Tical21 wrote:Unbelievable. Hugh Millen is right 99% of the time, and knows 27 times more about X's and O's than any other media type in the area, sans Holmgren. But Brock Huard is much better.
I agreed with him on Wilson at first also. When however many short QB's have come into the league and none have been successful, you're going to say the odds are ridiculously against him. He has since admitted that Wilson has been playing much better than anticipated. He was foolish with how brash he was with the statement, but at least he was willing to put it out there. Now all the Hawk fans are butthurt because he dare take an unpopular opinion about the chosen one.
LOL, what a joke. Right 99% of the time based on what? Millen blamed Jake Locker's inaccuracy on his supporting cast, he got to the NFL and he's still inaccurate.
Millen said Flynn was better than Wilson (a lot of people did) but when we lost to the Rams he said Wilson should be benched for Flynn.
He now admits he spoke too soon, perhaps judging Michael after one day is speaking too soon? How can you judge a RB when he's not in pads? Ridiculous.