Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 330 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:21 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm
Posts: 1378
I just got owned hard!

Well done David and kidhawk :bow:

:192214:

_________________
Talkin Seahawks All Day, All Night @ my blog Seafense! http://seafense.blogspot.com/


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:22 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 17511
Location: Graham, WA
TJack got caked up and now he's gonna get a ring? Who the hell has it better than him?

_________________
Image
3elieve


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:34 am 
* NET Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 4588
Location: Seattle, WA
RichNhansom wrote:
It's' not counting his money. If he is getting paid twice what Quinn is it could be a factor in whether he stays or not. Our cap is real important coming into the near future.


Why would Jackson's salary play into it at all? I highly doubt he signed for all that much more than Quinn. And even if he did, so what? He signed a one year deal. The Hawks wouldn't have signed him to a contract that screws up their salary cap this year. That makes no sense at all. Going into it, they had something like $4 mil in cap space. Even if TJack made over a mil, they'd be fine. This isn't like Matt Flynn making starter money and impacting your ability to re-sign Chancellor or make other moves. The roster is basically set. They aren't adding $4 mil more salary between now and week one.

_________________
http://twitter.com/EJZ206


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:23 am 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 13470
Location: King In The North
Throwdown wrote:
TJack got caked up and now he's gonna get a ring? Who the hell has it better than him?


That's the spirit!

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:35 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am
Posts: 2774
It's just a question Sea town relax. The point was of he signed for let's say 1.5 and Quinn is at .75 then it could play into decision making. That would actually support the supporters because the FO onviously UST think higher of him and if it didn't work out it could partially be for financial reason.

As for the cap, every penny is going to be important soon and 3/4 of a mill could be rolled into next years cap.

_________________
The Lion has no interest in the opinion of the sheep.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:55 pm 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 17511
Location: Graham, WA
According to the Seahawks twitter, Jerrod Johnson was cut for Jackson's spot.

_________________
Image
3elieve


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:17 pm 
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 1792
Location: Lacey, WA
Throwdown wrote:
According to the Seahawks twitter, Jerrod Johnson was cut for Jackson's spot.


Say it ain't so! Now we'll never win a Super Bowl!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:32 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 4655
Throwdown wrote:
TJack got caked up and now he's gonna get a ring? Who the hell has it better than him?


Seriously, he's getting hooked up pretty good here. Nobody can say he got mistreated by Seattle, that's for sure. He got a full year to start, proved he was a tough career backup, got hit by the RW bullet train, shipped to Buffalo, paid half a mil, then back to Seattle for the ice. Hopefully that'll innoculate us against the whiners who used to talk about how bad the poor guy always had it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:55 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 3080
Location: Anchorage, AK
SeaTown81 wrote:
RichNhansom wrote:
It's' not counting his money. If he is getting paid twice what Quinn is it could be a factor in whether he stays or not. Our cap is real important coming into the near future.


Why would Jackson's salary play into it at all? I highly doubt he signed for all that much more than Quinn. And even if he did, so what? He signed a one year deal. The Hawks wouldn't have signed him to a contract that screws up their salary cap this year. That makes no sense at all. Going into it, they had something like $4 mil in cap space. Even if TJack made over a mil, they'd be fine. This isn't like Matt Flynn making starter money and impacting your ability to re-sign Chancellor or make other moves. The roster is basically set. They aren't adding $4 mil more salary between now and week one.


Cap rolls. $4million over this year is $4million you can spend next year. The money left under the cap now matters unlike before

Hey Sherman - do you want to make $1million less per year than you think you are worth because we signed TJack over Quinn

Just saying it matters. If you get your moneys worth then great if you are not then you don't spend it just because you are under the cap


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tjack or Quinn (Update: TJack flying in for visit)
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:33 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 6:48 am
Posts: 177
Location: Vancouver BC
T-Jax is terrible. League average QB (at absolute BEST) for 3 quarters, and an absolute disaster in the 4th Quarter. He almost ruined my Christmas 2 years ago in that Xmas eve loss to the 9ers. That entire season I said we were a QB away from an instant 10 win team, and I'll be damned I was right. The least clutch Seahawks QB I've seen. To go from him to perhaps the most clutch Hawks QB in franchise history (time will tell but it looks bright for RW), I couldn't be more excited. The only problem is Brady Quinn might be just as terrible. I hated to get rid of Flynn as an insurance policiy, but seeing that money turned into some of the great signings they made makes me not as scared about that move. Everybody do a toast to Russell Wilson staying healthy this season and rendering this debate meaningless

_________________
Diehard lifetime Hawks fan and CFL hater. Jacked beyond belief for the Russ Wilson era !!


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 330 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atradees, BAJAHAWK, hawksfansinceday1, Lawke, LymonHawk, Meeker, olyfan63, Polaris, TwilightError, UK_Seahawk, Yahoo [Bot] and 63 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.