hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:48 pm
  • prob for KC is that denver is going to be good and the chargers should bounce back.

    However I've always thought alex smith was better than most people did and I think he will be better than most people think in KC. I could see him having a pro-bowl caliber year with some of those offensive weapons.
    Image
    User avatar
    Hawknballs
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2805
    Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:49 pm
  • kearly wrote:
    nIdahoSeahawk wrote:I see on the NFL's facebook post, that quite a few people are saying "packers #1"


    No run game, lost one of their better receivers, and mediocre defense. Way too many holes. If anything, Packers could be the team to plummet down the rankings this year.
    Stephen SeaHawking
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 254
    Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 2:21 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:49 pm
  • When we were on the top of this OFF-SEASON power poll most of you said that these things were pointless and just fluff to fill the void until pre-season started.

    Now that you are on top and we are second it is suddenly a meaningful tool for judging a teams potential.

    C'mon guys
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:53 pm
  • NinerLifer wrote:When we were on the top of this OFF-SEASON power poll most of you said that these things were pointless and just fluff to fill the void until pre-season started.

    Now that you are on top and we are second it is suddenly a meaningful tool for judging a teams potential.

    C'mon guys

    Well, it's always just "some guy's" opinion - and I seriously doubt many picked the Ravens to win it all last year. That said, it is interesting to see how people view the off season changes and what the expectations / reputation is of a franchise moving forward into the next year. But yeah it doesn't mean anything in the long run.
    Stephen SeaHawking
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 254
    Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 2:21 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:54 pm
  • NinerLifer wrote:When we were on the top of this OFF-SEASON power poll most of you said that these things were pointless and just fluff to fill the void until pre-season started.

    Now that you are on top and we are second it is suddenly a meaningful tool for judging a teams potential.

    C'mon guys

    Don't lump me into that I have made it clear that I think they're meaningless but I do think they are fun and a harmless way to pass the offseason.
    43-8...it's all about that action boss....
    next man up.
    User avatar
    MizzouHawkGal
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7833
    Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
    Location: Kansas City, MO


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:55 pm
  • NinerLifer wrote:When we were on the top of this OFF-SEASON power poll most of you said that these things were pointless and just fluff to fill the void until pre-season started.

    Now that you are on top and we are second it is suddenly a meaningful tool for judging a teams potential.

    C'mon guys


    If you don't like the pro-Seahawks commentary from the fans on a Seahawks fan forum, we can show you the door.

    In the mean time...zip it. :16:
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7534
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:58 pm
  • Stephen SeaHawking wrote:
    kearly wrote:
    nIdahoSeahawk wrote:I see on the NFL's facebook post, that quite a few people are saying "packers #1"


    No run game, lost one of their better receivers, and mediocre defense. Way too many holes. If anything, Packers could be the team to plummet down the rankings this year.


    Eddie Lacy would argue with you about the notion they don't have a run game. 8)
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7534
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:58 pm
  • Hawknballs wrote:prob for KC is that denver is going to be good and the chargers should bounce back.

    However I've always thought alex smith was better than most people did and I think he will be better than most people think in KC. I could see him having a pro-bowl caliber year with some of those offensive weapons.

    Not sold is all and most in KC are of my opinion. They really do need a 2nd receiver to be somewhat of a threat. But I could be wrong and most of the fanbase here is pretty downtrodden at this point so they tend to see things more negatively than positively.
    43-8...it's all about that action boss....
    next man up.
    User avatar
    MizzouHawkGal
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7833
    Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
    Location: Kansas City, MO


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 3:42 pm
  • As far as the writers are concerned it's a great story when we win, better story when we fail. Win/win for the press corps, as always. September can't get here fast enough. That, and it's 111 freaking degrees here today.
    User avatar
    PlinytheCenter
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2845
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:47 pm
    Location: In Bruges


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:14 pm
  • NinerLifer wrote:When we were on the top of this OFF-SEASON power poll most of you said that these things were pointless and just fluff to fill the void until pre-season started.

    Now that you are on top and we are second it is suddenly a meaningful tool for judging a teams potential.

    C'mon guys


    Perhaps it has something to do with the superstar WR we picked up that is 25 years old, or the old veteran CB that was ranked slightly ahead of Richard Sherman as the best CB in the NFL last year by Pro Football Focus, or the moves we made to add more pass rushing power. Our weakest link on defense last year (nickel/slot coverage) is suddenly a strength, our pass rush is pretty much guaranteed to be improved at least a little, and our offense that was en fuego the last half of the season picked up the most dynamic, creative receiver in the league.

    We were ranked 2nd-best team in the NFL before all of that. You honestly think we have any problem being ranked #1 now after the aforementioned? There's something to be said about fan hypocrisy, but don't pretend like you and all of your fan base doesn't do it, too. I remember you guys crying about how not everyone was picking you to go to the Super Bowl and win it when the playoffs came in Harbaugh's first year, and most of you wouldn't listen to reason about Alex Smith's lack of experience in the postseason.

    Give us a break, NinerLifer. :roll:
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26427
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:36 am
  • Tech Worlds wrote:Today this writer is a genius!


    No kidding!
    Let's all celebrate that we're #1 on some silly piece of paper. It does't mean squat. I'd rather we were ranked lower because: 1. Four teams made it further than us. 2. This is a new season and we haven't played a single game.
    "I cannot believe this............ I am stunned right now. This is now a rebuilding year for us. Our offense is crap now"

    Blitzer88 regarding trading Percy to the Jets
    User avatar
    HawKnPeppa
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2709
    Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:52 am
  • HawKnPeppa wrote:
    Tech Worlds wrote:Today this writer is a genius!


    No kidding!
    Let's all celebrate that we're #1 on some silly piece of paper. It does't mean squat. I'd rather we were ranked lower because: 1. Four teams made it further than us. 2. This is a new season and we haven't played a single game.

    Ranked lower or higher doesn't mean a thing except for YOUR personal comfort level. What I see is that right now in a vacuum we are better than Atlanta, San Francisco, Baltimore and New England (the teams that finished ahead of us last year). It's all meaningless and everything will sort itself out on the field soon enough.
    43-8...it's all about that action boss....
    next man up.
    User avatar
    MizzouHawkGal
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7833
    Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
    Location: Kansas City, MO


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:19 am
  • I can't decide if you some of you are just not ready to embrace the era of success that is upon us, or are just grumpy bastages to begin with.

    Perhaps a mix of both?

    ;)
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7534
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:42 am
  • Hey, we're one of the best teams in football, this is all part of it.
    60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2924
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:45 am
  • I think they should put this song next to every ranking of the seahawks. The butt hurt would flow nicely.

    hawksincebirth wrote:So Russell has leverage but marshawn doesn't ? I thought its next man up. Hey we got t jack and bj Daniels right ??
    User avatar
    Cartire
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3165
    Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:01 am
  • FlyingGreg wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:NFL preseason power rankings are about as useless as a 3rd nipple. If you don't believe me, just look at last year's preseason power rankings

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings/_/year/2012/week/0

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8 ... contenders

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1303 ... r-rankings


    I wouldn't say "useless"...

    In the ESPN poll, 5 of the top 6 teams made the playoffs and two reached the Super Bowl.

    In the NFL.COM poll, 3 of the 4 top shelf teams made the playoffs.

    In the Bleacher Report, 4 of the top 5 teams made the playoffs...but then again, it's Bleacher Report.



    Harmless to us, I agree. I'm just worried about the players buying into all the hype. Pete's been great so far at preparation, but this is the 1st year where the team's expectations is Super Bowl. So I'm worried about this young team not letting the hype go to their heads.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3480
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:28 am
  • FlyingGreg wrote:I can't decide if you some of you are just not ready to embrace the era of success that is upon us, or are just grumpy bastages to begin with.

    Perhaps a mix of both?

    ;)


    I think embracing the fact we now rock has to be done on a gradual basis in order to avoid any unforeseen complications. I mean, my heart stopped and re-started again four times during that game in Atlanta. That can't be good for you.

    Hearing all the schmoozing we are getting from the media is kinda like we all just woke up one morning and all our girlfriends and wives magically transformed from a 6.5 into a 9. I find myself bathing and combing my hair just a little bit more lately...
    Image
    "...Seattle has become the capital city of the New NFL" - Kip Earlywine

    Remembering "The Radish" :les:
    User avatar
    HoustonHawk82
    * NET Mechanic *
     
    Posts: 6712
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:51 am
    Location: Beneath, Between & Behind


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:33 am
  • HoustonHawk82 wrote:
    FlyingGreg wrote:I can't decide if you some of you are just not ready to embrace the era of success that is upon us, or are just grumpy bastages to begin with.

    Perhaps a mix of both?

    ;)


    I think embracing the fact we now rock has to be done on a gradual basis in order to avoid any unforeseen complications. I mean, my heart stopped and re-started again four times during that game in Atlanta. That can't be good for you.

    Hearing all the schmoozing we are getting from the media is kinda like we all just woke up one morning and all our girlfriends and wives magically transformed from a 6.5 into a 9. I find myself bathing and combing my hair just a little bit more lately...


    Lol, true. Although I was strangely calm at the end of the Falcons game... honestly, I looked at my wife after Lynch scored and said, "there is too much time left and we have no pass rush". The whole house was going ape sh*t and I was just "damn, we were this close"....I just knew we couldn't stop them from getting into field goal position.

    Alas, I think that game is going to be a HUGE motivator for this team that pushes them to the next level. You can tell they want to sand blast that memory.
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7534
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:46 am
  • FlyingGreg wrote:I can't decide if you some of you are just not ready to embrace the era of success that is upon us, or are just grumpy bastages to begin with.

    Perhaps a mix of both?

    ;)


    No grumpy bastard here. But I am a "show me first" kind of fan. I don't buy into hype, so to say we're in an "era of success" after one year of success where we didn't even make the conference finals is premature IMO.

    I measure success by division/conference trophies and Super Bowl appearances, not pre-season power rankings and Vegas odds.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3480
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:51 am
  • FlyingGreg wrote:
    Stephen SeaHawking wrote:
    No run game, lost one of their better receivers, and mediocre defense. Way too many holes. If anything, Packers could be the team to plummet down the rankings this year.


    Eddie Lacy would argue with you about the notion they don't have a run game. 8)


    Assuming that Eddie Lacy isn't Mark Ingram part II (by that I mean, ineffective in the NFL because Alabama had NFL talent playing against college teams on the O-line) and the Packers O-line suddenly stops being mediocre to awful in a way that would make this board go even more apoplectic about not drafting linemean.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15451
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:52 am
  • FlyingGreg wrote:
    NinerLifer wrote:When we were on the top of this OFF-SEASON power poll most of you said that these things were pointless and just fluff to fill the void until pre-season started.

    Now that you are on top and we are second it is suddenly a meaningful tool for judging a teams potential.

    C'mon guys


    If you don't like the pro-Seahawks commentary from the fans on a Seahawks fan forum, we can show you the door.

    In the mean time...zip it. :16:

    Wait a minute... aren't Niner fans here, not to glorify themselves, but to purely talk football? They wouldn't intend to veil insults. Surely, their presence and interaction improves the quality of this forum. Why would they need to be shown the door?
    :sarcasm_off:
    World Champion
    Image
    Seattle Seahawks
    User avatar
    TeamoftheCentury
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 942
    Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:54 am
    Location: Orlando, FL


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:48 pm
  • Stephen SeaHawking wrote:
    kearly wrote:
    nIdahoSeahawk wrote:I see on the NFL's facebook post, that quite a few people are saying "packers #1"


    No run game, lost one of their better receivers, and mediocre defense. Way too many holes. If anything, Packers could be the team to plummet down the rankings this year.

    Well if you subscribe to the theory that draft picks can help you have to figure Lacy and/or Franklin along with DuJuan Harris who actually was looking pretty good to finish the season you can see the Packers will likely improve there.
    Losing Greg Jennings isn't as bad as it might seem, it opens the door for the other receivers to get more touches. Randall Cobb can ably fill the shoes of Jennings (who was out for half of last season).
    11th ranked D last season. I don't think they will be top 3 but top 10 for certain and possibly top 5 with injured players back (hopefully not much in the way of injuries this year).
    Where are you seeing the holes in this team? Where are the Packers weak?
    They do have one of the toughest schedules this season but they are loaded with young talent. Really, please tell me where you think the Packers holes are?
    Rodgers
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 88
    Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:18 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:59 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:
    NinerLifer wrote:When we were on the top of this OFF-SEASON power poll most of you said that these things were pointless and just fluff to fill the void until pre-season started.

    Now that you are on top and we are second it is suddenly a meaningful tool for judging a teams potential.

    C'mon guys


    Perhaps it has something to do with the superstar WR we picked up that is 25 years old, or the old veteran CB that was ranked slightly ahead of Richard Sherman as the best CB in the NFL last year by Pro Football Focus, or the moves we made to add more pass rushing power. Our weakest link on defense last year (nickel/slot coverage) is suddenly a strength, our pass rush is pretty much guaranteed to be improved at least a little, and our offense that was en fuego the last half of the season picked up the most dynamic, creative receiver in the league.

    We were ranked 2nd-best team in the NFL before all of that. You honestly think we have any problem being ranked #1 now after the aforementioned? There's something to be said about fan hypocrisy, but don't pretend like you and all of your fan base doesn't do it, too. I remember you guys crying about how not everyone was picking you to go to the Super Bowl and win it when the playoffs came in Harbaugh's first year, and most of you wouldn't listen to reason about Alex Smith's lack of experience in the postseason.

    Give us a break, NinerLifer. :roll:

    Well here's another "outsiders" take:
    If you're a fan of another team and you didn't worry about playing Seattle last year, after this year's acquisitions you should be a little more nervous.
    I don't believe in all the hype either. Look what happened to the Eagles with the "dream team" but still - you take one part SB potential team and add one part top flight offensive weapon, one part seasoned vet DBack, one part solid contributors and one part draft. Mix it up and you can't help but think the Hawks are every bit the contender as any other top flight team and I'm not surprised at all to see them atop any preseason rankings.
    If I were a troll I'd dismiss all of these quality additions but as a football fan you can't ignore the potential.
    Rodgers
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 88
    Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:18 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Sun Jul 07, 2013 2:14 pm
  • This is a color writer whose dart happens to have landed on the right team this week. Next week he'll go back to being wrong.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11325
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Sun Jul 07, 2013 2:33 pm
  • MontanaHawk05 wrote:This is a color writer whose dart happens to have landed on the right team this week. Next week he'll go back to being wrong.


    Exactly. I am sure that we will see the Broncos on top eventually when some writer decides that Manning is aging and he will be extra motivated to win it all before he retires.

    Heck...he might be this years Ray Lewis if the fix is really in as mentioned in that other thread LOL.
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:07 pm
  • He cites Crabtree's injury as the reason Seattle jumped over the niners. Although that is a huge injury, the Seahawks are poised to be the better team anyway. Without Harvin, the Seahawks averaged 34 points per game down the stretch last season. Adding Harvin just opens up the offense even more. Even if Harvin misses some games, the Seahawks are more than capable offensively.

    I'm surprised there was no mention of the HUGE niner trade that brought Bolden to Frisco. Bolden is a good WR as long as he is the second or third guy. When he was asked by Baltimore to be their number one guy, he wasn't very productive. He is really good against the second or third best corners on a lot of teams, but he won't see those guys much with what the niners are going to be rolling out in their WR corps.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1881
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm


Re: hawks move to #1 on NFL.com rankings
Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:24 pm
  • MontanaHawk05 wrote:This is a color writer whose dart happens to have landed on the right team this week. Next week he'll go back to being wrong.


    I'll make fun of the people that do this again, even though it pisses a lot of people off. You should join in, it's fun.
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 26427
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Next


It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 8:32 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information