Jiggy
New member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 1,972
- Reaction score
- 0
Who have a much better D as far as bringing the pressure...
Next week will be no give me game.
Next week will be no give me game.
Rams Next Weekend
- Thread starter Jiggy
- Start date
Seahawkscrazy
New member
Yeah I'm legit worried about this now.
Reaneypark
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,127
- Reaction score
- 23
Playoffs start next week. We CAN lose at home. Time for them to pull their heads out of their asses and bring it next week.
If we do that, today means nothing.
If we do that, today means nothing.
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,892
- Reaction score
- 406
Rams have the perfect D to contain Wilson up front. Worse secondary, though.
Blitzer88
Active member
We are in trouble next weekend.
Seahawkscrazy
New member
The only bright spot is that we have Giacomini and Okung back, whereas we didn't last time. Their ends hopefully won't be free runners at Wilson all day long.
I cannot believe that I called having Giacomini back a bright spot. Wow.
I cannot believe that I called having Giacomini back a bright spot. Wow.
dontbelikethat
New member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 3,358
- Reaction score
- 0
This offense better come ready to play next week. Baldwin or Michael better be the one KRing. And most importantly Wilson better cut his hair.
seahawksfan28
New member
megamanflx1":rdb37cuc said:
I really fear the Hawks losing to the Rams next week, like 80% chance. This loss was hurtful in a few ways. Looking at the standings, the hawks are really no longer better than teams like the Saints, Panthers, Niners. The home field advantage factor is now gone. It really sucks this team has to win next week or its WC time. You can almost feel the other teams just waiting to destroy the hawks who are on the decline.
TheRealDTM
New member
Jake Long got hurt this week, if he doesn't play I'll feel much better. As it stands I'm very worried.
Seahawkscrazy
New member
seahawksfan28":2iepiwwy said:
Yes, they were back today, but they weren't the last time we played the Rams- ergo, first part of my post. I thought that it was obvious what I was talking about, given the title of the thread and all, but whatevs.
Grahamhawker
Well-known member
supahawk":3q724e0q said:
Bit exaggerated, don't you think?
Possibly exaggerated yeah, it's just that I don't see the fire in this team anymore. The 2012 Hawks were filled with it and this 2013 team just seems to be missing something. Maybe the loss was good so that they can get the fire back...I was hoping the Niner loss was good enough but maybe this one will do.
TheRealDTM
New member
Grahamhawker":1oy0hkwe said:
No i'm very concerned as well, Rams flat out looks better/more physical than us.
Heyseed
Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 651
- Reaction score
- 18
That's It! I'm Going! Section 123
DeathbyTalons
New member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
- Messages
- 612
- Reaction score
- 0
I think we come out swinging and remind the Rams why we're the best team in the conference. We aren't going to settle on tossing 15 -30 yard routes for WEe, I think we use the TE, FB, RB and some scripted runs for RW. This team responds next week.
HawKnPeppa
New member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 4,733
- Reaction score
- 0
Amusing how every time we lose the team suddenly has no 'fire' or 'fight' in them. The 'O' got beat like a drum and the 'D' was on the field for most of the game. Not much to get 'firey' about when you're not making plays to feed off of. The Cards were the better team today...especially their 'D' against our oh nooo 'O.'
MidwestHawker
New member
Blitzer88":1yvobaqs said:
I assume it's just going to be this all week, Blitzer?
Missing_Clink
New member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 3,287
- Reaction score
- 1
I agree. There is no team I'd want to face less right now than the Rams. They have the seahawks' number. Get ready for a constant stream of Wilson running for his life and WRs struggling to get open. I would not be surprised at all by a loss
