad for long stretches of times. Even the die hards found it hard to yell that much when your team has been terrible for years.

sc85sis":2l0jn0ae said:

Homefield advantage generally disappears if a team isn't doing well over a long period of time because the bandwagon fans stop going to games.

Click to expand...

Oh so the non-bandwagon fans aren't loud enough for you? In that case bring on the bandwagon.

TheHawkster":3pk76yj6 said:

I'm glad we passed Baltimore.
Balt was #1 the last time I saw an article like this.
We were #2.

Click to expand...

Why? Having a great home field advantage is great but the numbers here suggest it's equally damaging since it takes into account point differential. Based on these metrics I'd rather be lower on the chart by being better then we have been on the road.